logo
Hundreds attend solidarity gig in Dublin for Kneecap rapper

Hundreds attend solidarity gig in Dublin for Kneecap rapper

RTÉ News​a day ago
Hundreds of people have attended a music session in Dublin city in solidarity with Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh after he appeared in a London court on Wednesday.
Kneecap flags and logos hung from the windows in Connolly Books, which dubs itself Ireland's oldest radical bookshop, in solidarity with Ó hAnnaidh, Kneecap, and the people of Palestine.
Pro-Palestine supporters criticised the decision by British authorities to bring a charge against the performer instead of focusing on the Israeli government's actions against the Palestinian people.
Ó hAnnaidh, 27, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year.
Hundreds of Kneecap supporters greeted Ó hAnnaidh as he arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London on Wednesday morning, alongside fellow Kneecap rappers Naoise Ó Cairealláin and JJ Ó Dochartaigh.
During the hearing, his defence team argued the case should be thrown out, citing a technical error in the way the charge against him was brought.
The case has been adjourned until 26 September, when the judge will rule on whether he has the jurisdiction to try the case.
At the protest session at Connolly Books on Wednesday afternoon, several artists played Irish traditional music in solidarity with Kneecap.
Dubliner Aoife Powell, 19, said she came out to protest because she is "angry" at the decision to charge an artist rather than focus on what is happening to the people of Gaza.
"I'm here because it just worries me that the fact that governments are focused on artists expressing themselves rather than the actual problem, which is obviously the genocide in Gaza," she told the PA news agency.
"It's a little bit disheartening to see there's so much pressure being put on these artists to stop saying what they truly think and to stop standing on the right side of history.
"I feel like it's a distraction from what's actually happening.
"When a government tries to silence people, they should learn that they can never silence people. I feel like the public would get more angry at that."
Sean O'Grady is from Coleraine in Northern Ireland but has lived in Dublin for almost 70 years.
"I'm delighted with them (Kneecap), that they've done what they're doing, and they're getting plenty of publicity.
"The British government are crazy, I mean, what are they at?
"They're supplying a lot of the bombs, and a lot of the arms and ammunition to Israel to do what they're doing. So, they should be ashamed of themselves instead of bringing in these people (to court) for stupid reasons.
"It's getting good publicity over there for the cause of the Palestinians."
Dubliner Dermot Nolan said he attended his first Palestine protest in 1967, and while he remembers horrific events such as the Vietnam War, the scale of death and injuries in Gaza is the worst he has ever lived through.
"I'm here because it's important to for two reasons - first of all, to show our intolerance of the genocide and slaughter that's being carried out by the US, Nato and Israel.
"The second reason is the question of civil rights. We're protesting about the indictment of a member of the Irish group Kneecap.
"It is a sign of creeping authoritarianism which is happening in all the western countries and most clearly in Britain."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Open letter signed by players calls on GAA to end sponsorship deal with Allianz
Open letter signed by players calls on GAA to end sponsorship deal with Allianz

The 42

time27 minutes ago

  • The 42

Open letter signed by players calls on GAA to end sponsorship deal with Allianz

AN OPEN LETTER was presented to the GAA yesterday at a protest outside Croke Park, calling on the association to end its sponsorship arrangements with insurance company Allianz. It's reported that over 800 current and former GAA players have signed the letter due to links between Allianz and Israel. Advertisement Letter signed by over 800 GAA former and current players was handed into GAA HQ this afternoon - as part of 'Drop Allianz' Campaign. Allianz's business relationships with Israel are enabling the genocidal and apartheid Israeli regimes across Palestine. — Irish Sport for Palestine (@Sport4Palestine) August 20, 2025 A report published on the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN listed Allianz among companies and corporations that was buying Israeli treasury bonds, which, the report argues, play a 'critical role in funding the ongoing assault on Gaza'. The report was written by UN special rapporteur (independent human rights expert) on Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese. The 42 contacted the GAA for comment but did not receive a response at time of publication. Allianz, in a statement to The 42, said: 'Our long-standing partnership with the GAA is about supporting Irish sport and communities. 'Allianz Ireland is part of a global group, and while the wider group operates internationally across insurance and investment, as a matter of principle we do not comment on individual customers or business matters. 'What we can say is that all Allianz business decisions are guided by strict legal standards and world-leading ESG principles.'

Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible
Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible

Irish Examiner

time42 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible

The Israeli government has approved a plan for construction of a massive new settlement bloc in the controversial E1 area in the occupied West Bank. In reviving a project first proposed in 1994, which will comprise about 3,500 new dwellings in a line across the West Bank, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich laid bare the intentions of his government. He declared that 'approval of construction plans in E1 buries the idea of a Palestinian state, and continues the many steps we are taking on the ground as part of the de facto sovereignty plan'. E1 ('East 1') refers to 12 sq km of unsettled land east of Jerusalem. It sits inside the boundaries of the third most populous Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim. In 1975, Israel expropriated 30 sq km of land on which seven Palestinian villages had once stood. Here they built Ma'ale Adumim, one of three Israeli settlement blocs that form an 'outer ring' around the Israeli-defined municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. Israeli authorities refer to these blocs as 'facts on the ground'. They were initiated in the West Bank by the Israeli government after the 1967 War to ensure that Israeli population centres were protected from potential attacks. Today, almost 40,000 Israelis live in Ma'ale Adumim – largely secular Israelis and diaspora Jews who have moved to Israel. Far from the makeshift Israeli outposts that are scattered across the rural West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim was designated a city by Israel in 2015. It is considered by the majority of Israeli Jews to be a permanently protected settlement bloc, which will be retained through land swaps in any final agreement with Palestinians. The E1 development plan would involve a significant expansion of the existing settlement. All settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is deemed illegal under international law, but the E1 plans are particularly controversial. At the heart of the controversy is the viability of a Palestinian state. Israeli construction in E1 would cut the West Bank into two separate parts, rendering it impossible to establish a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. In addition, according to an objection lodged by the Israeli pressure group Peace Now, Israeli construction in E1 would negatively affect the economic development of a future Palestinian state. Its objection argues the E1 area is essential for expansion of an urban metropolis necessary for economic growth, and is the only land in East Jerusalem suitable for further development in the Palestinian part of the city. It states that E1 should therefore be left for Palestinian rather than Israeli development. Political threat The plan to develop E1 was first proposed in 1994 by Israel's then-prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, to make sure Ma'ale Adumim was part of a 'united Jerusalem'. This was subsequently reaffirmed by Shimon Peres during his prime ministership in 1996, as part of proposed territorial swaps in the framework of a permanent peace agreement. In 2005, those plans were frozen after the US administration under George W Bush told Israel that settlement in E1 would 'contravene American policy'. The plan was reignited by Israel's current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in 2012, in retaliation for the United Nations' extension of non-member status to Palestine. But it was then put on hold for eight years due to international pressure. In 2020, a week ahead of the third national elections held in Israel in a single year, Netanyahu pledged to revive the E1 project, with the hope of securing votes and to court the ultra-nationalist parties into a potential coalition. In 2022, Netanyahu renewed the E1 construction plans, weeks before then-US president Joe Biden was due to visit Israel. Opposition and support Each time the plans have been proposed, the decision to advance construction has been met with both internal and international condemnation. On June 9 2023, the planning hearing was 'indefinitely' postponed following a call between Netanyahu and Biden's secretary of state, Antony Blinken. In response to the most recent announcement to reinstate the plans, the European Union put out a statement expressing concern. It urged Israel 'to desist from taking this decision forward, noting its far-reaching implications and the need to consider action to protect the viability of the two-state solution'. However, Donald Trump now appears to be breaking with the position of previous US administrations. It was recently reported in the Jerusalem Post that the Trump administration supports the reactivation of the development plans. A spokesperson for the US state department said 'a stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region'. Israel's latest attempt to initiate construction in E1 shows that, while the plans have consistently been delayed, they have never been abandoned. The question is why did Smotrich, with the apparent approval of Netanyahu, make this announcement now? The answer is most likely that, with the international focus firmly on the continued assault on Gaza, the Israeli government believes it has the breathing space to press ahead with its commitment to building settlements across the West Bank. Alongside the proposed Israeli takeover of Gaza City, the promise by Smotrich that 2025 would be Israel's 'Year of Sovereignty' — and with it the end of a future Palestinian state — appears to be coming ever closer. Leonie Fleischmann is Senior Lecturer in International Politics at City St George's, University of London The Conversation

Ireland and UK among 21 nations to condemn Israel's plan for illegal Jerusalem settlements
Ireland and UK among 21 nations to condemn Israel's plan for illegal Jerusalem settlements

The Journal

time42 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Ireland and UK among 21 nations to condemn Israel's plan for illegal Jerusalem settlements

IRELAND IS AMONG 21 countries to sign a joint statement calling Israel's approval of a major settlement project in the occupied West Bank 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, had been under consideration for more than two decades – but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12-square-kilometre parcel of land which would effectively cut the West Bank in two on Wednesday. The joint statement, which has also been signed by Australia, Canada and Italy, said the plans are 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms. Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden also signed the statement, as did the European Commission's foreign affairs chief. Tánaiste @SimonHarrisTD has joined 21 counterparts from Europe and globally in condemning plans for settlement construction in the E1 area of the West Bank. These plans are a violation of international law & a fundamental threat to the two-state solution - they must be reversed. — Irish Foreign Ministry (@dfatirl) August 21, 2025 Advertisement The statement noted that Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the plan 'will make a two-state solution impossible by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem'. 'This brings no benefits to the Israeli people,' the foreign ministers said. 'Instead, it risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace. The statement concluded: 'The government of Israel still has an opportunity to stop the E1 plan going any further. We encourage them to urgently retract this plan. 'Unilateral action by the Israeli government undermines our collective desire for security and prosperity in the Middle East. The Israeli government must stop settlement construction in line with UNSC Resolution 2334 and remove their restrictions on the finances of the Palestinian Authority.' The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last week. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. Related Reads American citizen killed in the West Bank died from arson by Israeli settlers, his family say 'They just want to bury him': West Bank village devastated as Israel holds onto body of slain activist Israeli settler kills Palestinian teacher and activist linked to Oscar-Winning film in West Bank The two cities are 14 miles apart by air, but Palestinians travelling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority has slammed the latest move, which has also been criticised by UN chief Antonio Guterres. Britain today summoned Israeli ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely to the foreign ministry to protest the decision. 'If implemented, these settlement plans would be a flagrant breach of international law and would divide a future Palestinian state in two, critically undermining a two-state solution,' the foreign office said in a statement. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store