
Disney enters new streaming chapter
Why it matters: It's the latest in a string of Disney's efforts to streamline its direct-to-consumer business as it matures.
Zoom in: Disney said the new, unified Disney+ and Hulu app will be available in 2026. Consumers can still buy subscriptions to the two services separately, but they will be accessed through the same interface.
Hulu has traditionally housed Disney's more mature content, featuring shows from FX and ABC primetime. Disney+ has leaned into family-friendly programming.
Bringing the services together will drive efficiencies for the company and a better consumer experience, Disney CEO Bob Iger told investors.
"You're going to end up with a far better consumer experience when those apps are combined by combining all of the program assets of both current apps," he said.
"With an improved consumer experience comes the ability to lower churn, which is obviously something that we're very, very focused on and committed to doing. We obviously will deliver efficiencies when these are together."
Between the lines: The company also said it would no longer disclose quarterly paid subscriber number updates to investors, a move that other streamers like Netflix have also adopted as they try to push Wall Street to focus instead on their streaming financials.
For Disney, focusing on profit will also help alleviate any concerns of saturation in the U.S.
The entertainment giant on Wednesday said it now has 183 million total streaming subscribers, 128 million of which are for its core Disney+ product.
But the company added no new subscribers for Disney+ in North America. ESPN+ also stayed stagnant at 24.1 million subscribers.
Between the lines: For Disney, offering consumers more ways to bundle their subscriptions represents a stronger opportunity to upsell them and keep them engaged.
Bringing Disney's three services together on one tech stack will give the company "price elasticity" that it didn't have before, Iger said.
The big picture: Disney's transition comes as TV companies grapple with the best way to lean into streaming while preserving their cash-positive linear TV networks.
Iger said the company is drawing less of a distinction between the two mediums, and is more focused on giving consumers as much choice as possible.
"We're at a point, given the way we're operating our businesses, where we don't really look at being in the linear business and the streaming business. We're in the television business," Iger said.
What to watch: The entertainment streaming package will also be available to bundle with ESPN's new streaming service, set to debut later this month.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Why IPTV Subscriptions Are Revolutionizing TV Viewing in 2025
In an era where streaming services dominate entertainment, IPTV (Internet Protocol Television) subscriptions have emerged as a game-changer for how we consume television. Unlike traditional cable or satellite TV, IPTV delivers live TV channels, movies, and on-demand content over the internet, offering unparalleled flexibility and affordability. As the IPTV UK market continues to grow—projected to reach $194.21 billion by 2026—more people are ditching their cable plans for this modern alternative. In this article, we'll explore what makes IPTV subscriptions so appealing, key features to look for, and how to choose the right provider for your entertainment needs. IPTV stands for Internet Protocol Television, a technology that streams television content through broadband internet rather than traditional cable or satellite systems. With an IPTV subscription, users gain access to thousands of live TV channels, video-on-demand (VOD) libraries, and features like catch-up TV or electronic program guides (EPG). These services are typically accessed via apps on devices like smart TVs, Firesticks, Android/iOS devices, or computers, making them highly versatile. Unlike streaming platforms like Netflix or Disney+, which focus primarily on on-demand content, IPTV subscriptions excel at delivering live TV, including sports, news, and international channels, alongside movies and series. This combination of live and on-demand content makes IPTV a compelling choice for cord-cutters seeking a cable-like experience without the hefty price tag. IPTV subscriptions offer several advantages over traditional TV services, making them a popular choice in 2025. Here are the key benefits: One of the primary reasons people switch to IPTV is the significant cost savings. Traditional cable subscriptions can cost hundreds of dollars annually, while many IPTV services offer plans starting as low as $10–$20 per month for thousands of channels and VOD content. This affordability allows users to access premium entertainment without breaking the bank. IPTV subscriptions often provide access to thousands of live channels from around the world, covering sports, entertainment, news, and international programming. For example, some providers boast over 20,000 channels and 150,000 VOD titles, including HD and 4K options. This extensive selection ensures there's something for everyone, from sports enthusiasts to movie buffs. With IPTV, you're not tied to a specific location or device. Most services are compatible with a wide range of devices, including smart TVs, Firesticks, smartphones, and PCs. Features like catch-up TV, DVR, and multi-device streaming allow you to watch your favorite shows anytime, anywhere, as long as you have a stable internet connection (recommended at least 20 Mbps for HD streaming). IPTV subscriptions often come with advanced features that enhance the viewing experience. These include electronic program guides (EPG), pause/rewind live TV, and VOD libraries with movies and series updated regularly. Some providers even offer multi-screen viewing, allowing multiple users in a household to watch different content simultaneously. For viewers interested in global programming, IPTV subscription are a treasure trove. Whether it's European sports, Asian dramas, or American news, IPTV services provide access to channels and content from virtually every continent, making them ideal for multicultural households or expatriates. With thousands of IPTV providers available, choosing the right one can be daunting. Here are key factors to consider when selecting a subscription: A reliable IPTV provider ensures minimal buffering and high-quality streams (HD, FHD, or 4K). Look for services with stable servers and positive user reviews for uptime and performance. Declining stream quality can be a red flag for deeper issues, so opt for providers with a reputation for consistency. Ensure the provider offers the channels and content you care about, such as local stations, sports, or international programming. Some services also include premium features like pay-per-view (PPV) events or adult programming, depending on your preferences. Check if the VOD library is regularly updated with new movies and shows. The best IPTV services support a wide range of devices, including Amazon Firestick, Android/iOS devices, smart TVs, and computers. Confirm that the provider's app or player (e.g., IPTV Smarters Pro, TiviMate) is compatible with your devices for a seamless experience. Reputable providers often offer free trials (ranging from 12 hours to 48 hours) to let you test the service before committing. Monthly subscriptions are safer than long-term plans, as they minimize risk if the provider shuts down unexpectedly. Look for flexible payment options like PayPal or credit cards for added security. Quality customer support is crucial, especially for troubleshooting technical issues. Opt for providers with 24/7 support via live chat, email, or ticketing systems. Responsive support can make a significant difference in your streaming experience. Not all IPTV services are legal. Verified services, like YouTube TV or Sling TV, are available in official app stores and hold proper licensing, but they tend to be pricier. Unverified services, often cheaper, may lack proper licensing and carry legal risks. To protect yourself, use a VPN like ExpressVPN to mask your IP address and ensure secure streaming, especially on unverified services or restricted networks. Always check if the provider has the necessary licenses for your country. Ready to dive into IPTV? Here's a quick guide to get started: Choose a Provider: Research reputable IPTV services based on reviews, channel offerings, and trial options. Avoid providers with poor customer feedback or a history of abruptly shutting down. Check Internet Speed: Ensure your internet connection is at least 20 Mbps for smooth HD streaming. Faster speeds (50 Mbps+) are ideal for 4K content. Download the App: Install the provider's app or a compatible IPTV player (e.g., IPTV Smarters Pro, TiviMate) on your device. Some services may require side-loading for unverified apps. Test with a Trial: Take advantage of free trials to evaluate stream quality, channel selection, and ease of use before committing to a paid plan. Use a VPN: For privacy and access to geo-restricted content, use a VPN like ExpressVPN, especially when traveling or using unverified services. Explore Features: Familiarize yourself with features like EPG, catch-up TV, or DVR to maximize your subscription's value. IPTV subscriptions are transforming the way we watch television by offering affordability, flexibility, and a vast array of content. With the ability to stream live TV, movies, and series on multiple devices, IPTV caters to modern viewing habits in a way traditional cable cannot. As the market continues to grow, driven by demand for high-quality streaming and international content, IPTV is poised to become the go-to choice for entertainment enthusiasts worldwide. However, it's essential to choose a reputable provider to avoid common pitfalls like buffering, unreliable service, or legal issues. By prioritizing reliability, compatibility, and customer support, you can unlock a world of entertainment tailored to your needs. Ready to cut the cord? Explore IPTV subscriptions today and discover a smarter, more flexible way to enjoy your favorite shows, sports, and movies. For more information on top providers and pricing, check trusted resource… TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will the NFL Bring the Magic Back to Disney Stock?
In this podcast, Motley Fool contributors Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Rachel Warren discuss: The NFL and Disney. Rivian's lost EV credits. Shopify's great quarter. Upstart's explosive growth. To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy. A full transcript is below. Do the experts think Walt Disney is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Walt Disney make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,047% vs. just 181% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 865.68%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,563!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,108,033!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 This podcast was recorded on August 06, 2025. Travis Hoium: Disney pulled off a coup locking up the NFL as not just a partner but a part owner of ESPN. Motley Fool Money starts now. Today we're going to get to some of the recent earnings from Rivian, Shopify, and Upstart. But let's start with Disney and the NFL. Disney reported results this morning as we're recording, and they were fine, revenue was up 3% to $23.7 billion. There was a 15% drop in linear TV, so cord cutting is still a huge problem. But the big news is ESPN officially announcing a deal to acquire the NFL network. They get RedZone distribution, NFL's fantasy football business, and more this coincides with ESPN streaming app launching August 21st. You're going to be able to access all of these things all through the streaming app. ESPN also gets six additional NFL games going from 22-28 on that platform. Lou, if you take out political programming over the past year, the NFL accounts for about 98 out of the top 100 shows each year. This seems like a huge get for ESPN. Lou Whiteman: It's definitely a logical fit. It's hard to screw up if your goal is to, I'm going to try and make money off the NFL. That's what history tells us. I'm not really an NFL guy, to be honest. But look, it is the most important live content out there, at least sports content. Adding NFL games and content ahead of launching a streaming service, a no brainer. But Travis, if I had any pushback, I'd say, I think ESPN streaming is going to be a success either way. I'm not sure if I'm Disney how much I'd want to give up to secure this. I think it's a nice to have, not a need. The biggest impact might be outside of ESPN. Fox is launching a similar service. Discovery, Comcast, Paramount, they all have streaming services. They're all scrambling to add live sports. For me, the biggest benefit to Disney having the NFL is that all of these guys won't have the NFL, and the deal makes it a lot harder for all of those competitors. Rachel Warren: This is a landmark deal. There's no doubt about that. That could also be really beneficial for both parties. Bear in mind, you've still got some regulatory hurdles that could be ahead. The agreements also subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements and approval by NFL team owners. But, for example, merging NFL fantasy with ESPN fantasy football, creates a combined official NFL fantasy football experience. That could potentially dominate a large and lucrative market. We've also seen that ESPN will license an additional three NFL games per season to air on the acquired NFL network, which ESPN will now own and operate. That allows Disney to integrate NFL content across its platforms. That could potentially include, merchandising opportunities, theme park experiences, ways of capitalizing on the broader Disney ecosystem. This also, I think, very much aligns with the NFL's interest, as well as they seek to really further monetize their media assets. NFL has previously stated their ambition to reach 25 billion in annual revenue by 2027. But I think if you're looking at this as a Disney shareholder, this is great news for ESPN. Travis Hoium: The story isn't just about ESPN. This is really a Disney streaming story. Every streamer has essentially two challenges. How do you acquire customers and how do you prevent them from churning? This was something that came up a bunch of times during their conference call. The NFL should help with both, especially when you think about bundling them with Disney Plus and Hulu that's going to launch at $30 a month. That sounds expensive, but that's a lot of content for that. We know that Netflix is a Number 1 streaming company with over 300 million subscribers, but Disney Plus has 128 million, 56 million for Hulu, another 24 million for ESPN. Could the bundle that Disney is building position them to be at least Number 2 and potentially challenge Netflix on a different vector with sports and this family entertainment that they have with Disney properties as their competitive advantage. Rachel, what do you think? Rachel Warren: I do think this is a game changer for Disney. I do think it could give it a leg up as it continues to really battle it out for streaming domination against the likes of Netflix. Although these two businesses aren't necessarily one to one. As traditional cable subscriptions decline, though, this deal does allow ESPN to better adapt to the changing media consumption. Habits of fans. Netflix is also investing in live sports, but I do think this ESPN NFL deal really positions Disney to offer a much more robust and specialized sports experience. That could be a key differentiator in the competitive streaming market. They could even leverage the deal to boost advertising revenue through more targeted advertising enabled by that massive sports ecosystem. ESPN is building a comprehensive sports platform. It's creating this one stop shop approach that can appeal both to casual as well as hardcore sports fans. While other streaming services like Netflix are investing in live sports, I think that there is this reality where the combination of ESPN's established brand, the NFL's popularity, and just the underlying financial strength of Disney, it does give ESPN a unique advantage. I do think that it's fair to say that few other platforms can offer such a complete and compelling sports experience. Lou Whiteman: My only real pushback is, I think Disney was pretty well set up even prior to this deal. I think all the moves they've made, Hulu, everything they've done, they are well on their way to being a strong Number 2. In that regard, I'm not sure this is a game changer, but look, my household, we pay for YouTube each month. We subscribe to ESPN Plus. We don't watch a lot of other channels. I'm a soccer geek, so I'm going to hang on to Paramount and Peacock, but I know that's not the majority. I could see a world where Netflix and Disney are all most families really need, and for investors, I don't think it matters who's one and who's two. Travis Hoium: You touched on, Lou. The interesting thing coming up is going to be how much gravity does the NFL hold when it comes to sports rights for other leagues? If this is the place to go for sports, and if you're a sports fan, you have to have ESPN and essentially the Disney bundle. What does that mean for other content? We saw a deal with the WWE and their premium live events announced also this morning. That's going to start in 2026, last for five years. That company is actually owned by TKO who also runs the UFC. They're negotiating a rights deal that ESPN currently has, and they're playing all the streamers off of each other. There's different ways that these companies can go. One would be the MLS route, which went with Apple TV hasn't seemed to be a big success. Is this going to create a gravity for more sports content to end up on the ESPN platform? Lou Whiteman: I think it will. MLS talks growth, and they love to talk about growth. But look, I'm a soccer fan and I don't have Apple TV, and I think a lot of that growth, you better look at the denominator because you're talking about small numbers overall. I'm not the first person to say this, but it does feel like we're going back to the past. We're going back to we pay one or two large sums to an aggregator or a couple of aggregators instead of just a dozen $9 a month subscriptions. I'm not sure that's good news for the consumer. It's maybe just whatever news. But if you're a Disney shareholder, and Disney is transferring all of that value that used to go to the Comcast at the world, and they are now the aggregator, and they're getting that value, I think it's certainly good news for Disney shareholders. Rachel Warren: I do think you're right, Lou. I do think this recent development as well could really bring other players in this space into the fold. The funny thing about MLS commissioner Don Garber had recently said that the season pass available on Apple TV, it's leveraging about 120,000 unique viewers a match. That's a 50% increase from a year ago, but it's considerably lower than the average viewership that MLS games achieved on ESPN. I think it really underscores the importance of that ecosystem. For what it's worth, Disney, ESPN, this is very much a dynamic of going all in on live sports as a core part of the streaming strategy. That recent WWE deal really reinforces this commitment, and UFC remains a high, valuable property for them. It's generated record revenues for the business. It looks like they're still working on renewing their relationship with UFC, who is reportedly seeking a significantly higher yield than they have in the past. But I think that WWE deal could be an indicator of a potential path forward for UFC and NFL deal could create an environment where other players could fear getting left out in the cold if they don't ink a deal soon. Travis Hoium: Now, ESPN is trying to integrate everything together, not only all these sports rights, but also as Rachel mentioned, fantasy sports and sports betting. Now, this is going to be a interesting thread for [inaudible] team to try to work their way through because only a small percentage of people are actually betting on sports, but it sounds they're going to be integrating this quite a bit. Do you think that they're going to be able to pull this off correctly, Lou? Because if I'm seeing all betting information on the ESPN app, that could be a turn off for me as excited as I am to see something like fantasy sports there. Lou Whiteman: I think Pandora's box is open, and I think it'll be fine. Disney, look, they have the history of trying to be more thoughtful about this stuff than others. I definitely think it's something you have to worry about, but I don't think this derails them. I think they figured this out, because I think we're all getting used to betting a lot quicker than we thought we would, whether we do it or not. Travis Hoium: Let's end this segment with a bowl prediction. I have a bowl prediction for you too that I want your thoughts on Disney's streaming revenue with Disney Plus and Hulu is currently on a $24.7 billion run rate that does not include ESPN Plus. Netflix has a $44.3 billion run rate as of the most recent quarter. ESPN is going to be going over the top with $30 per month. Is Disney's streaming business going to be bigger than Netflix in 2026? I think it is. But what are your thoughts Rachel? Rachel Warren: I do think that that's absolutely the case that they could in fact be the bigger streaming company than Netflix by 2026. One analyst report that I saw had estimated that Disney Plus could reach something like 294 million subscribers by next year, and that would exceed the projections for Netflix of around 286 million. Ultimately, these are two fantastic businesses. They do cater to different types of streaming needs as well. I think Disney can be a winner and continue to be so really regardless of whether or not it actually exceeds Netflix's subscriber figures. But bowl prediction, I think it's possible. Lou Whiteman: I think probably is the answer, but like Rachel said, I don't think we should obsess on this, and I don't think as investors, it really matters. I don't think Disney's really competing with Netflix. I think they are competing to make sure it is them and Netflix, and they are the big other thing here. Look, Disney and Netflix have much different economics inside streaming, much different total businesses. Just Disney has all things going on. As an investor, I don't want to read too much into comparison. I'm ready to call Disney a winner. I'm not ready to call them Netflix in terms of profitability and stuff. That's how I view it as an investor. Travis Hoium: Their experiences business hit $2.5 billion in quarterly operating income. That's a business that Netflix doesn't have, so they are playing a different game. Next up, we're going to check in on EVs and shopping trends. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Lou Whiteman: Wish you could lock in rates without locking out liquidity? Meet LDDR a LifeX treasury bond ladder ETF built to simplify your cash flow plan for the next 10 years. With LDDR, you can lock in today's interest rates for a decade. It's built to deliver predictable monthly cash flow that boosts interest income by including tax free return of principle. That means the potential for higher, more stable cash flow without worrying about rate cuts, reinvestment risk or market swings. LDDR, take the guesswork out of your cash flow plan. Learn more at The LifeX ETFs return principal over the life of an ETF and therefore expected to have little or no assets remaining to distribute at the time of liquidation. Individual bonds carry an obligation to fully return the principal to shareholders at maturity. However, ETFs have no such obligation. The net asset value of the ETFs will decline over time as income payments are made to shareholders. The tax discussion herein is general in nature. Investors should consult with their tax advisor about the effect that an investment in LifeX ETFs could have on their tax situation. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks and charges and expenses of LDDR carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company and can be obtained by visiting or by calling 1-888-331-5558. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing. Investing in the LifeX ETFs involve risk. Principal laws is possible. The LifeX income ETFs are distributed by Foresight Financial Services, LLC. Travis Hoium: The EV space has struggled in 2025, and it looks like things are going to get worse before they get better, the elimination of the EV tax credit and restrictions on states' ability to create emissions restrictions, which ends up being regulatory credits for companies like Rivian and Tesla are hitting companies hard. Rivian said last night that they're going to generate $140 million less in revenue than they thought from those credit sales. This seems like a huge hit for EV companies. But is this going to be a boon for Detroit Lou? Lou Whiteman: Change is inherently risky for the incumbents. That's the whole point. The simple fact, and I think we have enough data to call it fact that things are going slower than planned, and we're losing some of these subsidies. Yes, that is indeed a boon for the incumbents. It could be bad news from the newcomers. I think Rivian is probably fine. I respect what they do, but look, Travis, it cracks me up to see it, the number of words and the number of calisthenics they use to get to the word profit in their profitability timeline, that's never a great sign. Meanwhile, Detroit's legacy business provides cash flows that Rivian and Teslas can't match. I think it's a pretty good time to be the incumbents. One word of caution, though, is, I don't necessarily want to call, especially all of the legacy automakers winners because of this. I think the future is going to be messy and uncertain. I think it'll involve consolidation. It'll involve reshuffling. I would really honestly be surprised if any of these stocks outperform the market over the next five years. But if nothing else, the idea that Detroit is toast and these newcomers are just going to inherit the world, I think that's done and dusted. The future likely involves Tesla, GM, Toyota, Ford, and maybe even Rivian, at least in brands, but it's going to be messy from here. Rachel Warren: Regulatory credits are earned by producing vehicles with low or zero emissions. That was a crucial revenue stream for EV manufacturers like Rivian and Tesla. While those regulatory credit changes do negatively impact EV makers, they could absolutely be a positive development for more traditional automakers. But I think the long term impact on EV adoption really remains to be seen. Some analysts have anticipated something like a short term surge in sales at least as consumers are trying to really take advantage of the expiring federal EV tax credit, but I still think there's tremendous potential in this space. The short term look ahead could be challenging, though. Travis Hoium: Shopify is the big winner in trading today after they came out with earnings. This is a hidden gems recommendation going all the way back to 2018. It's been recommended multiple times, starting at $14.05, so well over a 10 bagger since then. Rachel, what did we learn from Shopify about the quarter? Rachel Warren: This was a great quarter for Shopify. They beat on essentially all key metrics of note. They reported revenue of 2.7 billion. That was a beat from what analysts were projecting. They beat on the bottom line. GMV rose 31% year over year. That was also a beat. But importantly, and this is something that investors were really wanting to hear, what is the impact of tariffs? At least for now, Shopify leadership has indicated that while they had anticipated some impact from tariffs, those effects really did not materialize as strongly as they expected in Q2. For example, CFO Jeff Hoffmeister stated that they hadn't observed a slowdown in US demand in transactions. Even though they saw merchants raising prices in some cases, this seemingly wasn't due to significant tariff related cost increases. They also noted that Shopify hadn't seen any meaningful changes in cross border activity or buyer behavior, despite the existing trade tensions. Importantly, only 4% of Shopify's global gross merchandise volume is shipped under de minimis exemptions. This suggests that the impact of removing that exemption is having a limited effect on the company's overall business. This was a really great quarter, and certainly the market responded positively to those developments. Lou Whiteman: I think the tariff commentary is what's juicing the stock. I think a lot of us were confident that tariffs wouldn't ruin Shopify's business, but it was still really interesting to hear them talk about how little of an impact it has had. Here's the thing, though. I don't think the tariff story has played out yet. I do think the impact on mainstream will creep higher in the quarters to come, and it will inevitably to some extent, impact consumer spending. Just as before, I don't for a second, think this is going to ruin Shopify, but investors who might have been overly worried yesterday should not be totally dismissive today. I'm a happy holder of Shopify, but I'm personally zero interested in buying into this rally. Travis Hoium: I want to get to Upstart quickly. They reported over 100% revenue growth, but the stock is down today. Rachel, quickly, what did we learn from Upstart? Rachel Warren: They had their first GAAP profitable quarter since Q2 of 2022. As you noted, revenue surged 102% year over year. They also originated 159% more loans than one year ago. More than 90% of its loans processed through its AI driven underwriting platform are completely automated without human intervention. They're continuing to build really strong relationships with their funding partners, seeing the success from their newer home equity line of credit product. Over 50% of funding is coming from committed partnership agreements. It's adding a lot more stability to its business model. It was pretty great results for Upstart. Lou Whiteman: I'm a happy shareholder here, too, but if we're honest, the risk reward here remains high. We had another quarter where evidence that the partners like the platform. They're doing a good job, filling the demand that's there. But to me, the COVID recession, with all the stimulus, that doesn't really count as a true downturn. With Fintex, there are always a lot of unknowns until a company has proven its model works through a real sustained downturn. My big takeaway from Upstart is they did nothing to diminish the build bull case, but there's still just so much we won't know for a while. Travis Hoium: As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. Don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisers are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only to see our full advertising disclosure. Please check out our show notes. For Lou Whiteman, Rachel Warren, and Dan Boyd behind the glass, and the entire Motley Fool team, I'm Travis Hoium. We'll see you tomorrow. Lou Whiteman has positions in Shopify and Upstart. Rachel Warren has positions in Apple and Shopify. Travis Hoium has positions in Shopify and Walt Disney and has the following options: long December 2027 $5 puts on Rivian Automotive. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Netflix, Shopify, Tesla, Upstart, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Comcast, General Motors, and TKO Group Holdings. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Will the NFL Bring the Magic Back to Disney Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool


Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
‘Fantastic Four: First Steps' Continues Big Box Office Dive With 61% Drop
Disney and Marvel Studios' The Fantastic Four: First Steps — which had a steep drop in business in its second Friday to Sunday frame — is continuing its big box office dive in its third weekend in theaters. The third and Marvel Cinematic Universe release in 2025 after Captain America: Brave New World and Thunderbolts*, The Fantastic Four: First Steps found solid footing in its opening weekend in theaters July 25-27 with a domestic take of $115.6 million. The film's second weekend, Aug. 1-3 proved disastrous, however, as the film's $38.6 million domestic tally marked a 67% drop in business. Any hope for a turnaround in the film's third Friday to Sunday for The Fantastic Four quickly dissipated this weekend, though, as Deadline released its projections for the Aug. 8-10 North American box office. As of Saturday, the trade publication projected that The Fantastic Four: First Steps will earn $15 million from 3,600 North American theaters, marking a 61% drop from last weekend's already ailing numbers. Should the $15 million projection by Deadline hold, it will boost The Fantastic Four: First Steps' domestic tally to $229.9 million. The Fantastic Four: First Steps, per Variety, had a production budget of $200 million-plus before prints and advertisting costs. 'Superman's' Business Only Drops 41% In Weekend No. 5 The Fantastic Four: First Steps' main competitor for the top-grossing superhero movie of 2025 — James Gunn's Superman — is projected to make $7.8 million in its fifth weekend in theaters following its opening on July 11. The projected tally marks a $43% drop in business from the film's fourth weekend in theaters. Should Deadline's projection hold, this weekend's box office will boost Superman's domestic take to $331.2 million. Given Superman's solid hold at the box office and The Fantastic Four's downhill slide, DC Studios' Man of Steel film is poised to handily defeat the latest MCU chapter by the time each film wraps its theatrical run. The Fantastic Four: First Steps' drop to third place at the domestic box office comes in the wake of the strong performances of two newcomers — the Warner Bros. horror thriller Weapons and Disney's Freaky Friday sequel Freakier Friday. Weapons is projected by Deadline to earn anywhere from $40 million to $43 million in its opening weekend, while the trade publication pegs a $30 million to $32 million first frame for Freakier Friday. The final numbers for this weekend's box office will be released on Monday.