Meghan Markle shocks fans with Prince Harry confession in new Netflix trailer
Meghan Markle has given fans a fresh glimpse into what Prince Harry is really like in a new trailer for her latest Netflix collaboration.
The Duchess is set to launch the second series of her cooking and lifestyle show - With Love, Meghan - in a matter of days after the first series was panned by critics.
Sharing the teaser on Instagram, Meghan wrote: "The best moments are made to be shared. With Love, Meghan returns August 26th on @netflix."
While fans were quick to point out the celebrity guests set to appear on the show, others were stunned by an admission Meghan made about her husband. It comes after reports that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's new Netflix deal could cause 'concern' for Royal Family.
In the last few seconds of the trailer, Meghan is chatting candidly with famous chef José Andrés. She is then seen telling the cook: "Do you know who doesn't like lobster? My husband."
The chef then cheekily responded: "And you married him?!" prompting Meghan to laugh.
In the short preview of the second series, Queer Eye star Tan France and Chrissy Teigen make an appearance as guests in Meghan's house.
Other celeb cameos include Christina Tosi, Clare Smyth, Daniel Martin, David Chang, Heather Dorak, Jamie Kern Lima, Jay Shetty, José Andrés, Radhi Devlukia and Samin Nosrat.
The trailer showed Meghan cooking and baking with her famous pals. "I love the idea of just spending time together… and finding new ways to show people you care," she says. "There are easy ways to show up, lovingly.'
With Love, Meghan, season one was released in March but failed to break into the top 300 most-watched shows on the streaming platform in the first six months of 2025, and was widely panned by critics.
In the eight-part first season of the show, the former Suits actress gives hosting tips and cooks with celebrity friends including The Office star Mindy Kaling, whom Meghan tells she goes by the surname Sussex now.
Harry made just one appearance at the end of the first season's final episode when he joined Meghan, her mother Doria Ragland and friends for an outdoor celebratory brunch.
The preview comes just hours after Meghan and Harry announced they have signed a second deal with Netflix, after weeks of speculation that their partnership would be coming to an end in September.
Five years ago, Harry and Meghan secured a lucrative contract, thought to be worth more than 100 million dollars (£74 million), with Netflix after quitting as senior working royals in 2020 - but this new extension is seen as a downgrade on their previous exclusive rights deal and is believed to be worth a lot less .
Meghan, who has a partnership with Netflix for her As Ever brand, said of the new contract: 'We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand.
"My husband and I feel inspired by our partners who work closely with us and our Archewell Productions team to create thoughtful content across genres that resonates globally, and celebrates our shared vision.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Paramount Plus adds gory horror also perfect for romantic comedy fans
The film was released in cinemas earlier this year but is now streaming Heart Eyes trailer Paramount Plus has just added a gory horror movie that is said to also be perfect for romantic comedy fans. Genre mashup title Heart Eyes was only released in cinemas earlier this year before becoming a hit on Netflix in the United States. It performed well against its budget, earning around $32 million worldwide while it cost less than $20 million to make. It also features some experienced horror stars with Scream franchise alum Mason Gooding leading the cast alongside Totally Killer's Olivia Holt. Now audiences in the UK can see what all the fuss is about on Paramount's streaming library. Viewers can access it either by the dedicated app or as an add-on subscription via Amazon Prime Video. The premise of the film sees that for the past several years, a masked maniac with glowing, red eyes has wreaked havoc on Valentine's Day by stalking and murdering unsuspecting couples attempting to enjoy the day. When a cynical ad executive and her hopelessly romantic colleague become the next target, they decide to fight back and end the reign of terror. Heart Eyes registered a more than respectable 78% rating on website Rotten Tomatoes. Reviewers appreciated how it approached merging both horror and romantic comedy to successfully provide scares and laughs. One critic claimed: "Heart Eyes knows exactly what it is and fully commits to the chaos. The jump scares are effective, the comedy lands, and the action moves at full speed. It is a Scream clone in all the best ways, with just enough originality to carve out its own space." Another suggested: "Horror and rom-com fans alike are sure to have heart eyes for Heart Eyes with extravagant set pieces, intricate kills, witty one-liners, and heart-swelling romantic moments that celebrate the best of both genres." Someone else suggested: "A perfect blend of gory mayhem and romantic fun. While it lacks a compelling whodunit mystery, it more than makes up for it with two leads who share incredible chemistry." While another compared it to the Scream franchise, saying: "Heart Eyes is such a fun ride! It totally gave me Scream 4 vibes—smart, self-aware, and full of tension. The acting was great, and even the over-the-top or cheesy moments felt intentional in the best way." They continued: "It's got everything—gore, comedy, romance—and somehow balances it all perfectly, making it super easy to watch. I even caught a few potential Easter eggs that make me excited for a rewatch! If you're into horror that doesn't take itself too seriously but still delivers, definitely check this one out!" 'Heart Eyes is a remarkable cinematic experience that masterfully merges the conventions of a romantic comedy with the elements of a slasher genre. The film captivated me from the outset, and I wholeheartedly endorse its release in 2025. Oliva Holt is a mutha f***** SCREAM QUEEN!!! This film is deserving of unequivocal praise.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kim Kardashian and sister Khloe put detective hats on for unsolved mystery... 27 years after Amy Bradley vanished
Kim and Khloe Kardashian are reportedly trying to help solve the viral Amy Bradley missing persons case. Amy was just 23 when she mysteriously vanished in the early morning hours of March 21, 1998 while aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship with her family. The nearly 30-year-old case has garnered renewed interest following the release of the investigative three-part Netflix documentary, Amy Bradley Is Missing. Kim called the documentary 'mind blowing' in an Instagram Story post shared last month with her 355million followers. 'We must find Amy! This is so crazy @netflix,' the SKIMS founder, 44, wrote. The post caught the attention of Amy's distraught brother, Brad, who recently told TMZ that he tried contacting Kim via DM asking her to 'help [raise] awareness.' And now, the outlet is reporting that Kim and her younger sister Khloe, 40, have gotten in contact with the Bradley family directly — specifically, Amy's mother, Iva — in the hopes of aiding them in their ongoing search. Daily Mail has reached out to Kim and Khloe's representatives for comment. Sources claimed that Kim and Khloe personally contacted Iva via phone last Thursday to discuss the details of Amy's case and where the investigation currently stands. According to TMZ's insiders, Kim and Khloe were most intrigued by one suspicious detail in the documentary relating to a Barbados-based IP address, which has reportedly frequented the Amy Bradley Is Missing website. They reportedly spoke to to the Bradley family matriarch for 'about an hour.' The phone call was not filmed for the Kardashians' Hulu reality TV show as the sisters were solely focused on 'listening and brainstorming' with Iva about how they could help. The Bradley family are hopeful that Amy may still be still alive despite her being missing for nearly three decades. Kim involvement could prove beneficial as she's no stranger to the justice system, with the star having successfully advocated for clemency for several inmates along with studying law for the last seven years. The billionaire mogul completed her law program earlier this year, which puts her one step closer to becoming a lawyer like her late father Robert Kardashian. Kim and Khloe's alleged contact with the Bradley family comes shortly after Amy's brother spoke out about her mysterious disappearance 27 years ago. Amy, a recent college graduate, had set off on a seven-day trip with her parents and younger brother Brad from the Puerto Rican capital of San Juan on Saturday, March 21, 1998. Two days later, as they set sail for the island of Curacao, Amy and Brad partied at the ship's nightclub, after which she was seen resting on her balcony. But when her father checked on her early the next morning, she had gone, leaving no trace apart from a polo shirt and some sandals - and she has not been seen since. The case has made headlines once more as it's re-investigated Netflix's new Amy Bradley Is Missing documentary. It arrived on the streaming platform on July 16 and has since opened the floodgates for new theories and speculation over what happened. Amy's brother Brad shared what he believes happened to his sister while speaking on British TV to 'This Morning' hosts Emma Willis and Joel Dommett. The Bradleys have always been adamant that Amy neither fell nor jumped from their balcony, because she was scared of how high it was. Joining the ITV show on via link with his mother, Brad said from Virginia: 'Well obviously we don't know where she is. 'Since the show came out we've gotten thousands of tips, leads and people sending prayers, love and different ideas. 'We think what happened to Amy was that she was targeted.' 'She was seen, taken and removed from the ship and we believe she was trafficked into some kind of sex trade situation,' Brad continued. 'Obviously we need that one person who knows something to come forward and help us. 'Actually, I think there's more than one person who knows but we're waiting on that one call that breaks this thing open.' Before the release of Amy Bradley Is Missing, the family hoped the program would spark more tips, jog some memories and lead to real answers. However, her family have faced cruel trolling and backlash from Netflix viewers. Brad previously told Daily Mail that the documentary has been particularly difficult for his mother. 'Back then, there was no cell phones, there was not a whole lot of internet going on, there was no social media,' he said. 'There was none of that.' 'The upcoming series has been really tough on Mom, mostly, emotionally,' he added. 'And Dad obviously doesn't like that part of it for all of us.'
Spectator
8 hours ago
- Spectator
Woody Allen without the zingers: Materialists reviewed
Celine Song's first film, the wonderful Past Lives (2023), earned two Oscar nominations. So expectations were riding high for Materialists. Perhaps way too high. And, yes, it's a letdown. It feels like an early Woody Allen but blunter, shallower, with no zingers, and a lead character that's hard to care about. Dakota Johnson is our lead, playing a matchmaker who has two dreamboats (Chris Evans, Pedro Pascal) vying for her hand and throughout I was thinking: I should have your problems, love. It's billed as a romcom but those who expect that will be disappointed. It's more an essay on modern dating. Johnson, whom we have forgiven for her horrible performance in that horrible adaptation of Persuasion – we don't hold grudges – is Lucy. She works for a swanky Manhattan dating agency called Adore (ugh) that deals exclusively with the rich elite. She sees marriage as a business transaction in which people are buyers or sellers. The montage of clients' demands and feedback from first dates – too fat, too short, too old, too balding, 'I would never swipe right on that' etc. – is fun but only one client gets any real attention. This is Sophie, a 39-year-old lawyer who fears dying alone. She is played by Zoë Winters who steals the film from under everybody despite it being a minor role. Lucy attends the wedding of one of her clients and here she meets Harry (Pascal, gliding into view in a way that put me in mind of Omar Sharif). He's a 'unicorn' – hot, rich, tall, full head of hair – but, what do you know? At the same event, serving as a 'cater waiter', is John (Chris Evans). He's her ex, an out of work actor who – a flashback informs us – she left because they were always broke. He still wants her but Harry also now wants her. I wondered why, as she comes across as neither interesting nor especially bright. Midway through there's an act of violence and she is forced to reflect on the nature of her work and you think, you've never reflected on that before? Wake up and smell the coffee, lady! As an exploration of the tension between love and money the film is surprisingly unsubtle from the word go. The opening scene involves a prehistoric cave couple – I thought I was in the wrong screen! – which even sets out the film's stall when it comes to marriage, albeit in a laughably clumsy way. Lucy, meanwhile, has the following dilemma on her hands. Should she be seduced by Harry's $12 million penthouse or return to broke John? (Harry! He has silk sheets!) This leads her to question whether we might be worth more than our 'tangible assets' but is that taking us anywhere new? What is new, I suppose, is how far people will go to 'add value' to themselves these days but that involves a surgical subplot that I can't go into as it would take us into spoiler territory. The characters feel like cinema characters rather than character characters. They have no friends, no family, no interests beyond the dating scene. The film is talky, with some sharp dialogue, but no fresh insights. A good actor has something going on behind the eyes that the audience wants to know about and I'm not sure I ever get that with Johnson. Evans and Pascal bring A-list pizazz but no chemistry is ever ignited. I only ever felt for Sophie whom the film abandons just as she's always been abandoned. Poor Sophie. And why does Lucy have to choose? Why not neither? Is this saying marriage is the pinnacle of a woman's achievement? It's lushly photographed and beautifully framed and it's not a nightmare to sit through but whereas Past Lives stayed with you, I can feel this leaving me already.
