
Tariffs And Trade Winds: Vinitaly 2025 Reshapes Italian Wine Strategy
Though this is, at its core, an Italian wine trade fair, the real gravitational pull came from across the Atlantic. Importers, producers, retailers, journalists—everyone, everywhere—seemed to have the U.S. front and center in their minds. That's because America holds a major slice of the pie when it comes to Italian wine exports, and on April 2, the Trump administration's announcement of a sweeping 20% tariff on select categories of Italian wine sent a ripple effect through the global marketplace.
Markets shifted. Distributors recalibrated. Strategic meetings turned tactical.
But if you were expecting panic in Verona, you'd be mistaken. The tone at Vinitaly was not fear—it was focus. Within hours of the announcement, producers large and small were adjusting pricing, working through customs codes, and exploring new models. What could have been a crisis became, for many, a moment to move.
This year, Vinitaly wasn't just a showcase of Italian excellence. It was a high-functioning nerve center of global trade—one that revealed both the fragility and the agility of the wine industry in a fast-moving world.
As the dust settled and the conversations deepened, one theme became clear: the industry wasn't waiting to see what would happen next—it was already acting. From major importers hedging inventory to producers reassessing strategies on the ground in Verona, the response to the tariffs offered a snapshot of how quickly and cohesively the wine world can mobilize when the stakes are high.
A Unified Response from the Consorzio
Within 24 hours of the announcement, the Chianti Classico Consortium stepped forward with a clear message, aiming to strike a balance between concern and confidence. 'We are particularly concerned about the repercussions that the 20% tariff could have on our exports,' said Giovanni Manetti, President of the consortium. 'But we must have faith in our leaders, and we producers will work together to shoulder the burden. We believe American consumers will remain loyal to our wines, to the Black Rooster, and to the unique region behind every bottle.'
That message of solidarity and swift action wasn't limited to producers alone. On the U.S. side, importers were already responding in real time, making decisive moves to buffer the impact and keep wine flowing through the system.
Importers Move First to Protect the Pipeline
While the immediate cost of the tariffs lands on wine at the point of entry, the ripple effects quickly spread through the entire three-tier system—especially for importers, who serve as the critical link between European producers and U.S. distributors. With margins already tight and contracts often locked months in advance, many importers had to make quick, high-stakes decisions. In anticipation of the President's April 2 announcement, several—among them Wilson Daniels and Banville Wine Merchants—chose to hedge their bets, securing significant inventories of European wines and ensuring that shipping containers were en route to the U.S. before the new tariffs could take effect.
At an annual producer dinner hosted by Banville during Vinitaly, the atmosphere was more than celebratory—it was grateful. Producers like Klaus Gasser of Cantina Terlano and Claudio Farina of Azienda Agricola Farina openly praised Banville CEO Simone Luchetti for his swift action, which allowed their wines to remain in circulation without immediate pricing disruptions. For some larger firms, the move meant locking in nearly a year's worth of inventory. Banville secured three to four months' worth—enough to buy time, maintain momentum, and avoid passing costs downstream. Still, not all importers had the capital or logistical flexibility to make similar moves, highlighting the uneven impact the tariffs could have across the U.S. wine market.
Inside the Numbers: The Pressure of the Three-Tier System
For Banville's Luchetti, acting fast wasn't just about protecting margins—it was about protecting relationships. Vinitaly became a critical moment to reaffirm trust with producers and assure them that Banville was not only prepared, but committed to navigating the challenge side by side. 'Hope and pray is not a strategy,' Luchetti said. 'We hope these tariffs don't close anyone's doors—but we're not standing still.'
Securing early shipments was only one piece of the puzzle. Ensuring access to U.S. warehouse space—particularly in New Jersey, where Banville operates—was equally essential. 'Relationships here are key,' he emphasized. 'You need the logistical infrastructure in place long before the container hits the water.'
While some in the industry have suggested that producers, importers, and distributors can simply split the cost burden of tariffs across the chain, Luchetti cautions that the U.S. three-tier system leaves very little room to maneuver. 'The margin for wholesalers or importers is not that big,' he said. 'The American system makes it impossible to divide things up evenly when you're already operating on razor-thin margins.'
To illustrate the complexity of that system, Luchetti points to one of Banville's long-standing partners, Slovenian producer Domaine Marjan Simčič. A bottle of his Rebula white wine typically retails for about $22 in the U.S.—but is sold to Banville for just $2.66. Once the importer, distributor, and retailer apply their respective markups, the bottle reflects a 728% increase from winery to consumer. Before anyone gets upset about that, you have to understand the structure. Wineries are already selling at their lowest viable price. There is no room to offer a discount. And the three-tier system isn't going anywhere. This is just the reality of the American wine industry.
Ultimately, the burden of the tariff falls squarely on the importer the moment the container arrives in the U.S. port. Whether or not that cost is passed along to the consumer—and how—is a calculation that varies case by case. But the financial pressure starts long before the bottle ever hits the shelf.
Why America Dominated the Conversation—at an Italian Fair
Though Vinitaly is firmly rooted in Italy, it has always been global in its impact. The United States remains the single largest market for Italian wine exports, accounting for more than $2 billion annually—nearly a quarter of Italy's total wine export value. The significance of that footprint can't be overstated.
Even before tariffs, the Italian wine sector was already navigating razor-thin margins, inflationary pressure, rising logistics costs, and the ever-present conversation of lower demand for alcohol. Now, the sudden imposition of tariffs—at the height of buying season—has triggered an industry-wide scramble to reassess pricing models, renegotiate contracts, and in some cases, entirely reimagine market strategy.
Producers Adapt with Measured Optimism
Badia a Passignano Antinori estate
getty
Renzo Cotarella, CEO of Marchesi Antinori, acknowledges the tariffs as a challenge—but not an insurmountable one. While a 20% duty at the point of entry is far from ideal, Cotarella estimates that the actual impact on shelf price could be closer to 6–7%, provided there's no compounding markup downstream. For wines positioned at a higher price point, he sees the added cost as something that can be absorbed—albeit with sacrifice—across the supply chain, from producers to importers and distributors. His outlook is measured: the situation isn't welcome, but it's manageable, and there remains hope that the tariff rate could ultimately be reduced.
'Certainly, these tariffs, coming right during Vinitaly, have not helped to frame the event in a positive light,' Cotarella said. 'I believe that, in some ways, there has been too much discussion about them, and we've missed an opportunity to celebrate wine for what it truly is: for the pleasure it brings, for the moments of joy it creates, and for the friendships it fosters.'
For Cotarella, the structure of Antinori's U.S. operations offers a layer of stability. With its own import company in place, the group can manage much of the impact internally—at least up to the distributor level. Still, he emphasizes that tariffs create a negative effect across the board. While larger, more diversified companies may be better positioned to absorb the blow, Cotarella cautions against viewing this moment as an opportunity to gain market share at the expense of smaller producers, calling that mindset a fundamental misstep.
Beyond Logistics: Reaffirming the Value of the U.S. Market
Giuseppe Vajra of GD Vajra shares a similarly grounded perspective. Like Antinori, Vajra's family estate has its own U.S. import company, offering a degree of control and insulation from short-term volatility. But beyond logistics, Vajra is deeply attuned to the emotional and cultural dimensions of the American market. 'We love American wine lovers,' he says, 'and we suffer when some colleagues say that 'the future is elsewhere' or that 'America is the past.'' For Vajra, the U.S. remains a place of curiosity, connection, and enduring passion for wine. At the same time, he cautions against letting fear or division define the industry's response. 'The tariff-retaliation dynamic reveals that in a community, no one can stay unscathed by passing all onus to the others,' he notes. 'Instead, I hope we stay united, supportive, and focused on what we do best—offering something meaningful to people's lives.' He added that this is no time to move slowly or freeze like a deer in the headlights. The priority, he emphasized, is taking action—decisive, practical steps to keep business moving forward.
A Panoramic Perspective: Terra Moretti's Strategic Patience
As the CEO of Terra Moretti, Massimo Tuzzi oversees a portfolio that spans some of Italy's most iconic wine estates—including Bellavista in Franciacorta, Petra in Suvereto, Teruzzi in San Gimignano, and Sella & Mosca in Sardinia. That range gives him a panoramic view of the Italian wine landscape and a sharp sense of how small shifts in pricing can ripple across categories and regions. For Tuzzi, the concern isn't just about short-term strategy—it's about pricing psychology. 'Once you lift the bar on price,' he says, 'it's very, very unpredictable. That price rarely goes back down.'
Sella & Mosca's Vermentino, which typically retails around $14.99 in the U.S., is particularly vulnerable to subtle increases. A $1 jump at retail may seem minor, but Tuzzi warns that it sets a new expectation—one the consumer ultimately bears. 'The real potential fallout is that retailers and restaurants may raise prices by just one or two dollars,' he says. 'But the likelihood that they lower them again is very slim.'
Still, Tuzzi isn't advocating panic. In fact, he's an advocate for measured response rather than immediate reaction. 'Many producers and importers want answers now,' he says. 'But I'm very much against reacting before we have all the elements on the table.' He recommends using the moment wisely—monitoring developments, protecting margin where possible, and avoiding knee-jerk decisions. 'Keep calm and take time to think through the elements in front of you,' he advises. 'This is a moment to think—not just move.'
A Window of Reprieve—and a Call for Clarity
That philosophy gained added weight on Wednesday, April 9, when the Trump administration unexpectedly announced a 90-day pause on new tariffs—excluding those on China—offering the Italian wine world a brief but meaningful window to gather information, reassess, and prepare. With continued uncertainty on the horizon, the consensus across producers, importers, and institutions seems to echo a single, unifying strategy: move quickly when needed—but think even faster.
Back to What Matters
In the end, while strategy, pricing, and policy will always play a role, the soul of the wine industry lies elsewhere—in connection, culture, and the shared joy of the product itself. As Renzo Cotarella put it: 'So, enough with tariffs. If they are confirmed, we will work to navigate them. But let's focus on what really matters: promoting wine, encouraging its responsible consumption, and continuing to ensure that it is seen as a fascinating, enjoyable product to be shared with friends on the right occasions.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Gaming Handheld Shipments Delayed Over 'Excessive' Import Duties
Eager gamers keen to get their hands on the latest crypto gaming handheld from Mysten Labs are being greeted with unexpected import duties, potentially amounting to hundreds of dollars. Early buyers of the SuiPlay0X1 are staring down the consequences of President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' on global partners as the White House's trade policy begins to bite. Mysten Labs has confirmed to Decrypt that it is holding the next shipment of devices as it attempts to triage complaints from buyers and get a better handle on expected fees. SuiPlay0X1 Hands-On Preview: A Steam Deck Rival That Supports Crypto Games The SuiPlay0X1 is a handheld gaming PC akin to Valve's popular Steam Deck, albeit with built-in crypto wallet support to play blockchain games on Sui. It can also play popular games from Steam and the Epic Games Store, among other supported storefronts. The device was built in collaboration with gaming startup Playtron and uses its GameOS software. The company produced 10,000 units of the gaming handheld for early adopters and said that $599—a single price point offered to over 100 countries—is near the cost of manufacturing each device. As such, Mysten told buyers in an email Thursday that it cannot afford to pay the unexpected import duties for everyone. 'At this small scale, it is not possible to absorb tariffs and duties which differ for every country,' the email read. 'It's important to note: Mysten Labs does not receive any portion of duty fees or taxes. These are set by local and international governments and apply to all cross-border purchases. Given the unpredictable macroeconomic climate, we could not forecast how these fees might change during shipping.' Decrypt was offered a complementary loaner unit of the SuiPlay0X1 for testing and review purposes, and received a message from carrier DHL earlier this week that an import duty of more than $138 was required before the package—shipped from Hong Kong—could be delivered in Illinois. All products originating from Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, are currently subject to a 20% tariff when entering the U.S. A previous de minimis exemption meant that products priced at under $800 could avoid such duties, but Trump revoked that exemption in April via an executive order. Some SuiPlay0X1 buyers on social media and in the official Sui Discord server have reported a similar import duty demand. But others have said they've been hit up for much larger sums for a single device, with some claiming a demand from DHL to pay about $348. A Mysten Labs representative confirmed that the import duties have ranged significantly, and has informed buyers who have been hit with 'excessive' fees to email its support team for assistance. The email suggested that residents of select U.S. states are seeing higher duties than in others. 'No customer should be charged duties equal to half their purchase price,' Mysten Labs wrote in the email to buyers. Decrypt asked a Mysten representative how the company planned to assist buyers who face the higher fees, but they did not clarify further. 'While federal duties are harmonized across the U.S., some additional state taxes can apply, as well as courier fees for administering the charge and managing payments,' the rep said about varying fees. 'At this time, we are unsure of the differences in duties and shipping fees between different regions of the U.S., though we are actively working to determine what these are.' Until that is determined, the rep told Decrypt that Mysten is holding off on shipping additional SuiPlay0X1 units to buyers. So far, a total of 2,000 units have been sent, with the next batch of 3,000 units currently on hold. Mysten expects to begin shipping those units by the end of August. While the SuiPlay0X1 fallout has been met with memes and jokes from some (including an X user who said they 'love seeing innovation on Sui' with the 'new Tariff-Drop model'), many buyers are frustrated and upset about the unexpected fees. 'If the outstanding duties of $138.11 stand, how do I get a refund?' one buyer asked via Discord. 'I won't want this product if the fees are this high—especially since I would feel purposely misled by the SuiPlay team about the total cost.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Los Angeles Times
7 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge says former Trump lawyer Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as U.S. attorney in New Jersey
WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. — A federal judge ruled Thursday that President Trump's former lawyer, Alina Habba, has been unlawfully serving as the the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey. The court, saying the administration used 'a novel series of legal and personnel moves,' held that Habba's term as the interim U.S. attorney ended in July, and the Trump administration's maneuvers to keep her in the role without getting confirmation from the U.S. Senate didn't follow procedures required by federal law. 'Faced with the question of whether Ms. Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not,' Chief U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann wrote. The opinion says that Habba's actions since July 'may be declared void.' Brann, a President Obama appointee, said he's putting his order on hold pending an appeal. It wasn't immediately clear if that meant Habba would remain in charge of the U.S. attorney's office. A message seeking comment was sent to Habba's office Thursday. The Justice Department said it intends to appeal the ruling. Brann's decision comes in response to a filing on behalf of New Jersey defendants challenging Habba's tenure and the charges she was prosecuting against them. They sought to block the charges against them, arguing that Habba didn't have the authority to prosecute the case after her 120-day term as interim U.S. attorney expired in July. The defendants' motion to block Habba, a onetime White House advisor to President Trump and his former personal defense attorney, is another high-profile chapter in her short tenure. She made headlines when Trump named her U.S. attorney for New Jersey in March. She said the state could 'turn red,' a rare, overt political expression from a prosecutor, and said she planned to investigate the state's Democratic governor and attorney general. She then brought a trespassing charge, which was eventually dropped, against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka stemming from his visit to a federal immigration detention center. Habba later charged Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver with assault stemming from the same incident, a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress other than for corruption. She denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. Volatility over her tenure unfolded in late July when the four-month temporary appointment was coming to a close and it became clear that she would not get support from home state Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, effectively torpedoing her chances of Senate approval. The president withdrew her nomination. Around the same time, federal judges in New Jersey exercised their power under the law to replace Habba with a career prosecutor when Habba's temporary appointment lapsed, but Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi fired that prosecutor and renamed Habba as acting U.S. attorney. In his opinion, Brann questioned the legal moves the administration conducted to keep Habba in place. 'Taken to the extreme, the President could use this method to staff the United States Attorney's office with individuals of his personal choice for an entire term without seeking the Senate's advice and consent,' he wrote. The Justice Department has said in filings that the judges acted prematurely and that the executive has the authority to appoint his preferred candidate to enforce federal laws in the state. Trump had formally nominated Habba as his pick for U.S. attorney on July 1, but Booker and Kim's opposition meant that under long-standing Senate practice known as senatorial courtesy, the nomination would stall out. A handful of other Trump picks for U.S. attorney are facing a similar circumstance. Catalini writes for the Associated Press.


New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Steak ‘n Shake slams Cracker Barrel CEO for eliminating ‘old-timer' from logo: ‘We take pride in our history'
Steak 'n Shake has taken aim at Cracker Barrel, accusing the Southern country-themed chain of erasing its heritage and identity with its controversial new logo. The Indianapolis-based burger chain took to X on Thursday to slam Cracker Barrel for allegedly abandoning its roots, implying that CEO Julie Felss Masino is stripping away the identity of the restaurant and gift store chain in pursuit of short-term trends. Advertisement 'Sometimes, people want to change things just to put their own personality on things,' Steak 'n Shake posted on X on Thursday, along with an image of part of the old Cracker Barrel logo. 'At [Cracker Barrel], their goal is to just delete the personality altogether. Hence, the elimination of the 'old-timer' from the signage.' Steak 'n Shake continued, 'Heritage is what got Cracker Barrel this far, and now the CEO wants to just scrape it all away. At Steak 'n Shake, we take pride in our history, our families, and American values. All are welcome. We will never market ourselves away from our past in a cheap effort to gain the approval of trend seekers.' 3 Steak 'n Shake has fired back at Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino, accusing the company of eliminating its heritage with its new, controversial logo. FOX News Advertisement The fiery post followed just one day after Steak 'n Shake called out Cracker Barrel on Wednesday for the logo change. Replying to a post from Trump advisor Alex Bruesewitz in which he criticized the chain's leadership for the new logo, Steak 'n Shake accused Cracker Barrel's board of directors of not respecting its 'historical customers' or 'brand.' 'At Steak 'n Shake, we have gone back to basics,' Steak 'n Shake posted to X on Wednesday. 3 The Indianapolis-based burger chain posted on X that Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino is stripping away the restaurant's identity. AP Advertisement 'Our tallow fries are waiting for you. Oh yeah, you can also now pay with Bitcoin!' Cracker Barrel unveiled its new logo on Tuesday as part of its new branding campaign — eliminating the iconic image of a man resting on a barrel in favor of a text-only logo for the first time since 1977. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Conservative critics said the logo was the company's 'Bud Light' moment after receiving intense online backlash, while CEO Masino contended the response was 'overwhelmingly positive.' Advertisement According to a company press release, this new logo is still 'anchored in Cracker Barrel's signature gold and brown tones' and 'now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all.' 3 The company posted an image of the old Cracker Barrel logo with the caption, 'Sometimes, people want to change things just to put their own personality on things.' Getty Images On Thursday, shares of Cracker Barrel (CBRL) dropped more than 12%, the steepest drop since April. Steak 'n Shake and Cracker Barrel have been serving customers for more than 50 years. Steak 'n Shake was founded in 1934 in Normal, Illinois, while Cracker Barrel opened its first store in 1969 in Lebanon, Tennessee, according to their websites. Steak 'n Shake and Cracker Barrel did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment.