logo
High court sets aside Tshwane's 'unlawful, invalid' cleansing levy

High court sets aside Tshwane's 'unlawful, invalid' cleansing levy

TimesLIVE31-07-2025
The Pretoria high court on Thursday declared that the imposition of the cleansing levy by the City of Tshwane is unlawful, invalid and set it aside.
AfriForum brought the urgent application to set aside the metro's decision to impose the new mandatory monthly levy of R194.37 (excluding VAT) on about 260,000 households and businesses in the metro.
AfriForum had argued that the levy amounted to illegal and unfair double taxation, especially in cases where residents did not benefit from the metro's refuse removal service and were using private service providers.
'The court today ordered the metro to ensure that all municipal accounts on which the city cleaning levy has already been levied are credited in the next billing cycle with the amount equal to the amount levied for it,' AfriForum said in a statement.
In addition, the court said the metro must also take the necessary steps to ensure that residents and businesses were not further charged for the levy.
'The ruling is an important victory in the interests of residents and businesses who have been unfairly affected by the implementation of this levy. It is a clear confirmation of what AfriForum has been saying about this levy from the outset, namely that the Tshwane metro's introduction of the levy is illegal and arbitrary,' said Deidré Steffens, AfriForum's adviser for local government affairs.
During last week's court proceedings, the metro attempted to defend the levy, arguing it was justifiable considering its 2016 tariff policy.
'However, the metro's legal team was unable to present this policy to the court and even admitted that they were unable to locate the document. The court considered this administrative shortcoming to be serious,' AfriForum said.
Arno Roodt, AfriForum's district co-ordinator for Greater Pretoria South, said the implementation of the levy was nothing more than a fundraising ploy aimed at covering up years of poor planning and mismanagement.
'The court's decision sends a clear message that municipalities must also obey the law and that communities are ready to fight injustice and illegal actions,' said Roodt.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We don't need your racist views' at National Dialogue, Panyaza tells AfriForum, Solidarity
'We don't need your racist views' at National Dialogue, Panyaza tells AfriForum, Solidarity

The South African

time10 hours ago

  • The South African

'We don't need your racist views' at National Dialogue, Panyaza tells AfriForum, Solidarity

Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi has hit back at Afrikaner lobby group AfriForum for withdrawing from the National Dialogue Convention. AfriForum, Solidarity and Solidarity Movement withdrew from the National Dialogue accusing the African National Congress (ANC)-led government of hijacking the dialogue and degenerating it into a government-driven national monologue. The decision also comes as other legacy foundations, including those bearing the names of Thabo Mbeki, Desmond Tutu, Oliver Tambo, and Chief Albert Luthuli, have formally withdrawn from the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, scheduled for Friday, 15 August. In a joint statement released on Friday, 8 August, the legacy foundations cited serious concerns over breaches of key principles governing the National Dialogue process. These include government overreach, a rushed timeline, lack of transparency, and financial instability – factors they say undermine the credibility and original citizen-driven spirit of the event. Despite withdrawing from the 15 August event, the foundations emphasised that they are not abandoning the broader National Dialogue project. On Tuesday, 12 August, AfriForum took to X (formerly Twitter) to confirm that they have also withdrawn from the dialogue. AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said the crisis the country is currently in is due to the ANC's failed policies, mismanagement and corruption. Kriel said they are the cause of the problems and, therefore, they cannot be trusted to lead the process of finding solutions. In response, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi accused the lobby groups of being racist. 'Who's next? Thanks for not attending, we honestly don't need your racist views,' he posted on X. Unsurprisingly, chairperson of the Solidarity Movement, Flip Buys, said national discussions are essential to find solutions to the country's pressing crises, but everything indicates that the National Dialogue at this stage will only result in more useless discussions, instead of action. 'The reason for this is that it appears that the ANC wants to hijack the intended the dialogue to try to win back lost support, rather than find answers to the crises. 'Therefore, the Solidarity Movement supports the various foundations that have decided not to attend the dialogue on Friday, and we will not be there either. There is no point in putting the party responsible for the decline in the country in charge of the National Dialogue,' he said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Cost of new number plates faces scrutiny
Cost of new number plates faces scrutiny

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Cost of new number plates faces scrutiny

The rollout of a new high-tech, tamper-proof number plate system has sparked widespread concern over cost, necessity, and transparency, most notably from civil rights organisation AfriForum. Gauteng Provincial Government has begun rolling out the new number plate system within the province's fleet of cars since June 5 in a bid to combat crime, vehicle fraud, and enhance law enforcement. This pilot is expected to last for six months before a broader rollout to the public. As the pilot phase continues, AfriForum is awaiting a response to its internal appeal and weighing its next steps, which may include lodging a formal complaint with the Information Regulator or pursuing legal action to compel the release of requested data like the cost of the plates. The initiative, spearheaded by Premier Panyaza Lesufi and unveiled in June, includes plans to extend it to all private and commercial vehicles in the province by early 2026. The plates are designed with advanced security features, including QR codes, anti-tamper decals, and a digitised backend to allow for instant verification of vehicle ownership and status. No costs to vehicle owners were announced by the premier at the launch. The Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport touts the system as a modern, digitised approach to tackle vehicle-related crime and streamline enforcement. AfriForum, which represents over 185 000 members in Gauteng, has lodged an internal appeal after the department failed to respond to its Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) request on data about the project within the mandated 30 days. The organisation is demanding answers on key aspects of the new number plate project, including estimated cost per unit, the timeline for mandatory replacement, and the research behind claims that the system will improve road safety or reduce crime. According to Louis Boshoff, spokesperson and campaign officer at AfriForum, the organisation's concerns are rooted in broader issues of governance. 'Gauteng residents are already under pressure due to poor service delivery, ranging from persistent power cuts to unreliable water supply. Launching a costly new number plate system at this time appears to be a misplaced priority,' Boshoff stated. AfriForum's PAIA request focuses on three core areas: how much the new plates will cost motorists, when the public will be required to replace existing plates, and the research backing the claims of improved security. The department acknowledged receipt of the request, and after a follow-up, indicated that the information was being processed. However, when no further communication was received, AfriForum proceeded with an internal appeal. One of the organisation's main criticisms is the lack of clarity around pricing. At present in Pretoria, the cost of registration plates varies. A standard set of number plates (front and rear) can cost around R220 to R500 for metal plates with R100 for backing plates if needed. Additional fees may apply for things like attachment frames, service fees for processing the registration, or if you choose personalised plates. 'The only available comparison is the current price of a standard number plate. If the new system involves improved security features, higher production costs are almost inevitable,' said Boshoff. 'Additionally, replacing a number plate may also require a new licence disk, adding to the financial burden on motorists.' Boshoff questioned the project's relevance in addressing Gauteng's urgent challenges. 'Even if the new number plates function exactly as intended, this does not address the core issue, which is weak law enforcement. Without consistent enforcement, the efficacy of advanced number plates is negligible.' AfriForum is also sceptical about the research that supposedly informed the project. According to Boshoff, the organisation has reviewed numerous studies related to road safety and crime prevention in South Africa but has found no compelling evidence linking enhanced number plate security with measurable improvements in these areas. 'If such research does exist, we are baffled as to why the department has failed to share it with the public,' he said. The initiative comes with significant logistical implications. Gauteng is home to over 3.5 million registered vehicles, meaning about 7 million new plates, front and rear, would need to be produced and distributed. For AfriForum, the absence of a transparent budget or feasibility study raises red flags. Boshoff warns that the initiative could follow the same trajectory as the widely criticised e-toll system: 'If this is pushed through without public buy-in or transparency, we could see another stalled project due to mass non-compliance.' While the department maintains that the pilot phase will evaluate the system's cost implications and functionality, concerns persist that vehicle owners will ultimately shoulder the cost of the transition. If prices become too high, organisations like the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) have warned that fleet operators may choose to license their vehicles in other provinces, potentially leading to revenue losses for Gauteng. Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store