Nagaland MP raises Dimapur–Tizit rail project delay in Parliament
In a written submission under Rule 377, Jamir said the project was initiated by the ministry of railways (northeast region) in 2013-14.
According to a release from the Nagaland Pradesh Congress committee, the proposed railway line spans 257km and carries an estimated cost of Rs 4,27,000 crore.
He said despite more than a decade since its inception, the project's financial progress remains at "zero". Jamir urged the Union railways minister to take immediate action to ensure the early implementation of the project.
Meanwhile, the MP also participated in a protest led by the INDIA bloc in Delhi, opposing the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Court cannot have blinkered vision for paltry remuneration': Gujarat HC orders increased pay for Anganwadi workers, helpers
Stating that the duties and obligations of Anganwadi workers (AWWs) and Anganwadi Helpers (AWHs) are 'onerous' and 'influence the lowest strata of the social fabric', the Gujarat High Court on Wednesday modified and partially reversed a 2024 single-judge order of the HC that had ruled that the AWWs and AWHs should be treated similar to the regularly selected permanent employees holding civil posts in the State or Central Government. In its order, Division bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice RT Vachhani on Wednesday directed the State government departments to, jointly or exclusively, pay the minimum monthly wages of Rs 14,800 over and above of Rs 10,000 to the AWWs, which is a total of Rs 24,800. The sum is less than the fixed pay of Mukhiya Sevika (of Rs 40,800). Correspondingly, the AWHs shall also be paid the minimum wages of Rs 14, 800, in addition to Rs, 5,500, making a total of Rs 20,300, the court order said. The court has ordered that the AWWs and AWHs should be paid the arrears from the Financial Year that commenced in April 2025, within 'six months from the receipt of the high court order'. Stating that the directions would apply to all AWWs and AWHs working in all Anganwadi Centres across the state, without necessitating fresh petitions before the court, the HC said that the principle of 'equal pay and equal work' cannot be applied to AWWs and AWHs or be compared to any other Class-III or Class-IV employees. The court order stated, 'The onerous and arduous duties and obligations involving pregnant and lactating women and minors, which is unmatched to the duties of other part-time employees… There is also a huge difference between the onerous duties rendered by the AWWs and AWHs and the part-timers employed by other State Departments.' The court said, 'The duties and obligations of AWWs and AWHs influence the lowest strata of social fabric, and their duties cannot be compared to the duties rendered by other part timers engaged for six hours by the State Departments, for whom the policy of minimum wages of paying Rs 14,800 is implemented vide circular dated July 16, 2019. The amount of Rs.14,800 in the said Circular, is fixed from January 1, 2019, considering the minimum wages payable to Class-IV employees.' The court stated that as per the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Maniben (supra), the AWWs and AWHs were declared to be holding statutory posts. '… the direction issued by the learned Single Judge to treat them at par with regularly selected permanent employees holding posts either in the Central Government or State Government is fallible, since there is fundamental difference in their source of recruitment. There is also a vast difference in their mode and manner of recruitment, requisite educational qualifications etc…,' said the court. The court order further said, 'The AWWs and AWHs, though can be said to be holding statutory posts, and their appointments are neither illegal nor irregular, they still have to satisfy the mandate of the Gujarat Civil Services Classification and Recruitment (General) Rules, 1967, more particularly Rule 4 and Rule 9 thereof. The AWWs cannot be treated at par with Subordinate Service of Class-III. Similarly, AWHs cannot be considered at par with Inferior Service of Class-IV. Class-III and Class-IV employees in the State Government Departments, after undergoing the recruitment process as prescribed under Rules 9 by the respective departments, are placed in particular pay scales.' The court also noted that despite the top court order on the subject of wages, anganwadi workers and helpers are not being paid minimum wages. Referring to an affidavit of July 18, 2025, in which the state had showed the data of the entire state, the court order said, 'On a perusal of the same, we did not find any increase in the wages of the AWWs and AWHs and their plight remains inexorable, hence, this Court cannot have blinkered vision for the paltry remuneration paid to them.'
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
ICSSR issues show cause notice to CSDS for ‘maligning ECI', alleges ‘administrative, financial irregularities'
After the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) issued a show cause notice to the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) for 'deliberately scandalising and maligning the reputation and image of Election Commission of India (ECI)', senior officials at CSDS said that they had received the notice, were 'studying it in detail' and had been given a week's time to reply. Up to 90% of CSDS staff salaries and 50% of its administrative costs are covered by ICSSR, as part of its Grant-in-Aid scheme, according to Education Ministry sources said. Between 2020-21 and the first quarter of 2023-24, CSDS was allocated ₹13.92 crore, the Ministry told the Lok Sabha in 2023. The showcause notice has now asked CSDS to explain 'why the Grant-in-Aid, which is discretionary in nature, should not be cancelled and withdrawn', and CSDS removed from the purview of the ICSSR's Grant-in-Aid scheme. 'Scandalising ECI reputation' The Hindu accessed a copy of the show cause notice, issued by ICSSR deputy director Nitin Kumar and addressed to CSDS director Awadhendra Sharan. It lists eleven 'major irregularities', including a study conducted by CSDS on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls undertaken by the ECI, published with the title, 'How inclusive is EC's special revision exercise?' 'The CSDS seems to have published media stories based on biased interpretation of the SIR exercise by the ECI and deliberately scandalising and maligning the reputation and image of ECI which is a constitutional authority,' the notice states. 'Another study conducted on elections held in Maharashtra in recent past and deliberately allowing its employee holding responsible position at CSDS to make incorrect statements in media…subsequently retracting from the same citing glitches in data analysis…' Irregularities in faculty, director appointments The notice has also sought a reply from CSDS on allegations of 'administrative and financial irregularities', claiming that ICSSR has pointed them out in the past, but has not received any satisfactory response or action taken report from CSDS. These include the appointment of faculty in violation of mandatory UGC regulations and ICSSR guidelines and the consequential extension of illegal financial benefits to such persons, appointment and promotion of non-academic staff in violation of recruitment rules, the failure to hold elections for the chairman of CSDS' governing body, and the opaque method used to appoint the CSDS Director despite ICSSR's instructions to follow an objective and transparent method. The notice further raises concerns about the payment of House Rent Allowance (HRA) to employees staying in government accommodation allocated to their spouses and the grant of illegal financial benefits to such employees causing loss of public funds, CSDS' annual accounts not being audited by the CAG or AG in order to hide financial embezzlement and the misuse of public funds, the failure to submit details of funds recieved through the FCRA route and its use. The notice states that this leads to non-compliance with the principles of good governance issued by ICSSR. FIRs filed against CSDS faculty 'CSDS, Delhi has continuously been involved in various irregularities in the past and they were also reported to ICSSR in form of multiple complaints through various channels,' the show cause notice states. First Information Reports (FIRs) have been filed against CSDS faculty Sanjay Kumar by the Nashik and Nagpur police, for allegedly spreading false claims of voter declines on social media. He later deleted and apologised for these posts. CSDS sources said that Mr. Kumar was 'seeking legal opinion'. Despite repeated attempts, Mr. Kumar was unavailable for comment.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Lawfare politics: on the Bills for political probity
Three Bills, including one for a constitutional amendment, introduced hurriedly by the Centre towards the end of the Parliament session, are purportedly meant to improve probity and accountability for the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers and Ministers. They will lose their position if any of them is detained by a law enforcement agency in connection with an offence that is punishable with imprisonment of five years or more. Upon acquittal, they could return. Any objective observer would be sceptical of the stated intent of these proposals. The concern expressed by the Opposition and legal minds that the proposals open a new avenue for concentration of power with the Centre is legitimate. The claim that the proposed legal regime applies equally to the Prime Minister too is weak, considering the fact that all investigative agencies are under the administrative control of the Centre. No central agency will ever detain a Prime Minister; but they have already arrested several Opposition Chief Ministers. When viewed against the backdrop of the pattern of the functioning of central agencies, such as the Enforcement Directorate and the Central Bureau of Investigation, the real intent of the new proposals by the Centre appears to be to empower itself with sweeping and arbitrary powers, which can be used against political rivals. The police are eager to arrest. The increasing difficulty in obtaining bail due to harsh provisions in laws such as the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, as well as a judicial diffidence in granting bail is making liberty disturbingly dispensable. Corruption is dangerous for a society, but combating it cannot be at the cost of the principles of justice. Corruption prosecutions have attained an unmistakable political character in recent years. The pattern of an individual being a target of investigation when in the Opposition, but no longer once he or she switches sides to the Bharatiya Janata Party is noticeable. If the new proposals are enacted into law, an elected official can be removed from office by mere police action, and without a fair trial, not to mention a judicial conviction. Considering the certainty that this will, in practice, only apply to State/Union Territory governments, it will also be a violation of federal principles. It is not a mere coincidence that the Centre is seeking to invest in State Governors a veto over any and all decisions of elected legislatures. The existing laws provide for the removal from office of elected officials who are convicted in cases as defined in the new proposals. These proposals amount to holding someone guilty until proven innocent, and also dishonouring the verdict of the people who elected them.
