Taylor Swift announces new album
The announcement comes after an official countdown was put up on the singer's official website an orange glittery backdrop with the words "expires August 12 at 12:12am ET [Eastern Time]."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Films and video games have age classifications. Should books?
When looking for their next book recommendations, Sylvana, 19, and Ellie, 12, don't tend to browse their local library or bookstore. "If I want to get a certain book, I … just look it up on TikTok," Sylvana says. "I'll be like, 'Oh, what's the best book to read?' "We have found a lot of books that we have gotten into from, like, YouTube," Ellie says. However, Sylvana says the recommendations on these platforms aren't always spot on. "I know my little sister, she was reading some books that she shouldn't have been." The growing influence of BookTok, BookTube, and Bookstagram has a researcher concerned about the content young people are engaging with, and they are calling for an industry-wide book rating classification system. "It really is about, 'Don't judge a book by its cover,'" says Emma Hussey, a digital criminologist and child safeguarding expert at the Australian Catholic University's Institute of Child Protection Studies. "Just because there are cartoons on the front, [it] doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to be developmentally appropriate for a 12 to 17-year-old," she says. Dr Hussey's latest research looked at 20 books that are popular on BookTok, analysing them for domestic violence behaviours, other violence, including torture, murder and destruction of property, and sexually explicit scenes. "Of those books, 65 per cent of them had these domestic violence adjacent behaviours on the page," she says. "The themes that we were seeing were things like manipulation, intimidation, physical restraint, dubious consent, stalking. "At one point, there was a GPS tracker used … we know that technology-facilitated domestic violence is on the increase. "I think, more so than not, you'll find degradation and put-downs littered throughout also." The algorithm on these platforms is another concern for Dr Hussey, as she says it is often based on popularity rather than reader safety, so it will sometimes push adult fiction towards young adult, or YA, readers. Young adult fiction is a category of its own in publishing and is generally aimed at readers between the ages of 12 and 18. "I know that there's a system that authors use to know whether their books are marketed to a younger young adult audience or an older young adult audience [but] that's not made explicit or clear in bookstores or libraries," Dr Hussey says. Children's book specialist Tracy Glover, a bookseller in Adelaide, says she has noticed a shift in the reading habits of young people since the rise of social media. "The … students from the local schools, often when they come in, they come in with a specific request," Ms Glover says. "It might be something they've talked about or someone's mentioned at school; it might be something that's very current on Netflix or TikTok. In saying this, Ms Glover also believes the young adult collection is clearly labelled, at least in the store she works in, which helps guide young people to age-appropriate texts. "We have a fairly clear boundary just by geographically where the [young adult] books are." Additionally, Ms Glover says her bookstore, like many, has age recommendations on a lot of its YA fiction. These recommendations are guided by staff discretion and databases such as Common Sense Media, which are designed with young people's reading and safety in mind. "It's very rare that we have to say to a reader, 'We're just not sure that's going to be suitable for your age level,' but if we felt strongly enough, we would just give that warning," she says. "The 12 to 14-year-olds, we're very mindful with what they choose and what we would recommend for them. As someone who spends a lot of time in bookstores, Faith, 21, says it's easy to identify which areas are dedicated to YA fiction, and she is concerned about the impact age classifications could have on information. "Hard ratings like, 'You can't read this until you're 'X' age,' I think that's limiting people being able to share ideas with each other," she says. As far as what a classification system might look like in practice, Dr Hussey says we don't have to look far to find models that already exist. "We have implemented these sorts of classification systems across streaming websites, across movies that you purchase in store, so it's not a new system," she says. "It's just about bringing that to this new medium that we've not previously considered before." Young adult author Will Kostakis says the way we experience books is fundamentally different from other media, so taking a classification system built for films or video games and applying it to books wouldn't work. "The thing about books is you can actually go into the emotions of an action — you have a character's thoughts throughout," he says. "You would have the character reckoning with consequences afterwards, thinking about it, living in it. Owen, 18, agrees that books sit in a category of their own. "Movies are a bit different because, obviously, you're watching it play out; reading, it's your imagination and you can just close the book if it's too much for you." The idea of classification also raises questions around censorship. "I think it stretches to a level of potential censorship, whether it be unintentional or not," Owen says. "With films, you have to pay to get it tested and see whether or not it's appropriate or not. "I think for like young independent authors, that might stop them from being able to publish their books … I don't think that's a great thing either." Mr Kostakis shares similar concerns, particularly around who determines how texts are classified. "Would it be parents? Would it be politicians? Would it be booksellers? Would it be, you know, publishers?" he says. "The thing is, publishers and booksellers already choose and engaged parents already choose — they are talking to their kids. "We already have rules in place to protect kids, but that can be exploited, and so when we talk about classifications, I'm always worried about not just the next step, but the step four points down the road. Dr Hussey insists this isn't about sanitising literature, but more about increasing awareness. "This is not about banning," she says. "Censorship is about the denial of access, the stopping of access. "This [classification system] does not push or advocate for the removal of access to content. "It's more about giving respect to young adult readers, flagging content that may not be developmentally appropriate for them at that stage, or they may not be ready for." Ms Glover believes more focus should instead be placed on educating readers. "There has to be some responsibility taken from the reader themselves and then from their support system," she says. Mr Kostakis agrees and says we should expect more from our readers. "I grew up in the era of Twilight, all the teen girls in my life weren't like, 'Wow, I can't wait for a 108-year-old who's posing as a teenager to sweep me off my feet,'" he says. "They are getting the feels and all of the tropes and being like, 'Cool. This is a bit romantic. This is a bit spicy,' but I don't think they're looking at these books as manuals on how to live their romantic lives." For Ben, 20, any form of age classification implies that some topics are inherently inappropriate for kids, which he disagrees with. Instead, he thinks young people should be able to access books that reflect the realities of their day-to-day. "When I was like 15, 16, there [weren't] any books that I felt like the content would be super different from what you just experienced in like your daily life. "You're becoming an adult, so you should be exposed to like everything."
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Patrick Mahomes had doubts about Travis Kelce's romance with Taylor Swift at first
Patrick Mahomes was doubtful when Kansas City Chiefs team-mate Travis Kelce told him he was dating Taylor Swift. The Chiefs quarterback revealed that his friend Kelce had told him about the pair's relationship but explained that it was only when the pop star attended her first NFL game in September 2023 that he realised that the romance was genuine. Speaking in the ESPN docuseries The Kingdom, Mahomes said: "He told me during the week. It was one of those where I gotta see it until I believe it." Travis and Taylor's relationship was confirmed when the Blank Space singer attended the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium for the NFL clash against the Chicago Bears and Mahomes admits that her presence at the game generated a "buzz". The 29-year-old sports star said: "You definitely felt the buzz and you could see people in the stadium gravitating towards where she was up there. At the same time, we had business to handle." Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones was astonished when the team discovered Taylor's relationship with Kelce. He recalled in the documentary: "We were in the locker room like, 'Taylor Swift's here. Taylor Swift? For real? With Travis? Oh my God!' "We were like, 'Oh my God Travis pulled Taylor Swift.'" Taylor recently compared Travis wooing her to being a John Hughes movie as she opened up about how the pair's romance came about. The 35-year-old singer said in a revealing interview on her boyfriend and his brother Jason Kelce's New Heights podcast: "This dude didn't get a meet and greet and he's making it everyone's problem. "That's what I thought at first... You realise he didn't even reach out to our management. He came with Pat [Mahomes] and he thought that because he knows the elevator lady, that he could talk to her about just getting down to my dressing room." She continued: "It felt more like I was in an '80s John Hughes movie, and he was standing outside of my window with a boombox saying, 'I want to date you! Do you want to go on a date with me? I made you a friendship bracelet! Do you want to date me?" The Cardigan singer acknowledged that Travis, 35, turned out to be the guy she'd been manifesting in her songs. She smiled: "I was like, 'If this guy's not crazy, this is sort of what I've been writing songs about wanting to happen to me since I was a teenager.'"
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Musk's ‘Spicy Mode' AI porn generator is not just dumb, it's dangerous
Things are happening fast in the world of generative AI, and in the world of online safety. But where the two collide, particularly in the increasingly concerning regulatory environment of the United States, things seem to have shifted practically overnight. We're approaching a place where major Western governments are blocking access to educational material for young girls to learn about their own bodies, while AI scans images of those bodies without consent to make models for generating salacious material on demand. A place where mentions of homosexuality and transgenderism are scrubbed from scientific documents and pressure campaigns stop artists making money off their original erotic content, but where the world's richest man can sell you deepfakes of Taylor Swift's bare breasts for $45 a month. It's easy to imagine a horror-scenario future for our culture, which is already dominated and regulated by an internet that's increasingly privatised and vulnerable to the whims of governments and tech oligarchs. A scenario where certain kinds of sex – like anything that might empower women or queer people – are deemed woke and get buried. While other kinds – like the ability of men to see any woman they want naked, while she's powerless to do anything about it – are fine. And it's all the easier to imagine as the constant procession of AI grossness and conservative government mandates make us so apathetic that barely anybody seems to point it out any more. Last week, Elon Musk's xAI rolled out a public version of its image-generation platform Grok Imagine, with a marquee feature being its ability to turn any generated image into a short video. But true to form for Musk's 'free speech absolutist' X platform, which has a history of allowing, gestating and amplifying harm towards anyone of a different gender, sexuality, skin colour or belief system to the Tesla founder himself, this is mainstream AI video with a recklessly immature difference: an optional 'Spicy Mode' ensures the video output is suggestive or explicitly sexual in nature. The idea is that the user (and they must be a paying user, with access to Grok Imagine starting at $45 a month), can ask for an image of any person they want in any situation they want, and then hit the Spicy button to turn it into soft porn. X is filled with videos of users celebrating and sharing their creations. As you might expect, almost all the generated videos are of women, with videos commonly showing them removing their tops and shorts to expose their naked bodies, rolling around while ripping at skintight suits, or messily eating ice cream that Grok seems to think should become liquid the second it's touched by anything. The videos are uncanny, with moments of photorealism but also strange physics, impossible behaviour, weird shiny textures and other common AI video oddness, plus awful audio. They're also extremely unimaginative, despite the name of the product.
