logo
Seven harsh truths we've learned as young female business founders

Seven harsh truths we've learned as young female business founders

1News05-05-2025

Fifteen years of working in the finance world didn't prepare Victoria Harris for the harsh realities young female entrepreneurs face when they seek investment in a startup. She shares seven lessons she and business partner Sophie Hallwright learned when they co-founded their business
Let's set the scene. Before The Curve, I (Vic) spent about 15 years in the finance world hearing investment pitches — slick decks, sharp suits, confident projections. I thought I'd seen it all.
So when it was our turn to raise money for our own business, I thought: 'We've got this'. We had the numbers. We had the traction. We had a big, world-changing idea.
LOL. What I veeeeeery quickly learned is that being a female founder in a male-dominated industry is a whole different game — and the rules aren't exactly fair.
Here are seven raw, honest truths we uncovered along the way.
The Curve co-founder Victoria Harris tells Breakfast about the brutal - but beautiful - truths of raising money as female business founders. (Source: Breakfast)
You read that right.
Less than 2% of global venture capital funding (or VC) goes to women-led startups — and it shows.
That means out of every $100 invested, less than $2 goes to women. And it's not because our ideas aren't good enough. It's because we often don't look like what investors expect to see when they hear the word 'founder'. So we were already playing catch-up the second we walked through the door (or entered the Google Meet) — pitching ourselves before we even pitched the business.
One of the hardest — and most frustrating — truths to accept? People back people who look like them. It's not always conscious, but it's deeply human. We gravitate toward the familiar. We trust what we recognise.
And in finance, that usually means men investing in… you guessed it, men. And in the world of finance, the 'norm' is still white, male, and very at home on the corporate ladder.
So what happens when two women in their early 30s walk into the room, talking about a finance platform built for women, by women?
We've felt the shift. The tilt of a head. The polite-but-sceptical smile.
Suddenly, our ambition is seen as 'aggressive". Our confidence gets side-eyed.
We've had our numbers picked apart, not because they didn't stack up — but because they came from us.
Spoiler: we didn't just know the numbers — we built them.
This is the part that truly blows our minds. Female-founded startups generate 78 cents of revenue for every dollar invested. Male-founded ones? Just 31 cents. And yet, women get a tiny fraction of the funding. Whhhaaaat??
To go even further, female founders generate 10% more revenue over five years than their male counterparts. The numbers don't lie — women-led businesses deliver.
Having seen hundreds of investment pitches in my previous career, I thought I'd be immune to the nerves.
Wrong. It's totally different when it's your baby on the table.
Your dream. Your pitch. Your vision that someone's about to judge — usually in a room full of people who've never had to fight this hard to be taken seriously. The imposter syndrome is real.
Turns out, when women pitch to investors, we're not just judged more harshly — we're asked completely different questions.
Men are way more likely to be asked about how big their business could be — things like growth, potential, and vision.
Us? We got grilled about what could go wrong. Risk, churn, competition, failure.
So while a male founder might be asked, 'How will you scale to a million users?' we got, 'How will you stop people from leaving?'
Even worse? When asked these questions, we naturally answered in the tone of the question. So when we are asked about risk, we naturally talk about risk — and boom, you stay stuck in the 'safe but small' box reserved for women. The cycle repeats.
And the sad news is that we weren't even conscious of this happening until after we'd left the room and it was too late to change the dialogue. Cool.
We pitched The Curve over 100 times to various potential investors. Some meetings were energising. Some were soul-crushing.
Some investors loved the idea but didn't understand the space. Others thought it was 'a bit niche' (aka 'for women', who are over 50% of the population, I might add).
Eventually, we stopped trying to win everyone over. Instead, we focused on finding the right people — investors who got it, who got us, and who had a passion to be a part of something bigger than just our business.
We've always been protective of The Curve. It's our firstborn. So the idea of bringing in outside investors? Terrifying. What if they didn't get it? What if they tried to change it?
But we made a decision early on: we didn't want to just take money. We wanted to take the right money. The kind that comes with belief, support, and the kind of brainpower that helps you scale.
The Curve now has a group of investors filled with incredibly talented women, fintech veterans, brand experts, and operators who know how to build things that last.
And yes, we eventually raised the money we needed to raise our baby.
So, if you're a woman thinking about raising capital — do it. Just know it'll be tough. Know the stats aren't on your side (yet). But also know that the more women who raise money, grow their businesses and scale — the more we change the narrative.
Also remember, fear is growth.
If you ever need a gut check, a pep talk or a behind-the-scenes download, our DMs are wide open.
Let's raise the curve.
Victoria Harris (with Sophie Hallwright) runs The Curve, a finance education platform.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google unveils Gemini AI features for smarter emails & meetings
Google unveils Gemini AI features for smarter emails & meetings

Techday NZ

time24-05-2025

  • Techday NZ

Google unveils Gemini AI features for smarter emails & meetings

Google has announced a range of new features for Workspace, integrating AI capabilities from Gemini to enhance productivity across email, meetings, video creation, and document writing. Gemini in Gmail introduces personalised smart replies that consider a user's previous emails and Google Drive content. This aims to streamline drafting responses by offering suggestions that match the user's tone and context. According to Google, "Personalized smart replies in Gmail will help you draft emails that match your specific context and your tone. By pulling from your past emails and Google Drive, Gemini provides response suggestions with specific details that are more relevant and on point, eliminating the need to dig through your inbox and files yourself. Crucially, it also adapts to your typical tone — whether crisp and formal or warm and conversational — so your replies sound authentically like you." The company states these features will be generally available later in the year. Managing email clutter is also addressed with inbox cleanup automation. Users can instruct Gemini to perform actions such as deleting or archiving emails based on user-set criteria. Google says, "Gemini doesn't just help you write and find emails; now it can take over those time-consuming and dreaded email tasks, starting with deleting or archiving emails you no longer need. Reclaim control over your emails with inbox cleanup. Simply tell Gemini what you want to do (e.g., 'Delete all of my unread emails from The Groomed Paw from last year') and watch as it helps you manage and declutter your inbox with a single click." This feature is expected to be available to users next quarter. Gemini also looks to ease meeting scheduling challenges, especially with external contacts, through fast appointment scheduling integrated in Gmail. The system detects scheduling intent and facilitates sharing booking pages directly within emails to clients or customers. "Now, with fast appointment scheduling integrated into Gmail, you can easily offer times for customers or clients to book, without ever leaving your inbox. Gemini in Gmail detects when you're trying to set up a meeting and surfaces a helpful nudge, making it easy to share your booking page right in Gmail, significantly reducing the time and effort spent coordinating schedules," Google explained. This will also be generally available in the next quarter. On the communication front, Google Meet will begin rolling out a speech translation feature for its AI Pro and Ultra plan subscribers, initially supporting English and Spanish. The function translates spoken word in near real time while retaining the original speaker's tone and expression. "This new feature translates your spoken words into your listener's preferred language — in near real time, with low-latency, and while preserving your voice, tone, and expression. The result is a conversation that feels authentic and natural, even across languages — whether it's English-speaking grandchildren chatting effortlessly with their Spanish-speaking grandparents, or global colleagues connecting across continents." Google announced that wider language support and early enterprise testing are planned for the coming months. Google Vids, introduced last year to support video production, receives several upgrades. Users can convert Google Slides presentations into videos, with Gemini assisting in generating scripts, voiceovers, and animations. "With Vids, you can turn existing Google Slides into engaging videos. Imagine transforming an existing sales deck or a quarterly business review presentation into dynamic, shareable videos that truly capture your audience's attention. Gemini can help generate scripts, voiceovers, animations, and more," the company stated. These features are anticipated to be widely available next quarter. Automatic transcript trimming in video recordings will allow users to remove filler words and pauses, and a sound balance tool will adjust audio levels with one click. "Gemini generates a transcript of your recording, then identifies and removes filler words and awkward pauses with one click. If your video's sound quality is uneven, you're also a single click away from adjusting sound levels across the entire video with balance sound. No complicated audio mixing needed!" Google specified, with sound balance available next month and transcript trimming in Labs next quarter. Another addition is the use of AI avatars for video content, providing a way to create scripted video presentations without recording human presenters. Google described, "With AI avatars in Vids, you can skip the hassle of coordinating talent and video production. Just write a script and choose an avatar to deliver your message for you. It's a fast, consistent way to create polished video content — for onboarding, announcements, product explainers, and more — without the cameras or coordination headache." This feature will become available in Labs next month. For visual content, the latest Imagen 4 model will now be available in Slides, Vids, and Docs, enabling users to generate images with improved detail, text rendering, and accuracy. Google highlighted, "This means you'll be able to create richer, more detailed visuals with ease, with more accurate spelling and text rendering, whether you're designing product mock-ups, generating visually striking graphics for your brand campaign, or developing engaging infographics for your quarterly presentation." Google Docs will introduce source-grounded writing help, allowing users to link related data and documents directly into the writing process, ensuring Gemini's assistance is focused on specified content sources. "Now you can link any relevant decks, data, and reports directly into a Google Doc and Gemini will only pull from these sources when providing writing assistance, keeping suggestions focused and grounded in trusted content. So whether you're working on a status update, a research summary, or a business plan, you're writing with exactly the context you need — no guesswork, no switching tabs," Google said. General availability is expected next quarter. Google indicated that these updates are designed to integrate seamlessly into existing workflows. The company said, "These updates aren't standalone features — they're part of a bigger vision to create AI that fits into everyday workflows, helping you take action and giving you more time for work that moves things forward. These announcements are designed to offer help, not hype, and represent the next step in making AI useful for everyone."

Benefits, KiwiSaver to be means-tested — so why aren't pensions?
Benefits, KiwiSaver to be means-tested — so why aren't pensions?

1News

time23-05-2025

  • 1News

Benefits, KiwiSaver to be means-tested — so why aren't pensions?

A Government decision to means-and-income-test support available to children and younger people, but not alter the eligibility for NZ Super, has prompted questions from some commentators. As part of Budget 2025, the Government announced it would income-test eligibility for the Best Start payment in the first year of a child's life. This will affect about 60,000 families who previously would have been able to access the money, before being income tested in the child's second and third year. Teenagers who are receiving JobSeeker benefits will be assessed against a "parental assistance test" which will determine whether their parents could provide them financial support. The member tax credit in KiwiSaver will be halved and not available to anyone earning over $180,000. But anyone earning at that level was still entitled to the full NZ Super payment. "As one of my team members commented — this Budget was all about taking away from young people and giving to the older generation [through] extra cancer treatment, rates relief for Gold Card members and continuation of NZ Super," said Rupert Carlyon, founder of Koura KiwiSaver. "For young people, we are now means testing KiwiSaver contributions, Best Start payments and not providing welfare to those under the age of 20." He said younger people would also be affected by a lower level of investment in infrastructure. Financial journalist Frances Cook told Breakfast she was 'very concerned' by some of the changes made to KiwiSaver. (Source: Breakfast) "The Budget is described as a budget forcing people to pay their own way where they can. Though NZ Super remains untouched, despite hundreds of thousands of Kiwis receiving it that do not need it." He said NZ Super should be means tested in the same way but it was not politically feasible for the government to do so. "Young people need to be better at voting to drive through change that benefits them." Shamubeel Eaqub, chief economist at Simplicity, said he too thought it was interesting that the KiwiSaver incentive would not be available to people earning more than $180,000 but no such test applied to the pension, which costs nearly $25 billion a year. "It's incoherent... incentives for Kiwis to save for their future is means-tested, but New Zealand Super — which is universal welfare for older people — is untouched." Asked on Nine to Noon her thoughts on means-testing superannuation, Nicola Willis said it was not the Government's policy. "We remain committed to universal New Zealand superannuation." She said National had not yet had a caucus discussion on changes to superannuation. "But I'm on the record at the last election campaign that we campaigned for the age of eligibility for New Zealand superannuation to be lifted. That was to make New Zealand superannuation more affordable, and more sustainable, and to reflect the fact that New Zealanders are working for much, much longer. We campaigned on that because I believe it was the right thing to do… Labour weaponised that against us."

Kamahl Santamaria tells Employment Authority: 'I became and remain unemployable'
Kamahl Santamaria tells Employment Authority: 'I became and remain unemployable'

RNZ News

time14-05-2025

  • RNZ News

Kamahl Santamaria tells Employment Authority: 'I became and remain unemployable'

Kamahl Santamaria left TVNZ in May 2022. Photo: TVNZ / Supplied Former TVNZ presenter Kamahl Santamaria has been granted his request to move his case to the Employment Court, to achieve a faster resolution of the issue that he says has stopped him being able to work since being "cancelled". Santamaria quit Breakfast after 32 days on air amid allegations of inappropriate behaviour. He took a complaint about his former employer to the Employment Relations Authority . Authority member Rachel Larmer said both parties alleged the other had breached the settlement signed after Santamaria's departure, in a number of ways. The authority last year backed TVNZ in a preliminary decision but further claims were yet to be heard. Santamaria applied to have the claims removed to the Employment Court. He told the authority the most just, speedy and inexpensive course of action was to do so because his claims would end up there anyway. TVNZ opposed the move but both parties agreed that if Santamaria succeeded, TVNZ's counterclaim should also move. Santamaria said urgency for the case had built over time because he was not able to work or earn an income for an extended period. Larmer said he described the problem as having arisen because he had been "cancelled". But TVNZ said he took more than 18 months to lodge his claim and then lodged two subsequent amended statements of problem. It said his claims had no bearing on his employment status because he was not prevented from being employed as a journalist or in another role. Santamaria argued there was large public interest in his case due to media coverage and TVNZ should account to the public for its decisions. He also said there were questions of law to answer, including those arising from TVNZ's defence that the editorial independence of its newsroom meant the settlement had not been breached by reporting on the case. Larmer said the nature of the case, the entrenched views of the parties and the legal arguments Santamaria had been making meant any determination the authority made was likely to be challenged in the Employment Court. "While that is normally a neutral factor in removal applications, in this particular case there would need to be a preliminary determination on admissibility and that is a matter that cannot be challenged until after the authority had completed its investigation which would likely not be before 2026," she said. "The parties would therefore achieve a more timely and more cost effective final outcome if the Employment Court dealt with this matter in the first instance." She said one of the main purposes of the authority conducting its investigation first was to use its flexible powers to provide a "speedy low cost forum" for resolving the problems. "In terms of Mr Santamaria's proceedings there has already been one preliminary determination and a further admissibility determination appears inevitable, given how far apart the parties are on disputed document related issues. "The substantive claims and the counterclaim also cannot be progressed by the Authority until the current challenge has been dealt with by the Court. It would therefore be the most efficient use of the parties' time and resources for all matters to be before the Employment Court from the outset. Mr Santamaria's employment ended on 31 May 2022, so there has already been significant delay from the events that are in dispute. The Authority was concerned that the delay associated with retaining these proceedings could undermine the need to facilitate Mr Santamaria's access to justice." She said he was "strongly committed" to having his concerns about the publicity that followed the end of his employment dealt with. "In his affidavit he stated 'I became and remain unemployable'. He believes he needed his proceedings resolved 'as quickly and decisively as possible' in order for him to be able to return to his field of expertise. In Mr Santamaria's particular circumstances the fastest and most cost effective way of achieving the finality he sought would be to remove his matter to the Court. The Authority has not commenced its substantive investigation, so removal at this early stage would not mean the parties had incurred unnecessary additional cost."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store