Costco announces major change for shoppers
From June 30, the retail giant will open its core US warehouses at 9am for executive members, while extending Saturday hours until 7pm for all members.
The changes aim to improve shopping experiences for members who often left frustrated by crowded warehouses.
The decision, however, has triggered a wave of discontent among employees, who are worried about the impact on their schedules and workload.
'Yall ready for 9am openings?' a concerned customer wrote on Reddit.
'Mainly for the employees. How's your warehouse preparing for 9am openings every day. I hear it's starting June 30th. We struggle to get open on 945, I can imagine it's going to be fun every morning in merchandising. I'm assuming there will be no adjustments to schedules or depot times. Just get it done in less time.'
MORE NEWS
Why Aldi, Costco keep snubbing this Aussie state
Bunnings rolls out surprise new item
Inside Australia's haunting mall mystery
The question was met with nearly 400 comments from workers eager to sound off on the change.
One person admitted that the adjustment in hours has the potential to make things 'infinitely worse' for them.
'I'm in the meat department at Costco. It sucks. I already get there at 5am. Now it will be 4am… What sucks is we also will now open an hour later- 2 hours may not sound like a lot be we already struggle to get certain parts of the day covered and certain things done between opening an night crew. This 2 hour change will make it infinitely worse,' they wrote.
Other workers are also struggling to see how the change in hours will benefit them.
'As an employee who drives the cooler 4am to 10 every morning, and front end after, and has a second job to make ends meet and only sleeps 4-5 hours a night, no. No im not,' read one comment on Reddit.
'I hate it. I work in optical and there is no reason we have to be there because nothing is gunna happen. It's for executive members only. So now we are gunna have angry non-executive members too,' another user chimed in.
As Costco expands its footprint in Australia, the question arises: could similar changes be implemented here?
While there is no current indication of such plans, the U.S. scenario serves as a cautionary tale for Australian workers and consumers.
Australian stakeholders, no doubt, will be watching closely, aware that the developments overseas could eventually influence local practices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Real estate agents say new seller disclosure laws are 'bottlenecking' Queensland's property market
New seller disclosure laws in Queensland are contributing to a housing market slowdown, with documentation delays causing a contract "bottleneck". Real estate agents say there's anxiety and frustration over the regime, which came into effect on August 1 and is designed to increase transparency in property transactions and protect buyers. Sellers must provide a mandatory comprehensive disclosure statement before a contract is signed, with information including land contamination, zoning, heritage listings, transport resumption plans and accurate rates and water charges. Brisbane agent Brett Andreassen said the legislation has had an immediate, widespread impact on the housing market. "Right now, it's frozen," Mr Andreassen said. "It's stopping the ability to do contracts … because the entire process is bottlenecked. "It's causing headaches across the board." Mr Andreassen said agents were already experiencing lengthy delays of up to 10 days in getting the full suite of documentation required from relevant agencies and departments. "Previously, I could get a phone call today from someone wanting to sell, we could book in to get the photos for tomorrow, and have the property on the market within days," he said. "[That's] because we'd have a 48-hour turnaround on the paperwork that was required for the contract. "Now, we're waiting seven to 10 days for all the paperwork. It's resulting in lost momentum." It's a sentiment echoed by Antonia Mercorella from the Real Estate Institute of Queensland, who said sales had slowed, particularly for units and apartments. "What we're seeing playing out now is what we feared, which is that it can take time to obtain the necessary information from the relevant suppliers," she said. Fellow Brisbane agent Gabrielle Trickey said the additional requirements were impractical and complex. "It's been a nightmare," Ms Trickey said. "I know one agent who sent out a disclosure statement that's close to 100 pages … not even including the contract. "If you're a first home buyer, you're just buggered — you're looking at so many pages before you even get to the contract." The reforms enable buyers to terminate a contract up until settlement if the required disclosure documents are not provided, or contain insufficient or incorrect details. "As agents, we're all freaked out [by that]," Ms Trickey said. Ms Mercorella said sellers and agents were "right to be nervous". "I've spoken with a number of lawyers who have expressed the view that the regime will be used by some to terminate contracts … we've seen the experience in other jurisdictions," she said. "It's well-known that some buyers will get cold feet and will look for opportunities and grounds for termination. "So, understandably, there is a degree of nervousness that is being experienced." Mr Andreassen said the uncertainty had created the "potential" for "gazumping", which occurs when a buyer and seller agree on a price, but the seller backs out before the paperwork is complete. "It essentially means that if there's a delay between offer and acceptance and the contract being prepared, another buyer could come in and place an offer and beat them to the punch," he said. "Queensland has always avoided it … but it's a real possibility because of these ridiculous delays that we've got." He said many prospective buyers would also likely be "bitterly disappointed" by what's contained in the disclosure statement. "People want to know flood [history], illegal improvements or renovations and termite/asbestos [history] … but there's no requirement for the disclosure of those three things." Ms Mercorella said the REIQ has raised agents' concerns with the state government. "Whenever new legislation starts, it causes a level of disruption … and frustration," she said. "We have been given assurances that they are monitoring and watching closely."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
How Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has gone from dazzling property flipper to secret business trouble
Australians love a tale of property renovation, but one story that's little known is that Queensland Premier David Crisafulli was once a successful house flipper. Between 2005 and 2009, his private family company, Crisafulli Financial Services, bought and sold seven north Queensland houses in rapid, profitable deals. Those successful deals make a disastrous loss on another property in 2022, when he was opposition leader, unusual. The family company lost more than $50,000 on a long-held property sold in a rush. That was just less than a year after he secretly finished paying out liquidators $200,000 to settle claims of botched business oversight. Politicians have private business, but that business is sometimes thrust into the public arena. And the premier's failure to declare private business affairs on a register of interests was found in June to breach parliament's rules. A bipartisan parliamentary ethics committee decided he had failed to declare a liability for the $200,000 liquidator settlement. He had been "careless", and there was evidence he "ought to have known that such payments were to be declared (as a liability) or at least sought the registrar's advice", the committee found. Another question he has since refused to answer is how he paid for the $200,000. Journalist: Did you pay yourself? Premier: I've met my obligations. Did anyone assist him in paying for it? "Well, have a look at the report," he replied, arguing how he paid was "part of the analysis". But the report does not mention how he paid. It goes to what private business of politicians should be public. Transparency International Australia chief executive Clancy Moore said public figures withholding information about financial dealings erodes public trust. He said that was particularly the case when it related to "insolvency and potential conflicts of interest". "Being forthcoming about how a significant financial settlement was funded, especially while serving in public office, would demonstrate a commitment to integrity, reduce speculation and enhance public confidence," Mr Moore said. But back to the profitable days flipping homes in the mid 2000s. Mr Crisafulli's family company was acquiring homes — often in Townsville's battler suburbs — capitalising on demand for housing with quick, hard real estate work. In general, these properties were nothing fancy but could be spruced up. One might have new tiles installed, for instance. It was successful. Property records show Crisafulli Financial Services bought one property for $256,000 in June 2007 and offloaded it by September for $312,000. Another, acquired in December 2006 for $218,000, was sold in March 2008 for $291,000. All told, before costs, the Crisafullis cleared almost $330,000 on those seven homes. By then, Mr Crisafulli had been in local government, later becoming a state minister in the short-lived LNP administration of Campbell Newman. In 2015, Mr Crisafulli lost office and ventured into the private sector. As revealed by the ABC, he landed a job via LNP donor and soccer-fanatic businessman Rabieh Krayem. The pair had known each other from Townsville and Mr Krayem had put forward the now-premier's name as sole director of a long-struggling training organisation SET Solutions. That was the same company in which Mr Krayem had just acquired a 50 per cent stake. Mr Crisafulli lasted mere months in the role — from his appointment in December 2015 until his resignation in April 2016. He was ultimately never paid a wage for his time, and one creditor told the ABC that Mr Crisafulli had been a straight shooter at the business and paid bills when promised. The business, which auditors found had received government funding for more hours of teaching than it had delivered, even when Mr Crisafulli headed the company, collapsed into liquidation in June 2016. Mr Crisafulli returned to parliament in 2017, but the ABC later revealed he had quietly paid liquidators $200,000 to settle claims the training business might have been trading while insolvent while he was at its helm. Such a payment can make business sense even when people do not believe they have done anything wrong. That's because settling liquidator claims privately may be cheaper and less scarring than risking a long battle which could potentially involve public court hearings. Mr Crisafulli secretly paid the settlement in three tranches: $80,000 in March 2020, $60,000 in July 2020 and $60,000 in July 2021. Insolvency industry sources said the multiple transfers can indicate financial strain or an inability to gather sufficient funds for a one-off payment. At the time, Mr Crisafulli's register of interests listed a multi-property portfolio and six Bank of Queensland mortgages. Land records also show an early-mid 2021 sale of one mortgaged property for $2.3 million and a mortgage-backed purchase of another for $745,000 by his wife, Tegan Crisafulli. In February 2022, about half a year after finishing paying the liquidators, his family company tried to offload a Townsville property bought for $287,500 12 years earlier. It was on a big but odd-shaped battleaxe piece of land. Even the sale advertisement was blatant about the property's bad condition: "No point in doing a building and pest." But buyers weren't keen. The asking price dropped. The advertisement suggested selling pressure: "The owner's instructions are clear, and this will be gone before the end of the financial year." By May 2022 it was sold for $230,000, marking a gross loss of $57,500. Mr Crisafulli won't answer why a sale needed to go through that financial year or if he was under strain then. Perhaps he might have wanted cash to make another purchase later, or to bring down borrowing levels. It could be unrelated to the liquidator settlement. But the premier, who had campaigned on his love for small business and transparency, will not clarify that, nor how he financed the $200,000 liquidator settlement. Perhaps he drew down on existing loans. Or family might have provided a payment as a gift — a carve out in the register of interests allows some family contributions to not be declared. In June of this year, when asked how he financed the $200,000 payment, Mr Crisafulli repeated phrasing he'd used before about having met his "obligations". He was asked: Did the $200,000 payment impose obligations on him to other people? "I want to be clear, this was subject to this analysis (the committee report) and I have met my obligations," he responded. Yet the report does not mention how he paid. He had also previously, when asked why he had not listed the liquidators' debt as a liability, maintained he had "met [his] obligations" — a statement the ethics committee later found was incorrect. Transparency International's Mr Moore said even if a payments disclosure "is not technically required under the letter of the law, the spirit of democratic accountability calls for more openness". "Transparency is not a technicality, it is a test of leadership." Deputy Opposition Leader Cameron Dick argued in June that questions remained.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Five-storey buildings could replace farmland on Sunshine Coast CBD block
Developers had their eyes on Maroochydore's Wises Farm for decades, and for good reason. The prime parcel of land on Queensland's Sunshine Coast lies mere minutes from the Maroochydore city centre and Alexandra Headland beach. The late Peter Wise's staunch stance against urban development made the 39-hectare site, bordered by the Sunshine Motorway and Wises Road, even more alluring and valuable. The recent purchase of the land by Brisbane-based firm QM Properties, for an eye-watering $93.5 million, has only served to thrust it back into the spotlight. Maroochydore's last remaining undeveloped private land was sold with preliminary approval for low to medium density housing, and a maximum of 570 homes, or a maximum of 800 units. Plans submitted to Sunshine Coast Council in May show large sections of the site could include housing up to 15 metres, or about five storeys. The plans also retain many of the existing trees that line a creek along the site, and make provisions for a park and a small shopping centre. But longtime Sunshine Coast councillor Ted Hungerford said the plans were still subject to change. "I'm waiting to see whether they [QM Properties] continue to the current application that is being assessed by our planners or whether they bury that or whether they want to go with a whole new plan," he said. QM Properties was unavailable for an interview. A spokesperson said they understood the public interest but were not in a position to provide further comment or answer questions. The company's website states that it was founded in 1976 and its projects are "thoughtfully located, engineered and designed to suit market demand". "Adopting best practice and innovative solutions ensures QM developments are sensitive to both people and the environment," the website reads. David and Joannne Ellaby have lived along Wises Road for 14 years and worry about the impact on traffic. Mr Ellaby said there was already a large church, school, funeral home and sportsgrounds further up the road. "Some afternoons when the school's coming out, there's a football or a sporting thing happening at the rugby league club — it's a mess," Mr Ellaby said. "Then you add another 10,000 car movements coming out [of the new development], so it would be nice to know what traffic mitigation the council and the town planners are thinking about putting in here." The couple said that while they understood the need for more housing, they were concerned about the direction the Sunshine Coast was heading with higher-density living. "So many people have said over the years that we don't want it to be another Gold Coast, but unfortunately now it's seeming that way," Ms Ellaby said. Mr Ellaby said he had concerns about how the local council was handling the extra growth. "It just needs to be done in a sensible way and they're not doing that. And I'm pretty sure most other people who live here would agree with that," he said. Val Moran, who also lives along Wises Road, said he supported the project as it would provide much-needed housing for the region. "I have seen the [preliminary] plans and I think they're quite good," Mr Moran said. "There'll be open space along this road and of course a creek going through, so the creek will represent another green area." Jackie Le Roux, from local business group 4556 Chamber, said the development provided "fresh opportunities". "It will actually increase foot traffic for retailers, tradespeople, service providers, hospitality operators," Ms Le Roux said. "From a business point of view there is a positive embracing of the vision because it does help the local economy." Nicole Bennets from the Planning Institute of Australia said the site was well-suited to urban development. "We don't get parcels of land like this very often at all in South-East Queensland … most other land coming to market sits on the fringe of cities," Ms Bennets said. "This piece of land has good proximity to existing roads and other infrastructure so it means less cost for governments to actually deliver all the infrastructure required." She said under the Sunshine Coast Council's draft planning scheme there was also requirements on future developments to ensure they were creating "complete" communities. "If you're starting to push up around 500 dwellings on a site like this, you would expect to see some local parks being delivered and other amenities for those residents," she said. "Providing the services and infrastructure and amenities that they need in order to live really well."
