Agency to investigate SASSA Disability Grant maladministration
Meanwhile, 13 million receive Child Support and 4 million Older Person benefits. However, Social Development Minister, Sisisi Tolashe, told a meeting in Khayelitsha last week, that investigations were underway to remedy any potential irregularities.
Specifically, when it comes to the SASSA Disability Grant, the South African Social Security Agency is accused of not examining patients properly. You see, to qualify for a SASSA Disability Grant – never mind an asset and means test – you need an official letter by a government-approved doctor.
Furthermore, Minister Tolashe said the department had heard of patients who have no right to a SASSA Disability Grant being awarded one. As such, she says the agency is recruiting new doctors on a three-year contract to remedy the situation, reports GroundUp . The minister was slated to attend a similar outreach programme meeting recently, but did not arrive, angering community members. Image: File
As such, the minister explained that she doesn't want the agency being taken to court for denying those who legitimately qualify for the SASSA Disability Grant. So far in 2025, SASSA has also been under fire for stricter income and identity verification processes.
Moreover, the department has defended its actions, saying it's not circumventing the accepted three-month review process. But, rather, it is working to ensure that taxpayer money isn't going to grant recipients with unverified ID or additional income.
Minister Tolashe spoke candidly at an outreach programme meeting last week. Hundreds of grant beneficiaries attended. The event started late, and Khayelitsha residents voiced their grievances to the minister in person. Beyond issues with the SASSA Disability Grant, others mentioned unemployment, poor services at clinics, abuse of older persons and extortion of vulnerable beneficiaries. Other grievances mentioned include: Lack of youth programmes and educational camps.
R370-a-month SRD grant was not enough.
Lack of SASSA staff and facilities in underserved areas like Khayelitsha.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
20 hours ago
- The South African
Why 100 000 South Africans could lose their jobs thanks to Donald Trump
South Africa could lose up to 100 000 jobs if urgent action is not taken to counter looming US tariffs set to take effect next month, Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned. The anticipated job losses would primarily hit the automotive and agricultural sectors, both critical pillars of the country's economy. The warning comes amid growing concern over the US government's decision to impose 30% tariffs on South African imports, a move that could seriously undermine trade relations and damage the country's fragile economic recovery. 'By some measures, if we do not find alternative measures, the impact on jobs could be around 100 000,' Kganyago said during a media briefing. The automotive industry, which supports over 100 000 direct jobs, has already experienced an 82% drop in exports to the US this year due to earlier 25% tariffs on vehicle components. Industry insiders warn that further tariffs could push several manufacturers – particularly those dependent on the US market – into crisis. Meanwhile, agriculture, a major employer in rural areas, faces a similar threat. Despite posting record $13.7 billion in exports in 2024, the sector could see widespread job losses, especially among low-skilled workers with limited alternative employment options. President Cyril Ramaphosa has indicated a willingness to negotiate a reduction in tariffs, but no agreement has been reached with US counterparts. With the tariffs due to take effect in August 2025, time is running out for diplomacy to avert a crisis. Economists and trade analysts have urged the government to: Strengthen trade partnerships beyond the US Accelerate domestic economic reforms to support local industries And implement short-term relief measures to protect jobs South Africa's vulnerability to global trade shifts is once again in sharp focus. Without swift and effective measures, the combination of US tariffs and potential AGOA exclusion could deliver a major blow to economic growth, export revenues, and employment. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
20 hours ago
- The Citizen
Why do courts need to protect children?
Why are those platforms not playing ball, and why does it take going to court to force them to — especially when it's about protecting children? As the legal upper guardian of all children, the high court really delivered in its action against Meta. It's frightening that the Digital Law Company had to go to court to deal with Instagram profiles and WhatsApp channels disseminating child sexual content, but I guess some privacy is more important than others? Take nothing away from the massive achievement this is for protecting children, and thank goodness for the existence of the Digital Law Company, which ran this matter with urgency. What are social media giants doing to stop the filth? This is a victory to be celebrated. Once the dust settles, the difficult questions need to be put to the social media giants: why was going to court necessary? Our cyber laws really do go a long way in making these kinds of activities criminal and placing legal obligations on those who have control over the platforms to prevent and report. Not only do we have laws for these things, but the user policies of these platforms also prohibit child sexual content. So even if South Africa was blind to the existence of child abuse, which thankfully it is not, these platforms are self-obligated to deal with the matter. And yet, here we are, having to take up court time to deal with something that should never have happened, and when it did, should have taken less than a phone call to remove. Let police and prosecutors work What I'm so appreciative of is that the focus on the settlement agreement turned order doesn't allow for the immediate publicity of the details of the perpetrators. This may seem counterintuitive, but it is actually in line with a well-considered standard of care. Sometimes, the children involved can be identified when the accused is identified, and sometimes, there is collateral reputational damage to innocent people when names are simply released. Allowing the specialised investigative unit and prosecuting authority to build a case will likely eventually reveal the names, but in a responsible way that will take into consideration the welfare of the kids and the possibility of re-traumatising them. But again, why did the court need to get involved? Why is there a need for a hotline between the Digital Law Company and Meta? As great a result as that is, why must it come down to reporting before anything is done? If Google can identify that I have an illegal copy of The Jungle Book on my GDrive, I don't think it's a far stretch to build AI models that can detect language that suggests child pornography or abuse. Make it make sense why a legal team has to run to court to protect children from people who are not only breaking the law, but also breaching the terms and conditions of the platforms they're using to hurt children. Why are those platforms not playing ball, and why does it take going to court to force them to … especially in the interest of protecting children? Perhaps they don't want the bad publicity, or perhaps they don't want to admit that things are as bad as they are. ALSO READ: Meta complies, shuts down Instagram accounts and WhatsApp channels posting sexual content of SA school children Here's a different suggestion. Nobody is going to argue against the existence of bad people. Bad people will always be around. I think that's something we can safely say society has accepted a long time ago. If we can admit that, then there's no reason why Meta can't say we want to keep bad people off our platforms. There's no reputational damage to any platform for accepting that sometimes they'll get some awful person as a user, but then they apply their terms of service, report the person, and now that person is locked up. We already know creeps are on every available platform. That's not going to be what causes the reputational damage in future. What will cause reputational damage is knowing that those platforms will try to put their own name before the safety of our children. Emma, Ben, Rorke. Take a number of bows, and thanks for putting in the effort to protect our kids, even when you shouldn't have to. NOW READ: Parents, use these Instagram tools to keep your teens safe online
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Duduzile Zuma on July riots threat: 'Round 2 will be worse'
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla – the daughter of MK Party President Jacob Zuma – has threatened a 'round two' of July riots, after the party demanded the protection of KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The political party is demanding the dismissal of Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu – who was placed on a leave of absence – amid claims he orchestrated a criminal syndicate. The party also wants President Cyril Ramaphosa to tender his resignation. In an Instagram post, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla pledged her allegiance to Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi once again. The daughter of the former president threatened to rally the MK Party into action if anything happened to the KZN provincial police commissioner. Posting a flier for the party's protest march, which occurred on Friday, 18 July, she shared: 'Once they touch him, kuzonyiwa. Round two will be worse. Let's protect this man'. Earlier this month, she defiantly posted: 'Let them touch you. We're ready for round two!'. Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla has pledged allegience to KZN Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Images via Instagram: @duduzilezuma_sambundla Duduzile is referring to claims she incited violence through her social media posts during the July 2021 riots. During the civil unrest, the 42-year-old former housewife retweeted several videos of the violence and looting, which was a direct reaction to her father's incarceration on contempt-of-court charges shortly before. Duduzile is charged with contravening the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act (POCDATARA) and incitement to commit violence. She will appear in the Durban High Court again on 14 August. During the protest march in Pretoria on Friday, Duduzile-Sambudla Zuma and other MK Party members demanded that action be taken to protect Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Their list of demands included: Arrest of Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu Police file dockets of political killings should be returned to the Special Task Force Arrest of those implicated by Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, including deputy national commissioner, Shadrack Sibiya President Cyril Ramaphosa's resignation MK Party national organiser Joe Ndlela handed over a memorandum at the Union Buildings and told the crowd that they were giving the government '14 days to respond.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
