RTI reforms urged to counter disinformation
The Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN) has called on the government to undertake comprehensive legal reforms to strengthen the implementation of the Right of Access to Information Act, 2017.
In a policy brief titled 'Strengthening the Right to Information (RTI) in Pakistan', released on Sunday, FAFEN highlighted that while Pakistan's RTI framework is among the most progressive, its effectiveness has been hampered by institutional inertia, ambiguous legal provisions and weak enforcement mechanisms.
The shortcomings have prevented the law from achieving its intended goal of ensuring government transparency.
The absence of timely information about the actions, decisions and spending by public bodies breeds destabilising misinformation and disinformation.
"FAFEN strongly believes that strengthening the RTI legal framework will serve as a bulwark in the government's efforts to counter disinformation, which is deepening political polarisation in the country," FAFEN said.
As part of its ongoing "countering disinformation through information" campaign, FAFEN has already conducted an assessment of the websites of federal ministries and divisions, and found a low level of compliance with the provisions of the RTI Act, 2017.
Similar assessments are ongoing for provincial departments.
FAFEN said that greater independence and powers for the Pakistan Information Commission (PIC) will enable it to effectively enforce the provisions of the law on public bodies, which is critical to enhance government transparency and counter disinformation.
In its policy brief, FAFEN urged the parliament to further strengthen the RTI legal framework by eliminating ambiguities and empowering the PIC to lead enforcement efforts rather than merely serving as an appellate forum.
Proposed amendments include specifying clear deadlines for proactive disclosures and the digitisation of records, broadening the scope of public records, reforming the process for the appointment and removal of information commissioners, and mandating public bodies to submit compliance reports on the Act's requirements to the PIC.
FAFEN recommends a more consultative approach to the appointment and removal of information commissioners through a bipartisan parliamentary committee with equal representation from the treasury and opposition.
Transferring these responsibilities away from executive control and ensuring the commission's financial independence through amendments to Section 21 would enable it to function as a more effective oversight body.
FAFEN's policy brief also stressed the need for public bodies to move beyond merely posting raw data online.
Instead, it recommended the PIC to establish standardised, user-friendly record-keeping formats and practices, including searchable databases, clear summaries, and intuitive indexes to enhance accessibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
08-08-2025
- Business Recorder
ETs decide 35 pleas related to general elections 2024
ISLAMABAD: Between April 21 and July 31, 2025, the election tribunals decided 35 election petitions related to the General Elections 2024 (GE-2024). With these decisions, the total number of resolved petitions has reached 171, accounting for 46 percent of the overall caseload pending before 23 tribunals across the four provinces. Through its systematic tracking, Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN) has identified 374 election petitions — 124 challenging the electoral outcomes in the National Assembly (NA) constituencies and 250 in the Provincial Assemblies' (PA) constituencies. So far, approximately two-thirds (62 percent) of the petitions related to NA constituencies, and half (50 percent) of those pertaining to PA constituencies, remain undecided. During the reporting period, 28 of the 35 decided petitions were from Punjab, three each from Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and one from Balochistan. In Punjab, the four Lahore-based tribunals decided 15 petitions, the Bahawalpur tribunal decided nine, while the Rawalpindi and Multan tribunals decided two each. In Sindh, the two Karachi tribunals decided three petitions. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the Bannu tribunal decided three cases. In Balochistan, a Quetta tribunal decided one petition. While Punjab tribunals have gained pace in deciding the petitions, adjudication process in the remaining three provinces has slowed noticeably since April 2025. As many as 12 out of the 23 election tribunals have not concluded any petitions since April 21, 2025. Overall, Balochistan's three tribunals have collectively decided 44 out of 52 petitions (85 percent) filed for NA and PA constituencies. Punjab's eight tribunals have resolved 94 out of 192 petitions (49 percent). Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's six tribunals have decided 12 out of 43 petitions (28 percent), while Sindh's five tribunals have disposed of 21 out of 84 petitions (25 percent). Out of 124 petitions challenging NA constituency results, 47 (38 percent) have been decided thus far. These include 30 from Punjab, nine from Balochistan, five from Sindh, and three from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Regarding PA constituencies, 124 out of 250 petitions (50 percent) have been decided, including 64 from Punjab, 35 from Balochistan, 16 from Sindh, and nine from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Out of the 171 petitions decided so far, 168 have been dismissed, while only three have been accepted. FAFEN has yet to obtain copies of tribunal decisions for 40 dismissed petitions—11 related to NA constituencies and 29 to PA constituencies—so the reasons for dismissal in these cases remain unknown. The independent candidates supported by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) make the largest group of petitioners with 55 percent of total petitions filed by them, followed by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) candidates (13 percent), Pakistan People's Party Parliamentarians (PPPP) candidates (eight percent), unaffiliated independent candidates (seven percent) and JamiatUlma-e-Islam Pakistan (JUI-P) candidates (seven percent). As many as 16 other parties' candidates cumulatively account for the remaining 12 percent of the total petitions. Around 65 percent petitions of independent candidates, 54 percent of PPPP, 54 percent of PML-N, 40 percent of JUI-F, and 38 percent of PTI-backed independent candidates have been disposed of till date. The returned candidates belonging to PML-N make the largest group of defendants with 39 percent of the petitions challenging their victory, followed by PTI-backed candidates (16 percent), MuttahidaQaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) candidates and PPPP candidates (13 percent each), unaffiliated independents (six percent) and JUI-P (five percent). As many as 11 other defendant parties' candidates cumulatively account for the remaining eight percent petitions. So far, 84 decisions of election tribunals have been contested before the Supreme Court. Among these, three appeals were initiated by the returned candidates against whom election petitions had been accepted. Of these, Supreme Court has so far dismissed 12 appeals upholding the tribunals' decisions. These dismissed appeals were filed by candidates belonging to PPPP (four), PTI-backed independents (three), NP (two), and BNP-A, JUI-P, and unaffiliated independent (one each). The remaining 71 appeals—21 pertaining to the National Assembly and 50 to the Provincial Assemblies—are currently under adjudication. These include 26 petitions challenging results in constituencies of Balochistan, 37 in Punjab, and eight in Sindh. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
07-08-2025
- Express Tribune
PTI slams Punjab's Rs730m bulletproof vehicle purchase
Listen to article Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has sharply criticised the Punjab government's decision to allocate Rs730 million for the purchase of bulletproof vehicles, calling it a symbol of extravagant spending amid worsening economic conditions for the general public. In a statement, PTI Punjab's Media Cell Head Shayan Bashir condemned the move as 'a blatant display of anti-people governance.' He said the government's priorities are misaligned with the needs of the population, who are facing critical shortages of affordable flour, electricity, and medicine. Bashir highlighted that over 35 million people in Punjab live below the poverty line and a 15% tax on medicines has further restricted access to healthcare. He pointed to alarming maternal mortality rates—165 deaths per 100,000 births—as well as rising costs in the agricultural sector, with farmers grappling with a 25% increase in fertiliser prices, higher water bills, and poor returns on wheat. Read More: PTI won't recontest disqualified seats: Imran 'Unemployment has crossed 7.5%, yet the government continues to spend lavishly on itself instead of addressing the basic needs of the people,' Bashir said, adding that many communities still lack clean drinking water and sufficient food. He also recalled a previous approval of Rs7.5 billion for luxury vehicle procurement, alleging a continued lack of transparency from the Punjab Finance Department. On July 7, Bashir submitted a formal request for records related to the purchase and usage of the vehicles. In its reply, the department denied responsibility and referred the matter to other government bodies. 'This response either reflects dangerous administrative incompetence or a deeply rooted corruption scandal,' he stated. He accused the department of violating the Right of Access to Information Act, 2017, which obligates public institutions to disclose such information. Bashir also criticised Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, accusing her administration of masking systemic corruption with populist rhetoric. 'This is undeniable evidence of administrative dishonesty,' he said. He vowed that PTI Punjab would pursue legal and constitutional avenues, as well as public protest, to challenge what he termed 'exploitative governance.'
Express Tribune
04-08-2025
- Express Tribune
Imran's fate hinges on high courts
Though ex-prime minister Imran Khan has been convicted in five cases since August 5, 2023, none of his convictions has so far been endorsed by any high court. Likewise, serious questions are being raised on the fairness and non-adherence to due process during his trials. Imran Khan's legal team is consistently alleging that due process and the requirements of fairness enshrined in Article 10-A of the Constitution have not been adhered to during his trials. Though the PTI leadership has been unable to evolve any effective strategy for the release of Imran Khan during the last two years, the non-adherence to due process during his trials has raised serious doubts among the masses, which is also giving political advantages to his party. Despite the absence of a joint symbol and the non-availability of a level playing field, the February 8 general election results were shocking for other major political parties. Until Imran is considered a political victim, his opponents cannot defeat him in a free and fair election, says a senior lawyer. He said that the two major political parties, the PML-N and the PPP, should have realized that if they want to defeat Imran on the political ground, then the victim card should have been taken away. First, Imran Khan was convicted in the Toshakhana case on August 5, 2023. The trial court, presided over by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Humayun Dilawar, had given a three-year sentence. However, some lawyers believe that there were serious defects in the judgment. They questioned why the trial court was in such a hurry to decide the case without recording statements of the witnesses whom Imran Khan wanted to present in his defence. Even the trial court did not wait for his counsel, Khawaja Haris, to give his final arguments. Faisal Siddiqi, while commenting on the judgment on August 5, had expressed grave concern over the trial court's decision, viewing it as a symbolic destruction of political justice in the country. Siddiqi also asserted that the judgment was "a result of revenge politics on the part of the PDM government and political manipulation by the deep state." He not only called for the judgment to be overturned but also urged the superior judiciary to investigate the author judge for tarnishing the entire judicial system's reputation. Soon after the announcement of the decision, Imran Khan was arrested in Lahore. After a couple of weeks, the Islamabad High Court led by then Chief Justice Aamer Farooq suspended the trial court decision. The main appeal in this case is still pending in the IHC. Later, Imran was convicted in three cases wherein trials were conducted in Adiala Jail. These convictions were awarded before the general election of February 8, 2024. There are serious allegations of manipulation of trials in those matters. Interestingly, Imran's conviction in the Cypher case has been set aside by a division bench of the IHC led by Justice Aamer Farooq. Likewise, in a second matter, the appellate court also quashed Imran and his wife Bushra Bibi's convictions in the Iddat case. The IHC suspended their convictions in the Toshakhana case. The final appeal is still pending in this matter before the IHC. Meanwhile, the trial court conducted the jail trial of Imran and his wife in the 190 million pounds case. Though the judge fulfilled all procedural requirements during the trial in the 190 million pounds case, questions are being raised on the maintainability of the case after the NAB law amendments. Likewise, the judge postponed the date for the announcement of judgment three times. Despite the passage of more than five months, the IHC is yet to decide Imran and Bushra's petitions seeking suspension of the judgment in the 190 million pounds case. Imran's legal team is consistently filing early hearing applications, but the high court is yet to decide the case. Now, two trials of Imran Khan are continuing in Adiala Jail. One is related to Toshakhana and the other to the May 9 rioting. Recently, the Lahore High Court (LHC) rejected the post-arrest bail of Imran Khan in the May 9 cases. Subsequently, the legal team has approached the apex court against the LHC order. The matter is listed for hearing in the SC on August 12. Post-26th Amendment, as well as the transfer of judges to the IHC, Imran Khan is struggling to get relief in the superior courts. Though the IHC passed an order conditionally allowing meetings with Imran Khan in Adiala Jail, the decision has not been implemented by jail authorities. At present the government is in a strong position and Imran Khan is still receiving massive support, the only loser is the justice system, which has so far failed to adhere to due process and the requirements of fairness enshrined in Article 10-A of the Constitution during the last two years. Recently, Supreme Court judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah issued an additional note in the ex-PM Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto presidential reference case. He said judges must uphold their oaths with courage in the face of oppression, for only then can the judiciary truly safeguard democracy and the rights of the people. "Let the lesson of transitional justice be clear transitional justice, however, often becomes necessary because, during oppressive rule, some judges fail to uphold their constitutional duty, succumbing to the pressure of illegitimate authority. "This failure not only enables violations of due process and fair trial rights but also erodes public trust in the judiciary," wrote Justice Shah. He said the Bhutto case serves as a classic example of a political trial, illustrating how such trials can be manipulated to advance authoritarian designs. Likewise, present CJP Yahya Afridi in a similar case said that the extraordinary political climate of the time and the pressures inherent in such an environment appear to have influenced the course of justice in a manner inconsistent with the ideals of judicial independence.
