Kevin Feige Says The MCU Will Recast Iron Man, Captain America, The X-Men
I'm not sure just how many comic book-based news stories you can extract from Kevin Feige recently deciding to become a James Gunn-level chatterbox in a recent Variety story, but there are a few that stand out.
Namely, the idea that Avengers: Secret Wars is going to be a 'reset' for the MCU in some ways, with some individual storylines specifically being affected or culled as we move past the 'multiverse.'
Feige also talks about the current plan for the MCU being about seven years out right now, but he says he wants to do this job really forever. But continuing the MCU will come with challenges, and one is continuing to lose big characters to plot points, often involving dying, for the foreseeable future. But that can't last forever.
Feige addresses this, viewing these roles like how other famed parts get new actors in time:
'Amy Pascal and David Heyman are now searching for a new James Bond,' Feige said. 'David [Corenswet]
'I think it's hard for anybody to do that when an actor has done such a great role,' he said. 'How are they going to ever replace Sean Connery [as James Bond], right?'
Captain America
It does make sense, it just…hasn't really happened in the MCU for almost 20 years now, so it's a bit of a tough concept to wrap fans' heads around in this context. With DC doing this with Superman, for instance, that's launching an entire new universe that is not connected to the last Henry Cavill universe almost at all. Marvel doesn't want MCU 1 and MCU 2 totally cutting off continuity, so it will be a bit weird.
That said, it does not seem viable to simply lose these core characters forever, to be without Iron Man, Captain America, Black Widow, Black Panther and many others for another decade or more. Recasting does make sense, but how it's executed is going to be a lot trickier than Batman, Superman or James Bond, which he's not quite acknowledging.
Separately, Feige talks up the big new era after Secret Wars, which will be heavily focused on the X-Men. This confirms the long-running idea that no, the FOX X-Men are simply not going to be ported over to the MCU. However, that was very much complicated by the fact that most of the FOX X-Men are now in Doomsday and Secret Wars. Plus we already just saw Hugh Jackman in Deadpool and Wolverine. Feige also says they're exploring more with those characters, so that's going to be…double Wolverines? And that's a role that seems almost impossible to recast when Jackman is literally still playing it.
Deadpool and Wolverine
This time around, Feige says they'll be starting with young mutants, as opposed to the FOX ones where all these actors are over 50, not over 80 in some instances. Again, that makes sense, though we did have a whole FOX 'First Class' series of movies. But here it was just inevitable that the MCU was going to do its own slate of X-Men. It's just sort of weird that this is going to happen right after this big farewell tour to all the FOX X-Men who have been associated with these roles for 25 years now.
It's a strange new era, but one that the MCU has to face forever. So, who will be taking Stark and Rogers' shoes, and when?
Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.
Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jeremy Renner Is ‘Sure' Hawkeye Season 2 Will Happen
Jeremy Renner is 'sure' that will happen. Renner has played Clint Barton/Hawkeye in the MCU since 2011's Thor. In 2021, the character got his own Disney+ show that sees Renner reprise his role alongside Hailee Steinfeld's Kate Bishop, Tony Dalton's Jack Duquesne, Florence Pugh's Yelena Belova, and Vincent D'Onofrio's Wilson Fisk/Kingpin. What did Jeremy Renner say about Hawkeye Season 2? While there was some doubt that Hawkeye Season 2 would ever happen following salary disputes and Renner's snowplow accident, the actor told Empire Magazine he's quite sure they'll 'end up doing Season 2, and do other [Marvel Studios] things.' 'I'm always happy to be in that world, man,' he said. 'I love all those guys, I love the character…And I'm happy to do it. My body's getting ready for something like that. I don't know if anybody wants to see me in tights, but my body will look good in the tights.' Renner further said he's now 'more than 150 per cent' of where he was physically prior to the snowplow incident. He continued, 'Having health and wellness be such a central part of my life, that's what's gotten me back. And even as I age, I just feel stronger than I've been. I have some issues, and tendon issues and certain limitations of flexibility and mobility, but I spent a lot of time on getting better and stronger, and I wouldn't if I didn't get crushed.' There has been no official word about Hawkeye being renewed for a second season from Marvel at this time. It's also not clear if Renner will appear in any of the forthcoming Avengers movies — Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars — as he has not been part of the announced cast up until now. The first season of Marvel Television's Hawkeye is available to stream on Disney+. Solve the daily Crossword
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
5 reasons ‘Fantastic Four' is better than ‘Superman'
Not since the summer of 2012 have Marvel and DC gone toe to toe like two comic book titans are right now. The battle for the big screen is currently being fought by DC's 'Superman' and Marvel's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' And, at least for me, the winner is clear. There's no doubt, my more lukewarm reaction to 'Superman' is something of a hot take. And if I didn't already know that based on its 91% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, the myriad of less-than-impressed comments on my recent opinion piece certainly made that point clear. However, having now seen Marvel's tentpole blockbuster for 2025, in my eyes, there's no denying that the MCU's First Family soars higher than the Man of Tomorrow (and for what it's worth, FF's RT viewer score is 93%). The margins are somewhat slim. Both movies have clear faults, falling into many of the predictable superhero tropes that have seen the genre grow stale over the past 15 years, but if you can only see one in theaters this summer, I'd recommend spending your money on Fantastic Four." So, here are the five reasons I believe that 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' beats 'Superman.' 'Fantastic Four's' biggest strength is how it successfully balances its four main players, the eponymous quartet, ensuring that each is given their moment to shine, while also feeling part of a superhero team as well. Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn are all well cast in their roles, and I really enjoyed how each brings something to the comic book collective. Which isn't to say 'Superman' isn't also well cast and stuffed with acting talent, David Corenswet is a promising Clark Kent, and Rachel Brosnahan nearly steals the whole movie as Lois Lane. However, 'Superman's' struggles to balance its roster of heroes, with some upstaging the titular cape-wielder (Edi Gathegi's Mister Terrific is the focus of the flick's best action scene), while others are relegated to barely background extras like Isabela Merced's Hawkgirl. 'Fantastic Four' juggles its heroes significantly better, ensuring that all of them feel developed and play a key part in the overall story, and of course, contributing to saving the universe. Audiences have been treated to (or in recent years forced to endure) a lot of superhero movies since the MCU debuted in 2008 with 'Iron Man.' With dozens upon dozens of big-budget flicks all mining similar source material, it's increasingly hard to stand out in such a crowded field. From a narrative, tone, and character perspective, 'Fantastic Four' is largely more of the same. It sticks to the largely quippy vibe of the MCU without any real deviation. However, where it does stand out is in its 1960s aesthetic and its retro-futurism setting. Inspired by the Golden Era of Comic Books, which birthed many of the heroes we love together, and the 'Fantastic Four's' own debut in 1961, 'The First Steps' has a charming retro look which intentionally feels like a '60s-era idea of the far future. Yes, that does mean that 'Fantastic Four' drive a hovercar at one point, and the Baxter Building TVs remain delightfully chunky. This visual design helps elevate 'Fantastic Four' and ensures that even when the narrative falls into predictable tropes, there's a novel quality about the proceedings that kept me hooked. Plus, the cast's supersuits are just the right amount of dorky for me to love them. I often find that modern-day superhero movies hinge on their villains. After all, a compelling superpowered protagonist needs an equally well-considered antagonist to defeat in the grand finale. 'Superman' offers up the mack daddy of comic book foes in Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor, and while this take on the character has been met with much praise, it did little for me (through no fault of Hoult). His whiny tech bro persona grates, and the attempts to make him seem threatening feel manipulative. The less said about the army of trolling monkeys, the better. In this third 'Fantastic Four' reboot, the First Family faces off against an equally legendary villain: Galactus (Ralph Ineson). And oh boy, does this big purple boi feel intimidating. The first scene where the four encounter Galactus in his hulking ship sent a shiver down my spine, and his cold-blooded approach to consuming whole planets feels befitting of an enemy that is supposed to strike fear into the hearts of even the most powerful heroes. That Julia Garner's Silver Surfer is also thrown into the mix is a very appreciated bonus. I do wish that Galactus wasn't defeated quite so easily in the third act. However, this is a problem with superhero movies in general. The villain is hyped up to be a near undefeatable threat to the whole world, only to be snuffed out and dealt with inside a studio-demanded two-hour runtime. If you didn't already disagree with me on my point above, now I'm really going to put the cat among the pigeons. Or should that be dog, because Krypto was one of my least favorite parts of 'Superman.' As I noted in my previous 'Superman' article, I find the modern blockbuster trend of including some form of 'cute' animal/creature very tiresome. The cynic in me can't see it as anything other than a calculated attempt to create a sidekick ripe for merchandising opportunities. 'Fantastic Four' doesn't escape this trend either, with robot helper H.E.R.B.I.E. on hand to assist the family throughout. And, to the surprise of nobody, you can now buy a Pop Vinyl figure of the adorable android for the low price of just $15. Still, at least director Matt Shakman shows a little restraint with H.E.R.B.I.E., and unlike Krypto the Super Dog, he's not used as a 'get out of jail free' card to save the heroes whenever they're in a sticky situation (Krypto is used for those purposes twice in 'Superman'). Frankly, I could probably do without either sidekick, but if I'm picking between the two, at least H.E.R.B.I.E. fits within the '60s aesthetic and isn't leaned on like a cheap crutch. Both 'Superman' and 'Fantastic Four' aren't shy about winking nods to future comic book movies in the pipeline at their respective studios. But while 'Superman' leans into sequel-baiting and universe setup pretty hard, 'Fantastic Four' mostly saves it for the post-credits stinger. 'Superman' is so busy introducing us to the Justice Gang that it forgets this is the viewer's first chance to get acquainted with a character who is supposed to be the lynchpin of the new-look DC universe going forward. Marvel, who admittedly have the benefit of a well-established universe already humming, focuses first on establishing the 'Fantastic Four.' In the post-credits scene, we get our first glimpse of Robert Downey Jr's return to the MCU as Doctor Doom, and this tease feels well handled. It's a great preview for next year's 'Avengers: Doomdays,' but it also reminds us that the Fantastic Four are part of a larger world. It's enough to get superfans speculating, but it doesn't dominate the actual movie.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Dream Come True': Trainer Aggie Ordonez ‘Swinging Big' With Star California-Bred Om N Joy
'Dream Come True': Trainer Aggie Ordonez 'Swinging Big' With Star California-Bred Om N Joy originally appeared on Paulick Report. After a 21-year training career, the 3-year-old California-bred filly Om N Joy is providing 57-year-old Aggie Ordonez with several career chestnut filly provided Ordonez with her first career stakes win in the Evening Jewel Stakes at Santa Anita in May, and with her first stakes win at Del Mar when Om N Joy won the Fleet Treat over seven furlongs for 3-year-old California-bred fillies by 4 ¼ lengths on July 25. The daughter of Om out of Margie's Minute (Hard Spun) is owned in partnership by breeders Jerry and Connie Baker, Michael Golovko, and Terrence Scanlan.'Winning the Fleet Treat was a dream come true,' said Ordonez. 'I'm pretty sure she hasn't peaked by a long way. My dreams are getting bigger by the day with this filly.'Ordonez's life has revolved around racing for as long as she can remember. She was born in 1968 to Pete and Julia Anderson. Her father, Pete, was a big-league jockey, riding horses such as Forego, Cavan, Cannonade, and Sword Dancer, and he later trained racehorses, as graduated in the class of 1990 from Tulane University in New Orleans, La., and went on to work in racing publicity in the afternoons, while galloping racehorses in the morning. As time went on, she realized she wanted to be the one answering the media's questions, not asking them. She started her first horse in 2004 and relies on what she learned from her father in her training.'My dad had so much respect for a racehorse,' said Ordonez. 'He was so far ahead of everyone in the respect of treating these animals like treasures and putting their well-being first.'Ordonez, like her father, has a kind hand with a horse. She shared that she likes to massage her runners before putting a bridle on them. Several times, Om N Joy has yawned as Ordonez is trying to put the bridle on, causing Ordonez to joke that she might be overdoing it with her attempts to relax her runners. Om N Joy, who Ordonez calls a 'gentle giant,' is on a four-race winning streak, starting with her maiden-breaking score when she returned to dirt after spending the winter running on turf. Since then, she's dominated the California-bred sophomore filly scene with victories in the Evening Jewel Stakes, Melair Stakes, and now the Fleet Treat described Om N Joy as a 'gangly' 2-year-old, even doubting that she would make it to the races as a juvenile because of her physical and mental immaturity.'When she first started breezing, if I wanted her to go a half mile, I would tell the rider to go five,' Ordonez explained. 'Because it was in the early days, it took her an eighth of a mile to kind of get the idea.' Om N Joy surprised her trainer and made six starts at two, including two thirds, before running a distant last in the Grade 2 Oak Leaf in her third explained that she was hoping to run Om N Joy in a two-turn dirt maiden after she didn't take to the tapeta training track at Santa Ordonez couldn't find a routing dirt maiden for Om N Joy, she was left with few options. She could run her filly on the turf, which she probably wouldn't like, or run her against the best juvenile fillies California has in the Oak Leaf Stakes, where she might be outclassed.'I know that's a crazy move, but sometimes when you know you've got something special in a young horse, you have to give them an opportunity to prove you're wrong,' said Ordonez. It wasn't Om N Joy's day in the Oak Leaf, but now she's the second-highest earner from that field, only trailing G1 winner Del Mar's summer meet in full swing, Ordonez is at a crossroads with her star she run against older California-bred fillies and mares on the turf in the Solana Beach Stakes on Aug. 17, or stay on her preferred surface but against open company in the G3 Torrey Pines on the Pacific Classic undercard on Aug. 30?'It's a Grade 3,' Ordonez said. 'That's a big step, but here I go again, swinging big.' This story was originally reported by Paulick Report on Jul 29, 2025, where it first appeared.
