Those who change partners shouldn't preach, says Dilip
2
Kolkata: A year after he was "replaced" as the
BJP
candidate from his "stronghold", Midnapore, ahead of the
2024 Lok Sabha polls
,
Dilip Ghosh
on Thursday took aim at his critics in the party. "I do not need to learn about BJP from those who earlier survived on Kalighat's leftovers, and now live on BJP's leftovers," Ghosh said, adding that those who "change partners" should not preach to him.
Ghosh's visit to the Jagannath temple at the invitation of CM
Mamata Banerjee
had led to a fusillade of remarks against him, with Bishnupur MP Saumitra Khan leading the charge. Khan, who defected to BJP from
Trinamool
, said Ghosh seemed to have lost the plot. "He has become senile in his old age. He used to claim to be a tyagi (one who renounced all), but I see him as a bhogi (a pleasurist). People don't want to see a person like this, who breaks his vows at such a mature age. Is he planning to join Trinamool?" Khan said.
You Can Also Check:
Kolkata AQI
|
Weather in Kolkata
|
Bank Holidays in Kolkata
|
Public Holidays in Kolkata
Without naming Khan, Ghosh responded: "Look at his political career and his political associations. We have such netas in BJP who have strange bedfellows at night and try to look innocent the next morning. We have kept them in the party. The day we stop doing that, they will change colours. Such politicians should neither preach to BJP nor me."
The former Bengal BJP president faced 'go back' slogans from local netas at Kolaghat. Ghosh was dismissive of their actions, saying fly-by-night operators had joined the party. "I have poured carbolic acid in pits. Snakes have now started coming out. But that cannot stop me," he said.
He said he was not bothered by those who had breakfast with BJP, lunch with Trinamool, and then came back to BJP for dinner. "This is the crowd that joined the party during the 2021 assembly polls. They were children when I started fighting against Trinamool in 2015," Ghosh said.
Referring to his meeting with the CM, the BJP senior said: "PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee took a bus to Lahore. But when the time came, he bombed Pakistan bases in Kargil. PM Narendra Modi met the Pakistan PM (Nawaz Sharif) in Lahore. But when the time came, he put the nation first and ordered surgical strikes. In BJP, meeting and greeting has not caused anyone to deviate from our duty — to the nation and the party."
Former Tripura governor and BJP veteran Tathagata Roy had also criticised Ghosh for his bonhomie with Banerjee at the Jagannath temple in Digha. "The way he posed before the camera with the CM clearly points to his defection. He must have decided in his mind and looks like he is ready to join Trinamool," he said.
Ghosh hit back, questioning Roy's "performance" as BJP party president when he managed only a 4% vote share, saying: "His only interest seems to be his evening get-togethers."
Incidentally, Ghosh has been the most successful Bengal BJP president, leading the party to win 18 seats in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls and a 40.7% vote share, then narrowing the gap with Trinamool to only 3%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
J&K nominated MLAs: Centre says ‘no bearing or co-relation with formation of govt'
THE Centre has described the power vested in the Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor to nominate five members to its Legislative Assembly as 'discretionary', and exercisable by him without the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in the Union Territory. In an affidavit in the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, the Union Home Ministry has also said that this nomination has 'no bearing or co-relation with the formation of the government'. The affidavit was in response to a question framed by the court as to whether Sections 15, 15-A and 15-B of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019, providing for nomination of members to the UT's Legislative Assembly over and above its sanctioned strength – which could potentially convert a minority government into a majority government, and vice-a-versa – were in violation of basic structure of the Constitution. Senior Congress leader and its chief spokesperson Ravinder Kumar Sharma had filed a PIL in the High Court, challenging the provisions. Just before results were declared for the first elections held to the J&K Assembly following the abrogation of Article 370, in October 2024, non-BJP parties had expressed apprehension over the L-G's powers to nominate members. This fear was accentuated by claims of a BJP leader that all five would be BJP leaders, and that L-G Manoj Sinha would name them in consultation with the Centre. Opposition parties had demanded that the nominations be made only on 'the aid and advice' of the government that was due to take over, and not precede it. With five nominated members, the strength of the J&K Assembly would be 95, making the majority mark 48. It was feared that the Opposition would not reach this mark, and the BJP would tilt the scales in its favour with the nominated MLAs. Eventually, however, the L-G did not make any nominations before the results, and the National Conference-Congress combine won with 47 MLAs (NC 41 and Congress 6), apart from enjoying the support of four Independents and a CPI(M) MLA. In its affidavit in the High Court, the Union Home Ministry has noted that while Section 15 was part of the original 2019 Reorganization Act, Sections 15A and 15B were added through an amendment in 2023. Section 15A empowers the Lt Governor to nominate two members, one of whom shall be a woman, from the Kashmiri migrant community, while Section 15B provides for nomination of one member from persons displaced from Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). Speaking about Section 15, the Centre's affidavit says that the provision in it for nomination of two women MLAs was similar to an Article in the Constitution of the erstwhile J&K state, before its special status was scrapped. Then the Governor had the power to nominate up to two women members if women were not adequately represented in the Assembly. '(It) is an act of affirmative action, in support of promoting and ensuring female representation.' A 'plain reading' of the statute shows that 'it is a nomination which is to take place at any juncture post-elections, and has no bearing or co-relation with the formation of the government, inasmuch as the standard in the section is representation of women in the Assembly, and not in the government', says the affidavit. On Section 15A, the affidavit refers to the Supreme Court's verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 in which Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul wrote an epilogue on the migration of Kashmiri Pandits. 'In order to move forward, the wounds need healing… The first step towards this is to achieve a collective understanding of the human rights violations perpetrated both by State and non-State actors, against peoples of the region,' Justice Kaul wrote. The Centre's affidavit says that it is a matter of record that multiple regions of Kashmir have remained disturbed for decades, leading to extensive displacement of civilians. 'Accordingly, the nomination of two members from the Kashmiri Migrant community under Section 15A serves the objective of providing them with adequate representation, ensuring their voice is heard in the legislative process, and safeguarding their rights and interests,'' it says. Similarly, the affidavit talks of Section 15B providing representation to those displaced from PoJK, in 1947 and during the India-Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971. 'It is evident that displacement of these communities prevents them from their democratic participation… thereby necessitating the appointment of a nominated representative to ensure that their interests are not entirely excluded from governance.' Therefore, the affidavit says, the legislative intent behind these provisions is 'well-founded in law and equity', ensuring that voices of the displaced are neither ignored nor marginalised. On whether the J&K Lt Governor has to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers or has discretionary powers to nominate the five members, the affidavit says that this stands conclusively settled with respect to the Assemblies of both Puducherry and the Municipal Corporation in NCT of Delhi – the other two UTs with Assemblies. Sections 15, 15A and 15B specifically recognise the authority of the Lt Governor to nominate Assembly members, the affidavit says, adding that there can be no doubt that he has to exercise this duty in his discretion as a statutory functionary and not as an extension of the government – and thus, act without aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lok Sabha passes Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill, 2025
The Lok Sabha on Tuesday passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025, by a voice vote, despite ongoing protests from Opposition members over the Election Commission's revision of Bihar's electoral rolls. Union Minister for Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy , during the brief discussion, noted the Bill's importance for the mining sector and India's economic development, particularly in the context of critical and strategic minerals. The new legislation, which seeks to amend the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, introduces several key changes aimed at boosting mineral exploration and production in the country. A major provision is the expansion of the National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) under which funds can be used for the exploration and development of mines and minerals both within India (including offshore areas) and outside the country. This move is seen as a strategic step to secure critical mineral assets abroad. The Bill also mandates an increase in the amount paid to the Trust by lessees. The payment will rise from the current 2 per cent of the royalty payable to 3 per cent. The trust will also be renamed as the National Mineral Exploration and Development Trust, reflecting its widened scope.
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Owaisi blames BJP for mob desecrating tomb in Fatehpur, alleges environment of hatred against Muslims in UP
Hyderabad parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi blamed the 'atmosphere of hatred created by the BJP' that led to a mob desecrating the tomb of Nawab Abdul Samad in Fatehpur. Mr. Owaisi, who is the president of the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, while speaking to the media alleged that anti-social elements belonging to Hindutva groups, have been enjoying a free run in states like Uttar Pradesh. He further alleged such miscreants remain unchecked when they attack any site connected to the Muslim community. 'This is a result of the environment of hatred that the BJP has created. Especially in UP, they have a free run. Anything connected to Muslim culture, or history, any religious place, you are permitted to attack it, and take law in your hands. And the UP government will close its eyes and ears,' he said. He questioned why the police did not play a proactive role in stopping these miscreants. 'In the presence of police, graves are being destroyed and vandalised, and police does nothing. If the same people were from the Muslim community, then imagine what would have happened?' Mr. Owaisi claimed that 'the use of law' is based on religion and political ideology. 'This is a conspicuous example of the hatred against Muslims and to oppress them,' he said. 'What is astha then? Your astha is neither in rule of law, nor to keep the peace. You have one agenda, whether it be in Assam or UP, you want to target Muslims. You want to use bulldozers and render them homeless, or attack masjids or dargahs,' he said.
