Global shipping navigates Trump tariffs uncertainty
In the long run, shipping companies expect a decline in freight rates - as happened in 2018 to 2019 during Trump's first presidential term.
Back then liners "experienced an oversupply of shipping capacity, decreased shipping rates, increased operational costs and ultimately, a reduction in revenue", said Sandy Gosling, specialist in transport and logistics at consulting firm McKinsey.
Tariffs then were lower than those announced by Trump this year.
"It's difficult to see into the future but what seems most likely to us is a slowing of certain routes in favour of other countries in Southeast Asia or India," said Charpentier.
Anne-Sophie Fribourg, vice president of ocean procurement at British freight forwarder Zencargo, said she expected the China-US route would become unprofitable.
If this were to happen, she said, "shipowners will readjust their rotations. In other words, they will turn away from traditional routes to new ones, such as Latin America, where demand has been growing for some time now".
For the time being, major international companies such as MSC, CMA CGM and Maersk have not made such adjustments. ADJUSTING ROUTES
German container shipping firm Hapag-Lloyd said it was not noticing any changes on the Atlantic.
It however saw a "massive decline in China", offset by "a clear increase in demand in South-East Asia".
Consulting firm Boston Consulting Group said in a note sent to its clients that it expected a sharp decline in China-US trade and an increase in trade within what it called the "Global South".
The World Trade Organization (WTO) warned of a potential "even sharper decline of 1.5 per cent in global goods trade" in 2025, depending on Trump's tariffs policy.
It said merchandise trade between China and the US could plunge by 81 per cent.
Gosling said tariffs are just the latest of many disruptions the shipping industry suffered in recent decades.
"According to a 2020 McKinsey Global Institute report, industries have experienced material disruptions lasting a month or longer every 3.7 years on average," she said.
Logistical chains were upended during the COVID-19 years, before Houthi attacks in the Red Sea drove vessels to round Africa via the Cape of Good Hope. Shipowners have developed a certain "agility to change routes," said Fribourg of Zencargo.
But adjusting flows toward other destinations "will take some time", Charpentier said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Germany's Merz tempers expectations of breakthroughs in Trump talks
FILE PHOTO: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz delivers a speech at the German Association of Towns and Municipalities event in Berlin, Germany, June 3, 2025. REUTERS/Christian Mang/File Photo WASHINGTON/BERLIN - German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he would discuss Russia's war in Ukraine, U.S. tariffs and NATO in his first meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday, but was not expecting major breakthroughs. Merz, a conservative who took office last month, was scheduled to join Trump for a meeting in the Oval Office and a White House lunch that analysts say could set the tone for U.S.-German ties for years to come. "I look forward to the talks although I do not expect us to make major breakthroughs on these three topics," Merz told reporters ahead of the meeting, his first with Trump as chancellor of Germany, Europe's largest economy. Trade will be a key topic along with ending the Ukraine war, Merz said. Germany is the second largest military and financial backer of Ukraine in its defence against Russia's invasion, after the United States. While Trump has threatened tariffs to slash Germany's substantial trade surplus, Merz said he would counter that his country is also the third biggest direct investor in the United States. The meeting comes amid a broader fraying of ties between the U.S. and many European countries. Trump's administration has, for example, intervened in domestic European politics in a break with past practice, aligning with right-wing political movements and challenging European policies on immigration and free speech. The Merz-Trump encounter will be closely watched after some dramatic Oval Office meetings in recent months in which the U.S. leader scolded Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, and made false assertions. Merz, 69, and his entourage have sought coaching from other leaders on how to deal with Trump to avoid conflict, according to a source briefed on the matter. The meeting is taking place just weeks before a critical summit of the NATO Western military alliance, which has been strained by Trump's threats that the U.S. will not come to the aid of allies that do not increase their defence spending. Such threats are of particular concern to Germany, which has relied on U.S. nuclear deterrence for its security since the end of World War Two. Merz has already made some bold policy moves that he can highlight to appease Trump, analysts said. He has backed Trump's demand for NATO members to commit to a target of more than doubling defence spending to 5% of economic output in the future, earning praise last weekend from U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Merz, who has promised a more assertive foreign policy, also coordinated a visit by European leaders to Kyiv just days after taking office, two European diplomat sources said. "This shows that Germany is willing to accept a greater responsibility for Ukraine and the European security order – these are all things that have been wished for in the United States over years and will be welcomed," said Sudha David-Wilp of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The fact Merz was invited to stay in the Blair House guest quarters across from the White House is a positive signal, said analysts. TO ARGUE OR NOT WITH TRUMP Merz and Trump could find some common ground given they share business backgrounds, membership in right-of-centre political parties, a focus on fighting illegal immigration and a fondness for golf, said Steven Sokol, President and CEO of the American Council on Germany. Merz has described himself as "a convinced transatlanticist", chairing the "Atlantic Bridge", a non-profit fostering U.S.-German ties, for 10 years. "They might discover a kindred spirit," Sokol said. However, analysts noted huge frictions in the U.S.-German relationship. "The challenge that he could face is ... if Trump says something is erroneous, do you correct him? Do you risk turning it into an argument?" said Jeffrey Rathke, a former U.S. diplomat and president of the American-German Institute at the Johns Hopkins University in Washington. Merz was publicly critical of Trump shortly before the 2024 presidential election. On the eve of his own party's election victory in February, Merz criticised the "ultimately outrageous" comments flowing from Washington during the campaign, comparing them to hostile interventions from Russia. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trump and Xi agree to further talks to settle trade disputes
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping agreed to further talks between the countries to hash out differences on tariffs that have roiled the global economy, according to US and Chinese summaries of their phone call on Thursday (Jun 5). 'There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of rare earth products,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined.' Trump and a Chinese government summary of the meeting said the leaders had invited each other to their respective countries at a future date. 'The US side should take a realistic view of the progress made and withdraw the negative measures imposed on China,' the Chinese government said in a statement published by the state-run Xinhua news agency. 'Xi Jinping welcomed Trump's visit to China again, and Trump expressed his sincere gratitude.' The highly anticipated call came amid accusations between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over 'rare earths' minerals in a dispute that has threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives, who say the uncertainty has made it difficult to forecast market conditions. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets continues to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Beijing sees mineral exports as a source of leverage – halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot produce mineral-powered products. The 90-day deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions is tenuous. Trump has accused China of violating the agreement and has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China, while also doubling steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 per cent. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter-measures. In recent years, the US has identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the US economically and militarily. Despite this and repeated trade threats and tariff announcements, Trump has spoken admiringly of Xi, including of the Chinese leader's toughness and ability to stay in power without the term limits imposed on US presidents. Trump has long pushed for a call or a meeting with Xi, but China has rejected that as not in keeping with its traditional approach of working out agreement details before the leaders talk. The US president and his aides see leader-to-leader talks as vital to sort through log-jams that have vexed lower-level officials in difficult negotiations. Thursday's call came at Trump's request, China said. It's not clear when the two men last spoke. Both sides said they spoke on Jan 17, days before Trump's inauguration and Trump has repeatedly said that he had spoken to Xi since taking office on Jan 20. He has declined to say when any call took place or to give details of their conversation. China had said that the two leaders had not had any recent phone calls. The talks are being closely watched by investors worried that a chaotic trade war could cut into corporate earnings and disrupt supply chains in the key months before the Christmas holiday shopping season. Trump's tariffs are also the subject of ongoing litigation in US courts. Trump has met Xi on several occasions, including exchange visits in 2017, but they have not met face to face since 2019 talks in Osaka, Japan. Xi last traveled to the US in November 2023, for a summit with then-President Joe Biden, resulting in agreements to resume military-to-military communications and curb fentanyl production. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
How EU takes bigger defence role is main Europe-US issue, Costa says
BRUSSELS - The main issue in relations between the European Union and the United States is the EU taking on more responsibility for its own defence, while the trade dispute is only a distraction, the chairman of EU leaders Antonio Costa said on Thursday. Speaking to reporters ahead of talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada next week and a NATO summit in two weeks, Costa said the 27-nation European Union should focus on the main issue. "The main issue is the United States wanting to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. This is the real main issue," Costa said. "The United States has legitimately decided that they have new strategic priorities and we need to agree with the United States how during the coming years we can rebalance the burden-sharing on European defence in the most fair and effective way with very important concerns: never, never, never undermine the deterrence effect of Article 5 of the NATO Treaty," Costa said. European leaders have been scrambling to boost their defences against a potential Russian attack after the Trump administration made clear since it took office that the U.S. was no longer willing to be the main guarantor of Europe's security. At the same time, the EU and the U.S. are in negotiations on rebalancing their trade relationship, with Washington pushing to reduce its trade deficit with Europe in trade in goods. Washington has already imposed 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium and 25% tariffs on cars and car parts, in addition to a 10% tariff on most other goods. The EU is preparing its own retaliation package. "We need to ...focus on the main issue: how to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. If we start creating other kinds of problems between us, we are only creating irritants, losing the focus on the main issue," Costa said. NATO leaders -- which includes 23 European Union countries -- are to discuss on June 24-26 whether to boost defence spending to 5% of GDP from the current 2% following a call for such higher spending from Trump. Costa said that a few years ago boosting European defence capabilities was seen as undermining NATO, but the same action now was seen as the best way to preserve the transatlantic relationship. He also said the amounts spent on defence were secondary to how they were spent and the best option was for EU countries to coordinate their efforts and spending to create a collective defence capability. "Whether we need to increase spending to 3.5%, 5%, etc is not the question, because we are not looking at a magic number. We need to define ...what are the capabilities we need to build, what are the gaps we need to fill, and how we could invest in these capabilities in the coming years," Costa said. "Nobody is talking about a European army. What we need is to have one, very robust and effective, deterrence and collective defence system. And that's why what we need to do, is invest together ... based on the plans approved by NATO," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
