West Bengal denies Centre's outreach on common board, calls move unnecessary for high-performing state
Bratya Basu
on Thursday said he is yet to receive any communication from the Union Ministry of Education, which has recommended seven states to adopt a common board for classes 10 and 12 after an analysis flagged that they accounted for 66 per cent of student failures last year.
Speaking to reporters, Basu said students of the West Bengal boards always perform well, and the class 10 and 12 final examinations conducted by them record a high pass percentage.
"We are yet to hear anything about this from the Centre. However, whatever I read in the press, the issue is not relevant to our state. Except for the COVID period, the pass percentage of candidates appearing in both secondary and higher secondary exams in West Bengal has been high," he said.
The
West Bengal Board of Secondary Education
conducts the Madhyamik examination for class 10, while the West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education conducts the class 12 final examinations.
This year, 86.56 per cent out of the total 9,69,425 candidates cleared the Madhaymik examination, while 90.79 per cent of 4,82,948 candidates cleared the class 12 exams.
PTI had reported on Wednesday that the Ministry of Education has recommended seven states to adopt a common board for classes 10 and 12 after an analysis by the School Education Department found they accounted for 66 per cent of student failures last year.
The seven states are Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Kerala, Manipur, Odisha, Telangana and West Bengal.
There are a total of 66 school examination boards in the country -- three national-level boards and 63 state-level boards (54 regular and 12 open boards).
While the top 33 boards cover 97 per cent of students, the remaining 33 boards cover just 3 per cent of students.
"Common board for classes 10 and 12 is the way forward for ease of schooling. Not having a common board leads to poor academic outcomes. We have recommended these states to adopt a common board," School Education Secretary Sanjay Kumar said.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Record-breaking $27.7 tariff haul in July has Trump celebrating, but will it last?
Record US tariff revenue July 2025: US President Donald Trump is celebrating record tariff revenue, reaching $27.7 billion in July. While Trump hails this as a win, economists caution that American businesses and consumers are primarily bearing the costs. Tariffs constitute less than 10% of total government receipts, and the federal deficit continues to grow. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tariff Collections See Massive Year-Over-Year Growth Donald Trump Hails July Tariff Revenue Surge as a Win Tariffs Still a Small Piece of the Fiscal Puzzle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who's Really Paying the Tariffs? US Tariff Rate Heading to Historic High Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs US president Donald Trump is celebrating a record-breaking month for US tariff revenue due to the billions pouring into federal coffers as revenue supplied by importers hit another monthly record, as per a report. But economists and analysts are warning that the financial boost may be short-lived and that American businesses and consumers are footing most of the bill, as reported by Yahoo data released Tuesday by the Treasury Department shows the US collected $27.7 billion in customs duties in July, a new monthly record and a sharp jump from the $26.6 billion collected in June and $22.2 billion in May, as per the report. Just a year ago, monthly tariff collections hovered around $8 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Altogether, tariff revenue for the current fiscal year has climbed to roughly $135.7 billion, with two months still to go before the government's fiscal year ends on September 30, as per Yahoo READ: Houthis spare Chinese car ships, but others aren't so lucky - here's the surprising reason In a post on Truth Social, Trump celebrated the milestone, calling the revenue "has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else," as quoted in the report. He also took a swipe at Goldman Sachs, which has raised concerns about the long-term effects of his tariffs and disputed his repeated claim that foreign nations are the ones paying the duties, according to the Yahoo Finance the president's enthusiastic framing, a closer look at the numbers paints a more complicated picture, as per the tariffs brought in $27.7 billion last month, that sum accounted for less than 10% of total government receipts, which topped $338 billion in July, reported Yahoo Finance. The boost in tariff revenue also didn't help reduce the growing budget deficit, which widened by $291 billion last month alone, according to the report. Over the past 10 months, the federal deficit has grown to $1.63 trillion, as per the Yahoo Finance READ: Is it AI or Trump's policies? US sees brutal 140% layoff spike in July, worst surge since early COVID chaos Economists have pointed out that contrary to Trump's claims, it's not foreign governments footing the tariff bill, it's US businesses and, increasingly, American consumers, according to the from Goldman Sachs estimates that as of June, US companies absorbed about 64% of the costs from higher tariffs, while consumers paid about 22%, as reported by Yahoo Finance. But that is shifting, and by October, the investment bank forecasts that consumers could end up covering nearly 67% of tariff costs as businesses pass price hikes down to them, compared to only 8% for US businesses, reported Yahoo Finance. Goldman Sachs also predicted that foreign exporters' share would be around 25%, as per the READ: Giant Wyoming data center to guzzle 5x more power than residents, but the user remains secret However, further tariff increases are on the horizon. Last week, the Trump administration implemented new hikes on imports from key trading partners, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, and in the coming weeks, tariffs on some Indian goods are set to climb to 50%, as reported by Yahoo at the Yale Budget Lab estimate that once all of Trump's planned measures are fully implemented, the US average effective tariff rate will soar to 18.6%, the highest level since 1933, according to the READ: 10 must-change iOS 18.6 settings that'll make your iPhone feel like day one again As per economists, mostly US businesses and consumers, not foreign governments, despite Trump's than 10% of total government receipts, which stood at $338 billion.
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
15th Finance Commission's tax share rejig boosts Bihar, Maha; Karnataka hit
New Delhi: Seven states have seen their share of the divisible tax pool shrink, while 21 have gained under the 15th Finance Commission's 2021–26 award compared with the previous allocation, finance ministry data showed. Karnataka faced one of the sharpest cuts, with its share dropping from 4.713% in the 14th Finance Commission (2015-20) to 3.647%. The divisible pool is that portion of gross tax revenue that is distributed between the Centre and the states. The divisible pool consists of all taxes, except surcharges and cess levied for specific purpose, net of collection charges. Kerala's allocation fell from 2.5% to 1.925%, and Andhra Pradesh's from 4.305% to 4.047%. Assam, Odisha, Telangana, and the country's most populous state Uttar Pradesh also saw reductions. However, Uttar Pradesh's dip, from 17.959% to 17.939%, was marginal. In contrast, 21 states gained. Bihar's share rose from 9.665% to 10.058%, Maharashtra's from 5.521% to 6.317%, Rajasthan's from 5.495% to 6.026%, and West Bengal's from 7.324% to 7.523%. Smaller states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura, also recorded the largest proportional increases. To be sure, the Finance Commission determines each state's share of tax devolution by evaluating factors such as population, income, area and demographic performance, assigning specific weights to these criteria to calculate the final percentage allocation. 'It is the prerogative of the Finance Commission to decide the criteria for recommending inter se tax shares from overall tax devolution for each State. This power of the Commission is given in Article 280(3)(a) of the Constitution of India,' the ministry of finance recently said in a written response to a question in the Rajya Sabha. 'Depending upon the parameters chosen by the Finance Commission and the weightages assigned, the percentage share of the taxes received by the states varies from one Finance Commission period to another,' it added. Meanwhile, the Arvind Panagariya-led 16th Finance Commission is currently reviewing detailed submissions from states and central ministries to finalize its 2026–31 recommendations by 31 October, a verdict that will shape the fiscal landscape for the next five years (2027-31), deciding which states enjoy greater spending room and which must operate under tighter constraints. The 16th Finance Commission, like its predecessors, is tasked with recommending how central tax revenues should be divided between the Centre and the states (vertical devolution), and how that share should be distributed among states (horizontal devolution). It will also assess funding needs for disaster management and for strengthening local governments. Speaking to Mint, in an interview last month, Manoj Panda, a member of the 16th Finance Commission, said that the commission has just completed several rounds of state visits, and may have to go "a bit beyond" the standard parameters while computing the share of the country's revenue kitty between states and the Centre. He added that the states' tax-to-GSDP (gross state domestic product) ratios have remained stuck at 6-7% levels and that future tax collections will primarily hinge on GSDP growth. To be sure, there is a growing demand from wealthier Indian states, typically bunched around the western and southern regions, to be given a bigger share of the revenue. Richer states have pressed the 16th Finance Commission to factor in their outsized contribution to national growth and tax revenues when determining horizontal allocations, arguing that the current formula fails to adequately reward their stronger economic performance despite their disproportionate share in GDP and tax collections.
Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Green card holder in China slams US tax laws on foreign income: ‘Does that make sense?'
A US green card holder living in China has voiced his frustration about the tax responsibilities that come with holding permanent resident status while living abroad. Damon Chen, founder of and posted on X, questioning the US tax rules that apply to green card holders. Despite living in China, he said he is still required to pay US taxes. The IRS clearly states that both US citizens and green card holders living abroad must report and pay taxes on their worldwide income.(Pexel) Green card holder in China slams US tax laws on foreign income 'I'm a green card holder living in China. If I make any money in China, I still need to pay US federal and state taxes,' he wrote. 'Does that make sense?' In a follow-up post, he added, 'Most EU countries don't tax their Europeans on income made abroad.' Chen currently lives in China but is listed as being based in San Jose, California, on his LinkedIn profile. He earned a master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Penn State University and worked at Cisco Systems for more than eight years. During the COVID-19 lockdown, he launched IndieLog (formerly Lonely Dev), a platform for independent developers. Online reactions His post drew a wide range of reactions. One user wrote, 'Yes because green card is a subscription based service,' while another commented, 'The price you pay to have access to America. Unfortunately it's the only country powerful enough to have such tax laws. Can you not offset some tax with FTC?' Some users told him he could simply give up his green card. Chen responded, 'Of course! The card will be automatically cancelled if I don't return in 2 years.' When someone pointed out that staying outside the US for more than six months could affect his status, Chen replied, 'We have the re-entry permit (up to 2 years stay abroad).' Also Read: Green card rules change for married couples: See the new immigration guidelines Another user chimed, 'The value of a US green card is immense. It's the only country where you can succeed if you work hard and create value irrespective of your race, gender etc. Millions have been waiting decades just to get it.' A different user wrote, 'For US citizens, it doesn't, but for green card holders it does. Green card means you're a US permanent resident, benefiting from the services US provides. Infact you can lose your green card if you spend more than six months per year abroad.' What does the IRS say? The IRS clearly states that both US citizens and green card holders living abroad must report and pay taxes on their worldwide income. The agency answers this directly in its general FAQs, 'Your worldwide income is subject to US income tax, regardless of where you reside.' Even if income taxes are paid in another country, green card holders are still required to file US income tax returns. To stop this obligation, a person must give up their green card by filing Form I-407 with USCIS. Alternatively, US citizens can renounce their citizenship under specific circumstances defined in the expatriation tax rules. Anyone holding a green card is considered a lawful permanent resident and is treated as a US tax resident.
