logo
Nervousness in Labour about how spring statement might land - and there could be worse to come

Nervousness in Labour about how spring statement might land - and there could be worse to come

Sky News26-03-2025
Rachel Reeves will keep her remarks short when she delivers the spring statement today.
But the enormity of what she is saying will be lost on no one as the chancellor sets out the grim reality of the country's finances.
Her economic update to the House of Commons will reveal a deteriorating economic outlook and rising borrowing costs, which has forced her to find spending cuts, which she's left others to carry the can for (more on that in a bit).
The independent Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) is expected to forecast that growth for 2025 has halved from 2% to 1%.
That, combined with rising debt repayment costs on government borrowing, has left the chancellor with a black hole in the public finances against the forecasts published at the budget in October.
Back then, Reeves had a £9.9bn cushion against her "iron-clad" fiscal rule that day-to-day spending must be funded through tax receipts not debt by 2029-30.
But that surplus has been wiped out in the ensuing six months - now she finds herself about £4bn in the red, according to those familiar with the forecasts.
That's really uncomfortable for a chancellor who just months ago executed the biggest tax and spend budget in a generation with the promise that she would get the economy growing again.
At the first progress check, she looks to be failing and has been forced into finding spending cuts to make up the shortfall after ruling out her other two options - further tax rises or more borrowing via a loosening of her self-imposed fiscal rules.
7:26
'World has changed'
When Reeves gets up on Wednesday, she will put it differently, saying the "world has changed" and all that means is the government must move "further and faster" to deliver the reforms that will drive growth.
But her opponents will be quick to lay economic woes at her door, arguing that the unexpected £25bn tax hike on employers' national insurance contributions last October have choked off growth.
But it's not just opposition from the Conservative benches that the chancellor is facing - it is opposition from within as she sets about cutting government spending to the tune of £15bn to fill that black hole.
Politically, her allies know how awkward it would have been for the chancellor to announce £5bn in welfare cuts to avoid breaking her own fiscal rules, with one acknowledging that those cuts had to be kept separate from the spring statement.
There's also expected to be more than £5bn of extra cuts from public spending in the forecast period, which could see departments that don't have protected budgets - education, justice, home - face real-term spending cuts by the end of the decade.
Not an emergency budget
We won't see the detail of that until the Spending Review in June.
This is not an emergency budget because the chancellor isn't embarking on a round of tax raising to fix the public finances.
But these are, however they are framed, emergency spending cuts designed to plug her black hole and that is politically difficult for a government that has promised no return to austerity if some parts of the public sector face deep cuts to stick with fiscal rules.
If that's the macro picture, what about the "everyday economics" of peoples' lives?
I'd point out two things here. On Wednesday, we will get to see where those £5bn of welfare cuts will fall as the government publishes the impact assessment that it held back last week.
Up to a million people could be affected by cuts, and the reality of who will be hit will pile on the pressure for Labour MPs already uncomfortable with cuts to health and disability benefits.
3:06
The second point is whether the government remains on course to deliver its key pledge to "put more money in the pockets of working people" during this parliament after the Joseph Rowntree Foundation think-tank produced analysis over the weekend saying living standards for all UK families are set to fall by 2030.
The chancellor told my colleague Trevor Phillips on Sunday that she "rejects" the analysis that the average family could be £1,400 worse off by 2030.
But that doesn't mean that the forecasts published on Wednesday calculating real household disposable income per head won't make for grim reading as the economic outlook deteriorates.
Nervousness in Labour
Ask around the party, and there is obvious nervousness about how this might land, with a degree of anxiety about the economic outlook and what that has in store for departmental budgets.
But there is recognition too from many MPs that the government has political space afforded by that whopping majority, to make these decisions on spending cuts without too much fallout - for now.
Because while Wednesday will be bad, worse could be yet to come.
Staring down the barrel
The chancellor is staring down the barrel of a possible global trade war that will only serve to create more economic uncertainty, even if the UK is spared from the worst tariffs by President Donald Trump.
The national insurance hike is also set to kick in next month, with employers across the piece sounding the warnings around investment, jobs and growth.
Six months ago, Reeves said she wouldn't be coming back for more after she announced £40bn in tax rises in that massive first budget.
Six months on she is coming back for more, this time in the form of spending cuts. And in six months' time, she may well have to come back for more in the form of tax rises or deeper cuts.
The spring statement was meant to be a run-of-the-mill economic update, but it has morphed into much more.
The chancellor now has to make the hard sell from a very hard place, that could soon become even tougher still.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn
Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

Property experts have warned that Rachel Reeves ' plans to levy a so-called 'mansion tax' on high-value properties would stall housing sales and add to the exodus of the super-rich from the UK. Mortgage brokers and financial planners have rounded on the chancellor after reports she is considering hitting the owners of expensive properties when they sell to plug a £40bn hole in the public purse. The mooted plans would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. Currently, capital gains tax is not paid on the sale of primary residences. Proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold, sources told The Times. The threshold is said to still be under consideration, but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973. Financial adviser Scott Gallacher, director at Rowley Turton, said a level of £1.5m would prevent most older homeowners, particularly those who bought properties in the 80s and 90s, from selling houses. He added that the plans would 'kill off the upper end of the property market' and be difficult to implement. Mr Gallacher said: 'It would be insane if it creates a cliff edge in that properties over £1.5m are subject to Capital Gains Tax on the entire gain, as properties sold at £1.49m would incur no CGT whereas £1.5m might be a six-figure bill. If it's only on gains above £1.5m, then the CGT raised would be minimal, as potentially you'd be exempting six or even seven-figure gains.' He added: 'Homeowners, especially older ones, who perhaps bought their houses in the 1970s or 1980s, would be daft to sell and incur a huge CGT liability. Instead they would be incentivised to hold on to the home until they die and pay no CGT.' Meanwhile Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, warned the plans would leave families who bought homes in London more than a decade ago facing 'eye-watering' tax bills. 'Meanwhile, those who are actually wealthy know how to bypass these moves and won't pay it,' he said. He told The Independent: 'After the deadline passes people will simply not sell their homes. The property market above the threshold will die until Labour are voted out and the policy is repealed under a more sensible government.' Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, said the tax-free nature of primary residences is 'deeply embedded in the psyche of homeowners'. He warned: 'A mansion tax set at high level would naturally cause people to worry it was just the thin end of the wedge, and the next time the government needs a bit of money they could just lower the threshold. 'It would also be an impediment to mobility in the housing market, as those with properties which might fall foul of the tax would be inclined to sit on them for longer, leaving a log jam in the housing ladder below them.' And critics warned the tax change would add to the reported exodus of super-rich individuals fleeing Britain. 'I can see a lot of families in London being caught with this higher tax bill, and it may push more wealthy tax contributors to exodus the UK, which is already a problem following the Chancellor 's last budget,' said Stephen Perkins, managing director of Yellow Brick Mortgages. The Treasury was asked to comment.

Suranne Jones details 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for thriller role
Suranne Jones details 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for thriller role

Daily Mirror

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Suranne Jones details 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for thriller role

Suranne Jones has opened up about her 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for her new Netflix thriller and detailed one fiery moment in particular Suranne Jones has opened up about her 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for her new Netflix thriller. ‌ The former Coronation Street actress, 46, is now starring as fictional Prime Minister Abigail Dalton in Hostage, and follows the events that unfold after her character attends a summit with the French president Vivienne Toussaint (Julie Delpy) and her husband is kidnapped. ‌ As part of her research for the role, Suranne took a trip to Downing Street and ventured into the House of Commons, where she managed to catch a heated moment with the real-life Prime Minister. Speaking on Wednesday's edition of This Morning, she told hosts Sian Welby and Craig Doyle: "I did go to the House of Commons. It was great because when we then built our set, I'd been in the actual place. We did see Keir Starmer having a...[debate] it was quite rambunctious." ‌ The actress noted her disbelief at watching it all take place in front of her as she added: "There was a lot of shouting in there. You don't believe it til you see it!" The UK has only seen two female Prime Ministers in its time, with the late Margaret Thatcher having served a leader of the Conservative party from 1979 until 1990. In October 2022, Liz Truss became the shortest-serving Prime Minister in the country's history having managed to survive just 50 days in office. Suranne noted the lack of females in such a role of power but approached the role with a 'fresh' perspective, which she believes was necessary when taking into account the current political climate. She said: "We haven't got a lot of women to look at, have we? But that's another great thing. What I did and women in power, I wanted Abigail to be a fresh set of eyes, and the political landscape as it is, we needed that as it is." However, Suranne, who has carved out a stellar career in drama since leaving her role as Karen McDonald on ITV's flagship soap more than two decades ago, recently admitted she wouldn't want to take on the top job at number 10 in real life, mainly because of the amount of 'baggage' her new alter-ego has to carry round. ‌ She said: "A woman, before she's even put on her very high, hurty shoes, she has a lot of baggage and a lot of things that she is carrying: the way she looks, the way she dresses, the way she's been educated. "All of those things. How she behaves with her family or her background, everything, before she starts to go out into the world and getting judged for it. "Obviously, I'm well known. People recognise me. I try to keep a private element to my life, but then I do want to show support of the charities I work for and all of that stuff, and the community theatre that I like to give elevation to, so I drew on a lot of that stuff. But I wouldn't want to be a prime minister." ‌ She continued: "The early name for the show was The Choice and I think that's the thing, the choice of wanting a job like that, the choice of your family or your country. "It blows my mind, I can't even imagine... obviously, I had to because I play the prime minister, so I did have to imagine. But these big, big choices, they're huge and so it's just making people think." The five-part political thriller witnesses Dalton being blackmailed following her husband's kidnapping whilst he's working overseas, with the captors threatening his murder unless she steps down from office.

Thousands of mice, rats and birds have plagued Parliament for the last five year
Thousands of mice, rats and birds have plagued Parliament for the last five year

Metro

time42 minutes ago

  • Metro

Thousands of mice, rats and birds have plagued Parliament for the last five year

Thousands of pests have been caught in the corridors of Westminster, Metro can reveal. Pest controllers have had to tackle over 3,000 reports of mice, rats, insects and birds in Parliament, data from the House of Commons and Lords shows. Issues with unpleasant critters appear to be on the up as well, with the first six months of 2025 seeing almost as many call-outs as the whole of 2022. Westminster's pest team logged more than 3,000 reports of pests in the Parliamentary Estate since 2020. An army of mice is causing MPs and Lords the most issues, with more than 1,000 incidents to do with the small rodents. The problem has become so bad that Labour peer Lord Gardiner of Kimble called for cats to be brought in to tackle the vermin in July. They aren't the only challenge, though. Pesky moths flapping around have triggered more than 150 reports in the last five years. Others pests have also been caught scuttling around the corridors of Westminster. Dozens of rats and other 'mammals' have also been discovered in recent years. Parliament's pest control team has also been dispatched to eradicate scores of unspecified 'insects' and flies in the lobbies and grounds. Despite already employing baits, traps and hawks to prevent pests, issues appear to be on the rise. During the first two years of the Covid pandemic, there were fewer than 400 pests reported in the Lord's and shared spaces. But in 2022, that was at 578, and by last year it had hit 773. In the first six months of 2025, pest controllers have already tackled 516 reports. The pest control data was uncovered through Freedom of Information requests filed by Metro. The House of Lords provided numbers dating back to 2020, covering not just the House of Lords but also spaces shared with the House of Commons in Parliament. The House of Commons only revealed its pest incidents from August 2024 onwards. Some of the data covered in both responses might be duplicates of the same pest report, the House of Lords stressed. The Parliamentary Estate itself is massive, covering 16 football pitches, over 1,000 rooms and three miles of passageways. With buildings that date back to the tenth century, and its location next to the River Thames, the site has always been vulnerable to pests. It was revealed last year that Parliament has paid over £100,000 a year for pest control since 2014. In 2023-24 that figure rose to £136,000 – £10,000 higher than the previous 12 months, according to Daily Mail. More Trending A spokesperson for UK Parliament stressed it is a safe and hygienic place to work. They told Metro: 'With an area of over 250,000 m2, the number of pest control callouts for the Parliamentary Estate remains broadly in line with expectations, given the size and complexity of our building portfolio – one of the largest in Westminster and representing dozens of sites. 'We are committed to maintaining a humane and ethical pest control programme, focussed on preventative measures and the use of various control methods 'Increases in costs can be attributed to both inflation and increased building work on the Estate, though value for money remains a key consideration and we continue to follow all regulatory obligations.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man arrested at pro-Palestine protest after police misread 'Plasticine Action' T-shirt MORE: 'Brazen' drug dealers selling cocaine during Mass at the UK's biggest Catholic cathedral MORE: MPs being landlords would be comical if it wasn't so offensive

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store