
DK Shivakumar seeks Centre's help as Maharashtra opposes dam height increase
advertisement'This letter came as a shock to us,' Shivakumar said.
'Maharashtra had not raised any objection when the Krishna Tribunal passed its judgement in 2010. In fact, they had even submitted an affidavit seeking an increase in the height of the Alamatti dam. Why this sudden change in stand?'The Krishna Tribunal's verdict allows Karnataka to increase the dam's height to 524 meters. Shivakumar insisted that the state has full rights to implement the project and said further delays would escalate costs, particularly land acquisition, which he pegged at Rs 1 lakh crore.He appealed to all Karnataka MPs and Union Ministers to unite in support of the project. 'I fold my hands and appeal to all our MPs, regardless of party lines, to protect the state's interest. Union Minister V Somanna is part of the Jal Shakti Ministry and I hope he will represent our concerns.'advertisementShivakumar also said the Karnataka government would soon meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Union Jal Shakti Minister to press for a Gazette notification, pending since 2013, allowing the increase in dam height.'This is not a political issue. There is no scientific basis to Maharashtra's objections. Flooding in their region is for them to resolve. Karnataka has waited long enough,' Shivakumar said, adding that the state will share both Maharashtra's letter and its reply with all Karnataka MPs.The Alamatti Dam, or the Lal Bahadur Shastri Dam, is a key hydroelectric and irrigation project on the Krishna River in Bagalkote district, North Karnataka.Karnataka's proposal to raise the dam height from 519 to 524.2 metres would create an additional storage capacity of 100 tmcft and expand irrigation coverage by 6 lakh hectares. But it faces key challenges, including submersion of a considerable portion of the Bagalkot town.
IN THIS STORY#Karnataka#Maharashtra

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Wire
7 minutes ago
- The Wire
Police Detain Hundreds of Protesting Sanitation Workers in Chennai
In a massive police crackdown hours after the Madras high court's directive, hundreds of protesting sanitation workers were detained in Chennai late on Wednesday night. Hundreds of sanitation workers have been protesting for over 13 days against the move to privatise their jobs. On Wednesday, 13 August, the Madras High Court asked the Tamil Nadu government to remove the protestors from outside the Greater Chennai Corporation headquarters. Platoons of police personnel were deployed to clear protesters from the site, citing disturbance to public peace by occupying footpaths and causing traffic congestion. The high court held that the sanitation workers were protesting in an unauthorised site. A tense situation prevailed outside the Chennai Corporation headquarters as protesters intensified over the police's attempt to drive out sanitation workers and their supporters, who have been protesting against the MK Stalin-led DMK government. The court order The high court had directed that occupying public footpaths without permission is not allowed, stating that it is creating a problem for the public, including traffic congestion, and ordered the state to clear the protest site. The court has also instructed the police to act with restraint and clarified that the workers can continue their agitation at officially designated protest venues after obtaining due permission. Despite the court's order, sanitation workers continued to occupy the site, insisting that the government should respond to their justified demands. Although the court had given them time until Wednesday evening to vacate, the agitating sanitation workers continued to sit in protest at the site. Their defiance led to police intervention and the forceful removal of nearly 800 sanitation workers and their supporters. The workers have been protesting against the Greater Chennai Corporation's (GCC) decision to privatise garbage collection in Zones V and VI since 1 August 2025 The privatisation plan, valued at Rs 2,500 crore, has led to significant concerns among the workers. They allege that the move has resulted in reduced wages, from Rs 23,000 to as low as Rs 15,000 and diminished benefits. Additionally, there are claims of increased workloads and a lack of safety equipment. The workers, who have been employed by the GCC for over 15 years, express frustration over the sudden policy change and the perceived erosion of their job security. The protest has also led to a pile-up of waste in Chennai, causing inconvenience to residents across the city.


Hans India
7 minutes ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court seeks Centre's stand on pleas seeking restoration of J&K statehood
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday sought the Union government's stand on a batch of applications demanding the time-bound restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. A Bench of CJI B.R. Gavai and K. Vinod Chandran was hearing pleas contending that the continued delay in restoring statehood is "gravely affecting the rights of the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and also violating the idea of federalism". The applications argued that the failure to restore statehood within a time-bound framework amounts to a violation of federalism, which forms part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution. 'It has been 21 months since the Article 370 judgment. There has been no movement towards the restoration of statehood,' submitted senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, adding that the Constitution Bench had trusted the Union government when the Solicitor General assured it that statehood would be restored. On the other hand, Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, questioning the maintainability of the applications, urged the apex court to consider the 'peculiar position' in Jammu and Kashmir and sought that the pleas be listed after eight weeks, saying this was not the 'correct stage' to consider the matter. 'The MAs (miscellaneous applications) are not maintainable. We had assured two things: the election would be held, and thereafter, the statehood. Your lordships are aware of the peculiar position emerging from this part of our country. There are several considerations,' said SG Mehta. 'I don't know why, at this stage, this issue is agitated, but list it after 8 weeks. I will take instructions. My prayer is for eight weeks because this particular stage is not the correct stage to muddy the water,' Mehta added. After hearing the submissions, the CJI Gavai-led Bench listed the matter after eight weeks. In 're: Article 370 of the Constitution' verdict, a 5-judge Constitution Bench, headed by then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, had left open the question of whether the Parliament can extinguish the character of statehood by converting a state into one or more Union Territories, relying on an oral statement made on Centre's behalf that statehood would be restored to Jammu and Kashmir. In the course of the oral hearing, the Solicitor General, the second-highest law officer of the Centre, had submitted that the Union Home Ministry cannot give any exact timeframe and it would take "some time" for the restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir. However, the Constitution Bench, also comprising Justices S.K. Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Gavai and Surya Kant, had ordered the Election Commission of India (ECI) to take steps to conduct elections to the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, constituted under Section 14 of the Reorganisation Act, by September 30, 2024, and said that "restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible". It had upheld the status of Ladakh as a Union Territory under Article 3(a) read with Explanation I of the Constitution, which permits the formation of a Union Territory by separating a territory from any state. In May 2024, the Supreme Court dismissed review petitions challenging its verdict, stating there was 'no error apparent on the face of the record' and refused to list the matter in open court.


Hans India
7 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘People's support must to remove beggars from streets'
New Delhi: Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Virendra Kumar has said the removal of beggars from India's streets requires strong community participation alongside government schemes, citing successful rehabilitation examples from Varanasi and Indore. Speaking at the launch of a book, 'Last Beggar', by Beggars Corporation founder Dr Chandra Mishra on Tuesday, Kumar said that in Varanasi, people quit begging after they were given business training and were linked with employment-oriented activities. Some of them are now registered GST payers earning Rs 35,000-40,000 per month, he said. 'They are not dependent on society... they are providing jobs to others.' Kumar said that in Indore, residents, NGOs and civic authorities work together to provide education, healthcare and skill training to the rehabilitated beggars. He said that the ministry's SMILE (Support for Marginalised Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise) scheme was designed to support beggars and transgender persons through identification, shelter, skill training and self-reliance initiatives. National Human Rights Commission chairperson Justice (retd) V Ramasubramanian called the gathering 'a noble cause' and suggested using alternative terms for 'beggar' to protect their dignity.