Trump demands official overseeing US jobs data be fired over dismal report
Mr Trump in a post on his social media platform alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired.
'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social.
No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes
'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.'
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
Ms McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics in January 2024.
Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired.
The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
Mr Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data.
Job gains in the US in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and in June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000.
In July, only 73,000 positions were added.
The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%.
'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Mr Trump wrote.
'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.'
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets.
The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5% lower Friday.
While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted US government economic data as free from political manipulation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
36 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality
The Irish Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Russia walks out of ballistic missile treaty with US as Medvedev warns nemesis Donald Trump & Europe ‘expect more'
The treaty banned missiles capable of hitting targets up to 3,400 miles away ROCKET MAN Russia walks out of ballistic missile treaty with US as Medvedev warns nemesis Donald Trump & Europe 'expect more' DMITRY Medvedev slammed NATO's 'anti-Russian policy' for driving Russia to scrap the Cold War-era moratorium on nuclear missiles. In his latest online clash with Donald Trump, the ex-Russian president ominously warned the West to 'expect further steps'. 5 The Kremlin announced on Monday it was withdrawing from its self-imposed ban on deploying mid- and short-range missiles Credit: Getty 5 Ex-President Dmitry Medvedev said Russia's withdrawal was 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy' Credit: AFP 5 Footage released by the Russian Defence Ministry on March 2024 purportedly shows the test firing of an ICBM Credit: AFP Medvedev's comments came shortly after Russia's Foreign Ministry said the country no longer regarded itself bound by the moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles. The ex-president wrote on X on Monday: "The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy. "This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps." The deputy head of Russia's powerful Security Council did not elaborate on the nature of the "further steps". The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed in December 1987 by US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. But the US withdrew from the treaty in 2019, accusing Russia of breaking the rules. Moscow has since said it will not deploy the missiles - with ranges of 311 to 3,418 miles - unless Washington does first. But Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned last December that Moscow would have to respond to what he called the US and NATO's "destabilising actions". The ministry said: "Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of U.S.-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared." It comes as Trump said on Friday that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned to "the appropriate regions". Russia and China begin war games in Sea of Japan after Trump nuclear threat Trump and Medvedev have been locked in a war of words after the ex-Russian president accused Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game' over the White House's push to end the war in Ukraine. Trump first gave Putin 50 days to end the war - but slashed the deadline to just 10 days from July 29 due to a lack of progress on Moscow's part. The US president also vowed to impose secondary tariffs on Russia if a ceasefire agreement is not reached by August 8. Medvedev ominously warned Trump that Russia "isn't Israel or even Iran". 5 It comes as Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned near Russia Credit: Getty 5 A photo taken from video released by the Russian Defence Ministry in August 2024 of a Russian Army Buk-2M missile system targeting Ukraine Credit: AP "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war," he wrote on a post on X. Trump blasted Medvedev's comments as 'foolish and inflammatory' before ordering nuclear submarines to be deployed near Russian waters. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions," Trump wrote on Truth Social. The US has the world's largest fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, led by the USS Virginia - a 377-foot vessel armed with cruise missiles.
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
US government restricts sports visas for transgender women
Under the policy update, USCIS will consider 'the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women' as a negative factor when evaluating visa petitions in categories such as O-1A for extraordinary ability, EB-1 and EB-2 green cards for highly skilled workers, and national interest waivers. 'USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,' said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser. 'It's a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the US to participate in women's sports.' The move aligns with broader efforts by the administration of US President Donald Trump to regulate transgender participation in athletics and follows similar policies enacted at the state level across the country. The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee last month updated its policy to align with an executive order signed earlier this year by Trump barring transgender women from competing in women's sports. Trump signed the 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' order in February, a directive that supporters said will restore fairness but critics argue infringes on the rights of a tiny minority of athletes.
