logo
Trump Has the Tools to Deliver an Alaska Surprise

Trump Has the Tools to Deliver an Alaska Surprise

Bloomberga day ago
Sometimes the best outcome from a high-profile summit is just another summit, and that may well be the case when Donald Trump meets Vladimir Putin at a US military base in Alaska around midday local time.
The US President has been lowering expectations this week, in the face of growing alarm he'd agree to terms amounting to Ukraine's capitulation. And yet, a simple get-to-know you isn't exactly consistent with the threat he also made to impose 'very severe consequences' should Moscow fail to show interest in ending a war of choice that it started in 2014. As skeptical as I remain that Trump is ready to impose those costs, it's worth remembering that he can. And if he does, I'll be the first to admit to underestimating him.
Success is possible. Trump has the tools to drive Putin toward a settlement, one of which is his rejection of traditional US foreign policy norms when it comes to embracing autocrats. It isn't that Putin swoons in Trump's presence (if anything, that works the other way around). But Russia's leader is fully aware that no successor in the White House will be better disposed toward himself or Moscow's interests. That knowledge alone creates some potential for leverage.
More concretely, Trump could carry through on his repeated threat to impose secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian oil, including China, India and Turkey. As Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, Putin's debt-fueled war economy is increasingly fragile, with senior government and central bank officials issuing public warnings. A plunge in revenue from oil exports could cause genuine pain.
Trump could also tighten financial sanctions, cutting the access to dollar-based clearing systems that some Russian banks still enjoy. Although sanctions alone are never likely to force Putin to end the war, they can set conditions for other forms of pressure that do.
Those would have to relate to the war itself, including a clearly signaled upgrade to US military assistance for Ukraine. Since coming to office in January, Trump has twice cut off US arms supplies and once halted intelligence sharing with Kyiv, to devastating effect and Russia's advantage. He relented more recently, offering to let Ukraine and its European allies buy US weapons, but this still amounts to a substantial weakening of battlefield support to Ukrainian forces because the available funds are limited.
Combined with acute Ukrainian manpower shortages and Moscow's intensified long-range drone and missile campaign on cities and other targets far behind the lines, the US withdrawal has made for months of attritional Russian gains. Putin is convinced, as a result, that he is winning on the battlefield. He has little reason to wind down a war he began with far more ambitious goals, just as it shows potential for success.
Granted, the cost of each square kilometer gained over the last year makes no rational sense, either in terms of casualties suffered or the opportunity costs inflicted on a Russian economy that, even when adjusted for purchasing power parity, remains less than one tenth the size of Ukraine's allies. But that's to misconstrue Putin's understanding of what will secure his place in Russian history, which is to recover Moscow's status as the center of one of the world's great powers.
This is why Putin cleaves so hard to his original war aims and it's something Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski would instinctively have understood. For, as he famously once wrote: 'without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be an empire, but with Ukraine suborned and then subordinated, Russia automatically becomes an empire.'
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is not the obstacle here. His country badly wants and needs a ceasefire, for the same reasons that Putin is reluctant to grant one without first getting everything he wants. Zelenskiy knows and accepts that any ceasefire must inevitably take shape along the lines of the current battlefield. What he can't do is legitimize Putin's gains by agreeing to recognize occupied territories as part of Russia. Nor can he hand over territory that Russia has yet to take, as Putin is demanding, oragree to Ukraine's 'demilitarization' (for which read giving up the means to defend itself when Russia renews its assault), and 'denazification' (for which read the imposition of a new pro-Russian regime in Kyiv).
All of this makes it unrealistic to believe a lasting ceasefire could be agreed upon today. Russian forces have just penetrated thinning Ukrainian lines in the east and are no doubt trying now to find the reserves to turn that tactical success into the kind of breakthrough that changes the course of wars. Ukraine's intelligence services report that Putin is shifting forces along the front to mount a new offensive. The Kremlin has no incentive whatsoever to stop now.
Putin's task today will be to ensure he can continue his invasion without triggering any meaningful response from the US. It's up to Trump to decide what his own aims are. But if he really wants to end the bloodshed, he needs to make sure Putin leaves Alaska persuaded that the cost of intransigence would be to trigger a level of financial punishment and US support for Ukraine's defense that would put the victory he craves out of reach.
More From Bloomberg Opinion:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin summit live updates: Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy to visit Trump in Washington on Monday
Trump-Putin summit live updates: Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy to visit Trump in Washington on Monday

NBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • NBC News

Trump-Putin summit live updates: Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy to visit Trump in Washington on Monday

What to know today ZELENSKYY VISIT: Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will visit President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday to discuss "ending the war." 'NO DEAL': President Donald Trump returned to Washington early today after failing to secure an agreement on Ukraine with Russian President Vladimir Putin at yesterday's summit in Alaska. ANOTHER MEETING?: Trump said in an interview with Fox News before departing Anchorage that a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy will be arranged by the two countries, and that he'll attend as well. No details on timing or location were provided. INTERNATIONAL CALL: Trump conducted a multilateral phone call with European leaders last night including Zelenskyy after the summit.

Zelenskiy Says He Will Meet Trump in Washington on Monday
Zelenskiy Says He Will Meet Trump in Washington on Monday

Bloomberg

timea few seconds ago

  • Bloomberg

Zelenskiy Says He Will Meet Trump in Washington on Monday

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he will travel to Washington to meet his US counterpart Donald Trump on Monday to discuss the end of Russia's invasion. 'Ukraine once again confirms that it is ready to work productively to achieve peace,' Zelenskiy said in a social media post after a phone call with Trump on Saturday. 'We support President Trump's proposal to hold a trilateral meeting of Ukraine-US-Russia.'

Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

CNN

timea few seconds ago

  • CNN

Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. US District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the US government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long US Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store