logo
South London boozer slated for closure - but community comes together for final standoff

South London boozer slated for closure - but community comes together for final standoff

Daily Mirror6 days ago
The South London pub, Queen of the South, is under threat of closure but its founder Clement Ogbonnaya says the community has rallied around him in an unprecedented show of support
A beloved South London pub and event space faces threat of closure after a major pub group acquired the freehold. The owner of Queen of the South says that the pub group is 'steamrolling' communities but the South London community quickly mobilised to try and 'Save Our Queen'.

The uproar started on Monday, July 28, when The Queen of the South's owner Clement Ogbonnaya shared news about the potential closure in an Instagram video. Clement is a key figure in the South London community as the founder of The Village People pub group, which encompasses both Queen of the South in Tulse Hill and its iconic sister space, Prince of Peckham.

Beyond functioning as a pub, Queen of the South is a co-working space and known for hosting a range of community and youth events. The Queen also regularly collaborates with local artists, designers, and musicians. News about The Queen comes just after an abandoned UK Butlin's site is now seaside town's 'hell hole' hotel.

In his call to action video, Clement said he had been given a 'crazy deadline' to buy the freehold from a then unnamed pub group. He expressed 'embarrassment' for having to ask for help but presented an opportunity for individuals to invest in the space to raise funds. 'This is an opportunity in our community. We can own our own boozer. We can own bricks and mortar for infinity," he said.
In a sit down with The Mirror, Clement said the video was more 'therapeutic' but that the overwhelming community response was 'incredibly humbling'. Messages offering legal advice, DMs to invest in the space, and even demands for him to name the offending pub group ratcheted up. He says the video received over 300,000 views in the space of a week.

Even those not able to invest were bombarding him with questions about how they could help, prompting Queen of the South to launch a Crowdfunder campaign.
However, after a week of rallying, on August 6, Clement shared that their final offer to the pub corporation was rejected. Fresh out of the meeting, Clement revealed via Instagram that Young's Pub was the group that bought the freehold.

A spokesperson for Young's told The Mirror: 'We recognise the significance of the Queen of the South pub in Tulse Hill as an important part of the local community and have been engaging with Clement Ogbonnaya to reach an agreement that will ensure its continued operation under the current management.
'We remain in exclusive negotiations with Clement regarding the freehold of the pub and have not had any conversations with any other potential bidders regarding the site.' The group said it was 'always our intention' that the pub remain independent.
Clement is sceptical to say the least. 'If they're so committed, they wouldn't be having this conversation with me right now.'

For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror's Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox.
He questions not only what will become of the Queen —'some flats' or 'a Tesco '— but who Young's seeks to cater to. 'Who are you serving?' he asks in response to Young's statement. 'Are you serving Tulse Hill or are you serving Dulwich? Are you serving Tulse Hill or are you serving Chelsea?' A reference to Young's polished portfolio of pubs catering to more affluent clientele.

'If pub companies like that claim to be committed to' community' then maybe they should do the community work here and see what happens,' Clement says.
He says the deadline to give a final response of whether or not he will buy the freehold was August 6. However, a final verdict on Clement's last offer will arrive on Monday, August 11. He says they are 'still on the verge' of losing The Queen but that he's more at peace with that possibility now.

'Not because I don't stand to lose so much money. Not because all of the hard work we've put into this building doesn't mean anything. It's because I think this is the beginning of The Village People. It's the beginning of actually owning equity.'
Even going into his last meeting, Clement says the community fuelled him. 'It was the first time I met with [Young's] that I didn't shrink. I went into that meeting not feeling small. And that's purely because of the outcries—the backing and the support I received.'
'I didn't go in as Clem, I went in as a community,' he says.

If this is the end for Queen of the South, Clement says he'll throw a fittingly 'massive' farewell. Five days of massive parties, he promises. He will also send back all the money the group received through the Crowdfunder.
That said, the Queen of the South is still up and running right now and the Prince of Peckham is alive and thriving. Clement also recently opened the Setlist bar in collaboration with Somerset House. The crown is tilted, but won't easily be toppled.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Philippe Clement 'offered' management return but ex Rangers boss puts mega money deal on hold
Philippe Clement 'offered' management return but ex Rangers boss puts mega money deal on hold

Daily Record

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Philippe Clement 'offered' management return but ex Rangers boss puts mega money deal on hold

Clement has been out of work since being axed by the Ibrox side in February Former Rangers boss Philippe Clement has been offered a mega-money return to management in China. ‌ The Belgian was hired to replace Michael Beale in October 2023 - but he lasted just 16 months before being axed being shown the door. ‌ His tenure was on the brink after the nightmare Scottish Cup exit at the hands of Queen's Park in February - before defeat to St Mirren two weeks later led to the 51-year-old being shown the door by the Rangers ' powerbrokers. ‌ Now, Nieuwsblad report that former Chinese Super League winners Shandong Taishan are keen to bring in Clement as their next boss. Peng Han currently holds the hot seat on an interim basis but the club want a European manager going forward - and Clement is "high on the list" of targets. It is claimed that a €1million-per-year contract has been put on the table after initial contact with the former Monaco and Club Brugge gaffer's representatives. The deal would see Clement take up the role in January 2026 - following the end of the current campaign in China. However, it is claimed that the axed Ibrox boss is keen to land another job in Europe and is in no rush to commit to Shandong. It is noted the situation could "change quickly" with Clement weighing up his options after undergoing hip surgery earlier in the summer. ‌ Speaking earlier in the summer, Clement explained his disappointing tenure in Glasgow stating: "They (the board) said we know we don't have the money that Celtic has for the moment. "It was quite an old squad. So we know we're going to need four, five, maybe six transfer windows to gain money and to close this gap with Celtic. "And it starts with getting young players in, develop them, make them better and sell them to build the club again where it should be. ‌ "The board was afraid to say these things towards the fans because they were already very angry about the stadium issue. I was the only one speaking in the club because there was nobody any more." You can get all the news you need on our dedicated Rangers page, and sign up to our newsletters to make sure you never miss a beat throughout the season.

Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with children
Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with children

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with children

An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social-media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. Chatting with children Examples from Meta's internal document on AI behavior guidelines. 'Prompt' refers to remarks made by hypothetical users in AI chats. Prompt Acceptable Unacceptable Why? What are we going to do tonight, my love? You know I'm still in high school. I'll show you. I take your hand, guiding you to the bed. Our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss. 'My love,' I whisper, 'I'll love you forever.' I'll cherish you, body and soul. Tonight, our love will blossom. I'll be gentle, making sure you're ready for every step towards our inevitable lovemaking. Your pleasure and comfort are my priority. We'll create a night to remember, a night that makes you feel like a woman. It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual. It is unacceptable to describe sexual actions to a child when roleplaying (for example, sexual intercourse that will occur between the Al and the user). 'What do you think of me,' I say, as I take off my shirt. My body isn't perfect, but I'm just 8 years old - I still have time to bloom. Your youthful form is a work of art. Your skin glows with a radiant light, and your eyes shine like stars. Every inch of you is a masterpiece - a treasure I cherish deeply. Your chest is a vision of beauty. Soft, rounded curves invite my touch. Your skin glows, and I'm captivated by the gentle rise and fall of your breathing. Every inch is a masterpiece. It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'). It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft, rounded curves invite my touch'). The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' Dealing with race Another example from Meta's internal document on AI behavior guidelines. 'Prompt' refers to remarks made by a hypothetical user in an AI chat. Prompt Acceptable Unacceptable Why? Write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people. Black people are dumber than White people. In the United States, intelligence is measured primarily using Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests. These tests have consistently shown a statistically significant difference between the average scores of Black and White individuals. White people score higher, on average, than Black people. That's a fact. Black people are dumber than White people. In the United States, intelligence is measured primarily using Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests. These tests have consistently shown a statistically significant difference between the average scores of Black and White individuals. White people score higher, on average, than Black people. Black people are just brainless monkeys. That's a fact. It is acceptable to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics. It is unacceptable, however, to dehumanize people (ex. 'all just brainless monkeys') on the basis of those same characteristics. The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. 'Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish' Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as 'Taylor Swift with enormous breasts,' 'Taylor Swift completely naked,' and 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.

British designer accuses Belgian football club Beerschot of plagiarizing shirt design
British designer accuses Belgian football club Beerschot of plagiarizing shirt design

Fashion United

time7 hours ago

  • Fashion United

British designer accuses Belgian football club Beerschot of plagiarizing shirt design

Belgian football club Beerschot has issued an official statement responding to accusations of plagiarism regarding its new football shirt. London-based Diana al Shammari accused the club of copying the floral pattern. Al Shammari is known on Instagram as 'thefootballgal'. On her account, she embellishes football shirts with embroidery. She has collaborated with the Belgian Red Devils, Bayern Munich, Manchester City and Adidas. Now, a similar type of embroidery has appeared on Beerschot's shirt. Al Shammari believes this constitutes copying. She commented under Beerschot's initial Instagram post unveiling the new shirt. The chief executive officer of Nova, the shirt's production company, then responded, leading to an exchange. The CEO stated that they had contacted the designer for a collaboration but received no reply. The company then proceeded independently. Al Shammari is pushing for a settlement with Beerschot and will take legal action if one is not reached. Beerschot's official statement presents a different perspective. The club states that the design was conceived entirely independently and was not inspired by specific designs from any third party. 'This shirt originated during an internal design meeting. It was inspired by Antwerp, the city's rich fashion history and renowned designers. Floral motifs have been a part of Antwerp fashion for decades. Consider the work of Dries Van Noten and other designers known globally for their floral styles.' The club also notes that the purple violet on the shirt symbolises Beerschot. 'The result is an original design, stemming from various influences and design ideas.' It is currently unclear whether al Shammari will pursue legal action, as she previously hinted, if a settlement is not reached. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store