Twin Lamborghinis seized in central London supercar crackdown
One car was stopped by officers over a discrepancy with the vehicle's insurance. But after routine checks, officers had enough information to arrest four people for immigration offences.The force said uninsured driving was often linked to broader criminal activity including drink and drug driving, disqualified driving, stolen vehicles, money laundering, drug running and organised crime.
Luxury vehicles seized included Ferraris, Lamborghinis and Bentleys that were either unroadworthy or being driven illegally.A pair of uninsured purple Lamborghinis were also seized after they were flown into the UK for their owner's summer trip. One of the two drivers had been in the country for two hours and had been driving for 15 minutes before the car was seized, the Motor Insurers' Bureau said.Several of the seized vehicles had been brought to the UK from abroad, with drivers using motor insurance from their home countries without verifying whether the policy provided coverage in the UK, the organisation added.
Andy Trotter, from the Motor Insurers' Bureau said: "Someone is hit by an uninsured driver every 20 minutes in the UK, someone is seriously injured by an uninsured driver every day and one person will lose their lives to an uninsured driver every week."
One driver who was stopped by police officers told BBC London: "Apparently the car came up without insurance on this registration."It was my mistake because I changed it two days ago. "On DVLA it wasn't automatically swapped from the original reg number to the personalised one, and my mistake was not to call the insurance and declare the new reg with them."
Special Chief Officer James Deller, from the Met's Special Constabulary, said the operation was in response to concerns from residents and businesses that high-value vehicles were "causing a nuisance" in central and west London.
Seven men and one woman were arrested during the operation:A 22-year-old man who was arrested for ABH and criminal damageA 25-year-old man, who was later charged for possession of a Class B drugA 27-year-old man was arrested for theft of a motor vehicle and released under investigationA 23-year-old man was arrested for theft of motor vehicle, dangerous driving, failing to stop for police, no insurance, no driving licence and drug drivingThree men, aged 26, 35 and 39, and a 23-year-old woman, were arrested on suspicion of immigration offences.
Last year's operation saw £60m worth of vehicles seized, including a McLaren, Bentley, Rolls Royce, Ferrari and Lamborghini, mostly due to a lack of insurance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Don't put expensive items at front of stores because ‘people will nick them', minister tells shopkeepers
Shopkeepers should not place 'high value' items close to store entrances because 'obviously people will nick', a Labour minister has told shopkeepers. It comes after new figures showed that shoplifting is at a record high, with retailers accusing police of not doing enough to tackle the problem. Asked about the issue, policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said expensive items such as alcohol should not be displayed at the front of stores and said shopkeepers needed to do more to deter shoplifters. Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Dame Diana said: 'I think stores need to play their part in making sure that items that are high value are not at the front of the store because that is an issue in some stores, that they put bottles of alcohol at the front of the store, which obviously people will nick. 'If they are going to steal to resell, they will nick items like that. So I think it is not just one thing here, it has to be an approach with the retailers, with the government and with the police to work together.' But she warned members of the public against confronting shoplifters, after Tory Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley Matthew Barber claimed people had a duty to stand up to shoplifters rather than relying solely on police officers. 'I would not advise people to tackle an individual who was stealing. I came across someone stealing in a store in Hull. 'I went straight to the assistant to tell them what was happening. I felt that was the best thing to do. 'Obviously, it is a judgment for individuals to take, but I am worried about people feeling they need to have a go. I don't think that is appropriate', she said. Shoplifting hit a record high in 2024, with the number of offences surpassing 500,000 for the first time. Some 530,643 offences were recorded by forces in England and Wales in 2024/25 - up 20 per cent from 444,022 in 2023/24 and is the highest total since current police recording practices began in 2002/03. Offences involving theft from the person have also remained at record levels. Some 151,220 of these offences were recorded by forces in the year to March, up 15 per cent from 131,584 in the previous 12 months – again, the highest since the current recording began in 2002/03. Speaking on Wednesday, Richard Walker, the executive chairman of supermarket chain Iceland, argued that shoplifting is getting worse because offenders appeared to be able to act with 'impunity'. 'We now have over 1,000 serious incidents a year, serious incidents being marauding gangs, violent assaults, needles, knives, hammers, you name it', he told the Today programme. 'I go through our weekly serious incidents report every Monday morning, and it is clear that firstly, there is now no area of the country unaffected by this issue, it happens everywhere from small market towns through to big inner cities. 'But secondly, and importantly, there is an impunity, an increasing level of violence that is caused by a lack of deterrent.' Responding to his remarks, Dame Diana said: 'I think he does actually have a point, and that's why we're investing into neighbourhood policing, because we know a police deterrent in our town centres and in our high streets is really important in starting to tackle shop theft and anti-social behaviour. 'We're bringing forward legislation to make it a specific offence to assault a retail worker, and we're getting rid of what the previous government brought in, which was this sort of £200 limit. If you stole below £200, the case wouldn't necessarily be proceeded with. 'We want to make clear, if you steal, that is a criminal offence, whether it's £5 or £500, pounds.' On Wednesday, the government announced an expansion of the use of facial recognition technology in an attempt to tackle crime. Seven English forces will have access to 10 vans equipped with cameras across Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire, following recent deployments by London's Met Police and South Wales Police. Dame Diana said she believes the public would back the police's use of live facial recognition cameras, if they are used 'in a very measured, proportionate way to go after' suspects who officers are looking for. But Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti alleged that the technology had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law', and voiced fears that the government's plan is 'yet another move towards a total surveillance society'.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Live facial recognition is 'worrying for our democracy', experts warn as the government expands the 'Orwellian' system across Britain
Experts have warned of a 'frightening expansion' of 'Orwellian' technology as the government expands the use of live facial recognition across the country. Ten vans equipped with facial recognition cameras will be deployed across seven police forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire. The Home Office maintains that this technology will only be used to catch 'high–harm' offenders with rules to ensure 'safeguards and oversight'. According to the government, the technology has already been used to make 580 arrests in London over the last year, including 52 registered sex offenders. However, rights groups have raised concerns that the unprecedented rollout of this surveillance technology risks becoming overly intrusive. Rebecca Vincent, interim director of Big Brother Watch, says that the move 'represents a significant expansion of the surveillance state.' Ms Vincent adds: 'Live facial recognition turns every passer–by into a walking barcode and treats us all as a nation of suspects. 'This move is not only worrying for our privacy rights, it is worrying for our democracy.' Facial recognition vans work by using cameras to automatically scan the facial features of passers–by and record measurements, such as the distance between the eyes. This data is then compared to an existing watch–list while an officer checks the matches flagged by the system. Under current rules, the technology can only be used to search for watch lists of wanted criminals, suspects, or individuals subject to bail or court order conditions. However, the government is also preparing for a consultation in Autumn, which will help 'shape a new framework' for the technology's use. Facial recognition was first used in the UK during the UEFA Champions League final in Cardiff in 2017, but has since been used more widely. The most enthusiastic adopters of the technology have been police forces in South Wales, London, and Essex. Chief Superintendent Tim Morgan, from South Wales Police, which is coordinating the rollout, insisted the technology would be used 'ethically'. However, Big Brother Watch is concerned that there is a clear legal framework to ensure that facial recognition doesn't infringe on individuals' right to privacy. Campaign groups have raised concerns that the use of facial recognition is overly invasive and 'worrying for our democracy' What is live facial recognition? As the name suggests, live facial recognition allows the police to recognise wanted individuals among a large crowd in real time. Police use a series of cameras to record the faces of anyone who passes through a set zone. An algorithm then compares the faces of those walking in front of the camera to a 'watchlist' of wanted criminals and an alert is generated if the AI spots a match. According to South Wales Police, the watchlist includes individuals who are wanted for committing crime, who are banned from an area or who pose a risk to the public. The cameras look just like standard CCTV cameras, but do not record footage. In the event of a 'no match', the data will be deleted immediately and automatically. Big Brother Watch points out that Parliament never formally voted to authorise the use of facial recognition. Instead, police forces have relied on a 'patchwork' of legislation to justify and manage the use of facial recognition. Ms Vincent says: 'Police have interpreted the absence of any legislative basis authorising the use of this intrusive technology as carte blanche to continue to roll it out unfettered, despite the fact that a crucial judicial review on the matter is pending.' She adds: 'The Home Office must scrap its plans to roll out further live facial recognition capacity until robust legislative safeguards are established.' Likewise, Big Brother Watch alleges that the use of pre–approved watchlists has not prevented innocent members of the public from being swept up in arrests. The group is currently assisting anti–knife crime community worker Shaun Thompson in his legal challenge against the Met Police after he was wrongly identified by a facial recognition camera. The group also alleges that there have been incidents in which 'protesters not wanted for any crime and people with mental health issues' have appeared on police facial recognition watchlists. The 10 new facial recognition vans will be deployed in the coming weeks, and it will be entirely up to individual police forces how and when they are deployed. However, the Home Office insists that the vans will operate according to strict rules and only be used when there is 'specific intelligence'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper says: 'Facial recognition will be used in a targeted way to identify sex offenders or people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find.' The Home Office also argues that the algorithm used by the facial recognition vans has been independently tested for bias by the National Physical Laboratory. The rollout comes ahead of a planned consultation on how the technology should be used and what can be done to ensure transparency and public trust. Each police force involved using one of the new vans must have 'clear monitoring' of their use and effectiveness for use in the consultation. Lindsey Chiswick, National Police Chiefs Council lead for facial recognition, says: 'Each Live Facial Recognition deployment will be targeted, intelligence–led, within a set geographical location and for defined period of time, ensuring deployments are proportionate, lawful and necessary. 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward.' The Home Office has been contacted for additional comment.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Vietnamese restaurant is forced to shut down after DOG MEAT was discovered in the freezer by hygiene inspectors
A Vietnamese restaurant in London has shut down after inspectors allegedly found dog meat in the freezer. It was labelled 'goat wrapped in leaves' but when they sent it for analysis it came back as dog meat, a court heard. They also reported mice droppings and live and dead cockroaches at Pho Na restaurant in Old Kent Road, Southwark. Vuong Quoc Nguyen, 47, the Vietnamese owner of the restaurant, denied multiple food safety and hygiene offences when he appeared at Bromley Magistrates' Court on Tuesday. Nguyen appeared at the brief hearing wearing a navy blue polo neck, black jeans and and blue trainers. Defence solicitor Piers Kiss-Wilson insisted the 47-year-old defendant had no idea the 'goat' was dog meat and said it was supplied to him by someone else. He added the dog meat was not for sale for human consumption and that the owner had brought in pest control to try and fix the issues at the restaurant. Nguyen is due to stand trial at Bromley Magistrates' Court on December 18. Pho Na is now listed on Google as 'permanently closed'. Prior to the alleged discovery of the dog meat in one of the eatery's freezers, it had a 4.6-star rating. A new Vietnamese takeaway called Dac San Xu Nghe has since opened at the former site of Pho Na. According to Companies House, it is operated by 35-year-old Vietnamese national Hung Van Nguyen, who was appointed director on March 19. Daily Mail has approached Lewisham Council for comment.
