Rainbow PUSH accuses Target of backing away from commitment to Black community
Black leaders also demanded more hiring and advancement opportunities. For Rev. Jamal Bryant of Atlanta, Georgia, it's a lingering question about fairness.
'African Americans spend in the orbit of $12 million a day in Target stores around the country. So to just walk away from our community, we really felt betrayed,' Bryant said.
Target latest company to roll back DEI programs
Leading Thursday's protest on State Street in the city's Loop, Bryant, along with Rev. Jessie Jackson and members of his Rainbow Coalition, asked Target why the retailer seemingly had a change of heart.
'Under no pressure and no response to any protest, they offered themselves a $2 billion commitment to the Black community and Black entrepreneurs, and then after the inauguration of Donald Trump, walked away from it,' Bryant said.
Organizers are pointing to glaring disparities, such as the presence of 26 Target stores on college campuses across the country, they say. But none of them are at Historically Black Colleges and Universities — HBCUs for short.
'We've asked them to partner with six HBCUs' business programs,' Bryant said. 'They've not responded to that.'
But in a written statement to WGN-TV, Target spokespersons said:
We have committed to invest $2 billion in Black owned businesses and brands, supported students at over 20 Historically Black Colleges in Universities, invested 100 million to Black lead community organizations and given scholarships to over 30,000 members of our team to advance their career.'
Statement from Target
Yet, Yusef Jackson, with his father Jesse Jackson, and other community leaders say they need to see action.
'Your word ought to mean nothing,' Yusef Jackson said. 'You can't expect us to have foot traffic in a store and not be able to sit at the table with you to make decisions.'
Last month, Target announced that sales fell more than expected in the first quarter, and the retailer warned they will slip for all of 2025 year as its customers, worried over the impact of tariffs and the economy, pull back on spending.
Target sales drop in 1st quarter and retailer warns they will slip for all of 2025
The retailer also acknowledged that customer boycotts did some damage during the latest quarter.
Rainbow PUSH is holding its annual 'People's Conference' this week.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
19 minutes ago
- American Military News
Democrat lawmaker arrested for shoplifting again
A Democrat lawmaker recently turned himself in after being caught shoplifting for a second time at a Target store in Bethel, Connecticut. The New York Post reported that Connecticut state Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan, a Democrat, is currently facing charges after turning himself in to police officials on July 28. The outlet noted that an arrest warrant for the 33-year-old Democrat lawmaker had been issued following the second shoplifting incident. In an arrest affidavit obtained by The New York Post, a Target security guard said they observed Allie-Brennan 'concealing items into the Goodfellow bag that he had selected.' The affidavit accused the Democrat lawmaker of attempting to steal $54.55 in unpaid goods. Allie-Brennan was previously arrested in June after police officials reviewed security footage that showed the Connecticut lawmaker trying to leave the Bethel Target location with $26.69 in unpaid items. The Democrat lawmaker admitted to the June incident; however, he blamed the shoplifting incident on being in a 'rush' to bring items to his hospitalized grandmother. In a July statement on Facebook, Allie-Brennan said, 'This week, I appeared in court and applied for Accelerated Rehabilitation, a program for first-time offenders that, if granted, can lead to dismissal of the charge after meeting court conditions. 'I am taking responsibility for all of my actions and participating in a program to address my behavior seriously and constructively,' the Democrat lawmaker added. 'I know I've let people down, and I'm not proud of that. But I also believe in owning mistakes and doing the work to make them right. I remain committed to accountability, growth, and continuing to serve my community with integrity.' According to The New York Post, Allie-Brennan told the outlet that both shoplifting charges are being addressed under the Accelerated Rehabilitation program. READ MORE: Pic: Democrat lawmaker arrested for shoplifting 'Recently, State Representative Raghib Allie-Brennan (D-2nd District – Bethel) was arrested for shoplifting at a local Target store,' Connecticut Republican State Chairman Ben Proto said in a recent press release. 'While we fully support Representative Allie-Brennan's due process and the presumption of innocence that all of us enjoy under our Constitutions, it is regrettable that, once again, a Democrat member of the Connecticut General Assembly has found themselves in handcuffs and subject to criminal prosecution.' Proto added, 'In light of these allegations, Representative Allie-Brennan should step down from his position.' Connecticut House Speaker Matt Ritter, a Democrat, also issued a statement regarding the Connecticut lawmaker's legal issues. Ritter explained that he had talked with Allie-Brennan about the shoplifting charges and expressed his concerns to the Democrat lawmaker. 'Raghib will take some personal time away from the legislature over the next month to deal with the legal, political and personal ramifications,' Ritter stated.
Los Angeles Times
19 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump wants troops in D.C. But don't expect him to stop there
Well, at least they're not eating the cats and dogs. To hear President Trump tell it, Washington, D.C., has become a barbarous hellhole — worse even than Springfield, Ohio, it would seem, where he accused Black immigrants, many from Somalia, of barbecuing pets last year during the campaign. Back then, Trump was just a candidate. Now, he's the commander in chief of the U.S. military with a clear desire to use troops of war on American streets, whether it's for a fancy birthday parade, to enforce his immigration agenda in Los Angeles or to stop car thefts in the nation's capital. 'It's becoming a situation of complete and total lawlessness,' Trump said during a Monday news conference, announcing that he was calling up National Guard troops to help with domestic policing in D.C. 'We'll get rid of the slums, too. We have slums here. We'll get rid of them,' he said. 'I know it's not politically correct. You'll say, 'Oh, so terrible.' No, we're getting rid of the slums where they live.' Where 'they' live. While the use of the military on American streets is alarming, it should be just as scary how blatantly this president is tying race not just to crime, but to violence so uncontrollable it requires military troops to stop it. Tying race to criminality is nothing new, of course. It's a big part of American history and our justice system has unfortunately been steeped in it, from the Jim Crow era to the 1990s war on drugs, which targeted inner cities with the same rhetoric that Trump is recycling now. The difference between that last attack on minorities — started by President Nixon and lasting through Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, also under the guise of law and order — and our current circumstances is that in this instance, the notion of war isn't just hyperbole. We are literally talking about soldiers in the streets, targeting Black and brown people. Whether they are car wash employees in California or teenagers on school break in D.C., actual crimes don't seem to matter. Skin color is enough for law enforcement scrutiny, a sad and dangerous return to an era before civil rights. 'Certainly the language that President Trump is using with regard to D.C. has a message that's racially based,' said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Chemerinsky pointed out that just a few days ago, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals called out the Trump administration for immigration raids that were unconstitutional because they were basically racial sweeps. But he is unabashed. His calls for violence against people of color are escalating. It increasingly appears that bringing troops to Los Angeles was a test case for a larger use of the military in civilian settings. 'This will go further,' Trump ominously said, making it clear he'd like to see soldiers policing across America. 'We have other cities also that are bad, very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is,' he went on. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore, they're so, they're so far gone.' In reality, crime is dropping across the United States, including in Washington. As the Washington Post pointed out, violent crime rates, including murders, have for the most part been on a downward trend since 2023. But all it takes is a few explosive examples to banish truth from conscientiousness. Trump pointed out some tragic and horrific examples — including the beating of Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, a former employee of the president's Department of Government Efficiency who was attacked after attempting to defend a woman during a carjacking recently, not far from the White House. These are crimes that should be punished, and certainly not tolerated. But the exploitation we are seeing from Trump is a dangerous precedent to justify military force for domestic law enforcement, which until now has been forbidden — or at least assumed forbidden — by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. This week, just how strong that prohibition is will be debated in a San Francisco courtroom, during the three-day trial over the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. While it's uncertain how that case will resolve, 'Los Angeles could provide a bit of a road map for any jurisdiction seeking to push back against the Trump administration when there's a potential threat of sending in federal troops,' Jessica Levinson, a constitutional legal scholar at Loyola Law School, told me. Again, California coming out as the biggest foil to a Trump autocracy. But while we wait in the hopes that the courts will catch up to Trump, we can't be blind to what is happening on our streets. Race and crime are not linked by anything other than racism. Allowing our military to terrorize Black and brown people under the guise of law and order is nothing more than a power grab based on the exploitation of our darkest natures. It's a tactic Trump has perfected, but one which will fundamentally change, and weaken, American justice if we do not stop it.
Atlantic
21 minutes ago
- Atlantic
This Isn't About Crime
Donald Trump is famously reluctant to commit troops abroad, but salivates at the prospect of using them against Americans at home. That is the context in which one must understand his takeover of the Washington, D.C., police force; his deployment of the National Guard; and his threats to occupy other cities. Trump claims that he is acting to quell a spike in violent crime. And although he might very well feel sincere concern about crime, this does not explain his actions any more than concern about fentanyl smuggling (which he no doubt also genuinely opposes) motivates his trade restrictions against Canada. The most obvious reason for skepticism about Trump's desire to fight crime is that he is the most pro-criminal president in American history. He has treated laws as suggestions throughout his career, beginning with his defiance of Justice Department orders that he and his father stop discriminating against Black prospective tenants. Trump is a felon who has surrounded himself with criminals and promiscuously extended clemency to criminals who support him. When Trump talks about 'criminals,' he doesn't mean people who violate the law, or even people who violate the narrower and more serious set of laws against violence. (One of the first acts of his second term was a blanket pardon of violent criminals convicted of assaulting police officers on January 6, 2021. He even appointed to the Justice Department one of the instigators of the violence.) Trump's idea of criminality excludes himself and his supporters; includes noncriminal states of being, such as homelessness; and focuses heavily on categories of street crime that he seems to associate with Black people. Even by this skewed definition of crime, however, Trump's D.C. takeover makes little sense. His executive order announcing a state of emergency claims that crime is 'rising' and 'out of control,' but in reality, it has been falling since its post-pandemic spike two years ago. His defenders might correctly respond that crime remains too high. But imagine if Trump were declaring an emergency on the slightly more honest basis that crime in Washington was not falling quickly enough for his tastes. What would be left of the concept of an emergency? Serious policy experts, some of them conservative, have proposed solutions to bring down crime levels in Washington. The most straightforward remedy is to fill vacancies in the city's courts to speed up the processing of criminal cases. At Trump's press conference, the Fox News host turned (God help us) U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro denounced the District of Columbia's laws restricting sentencing for juvenile offenders. That's a reasonable complaint, but one that could be addressed by legislation, not by putting troops on the streets. Gilad Edelman: Just don't call her unqualified Trump's plan bears little resemblance to any of these remedies. His big idea is to flood the streets with troops. Yet the president himself does not appear committed to the belief that this will solve crime. In his press conference, Trump said that, by his reckoning, Washington already has more than enough police officers (3,500) to deter criminals. If that's true, why would adding more bodies—specifically, members of the military who lack training in law enforcement—improve the situation? Nothing about this proposal makes sense. The fact that Trump has proposed something illogical does not automatically imply that he is concealing a hidden motive. Anonymous White House sources assured Politico that the president is acting out of revulsion at scenes of crime and disorder that he has spotted while driving around town, and that might be true. But the obvious reality is that Trump has consistently and openly displayed a lust to use the power of the state against his political enemies. During his first term, he constantly described protesters as an unruly mob. He did this well before the George Floyd demonstrations, which did include pockets of vandalism and violence. He raged at the leaders of the military for failing to carry out his orders to have troops shoot protesters. More recently, before staging his birthday parade in June, he warned, 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' making no distinction between violent and peaceful protests. At the press conference, Trump appeared with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, both of whom have followed the second-term Trump mandate to place personal loyalty to the president above all other considerations. Hegseth's worldview, judging by his written output, is predicated on erasing the difference between foreign enemies and domestic critics. The Justice Department has lately been leaking splashy investigations of various Trump critics who obviously did nothing illegal. Activists on the post-liberal right, who yearn for Trump to use state power to crush their opponents, have barely disguised their glee. 'Trump has the opportunity to do a Bukele-style crackdown on DC crime,' Chris Rufo, a conservative activist who has influenced the administration, wrote on X. 'Big test: Can he reduce crime faster than the Left advances a counternarrative about 'authoritarianism'? If yes, he wins. Speed matters.' Note that Rufo is putting authoritarianism in scare quotes while holding up as a model Nayib Bukele, the thuggish president of El Salvador whose gulag-style prison employs torture, and who just recently smashed a constitutional term limit that represented one of the few remaining checks on his power. Bukele no doubt dislikes crime. But he has also used crime as a wedge to delegitimize all opposition. Rufo's invocation of him as an aspirational archetype is revealing. This morning, Trump depicted the Washington deployment as essential to secure the nation's capital, which hosts important foreign and domestic visitors. (He did not even claim to care about the needs of the city's residents.) He proceeded to mention, almost casually, that he would like to follow the occupation of Washington with similar action in a host of other cities. It should be abundantly clear that his stated motives do not align with his actual ones. His plans for Washington, D.C., are a warning to us all.
