Poland's prime minister warns of Russian interference before election that could change European landscape
Polish
prime minister
Donald Tusk
said on Friday that
Russian
hackers were attacking the website of his Civic Platform party website in advance of Sunday's first-round presidential election.
Nearly 29 million Poles go to the polls in a two-round process that will determine the country's defence policy and EU path for years to come.
The final days of the campaign have seen warnings by Poland's national cybersecurity agency (Nask) about operations on social media 'aimed at destabilising the electoral process'. Mr Tusk wrote on Twitter/X that a known Russian hacker group was 'conducting intensive activities ... the attack is ongoing'.
Though 13 candidates are running for president, Sunday's poll is the latest proxy clash between liberal conservative Mr Tusk and Jaroslaw Kaczynski, his political nemesis and national conservative opposition leader.
READ MORE
Each of their parties has fielded a presidential candidate to help – or hinder – the Tusk government's policy ambitions and efforts to restore the rule of law.
Mr Tusk's 'hacker' warning on Friday came as his party's presidential election candidate, Rafal Trzaskowski, dropped three points in a final poll to 30 per cent support.
Five years ago the 53-year-old liberal Warsaw mayor lost narrowly a problematic pandemic-era presidential poll. Today he is still seen as a pro-EU and liberal candidate, but has shifted with the public mood to take a harder stance in the campaign against migration and welfare for Ukrainians in Poland.
A Trzaskowski victory would end the Tusk government's uneasy cohabitation – and legislative deadlock – with outgoing two-term president Andrzej Duda, an ally of Mr Kaczynski.
Poland's president has far-reaching control of the armed forces and has powers to veto or stall legislation, something Mr Duda has done regularly in the last 18 months.
With Mr Duda unable to run for a third term, Mr Kaczynski's national conservative Law and Justice party (PiS) has fielded Karol Nawrocki.
The 42-year-old conservative historian is head of the Institute of National Memory and has a steady 25 per cent support in polls.
With no candidate likely to take at least 50 per cent support, Polish election rules mean a second ballot – mostly likely between Mr Trzaskowski and Mr Nawrocki – will be held on June 1st.
In a series of heated debates, candidates have clashed over housing, healthcare, abortion, refugees and Russia – but neither Mr Trzaskowski nor Mr Nawrocki landed a knockout blow on each other.
Complicating the race is Slawomir Mentzen, a 38-year-old social media-savvy candidate of the far-right Confederation Party. His initial popularity among younger male voters, with anti-EU rhetoric and agitation against refugees, has slid after he backed university fees and a total abortion ban, even in cases of rape.
Transfers will be key in the second round poll on June 1st, with Mr Trzaskowski likely to secure voters from losing candidates of Mr Tusk's coalition partners. As the government-backed candidate, he has become a target of voters who backed Mr Tusk's return to power and are frustrated with the coalition's progress.
That, and signs of growing voter apathy after a recent run of elections, mean turnout could be as much a deciding factor as any candidate's arguments.
Even before this week's cyber attack warnings, analysts saw the election as a major stress test for Polish democracy, given PiS and far-right candidates have already been preparing narratives of stolen and rigged elections – to be activated if they lose.
'Meanwhile a victory of Nawrocki would also mean snap parliamentary elections and Poland moving away from its strategic partners in Europe,' said Mateusz Mazzini, a Warsaw-based political analyst. 'It can change the landscape entirely for a lot of people in Europe.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
26 minutes ago
- The Journal
Government rejects motion calling on it to stop sale of 'Israeli war bonds'
GOVERNMENT HAS REJECTED a joint-proposal from the opposition which called on the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds within the EU, an issue that has moved up the political agenda in Ireland in recent months. The motion, put forward by the Social Democrats and supported by Sinn Féin, People Before Profit and the Labour Party, sought the reversal of a previous government decision to block a bill calling for the same measure last month . Members of those parties on Monday requested that a free 'vote of conscience' take place on the issue – meaning that government TDs would not have to vote with their party. The motion was defeated this evening 85 to 71 in the government's favour. Israeli State Bonds have been advertised as a method to support the country's economy and, more recently, websites promoting the investments have emphasised their importance to Israel's military operations in Gaza. Some TDs, as a result, have dubbed the securities as 'Israeli war bonds'. Coalition-supporting TDs, independents Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole, repeated their vote to support the opposition's call . Both TDs previously said that they had a right to vote, as independents, in a manner they agreed with, pointing out that the programme for government does not include references to the issue. Advertisement Bonds from countries outside the EU must have legal documents approved by a central bank from a member state in order for the securities to be sold within the European single market. In the case of Israel, the country is Ireland. A protest outside the Dáil today calling on government to support the opposition's motion. Alamy Alamy The Central Bank itself is responsible for assessing whether the products it offers are compliant with these EU requirements. Since Hamas's attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and Israel's subsequent bombardment and siege of Gaza, there has been mounting pressure on the Government from pro-Palestinian activists in Ireland to stop the facilitation of the sale of these bonds. But, Governor of the Central Bank Gabriel Makhlouf today defended its offerings, telling TDs at an Oireachtas Committee that the UN's Genocide Convention applies only to the Irish State, not the country's banking regulator. Activists have demonstrated at the site in Dublin over the last number of months and have called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. Speaking during a Fine Gael parliamentary party meeting this evening, finance minister Paschal Donohoe told members that oppositional TDs wanted the government to tell the state's banking regulator what to do, despite its mandated independence. The Dublin Central TD said government cannot approve legislation that impedes on the independence of the Central Bank for legal purposes. Opposition TDs argued this evening that, as the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza, Ireland has obligations under the UN's Genocide Convention to use 'all means likely to have a deterrent effect' on those suspected of committing such crimes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
37 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Government will be on 'the wrong side' of history over Israeli bonds decision, opposition says
The Government has been warned it is on the "the wrong side" of history after rejecting a motion to prevent the facilitation of Israeli war bonds. Opposition parties united behind a motion demanding the Government enact emergency legislation to explicitly force the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israel bonds. The Social Democrats motion, supported by Sinn Féin, Labour, and People Before Profit-Solidarity also called on the coalition to advise the bank that "by acting as the enabling cog in Israel's fund-raising machine in the EU, it is putting the State at risk of a charge of complicity in genocide". However, the Government's countermotion stated that it had "received advice from the Attorney General that recently proposed legislation to introduce 'restrictive measures' was not compatible with our obligations as members of the EU and in conflict with Article 215 and Article 63 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU". The motion with the amendment put forward by the Government was then passed by 85 votes to 71. Speaking in the Dáil ahead of the vote, finance minister Paschal Donohoe said: "Despite the human feelings I have and the determination of the Government to respond to this, I have to recognise the law with regard to the EU and the law that recognises the independent operation of the Central Bank of Ireland." But Social Democrats TD Cian O'Callaghan claimed that the Government was "hiding behind technicalities" and could act on the matter if it wanted to. Let us be clear about this. Genocide is taking place and is being part-funded by the sale of Israeli bonds including in Europe, which is being facilitated by the Irish Central Bank. Sinn Fein's Pearse Doherty described Mr Donohoe's response as "shameful", adding: "History will show that the minister is on the wrong side of this issue. He has used carefully constructed words to tell us what we cannot do. "However, the reality is that if Government wants to initiate national measures that will ensure that the Central Bank does not sign off on a prospective and therefore, not facilitate the sale of these war bonds in Ireland, then it can do so."
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Taoiseach labelling Israel's actions in Gaza ‘genocide' won't stop Central Bank approving ‘war bonds', governor tells TDs
So-called 'war bonds', which it is claimed are being used to fund the killing of innocent children and civilians in Gaza, are under intense scrutiny as a second Dáil motion was tabled to ban them. The Central Bank faced sustained questioning from TDs and senators at the Oireachtas Finance Committee, but insisted it is legally required to approve the legal document, or prospectus, required for the sale of the bonds. To be sold in the EU, bonds from non-EU countries must have their bond prospectus approved by an EU country. Israel traditionally had its European bond prospectuses approved in the UK, but turned to the Central Bank in Ireland for authorisations after Brexit. The Governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, said it was 'incorrect' to claim it can impose sanctions on the processing of the bonds on the basis of international court rulings. He said it is up to international bodies including the UN and the EU to respond to breaches of international law by Israel, and to determine if sanctions are necessary. 'The Central Bank cannot impose sanctions on Israel – for example by refusing to approve the Israeli bond prospectus – in circumstances where the EU has not imposed any such sanctions itself,' he told TDs and senators. The Central Bank said its approval for Israel trading bonds in the EU is due for renewal in September. 'We will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at that time and will make a judgment on it,' said the Central Bank governor. A number of TDs, including Sinn Féin's Pearse Doherty and Cian O'Callaghan of the Social Democrats, said Ireland was a signatory to the Genocide Convention and this would enable the Central Bank to reject Israel's bond prospectuses. But Mr Makhlouf said the body is not bound by the Genocide Convention, but rather EU financial regulations, when deciding whether to facilitate the sale of bonds. ADVERTISEMENT The current prospectus is due for renewal again in September. 'If, when the state of Israel looks to renew its prospectus we will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at the time and we will make a judgment on it,' he said. But this will be based on the requirements of the financial regulations. 'The fact that the Taoiseach made the statement at the time, that is not going to change the judgement we come to,' he said, referring to Micheál Martin's comments last month that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Ahead of last night's Dáil vote on a Bill enabling the Central Bank to stop facilitating Israeli bonds. Sinn Féin urged government TDs to 'have a backbone'. Deputy Doherty said: 'We have to ensure the State has no hand, act or part in facilitating the sale of Israeli war bonds. These aren't just financial instruments, this is the money that is raised that pays for the bombs that pays for the bullets that pays for the destruction of the lives of men, women and children across Palestine as we speak.' Deputy O'Callaghan said while Independent TDs backing the Government had a free vote on the motion, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael TDs had to vote along with the party whip. 'That is utterly unjust and unfair,' he said. 'If there was a free vote, this motion would pass and that would put the Central Bank under severe pressure to stop facilitating the sale of these bonds and would cut off a source of finance for the genocide that is taking place.' Labour's Conor Sheehan said: 'It is not enough to just call this a genocide. We need to make Israel an international pariah.'
