Mubi facing pressure from film industry over Israeli military ties
The growing pressure aimed at the upstart distributor, which ushered The Substance to awards success last year, centres on a recent $100 million investment it received from the Silicon Valley-based private equity firm.
Sequoia Capital backs a number of Israeli defence-tech start-ups, including Kela Technologies, a firm founded by veterans of the Israeli military in the wake of the October 7 Hamas attack, and military drone manufacturer Neros.
Filmmakers with ties to Mubi have signed an open letter, first published by Variety on 30 July. Creatives like Aki Kaurismäki, Miguel Gomes, Radu Jude, Sarah Friedland and Joshua Oppenheimer strongly criticise the VOD platform's ties to Sequoia Capital.
According to Variety, the number of signatories now stands at 63, with additional names including the Israeli directors Ari Folman and Nadav Lapid.
'Mubi's financial growth as a company is now explicitly tied to the genocide in Gaza, which implicates all of us that work with Mubi,' reads the letter.
It continues: 'We too believe that cinema can be powerful. And we know that we can't always control how audiences will respond to our work, and whether or not it will move and inspire them. But we can control how our work reflects our values and commitments – ones that are wholly ignored when our work is brought into alliance with a genocide-profiteering private equity firm.'
Scroll down to read the letter in full.
A UN report has found that Israel's military actions are consistent with genocide. Israel has continually denied that their actions in Palestine can be equated to genocide and argued that it has not partaken in any war crimes. A spokesperson recently called the claims of genocide 'baseless' because it is not acting with 'intent.'
Une publication partagée par MUBI (@mubi)
When controversy over the Sequoia Capital investment first broke in June, Mubi said in a statement posted on Instagram that it had entered into the partnership 'to accelerate' its 'mission of delivering bold and visionary films to global audiences'.
It added that Sequoia's investments did 'not reflect the views of Mubi.'
'We take the feedback from our community very seriously, and are steadfast in remaining an independent founder-led company,' it concluded.
Here is the full statement addressed to Mubi:
Dear Mubi leadership,
We write as filmmakers who have a professional relationship to Mubi to express our serious concern regarding Mubi's decision to accept $100 million in funding from Sequoia Capital, a private equity firm that, since late 2023 has chosen to double down on investing in Israeli military technology companies with the goal of profiting from the Gazan genocide. In 2024, Sequoia heavily invested in Kela, a military tech startup founded by a former senior manager of Palantir Israel and multiple Israeli military intelligence veterans, as well as military drone manufacturer Neros, and the unmanned aerial vehicle manufacture, Mach Industries.
Mubi's financial growth as a company is now explicitly tied to the genocide in Gaza, which implicates all of us that work with Mubi. We too believe that cinema can be powerful. And we know that we can't always control how audiences will respond to our work, and whether or not it will move and inspire them. But we can control how our work reflects our values and commitments—ones that are wholly ignored when our work is brought into alliance with a genocide-profiteering private equity firm.
Gaza is enduring mass civilian killings, including of journalists, artists, and film workers, alongside the widespread destruction of Palestinian cultural sites and heritage. We don't believe an arthouse film platform can meaningfully support a global community of cinephiles while also partnering with a company invested in murdering Palestinian artists and filmmakers.
We approach our work with care for the people and communities they represent, and the audiences who will watch it, because as artists we are accountable to more than the bottom line. Yet Mubi's decision to partner with Sequoia demonstrates a total lack of accountability to the artists and communities who have helped the company flourish. We believe that it is our ethical duty to do no harm. We expect our partners, at a minimum, to refuse to be complicit in the horrific violence being waged against Palestinians.
We ask you to heed the call made by Film Workers for Palestine and take action that meaningfully responds to the artists and the audiences who are such an integral part of Mubi's success.
Mubi has yet to respond publicly to the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Relief for River Island as High Court approves restructuring, but the hard work starts now
Chris Bowers, a partner and head of insolvency at Forbes Solicitors, told 'The real question now is whether the restructure plans are anything more than just a sticking plaster, prolonging an inevitable collapse in the near future. Restructure plans concentrate on shutting stores and cutting rents. Such moves support liquidity but stop short of addressing declining sales. River Island's most recent accounts show turnover fell more than 19%. Any form of long-term survival needs to reconnect the retailer with consumers to boost revenues, and quickly.' Bowers cited Arcadia, which went into administration just over a year after a CVA-based restructure. Meanwhile, Marty Bauer, retail and e-tail expert at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend, told us: 'River Island's decision to restructure, including the closure of 33 stores, is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by retailers operating on the British high street. 'Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar tale, with physical stores often struggling to compete with the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, and sailing against the wind when it comes to shifting buying habits. 'The future of the high street is uncertain, but while online shopping continues to innovate with better customer service and convenience, many shoppers still value the tactile in-store experience and personal interaction. This is where the key to success still lies. 'While the likes of River Island and New Look have faced challenges on the high street, other fashion brands such as Uniqlo are going from strength to strength by creating a seamless shopping experience that offers well-curated selections, an efficient checkout process and unique in-store experiences such as clothing alterations.' As for the reason for the court's approval of the plan, Lucy Trott, managing associate and insolvency expert at law firm Stevens & Bolton, added that with it having been supported by 80% in value of the company's creditors but failing to meet the required 75% support in each creditor class, 'the High Court was asked to 'cram down' the dissenting categories of creditors [ that is, impose it on them ], which reportedly included landlords, local authorities and trade creditors. 'For the court to grant sanction, it would need to be satisfied that none of the dissenting classes of creditors would be worse off than in the 'relevant alternative' scenario which would likely be administration or liquidation, with a sale of the company's business or assets to follow. 'It is possible that the dissenting creditors could yet seek to appeal the court's decision to sanction the plan particularly in light of the damaging precedent this decision sets in relation to cramming down commercial landlords. However, the River Island creditors will no doubt be wary of appealing the court's decision in light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment on the Thames Water appeal. If the restructuring plan were to be upheld on appeal, an adverse costs order would rub further salt in the creditors' wounds.'
Fashion Network
4 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Relief for River Island as High Court approves restructuring, but the hard work starts now
Chris Bowers, a partner and head of insolvency at Forbes Solicitors, told 'The real question now is whether the restructure plans are anything more than just a sticking plaster, prolonging an inevitable collapse in the near future. Restructure plans concentrate on shutting stores and cutting rents. Such moves support liquidity but stop short of addressing declining sales. River Island's most recent accounts show turnover fell more than 19%. Any form of long-term survival needs to reconnect the retailer with consumers to boost revenues, and quickly.' Bowers cited Arcadia, which went into administration just over a year after a CVA-based restructure. Meanwhile, Marty Bauer, retail and e-tail expert at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend, told us: 'River Island's decision to restructure, including the closure of 33 stores, is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by retailers operating on the British high street. 'Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar tale, with physical stores often struggling to compete with the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, and sailing against the wind when it comes to shifting buying habits. 'The future of the high street is uncertain, but while online shopping continues to innovate with better customer service and convenience, many shoppers still value the tactile in-store experience and personal interaction. This is where the key to success still lies. 'While the likes of River Island and New Look have faced challenges on the high street, other fashion brands such as Uniqlo are going from strength to strength by creating a seamless shopping experience that offers well-curated selections, an efficient checkout process and unique in-store experiences such as clothing alterations.' As for the reason for the court's approval of the plan, Lucy Trott, managing associate and insolvency expert at law firm Stevens & Bolton, added that with it having been supported by 80% in value of the company's creditors but failing to meet the required 75% support in each creditor class, 'the High Court was asked to 'cram down' the dissenting categories of creditors [ that is, impose it on them ], which reportedly included landlords, local authorities and trade creditors. 'For the court to grant sanction, it would need to be satisfied that none of the dissenting classes of creditors would be worse off than in the 'relevant alternative' scenario which would likely be administration or liquidation, with a sale of the company's business or assets to follow. 'It is possible that the dissenting creditors could yet seek to appeal the court's decision to sanction the plan particularly in light of the damaging precedent this decision sets in relation to cramming down commercial landlords. However, the River Island creditors will no doubt be wary of appealing the court's decision in light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment on the Thames Water appeal. If the restructuring plan were to be upheld on appeal, an adverse costs order would rub further salt in the creditors' wounds.'
Fashion Network
11 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Under Armour's turnaround takes hit after weak sales outlook
Under Armour Inc. forecast worse-than-expected sales for the current quarter, stalling a turnaround plan that was taking hold. The Baltimore, Maryland-based brand said revenue this quarter is expected to fall between 6% and 7%. Analysts on average projected a drop of almost 3%. Tariffs and a more cautious consumer have complicated turnarounds for companies as they have had to cut costs and seen customers pull back on spending. Now Under Armour, which began its restructuring last year, is trying to keep its positive momentum going amid economic challenges. Shares of the athletic-wear brand company sank as much as 15% in premarket trading. So far this year, shares of Under Armour have declined almost 20% as of the close on Thursday. 'We're focused on strengthening our brand positioning with premium products and increasing our average selling prices,' Kevin Plank, Under Armour's CEO said in the statement.
