logo
Denzel Washington, Spike Lee Couldn't Have Made ‘Highest 2 Lowest' Without Apple Streaming Deal: ‘Industry Has Changed'

Denzel Washington, Spike Lee Couldn't Have Made ‘Highest 2 Lowest' Without Apple Streaming Deal: ‘Industry Has Changed'

Yahoo15 hours ago
But the star and his director still urge audiences to see their latest collab in theaters Aug. 15
Spike Lee and Denzel Washington's 'Highest 2 Lowest' hits theaters on Aug. 15 and in a joint interview with Vanity Fair published Thursday, the pair discussed the film's limited theatrical release and how Apple played a big part in getting the film made.
The film will hit the streamer in September. While discussing the shifting landscape of film distribution they acknowledged how limited theatrical rollout is now the name of the game in the industry.
More from TheWrap
'Sketch' Saved: How Angel Studios Rescued a Festival Darling and Blessed It With a Big Summertime Release
Brands Are Buying Their Way Into Writers' Rooms
Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a 'Scheduling Conflict'
Denzel Washington, Spike Lee Couldn't Have Made 'Highest 2 Lowest' Without Apple Streaming Deal: 'Industry Has Changed'
'That's the nature of the business now—they also gave us a lot of money to make the film,' Washington said of Apple's involvement. 'The industry has changed. Time has changed. So we've got to change with the times.'
'This film would not have been made without Apple,' Lee said. 'That's just the truth.'
Though Washington and Lee are regarded as an iconic actor/director pairing, it's been a long time since they last partnered in this way. Their first collaboration was 'Mo' Better Blues,' released in 1990, followed by 'Malcolm X' (for which Washington scored a Best Actor nomination) and 'He Got Game' later that decade. Their most recent team-up was 'Inside Man,' which came in 2006 — nearly two decades prior to 'Highest 2 Lowest.'
Now, they're playing with house money at A24, with the film (produced in part by Apple Studios) scheduled to land on Apple TV+ on Sept 5.
It's a move that gave the pair the freedom to make the film, which adapts Akira Kurosawa's 'High and Low' in the modern day, how they saw fit. It also meant 'Highest 2 Lowest' would have a truncated theatrical window of three weeks — with major chains like AMC and Cinemark not screening the film at all.
'We'd done this four times already, and the last time was a great box office success,' Lee said. 'Not to say that all success is built upon box office, but—'
'But it is called show business,' Washington added. 'No business, no show. No business, no next show.'
'That's true,' Lee said. 'We understand the ramifications of this business.'
When the pair made 'Inside Man,' they brought in more than $180 million at the box office. Washington's last theatrical film, 'Gladiator 2,' made roughly $462 million with a budget in the hundreds of millions. A more modest effort, Lee's last solo theatrical effort, 'BlacKkKlansman' (starring Denzel's son, John David Washington) made over $90 million on an approximate budget of $15 million.
'Highest 2 Lowest's' theatrical strategy all but guarantees these numbers will be impossible for Lee and Washington's latest film. Still, the pair urged those who are able to go out and see the film before they stream it in September.
'I'll keep saying August 15,' Washington said.
'No matter how big that TV on the wall in your home is, see it in theaters first,' Lee said.
The post Denzel Washington, Spike Lee Couldn't Have Made 'Highest 2 Lowest' Without Apple Streaming Deal: 'Industry Has Changed' appeared first on TheWrap.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion
Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion

Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell turned down his former employee, the late Steve Jobs, when he was offered to buy a third of Apple for $50,000 in the 1970s. With the iPhone titan now standing at $3.1 trillion, the video gaming pioneer missed out on making $1 trillion from his relatively small investment. But he isn't troubling himself with regret, reasoning he might not be as happy—and Apple may not have been as successful—if he accepted the deal. Many people may be kicking themselves for not buying Bitcoin or investing in Nvidia stock sooner—but few will have missed out on a bigger deal than Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell, the first Silicon Valley boss of the late Steve Jobs. A young Jobs offered the gaming mogul an eye-popping deal: buy a third of Apple for just $50,000. What might come as a shock to many is that Bushnell turned it down. Apple has since grown into a $3.1 billion sensation with over a billion iPhones sitting in people's back pockets, and over 100 million Mac users worldwide—and if Bushnell had taken the deal, his cut would have made him $1 trillion today. But Bushnell isn't crying over the missed opportunity Bushnell first witnessed Jobs' potential as a businessman in the 1970s, when the college dropout joined Atari as a technician and games designer before moving into entrepreneurship. Jobs was an essential engineer 'solving problems in the field' at Atari, Bushnell recalled, but his leadership mentality also meant some tension at the office. The Atari cofounder strategically employed Jobs during nightshifts, knowing that Wozniak would also join and help out on projects like the brick-breaking game 'Breakout.' But Jobs would also barge into his office to tell Bushnell that the other employees weren't good at soldering, offering to instruct them. Bushnell recognized that Jobs was a genius—albiet, a complicated one. 'He was a difficult person,' Bushnell told ABC News in 2015. 'He was very smart. Often he was the smartest person in the room, and he would tell everybody that. It's generally not a good social dynamic.' But years later, the tech pioneer isn't quietly simmering over his choice to reject the offer. 'I could have owned a third of Apple computer for $50,000, and I turned it down,' Bushnell said in the interview. 'I've got a wonderful family, I've got a great wife, my life is wonderful. I'm not sure that if I had been uber, uber, uber rich that I'd have had all of that.' In fact, Bushnell even thinks Apple may not have been so successful if he had taken the deal. And his potential payout may not have soared to that trillion-dollar height. 'I'm still an Apple fan and you know I think that hindsight is 20/20,' he told Tech Radar in 2013, when asked about his decision to say no. 'I can go through a thread very easily which, by me turning Steve down led to me introducing him to Don Valentine, and he introduced him to Mike Markkula who is as responsible for Apple's success as Steve Woz[niak] and Jobs.' He's not the first tech boss to have missed out on billions Bushnell isn't the only one who missed out on critical business opportunities that would launch them into billionaire status—there are even others who blew it on big deals with Apple. Ronald Wayne, the lesser-known third Apple cofounder, was also working at the electronics company Atari when he stepped up as Jobs' friend to help convince Wozniak of formalizing Apple's launch. Wayne even typed up the contract, penning that he would receive a 10% share in the tech company, while Jobs and Wozniak would each be awarded a 45% stake. However, less than two weeks after drafting up the document, Wayne sold his stake for just $800, also reaping $1,500 to forgo any claim to the company. Looking back, it's a massive misstep as his 10% share could now be worth between $75 billion and $300 billion today. His wasted opportunity isn't as stark as Bushnell's—and the decision mainly came from a desire to have financial stability in his life. 'Jobs and Woz didn't have two nickels to rub together,' Wayne told Business Insider in 2017. 'I, on the other hand, had a house, and a car, and a bank account—which meant that I was on the hook if that thing blew up.' YouTube's cofounders, Chad Hurley, Steven Chen and Jawed Karim could also be sitting in a sizable nest egg today if they didn't sell their company so early. The YouTube creators sold their popular video platform to Google for $1.65 billion in fall 2006—each receiving millions of dollars worth of stock. Hurley got company shares worth around $345 million, according to The New York Times, while Chen accepted about $326 million worth. Karim, who left the business early to go back to school, got $64 million of shares. They were ecstatic about the deal in the beginning, but the buyer's remorse would potentially creep up less than 20 years later. Today, YouTube is valued at $550 billion—333 times higher than its market cap from nearly two decades prior, adjusted to inflation. If Hurley and Chen accepted the same stock deal today that they did in 2006, each could have more than $100 billion in their bank accounts. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio

Kansas City Chiefs arrive at preseason matchup vs. Seattle Seahawks in style
Kansas City Chiefs arrive at preseason matchup vs. Seattle Seahawks in style

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kansas City Chiefs arrive at preseason matchup vs. Seattle Seahawks in style

The Kansas City Chiefs arrived in style at Lumen Stadium for their tilt against the Seattle Seahawks in Week 2 of the 2025 NFL preseason. Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes and tight end Travis Kelce — who always make a point to don their best attire for Kansas City's games — were sure to dress their best for Seattle's famously dreary weather as the rain started to fall in the Emerald City. Mahomes wore an all-white ensemble that featured the Adidas logo, a silver chain, and a snazzy hat from his new steakhouse, 1587 Prime. Kelce joined his quarterback in promoting the fledgling restaurant by wearing a white 1587 Prime cap, an orange and green rugby shirt, and oversized khakis. Take a look at what the rest of the reigning AFC champions wore as they walked to Kansas City's locker room this evening: Patrick Mahomes Travis Kelce Bryan Cook and Jared Wiley Charles Omenihu and Marquise 'Hollywood' Brown Andy Reid This article originally appeared on Chiefs Wire: Chiefs make fashionable entrance at preseason matchup vs. Seahawks

Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a ‘Scheduling Conflict'
Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a ‘Scheduling Conflict'

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a ‘Scheduling Conflict'

This year's honorees include George Strait, Michael Crawford, Sylvester Stallone, singer Gloria Gaynor and rock legends Kiss Country icon George Strait, actor Michael Crawford, Sylvester Stallone, disco legend Gloria Gaynor and the rock band Kiss will be honored at this year's highly unusual John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts honors. But according to one report, the biggest movie star in the world was also invited to join their ranks — but he declined. On Wednesday the Washington Post reported that Tom Cruise was also invited to be feted by the Kennedy Center, but turned the offer down due to a 'scheduling conflict.' WaPo cites 'several current and former Kennedy Center employees who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss event plans' for this report, but notes neither Cruise nor his representatives have commented on the story. More from TheWrap Nicole Byer Jokes School Now Prepares Kids for Jobs That Will Be Taken Away by ChatGPT | Video DC Attorney General Sues Trump Over 'Unlawful' Washington Takeover: 'The Gravest Threat' Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a 'Scheduling Conflict' UTA Vice Chairman Jay Sures Ordered to Pay $150K in Legal Fees to Pro-Palestine UCLA Grad Student Representatives for the actor didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from TheWrap. But while Cruise won't be attending the ceremony, the 5 honorees who do will experience what is likely to be the most unusual version in the 48-year history of the awards. Continuing from Trump's takeover — and subsequent right wing political makeover — of the Kennedy Center earlier this year, Trump chose all of this year's nominees and he also plans to host this year's event. Indeed, in his statement announcing this, he also complained about having never been so honored, saying in part, 'I wanted one, I was never able to get one. It's true, actually. I would've taken it if they would've called me. I waited, and waited, and waited.' Ok then. 'Then I said to hell with it, I'll become chairman. And I'll give myself an honor. Next year we'll honor Trump, OK?' the president continued. Trump also complained about the fact that he is hosting, claiming in his remarks that he was 'begged' to do it. With or without Cruise, this year's honors happen Dec. 7, 2025, which incidentally also happens to be Pearl Harbor Day. The post Tom Cruise Turned Down Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center Honors Due to a 'Scheduling Conflict' appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store