Failure to finalise budget will hurt SA's vulnerable members of society the most
Masondo's warning about the impact on South Africans comes as MPs prepare to vote on the Appropriation Bill in the National Assembly on Wednesday afternoon.
If it passes, it will bring to a close four months of an intense back-and-forth between parties over government's spending plans.
ALSO READ:
• Budget 2025: MK Party, EFF call Appropriation Bill anti-poor
• Parliament's Appropriations Committee stresses importance of economic growth to support social wage
• Steenhuisen: DA will support Appropriation Bill
• Parliament preps for possibility & implications of national budget not being passed
Masondo said that failing to finalise the budget would hurt the vulnerable the most.
In budget 3.0, National Treasury focused on plans to address the persistent spending pressures to restore critical frontline services and invest in infrastructure.
This is part of a broader plan to improve access to basic services and turn the economy around.
The delays in tabling the budget and voting in favour of it mean that from August, government will only be able to spend 10 percent of the previous year's appropriation budget per month.
Deputy Finance Minister David Masondo: "Our estimation is that by October 2025, the government will be without authority when we reach 100% of last year's appropriation."
He said that the cost to service delivery was insurmountable.
"We should not prolong the passing of this bill because ultimately, it is the most vulnerable members of society who depend on grants, public clinics and schools who will suffer the most."
The EFF and MK Party are expected to vote against the Appropriation Bill, while ANC and DA MPs are expected to vote in favour of it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on August 6, 2025
ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said that the party might have reached a point where it was no longer able to persuade the South African Communist Party (SACP) to abandon its decision to contest the elections. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Wednesday, August 6, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know. What does the SACP's independence mean for the ANC's election future? ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said that the party might have reached a point where it was no longer able to persuade the South African Communist Party (SACP) to abandon its decision to contest the elections. To read on, click here. A closer look at Tebogo Malaka, the suspended IDT CEO facing bribery allegations Who is Tebogo Malaka, the suspended CEO of the Independent Development Trust (IDT), who allegedly tried to bribe a journalist? To read on, click here. SANDF warns troops: No explicit content in uniform on social media The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) has issued a stern warning to its members regarding the inappropriate use of their military uniform in conjunction with explicit content on personal social media platforms. To read on, click here. Police intercept Eswatini dagga smuggler in R4 million Dundee drug bust A 32-year-old suspect has been arrested in Dundee, KwaZulu-Natal, after police found 90 bags of compressed dagga with an estimated street value of R4 million in his vehicle on Tuesday evening. To read on, click here. Kopanang Africa: Migrants are not the cause of South Africa's healthcare crisis Anti-xenophobia movement, Kopanang Africa, says the violent skirmishes witnessed outside numerous healthcare facilities in South Africa are an attempt to divert attention to hijack legitimate frustrations among communities including high unemployment and poor service delivery. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Left behind? Somalia secures Starlink
Somalia is the latest country on the continent to get Starlink – the internet satellite service belonging to Pretoria-born Elon Musk – leaving many South Africans frustrated at being 'left behind'. The news comes amid reports that the world's richest man is set to bypass transformative legislation like Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policies to operate his company in his home country. Musk is reportedly planning a R2 billion investment in development in southern Africa. On the X app, Elon Musk announced that Starlink was now operating in Somalia. The news came as a surprise to many, given the East African country's ongoing civil war and widespread poverty. South Africans also joined the commentary. Some, like former DA Renaldo Gouws, expressed their annoyance at South Africa seemingly falling behind. He posted on X: 'A war-torn Somalia manages to get Starlink before South Africa. What does this tell us about the competence of our government?' Another, @G1ngerNomad, added: 'What's actually sad is a country blocking a South African-born billionaire from connecting its poorest schools. While the rest of Africa just says 'yes' and plugs in'. Others claimed that Elon Musk's company was not welcome in South Africa, as long as it did not adhere to transformative legislation that applied to foreign investors. Starlink currently operates in 20 African countries, including South Africa's neighbouring countries, such as Zimbabwe, Botswana, Mozambique, eSwatini, and Lesotho. However, the internet satellite service has yet to be granted an operating licence in South Africa. According to reports, Starlink, which falls under SpaceX, is likely hoping to achieve this with its plans to invest over R2 billion in the country. Business Day reports that the company would finance infrastructure to support the Southern African Development Community (SADC), which is made up of 16 countries. Should Starlink operate in South Africa? Images via X: @starlink The move is thought to be a way to 'work around' local BEE policies, which require 30% local shareholding for foreign investors. In May, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction for his department on EEIPs, which are considered 'alternatives' to transformative legislation. Without mentioning Starlink, the minister claimed that the policy would 'attract investment,' specifically in operating licensing. The minister revealed that current legislation for foreign investments 'did not allow companies to contribute to transformation goals in ways other than traditional ownership'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘It's racism' – Gayton McKenzie plans legal action against Open Chats podcast
Patriotic Alliance leader said he would be taking legal action after racial slurs spark nationwide outrage Gayton McKenzie, the Patriotic Alliance (PA) leader and current Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture, has vowed to take legal action against the Open Chats Podcast after a viral clip surfaced showing its hosts making derogatory and racist comments about the coloured community in South Africa. In the video, the podcasters claimed that coloured families engage in incest and described the community as 'crazy'. The remarks have sparked public outrage, prompting political leaders, civil society and ordinary citizens to demand accountability and legal barriers. McKenzie reacts: 'It's racism, we're going after them' Open chat podcast team. Image: Instagram In a video posted to social media, McKenzie condemned the podcast episode, calling it blatant racism and confirming that his party's legal team had been instructed to deal with the matter swiftly. 'I want a report today of how we are going to deal with those people who said coloureds are crazy,' said McKenzie. 'All steps are going to be taken; we're going after them in their capacity legally.' He further highlighted the double standard in how the media and society react to racial issues. 'If coloured people made those remarks about any other race group, it would be frontpage news. We must never allow people to become that comfortable with disrespecting us.' McKenzie emphasised the need for legal answers to offensive remarks about his community. ALSO READ: 8 things South Africans secretly miss from the '90s Public outrage and calls for accountability Gayton McKenzie. Picture: TikTok The clip has triggered a flood of criticism across social media platforms, with users calling for the episode to be taken down and for consequences to follow. Many were particularly incensed that the podcast production team allowed the episode to be aired, even after hearing the derogatory remarks during recording and editing. PA councillor Liam Jacobs also condemned the remarks, saying: 'This clip hurt. Action needs to be taken, and we must make a strong point. To the podcasters: go read and educate yourselves about coloured people. We are not your punchline.' DA files complaint with South African Human Rights Commission Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) also entered the fray, reporting the incident to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC). 'Hate speech, harmful racial stereotyping, and the public degradation of any group in our society cannot be tolerated. We note the podcasters have since apologised, an implicit admission of guilt. But an apology alone does not erase the harm caused,' the party said. The DA also emphasised the importance of upholding free speech responsibly. 'We will always defend the right to free speech, but that right ends where it infringes on the constitutional rights and dignity of others.' Podcast apologises amid growing backlash In response to the criticism, the Open Chats Podcast issued a public apology via its social media platforms, expressing regret for the episode. 'The intention was never to cause harm or disrespect the coloured community. Open Chats is a platform centred around open conversations that sometimes touch on sensitive topics. However, we recognise that we must conduct our conversations respectfully,' the statement read. The podcast has since issued a written apology and removed the controversial episode from all platforms. Civil society weighs in Civil rights organisation Cape Forum also condemned the podcast's remarks and called for a full investigation by the SAHRC. 'This type of rhetoric is damaging, degrading, and cannot be swept under the rug. We demand a full inquiry and appropriate sanctions,' the group said.
