logo
Tariffs And Trade Winds: Vinitaly 2025 Reshapes Italian Wine Strategy

Tariffs And Trade Winds: Vinitaly 2025 Reshapes Italian Wine Strategy

Forbes10-04-2025

Vinitaly 2025 has just wrapped, and while the pavilions were filled with wine, espresso, and handshakes as always, there was no mistaking what dominated the conversation this year: U.S. tariffs. Vinitaly is Italy's largest international wine and spirits trade fair, held annually in Verona, bringing together producers, buyers, importers, and industry professionals from around the world.
Though this is, at its core, an Italian wine trade fair, the real gravitational pull came from across the Atlantic. Importers, producers, retailers, journalists—everyone, everywhere—seemed to have the U.S. front and center in their minds. That's because America holds a major slice of the pie when it comes to Italian wine exports, and on April 2, the Trump administration's announcement of a sweeping 20% tariff on select categories of Italian wine sent a ripple effect through the global marketplace.
Markets shifted. Distributors recalibrated. Strategic meetings turned tactical.
But if you were expecting panic in Verona, you'd be mistaken. The tone at Vinitaly was not fear—it was focus. Within hours of the announcement, producers large and small were adjusting pricing, working through customs codes, and exploring new models. What could have been a crisis became, for many, a moment to move.
This year, Vinitaly wasn't just a showcase of Italian excellence. It was a high-functioning nerve center of global trade—one that revealed both the fragility and the agility of the wine industry in a fast-moving world.
As the dust settled and the conversations deepened, one theme became clear: the industry wasn't waiting to see what would happen next—it was already acting. From major importers hedging inventory to producers reassessing strategies on the ground in Verona, the response to the tariffs offered a snapshot of how quickly and cohesively the wine world can mobilize when the stakes are high.
A Unified Response from the Consorzio
Within 24 hours of the announcement, the Chianti Classico Consortium stepped forward with a clear message, aiming to strike a balance between concern and confidence. 'We are particularly concerned about the repercussions that the 20% tariff could have on our exports,' said Giovanni Manetti, President of the consortium. 'But we must have faith in our leaders, and we producers will work together to shoulder the burden. We believe American consumers will remain loyal to our wines, to the Black Rooster, and to the unique region behind every bottle.'
That message of solidarity and swift action wasn't limited to producers alone. On the U.S. side, importers were already responding in real time, making decisive moves to buffer the impact and keep wine flowing through the system.
Importers Move First to Protect the Pipeline
While the immediate cost of the tariffs lands on wine at the point of entry, the ripple effects quickly spread through the entire three-tier system—especially for importers, who serve as the critical link between European producers and U.S. distributors. With margins already tight and contracts often locked months in advance, many importers had to make quick, high-stakes decisions. In anticipation of the President's April 2 announcement, several—among them Wilson Daniels and Banville Wine Merchants—chose to hedge their bets, securing significant inventories of European wines and ensuring that shipping containers were en route to the U.S. before the new tariffs could take effect.
At an annual producer dinner hosted by Banville during Vinitaly, the atmosphere was more than celebratory—it was grateful. Producers like Klaus Gasser of Cantina Terlano and Claudio Farina of Azienda Agricola Farina openly praised Banville CEO Simone Luchetti for his swift action, which allowed their wines to remain in circulation without immediate pricing disruptions. For some larger firms, the move meant locking in nearly a year's worth of inventory. Banville secured three to four months' worth—enough to buy time, maintain momentum, and avoid passing costs downstream. Still, not all importers had the capital or logistical flexibility to make similar moves, highlighting the uneven impact the tariffs could have across the U.S. wine market.
Inside the Numbers: The Pressure of the Three-Tier System
For Banville's Luchetti, acting fast wasn't just about protecting margins—it was about protecting relationships. Vinitaly became a critical moment to reaffirm trust with producers and assure them that Banville was not only prepared, but committed to navigating the challenge side by side. 'Hope and pray is not a strategy,' Luchetti said. 'We hope these tariffs don't close anyone's doors—but we're not standing still.'
Securing early shipments was only one piece of the puzzle. Ensuring access to U.S. warehouse space—particularly in New Jersey, where Banville operates—was equally essential. 'Relationships here are key,' he emphasized. 'You need the logistical infrastructure in place long before the container hits the water.'
While some in the industry have suggested that producers, importers, and distributors can simply split the cost burden of tariffs across the chain, Luchetti cautions that the U.S. three-tier system leaves very little room to maneuver. 'The margin for wholesalers or importers is not that big,' he said. 'The American system makes it impossible to divide things up evenly when you're already operating on razor-thin margins.'
To illustrate the complexity of that system, Luchetti points to one of Banville's long-standing partners, Slovenian producer Domaine Marjan Simčič. A bottle of his Rebula white wine typically retails for about $22 in the U.S.—but is sold to Banville for just $2.66. Once the importer, distributor, and retailer apply their respective markups, the bottle reflects a 728% increase from winery to consumer. Before anyone gets upset about that, you have to understand the structure. Wineries are already selling at their lowest viable price. There is no room to offer a discount. And the three-tier system isn't going anywhere. This is just the reality of the American wine industry.
Ultimately, the burden of the tariff falls squarely on the importer the moment the container arrives in the U.S. port. Whether or not that cost is passed along to the consumer—and how—is a calculation that varies case by case. But the financial pressure starts long before the bottle ever hits the shelf.
Why America Dominated the Conversation—at an Italian Fair
Though Vinitaly is firmly rooted in Italy, it has always been global in its impact. The United States remains the single largest market for Italian wine exports, accounting for more than $2 billion annually—nearly a quarter of Italy's total wine export value. The significance of that footprint can't be overstated.
Even before tariffs, the Italian wine sector was already navigating razor-thin margins, inflationary pressure, rising logistics costs, and the ever-present conversation of lower demand for alcohol. Now, the sudden imposition of tariffs—at the height of buying season—has triggered an industry-wide scramble to reassess pricing models, renegotiate contracts, and in some cases, entirely reimagine market strategy.
Producers Adapt with Measured Optimism
Badia a Passignano Antinori estate
getty
Renzo Cotarella, CEO of Marchesi Antinori, acknowledges the tariffs as a challenge—but not an insurmountable one. While a 20% duty at the point of entry is far from ideal, Cotarella estimates that the actual impact on shelf price could be closer to 6–7%, provided there's no compounding markup downstream. For wines positioned at a higher price point, he sees the added cost as something that can be absorbed—albeit with sacrifice—across the supply chain, from producers to importers and distributors. His outlook is measured: the situation isn't welcome, but it's manageable, and there remains hope that the tariff rate could ultimately be reduced.
'Certainly, these tariffs, coming right during Vinitaly, have not helped to frame the event in a positive light,' Cotarella said. 'I believe that, in some ways, there has been too much discussion about them, and we've missed an opportunity to celebrate wine for what it truly is: for the pleasure it brings, for the moments of joy it creates, and for the friendships it fosters.'
For Cotarella, the structure of Antinori's U.S. operations offers a layer of stability. With its own import company in place, the group can manage much of the impact internally—at least up to the distributor level. Still, he emphasizes that tariffs create a negative effect across the board. While larger, more diversified companies may be better positioned to absorb the blow, Cotarella cautions against viewing this moment as an opportunity to gain market share at the expense of smaller producers, calling that mindset a fundamental misstep.
Beyond Logistics: Reaffirming the Value of the U.S. Market
Giuseppe Vajra of GD Vajra shares a similarly grounded perspective. Like Antinori, Vajra's family estate has its own U.S. import company, offering a degree of control and insulation from short-term volatility. But beyond logistics, Vajra is deeply attuned to the emotional and cultural dimensions of the American market. 'We love American wine lovers,' he says, 'and we suffer when some colleagues say that 'the future is elsewhere' or that 'America is the past.'' For Vajra, the U.S. remains a place of curiosity, connection, and enduring passion for wine. At the same time, he cautions against letting fear or division define the industry's response. 'The tariff-retaliation dynamic reveals that in a community, no one can stay unscathed by passing all onus to the others,' he notes. 'Instead, I hope we stay united, supportive, and focused on what we do best—offering something meaningful to people's lives.' He added that this is no time to move slowly or freeze like a deer in the headlights. The priority, he emphasized, is taking action—decisive, practical steps to keep business moving forward.
A Panoramic Perspective: Terra Moretti's Strategic Patience
As the CEO of Terra Moretti, Massimo Tuzzi oversees a portfolio that spans some of Italy's most iconic wine estates—including Bellavista in Franciacorta, Petra in Suvereto, Teruzzi in San Gimignano, and Sella & Mosca in Sardinia. That range gives him a panoramic view of the Italian wine landscape and a sharp sense of how small shifts in pricing can ripple across categories and regions. For Tuzzi, the concern isn't just about short-term strategy—it's about pricing psychology. 'Once you lift the bar on price,' he says, 'it's very, very unpredictable. That price rarely goes back down.'
Sella & Mosca's Vermentino, which typically retails around $14.99 in the U.S., is particularly vulnerable to subtle increases. A $1 jump at retail may seem minor, but Tuzzi warns that it sets a new expectation—one the consumer ultimately bears. 'The real potential fallout is that retailers and restaurants may raise prices by just one or two dollars,' he says. 'But the likelihood that they lower them again is very slim.'
Still, Tuzzi isn't advocating panic. In fact, he's an advocate for measured response rather than immediate reaction. 'Many producers and importers want answers now,' he says. 'But I'm very much against reacting before we have all the elements on the table.' He recommends using the moment wisely—monitoring developments, protecting margin where possible, and avoiding knee-jerk decisions. 'Keep calm and take time to think through the elements in front of you,' he advises. 'This is a moment to think—not just move.'
A Window of Reprieve—and a Call for Clarity
That philosophy gained added weight on Wednesday, April 9, when the Trump administration unexpectedly announced a 90-day pause on new tariffs—excluding those on China—offering the Italian wine world a brief but meaningful window to gather information, reassess, and prepare. With continued uncertainty on the horizon, the consensus across producers, importers, and institutions seems to echo a single, unifying strategy: move quickly when needed—but think even faster.
Back to What Matters
In the end, while strategy, pricing, and policy will always play a role, the soul of the wine industry lies elsewhere—in connection, culture, and the shared joy of the product itself. As Renzo Cotarella put it: 'So, enough with tariffs. If they are confirmed, we will work to navigate them. But let's focus on what really matters: promoting wine, encouraging its responsible consumption, and continuing to ensure that it is seen as a fascinating, enjoyable product to be shared with friends on the right occasions.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank
Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank

The Trump administration is asking a judge to drop a 2022 settlement the Justice Department had reached with North Jersey-based Lakeland Bank — which was later absorbed by Provident Bank — over allegations of redlining against Black and Hispanic customers. While Provident Bank said it will continue to provide low-cost mortgages to underserved communities, the motion by the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the settlement has drawn the ire of community advocates and legal experts, who say it would make it easier for banks to engage in redlining. 'It goes without saying it's a good thing when financial institutions are complying with those consent orders, but when you take away the teeth — the actual enforcement — who's to say that they will continue to comply,' said Leila Amirhamzeh, director of community reinvestment for New Jersey Citizen Action, a consumer advocacy four-page motion by the Justice Department, filed May 28 in U.S. District Court, seeks to terminate the consent order the Biden administration negotiated with what was then Lakeland Bank. In the initial complaint, the Justice Department said Lakeland violated the federal Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act by deliberately avoiding banking with Black and Hispanic customers, particularly in and around Newark. The discrimination in question allegedly took place between 2015 and 2021, according to the Biden administration. To settle the complaint, Lakeland agreed to pay $12 million to subsidize mortgages, home improvement loans and home refinancing loans for Black and Hispanic residents and open two branches in underserved neighborhoods. Lakeland also had to provide $150,000 a year for advertising, outreach and consumer finance education in the Newark area. Newark Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ras Baraka wanted one of those new branches to be in his city, and the Greater Toms River Chamber of Commerce also wanted a branch in its area. According to the Provident Bank website, there are currently four locations in Newark and three in Toms River. After acquiring Lakeland, Provident took ownership of the settlement and the mandate to open two branches in underserved areas of New Jersey. The Justice Department in its motion to terminate the order said Lakeland reached substantial commitment to comply with the consent agreement and it is committed to continuing its disbursement of the loan subsidy. Provident spokesperson Keith Buscio told and the USA TODAY Network New Jersey that the bank remains committed to the loan subsidy initiative. He said Provident is not a party to the litigation and referred other questions to the Justice Department. The Justice Department could not immediately be reached for comment. Baraka's office in Newark said it is planning to hold a press conference about the motion by the Justice Department on June 5. Court filings show two attorneys who helped file the initial complaint against Lakeland, Michael Campion and Susan Millenky, withdrew as counsel from the case. Campion was appointed in 2022 to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office's Civil Rights Division that was created to enforce federal civil rights laws in New Jersey. The Fair Housing Act was passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 to prohibit landlords and mortgage lenders from discriminating based on race, religion, national origin or sex. Nearly 60 years later, racial wealth disparity remains vast. In New Jersey, the median household wealth of white families is $322,500, compared with $17,700 for Black families and $26,100 for Hispanic families, the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice said. In New Jersey, 77.3% of white residents owned a home in 2020. By comparison, 42.8% of Black residents and 32.7% of Hispanic residents were homeowners, according to the Urban Institute, a research group. Critics said the Justice Department's motion to drop the Lakeland settlement is a step by the Trump administration's bid to reverse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. David Troutt, a professor at Rutgers Law School in Newark, said the motion by the Justice Department to terminate the consent decree is part of a larger campaign by the department to rescind investigations and agreements involving anti-Black racism, while beginning investigations into what it deems 'illegal DEI.' 'The Trump administration's withdrawal from a federal consent decree without justification is an extraordinary act of endorsing racist practices and housing market manipulation,' Troutt said. 'For the very government that successfully enforced those borrowers' civil rights to now repudiate them sends a message unlike any we've seen since the federal government first endorsed redlining in the 1930s,' Troutt said. Lakeland isn't the only New Jersey bank that faced scrutiny under the Biden administration. Toms River-based OceanFirst Financial Corp. agreed to pay $14 million to subsidize mortgages, helping settle a lawsuit that alleged the bank violated federal discrimination laws. Since then, it has improved the rating given by federal bank regulators who oversee investments in underserved communities to 'outstanding.' The Justice Department hasn't filed a motion seeking to terminate the consent order with OceanFirst. But two attorneys who represented the U.S. in the initial complaint, Millenky and Nathan Shulock, have filed motions to withdraw from the case, according to the court docket. A combined 22 Provident and Lakeland branches closed in 2024 following the $1.3 billion merger creating a 'super community bank.' Each branch that closed was within roughly three miles of a nearby branch. Activists and opponents warned that the merger would mean fewer banking services would be available for underserved communities, such as people of color, the elderly and disabled. New Jersey Citizen Action applauded Provident for its continued commitment to the terms of the consent order. But the group said the Justice Department should continue to enforce it. 'When you actually terminate these consent orders, there's no deterrence, and it's basically telling financial institutions that the Department of Justice is going to be taking a hands-off approach to fair lending issues, to redlining,' New Jersey Citizen Action's Amirhamzeh said. Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook Michael L. Diamond is a business reporter for the Asbury Park Press. He has been writing about the New Jersey economy and health care industry since 1999. He can be reached at mdiamond@ This article originally appeared on Feds seek to drop Lakeland Bank settlement over alleged redlining

Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE

Los Angeles Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE

WASHINGTON — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. ' Here's what to know about the rescissions request: The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Boak writes for the Associated Press.

Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks
Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks

A month after the 2018 mass school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Citigroup enacted restrictions for its clients that sold firearms — the first major bank on Wall Street to do so. On Tuesday, the bank rolled back that policy. 'We also will no longer have a specific policy as it relates to firearms,' the company said in a statement Tuesday. 'The policy was intended to promote the adoption of best sales practices as prudent risk management and didn't address the manufacturing of firearms.' The decision comes as the Trump administration alleges that Wall Street is biased against conservatives — a right-wing talking point since more than a dozen state auditors accused Bank of America of 'politicized de-banking' in an open letter last year (de-banking is when a bank closes an account for a customer it deems high risk). At the time, Bank of America said it has 'no political litmus test.' On Tuesday, Citi said it was 'following regulatory developments, recent Executive Orders and federal legislation.' In 2018, Citi said it would ban banking services to businesses that sold firearms to those under 21, those who didn't pass a background check, or sold bump stocks (used by the gunman in the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas) or high-capacity magazines. The policy applied to small businesses, commercial and institutional clients, and credit card partners, but did not restrict how individual customers used their cards. Big banks have recently caught the ire of the president as well as the crypto industry. In January at the annual World Economic Forum, President Donald Trump scolded Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America. 'You've done a fantastic job, but I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank,' Trump said. 'You and Jamie and everybody… What you're doing is wrong,' referring to JPMorgan Chase head Jamie Dimon. Citigroup also announced on Tuesday that it will update its employee Code of Conduct and its external Global Financial Access Policy 'to clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store