UK: Starmer and Cooper urged by over 400 cultural figures not to ban Palestine Action
The novelist Alan Hollinghurst, writer Reni Eddo-Lodge and musician Brian Eno are among those who have signed a joint statement organised by Fossil Free Books. 'Whether we as individuals support Palestine Action is irrelevant: what is at stake here is the very principle of freedom of expression,' the statement reads.
Pankaj Mishra, whose recent book The World After Gaza responds to the impact of Israel's war on Gaza, has signed the statement, as have the journalist George Monbiot, economist Yanis Varoufakis, academic Kojo Karam, comedian Frankie Boyle and the writers Aja Barber, Max Porter and Afua Hirsch.
In a separate letter organised by Artists for Palestine UK, another group of high profile British cultural figures, including the actor Tilda Swinton and the musician Paul Weller, said: "The real threat to the life of the nation comes not from Palestine Action but from Home Secretary Yvonne Cooper's efforts to ban it."
'Civil disobedience is not 'terrorism', as history shows us, from the suffragettes to Martin Luther King Jr. It is the right of all citizens in a democracy," the Fossil Free Books statement says.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"In 2004, Keir Starmer made this very argument when he represented an activist who sabotaged a military aircraft, making the case that his actions were lawful because they aimed to prevent an 'illegal war'.
'Legal and human rights groups, such as Amnesty, Greenpeace and Liberty, have been clear that the proscription of Palestine Action threatens the right to protest in the UK.'
As a lawyer, Starmer represented Josh Richards, one of five British peace activists who in 2003 sought to sabotage operations at RAF Fairford, a military air base that was housing B-52 bombers due to fly to Iraq.
Banning Palestine Action
Founded in 2020, Palestine Action is a direct action group the UK government is set to ban after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton, the largest airbase in Britain, on 20 June and spray-painted two planes while on electric scooters.
The activists then evaded security and escaped the base, which they said they targeted because flights leave from there for RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, 'a base used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East'.
'As a precedent for what constitutes free speech and appropriate civil disobedience, this is appalling'
- Nikesh Shukla, British screenwriter
On Friday police announced they had arrested two people connected to the incident, and have since made four more arrests related to the RAF base break-in.
Speaking in parliament on 23 June, Yvette Cooper said: 'I have decided to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
She said a draft proscription order will be presented in Parliament on 30 June. "If passed, it will make it illegal to be a member of, or to invite support for, Palestine Action.'
After the draft order is presented in parliament on Monday, it will be put to a vote on Wednesday and could come into effect as soon as Friday this week.
On Monday, Palestine Action said that Cooper "will ask MPs to decide in one vote to ban Palestine Action and neo-Nazi groups 'Maniac Murder Cult' and 'Russian Imperialist Movement'.
"She's done this deliberately to try and ensure the vote is successful."
New report lays out full extent of UK-Israel military partnership in Gaza Read More »
If Palestine Action is proscribed, it will place it alongside the likes of Islamic State and the neo-Nazi group National Action. It will be the first time a direct action group has been classified in this way.
George Monbiot, a Guardian columnist and author, said that the planned proscription of Palestine Action was 'our 'I'm Spartacus' moment.'
Scottish comedian Fern Brady said: 'Civil disobedience, protest and the expression of political solidarity is not terrorism.
"To say that it is would be an indictment of the UK democracy and every self-respecting comedian should take a stand.'
Nikesh Shukla, the British novelist and screenwriter, said: 'As a precedent for what constitutes free speech and appropriate civil disobedience, this is appalling.
"We call on all writers, no matter your political views, to join us in defending freedom of speech.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
23 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
France: 'From the River to the Sea' colouring book sparks far-right fury
A children's colouring book on the history and culture of Palestine is at the centre of a debate about the representation of Palestinians and pro-Palestine advocacy in France. Originally published in English, From the River to Sea by South African author and illustrator Nathi Ngubane was in the summer window display of the Violette and Co bookstore in Paris, alongside titles addressing themes of racism, colonialism and the Palestinian cause. This display triggered what the bookstore described as "intimidation, harassment, cyberbullying, defacement, and threats from the far right", starting in July. In a post on Instagram dated 11 August, Violette and Co, which identifies as a feminist and LGBTQIA+ space, detailed the graffiti on its storefront reading 'Islamocomplice' and 'Hamas rapist', "hateful, LGBT-phobic, sexist, and racist comments", as well as death threats. "A group of five people came to the bookstore to intimidate us," the statement continued, adding that right-wing media outlets in the country fuelled a "disinformation campaign" regarding the shop. From the River to the Sea was singled out by the media, politicians and social media users alike. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters French channel CNews decried the book as "teaching kids to hate Israel", while Europe 1 labelled its title a "Hamas slogan". The title is based on the decades-old chant "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free", widely used by pro-Palestinian campaigners. It refers to liberating the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea in historic Palestine. Propagande du Hamas… en coloriage pour enfants ? Vendu dans le 11eme chez Les Violette and CO. Un livre intitulé 'From the River to the Sea' est en vente. Et il est destiné aux plus jeunes. ➡️ Ce n'est pas un ouvrage d'analyse. C'est un album de coloriage. 🤔 ⬇️ — Jugé Coupable (@JCoupable) August 7, 2025 Translation: Hamas propaganda… in a colouring book for kids? Being sold in the 11th arrondissement at Les Violettes and Co. A book titled "From the River to the Sea" is on sale. And it's aimed at young children. This isn't a political analysis. It's a colouring book. Supporters of Israel claim it implies the destruction of the country. French MP Aurelien Veron joined the chorus, calling it an "appeal to the destruction of Israel", while MP Nelly Garnier and Isabelle Nizard, deputy mayor of the 16th arrondissement of Paris, called for the withdrawal of government subsidies granted to Violette and Co. Amid the backlash, some elected officials voiced their support for the bookstore, with Paris's deputy mayor, Jean-Luc Romero-Michel, posting on X: "Full support to the Violette and Co bookstore, which is currently facing a campaign of intimidation and harassement for placing a colouring book on Palestine in its window." Online, supporters defended the bookstore and the colouring book against attempts at "censorship". Many stated that the right-wing backlash was misplaced amid Israel's ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip. Soutien à la librairie Violette and Co qui subit des menaces et intimidations depuis quelques jours, en plus d'essuyer des insultes lesbophobes sur les réseaux sociaux. Ces obscurantistes qui sont plus dérangés par une librairie que par un génocide sont répugnants. — Marion Beauvalet (@MarionBeauvalet) August 12, 2025 Translation: Standing with the Violette and Co bookstore, which has been facing threats and intimidation for several days now, along with a flood of lesbophobic abuse on social media. The fact that these reactionary bigots are more outraged by a bookstore than by a genocide is nothing short of disgusting. "Certain struggles, particularly the Palestinian cause, unfortunately expose one to many aggressions and attempts at intimidation and censorship," said Turkish-Israeli-French historian Esther Benbassa in a solidarity message about Violette and Co. One commenter on Instagram said: "People are more offended by a colouring book than by genocide." The backlash also appeared to introduce the book and shop to new and curious readers. "The only good thing about this kind of rage-tweet is that they make you discover lots of people and initiatives," posted journalist Sihame Assbague on X. "If this pisses off the Zionists, then you should go buy this colouring book," said another user. 'Hysterical reaction' Violette and Co, which champions feminist and anti-colonial literature, stated it sought to promote diverse narratives through its display in an effort to counteract "homonationalist and femonationalist" political discourse. "We salute Violette and Co for continuing to elevate Palestinian narratives and for remaining steadfast," said Ngubane, the author and illustrator of the colouring book, in a statement. "The hysterical reaction from the French right wing shows Zionism for what it is: an ideology based on intimidation and supremacy," added the book's publisher, Social Bandit. The book covers key moments such as the Nakba - the ethnic cleansing of around 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland to make way for the creation of Israel - the ongoing Israeli occupation and Palestinian resistance movements. This isn't the first time From the River to the Sea has faced backlash from pro-Israeli groups. In June 2024, South Africa's biggest bookstore chain pulled the book from sales, sparking protest online.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli media praise killing of Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif
"It's about time," wrote Daphna Liel, a senior journalist at Israel's Channel 12 News, on her Telegram page on Sunday night. "The IDF killed the terrorist who operated under the guise of an Al Jazeera journalist," her report said, referring to the Israeli army. The picture of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif was attached. The killing of Sharif on Sunday has provoked outrage from press freedom groups and other media outlets - but in Israel, the response by most of the media has seemingly been that Sharif, in fact, had it coming. Ynet described Sharif as "the reporter-terrorist who was assassinated", Maariv newspaper said he was "a journalist in the service of Hamas", and Israel Hayom wrote that he was "a terrorist disguised as a journalist". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters On Sunday night, the Israeli military announced that it had attacked a journalists' tent near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Sharif, who was one of the most prominent journalists covering Israel's assault on Gaza, was the target of the attack. In addition to Sharif, six other Palestinians were killed in the attack, including Al Jazeera correspondent and Middle East Eye contributor Mohammed Qreiqeh as well as camera operators Mohammed Noufal, Ibrahim Zaher and Moamen Aliwa. "The Israeli media's response to the killing of the journalists was frightening," Zahra Saeed, a Palestinian journalist at Radio Al-Shams, told MEE. "Amit Segal [a senior journalist at Channel 12 News] wrote on his Telegram account that he was waiting for this assassination, it's unbelievable. He is part of the Israeli apparatus of incitement against journalists." 'Murder. Plain and simple' The Israeli attack on Sunday was condemned around the world. Sara Qudah, regional director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said: "Israel wiped out an entire news crew. It has made no claims that any of the other journalists were terrorists. That's murder. Plain and simple." The war in Gaza is the deadliest conflict for journalists since such data began to be collected. Since the beginning of the war, Israel has killed 270 journalists and media workers. The Israeli army spokesperson claimed it had documents indicating that Sharif was active in Hamas, but did not produce the evidence. 'The Israeli media plays a central role in the genocide in Gaza, whether actively or silently' - Hanin Majadli, Haaretz Hanin Majadli, a Palestinian journalist who writes for Haaretz, told MEE that Israeli media were actively trying to misrepresent the current situation as normal. "The Israeli media is an inseparable part of the Israeli apparatus, which also includes the government, the military, and the public, which commits crimes in Gaza," Majadli said. "The Israeli media plays a central role in the genocide in Gaza, whether actively or silently." Right-wing journalist Yinon Magal of Channel 14 criticised a demonstration by Palestinians in Umm al-Fahm, in northern Israel, "for the 'journalist'-terrorist, Anas al-Sharif". Saeed said there was effectively no difference between the mainstream media and the far-right media regarding the coverage of the assassination of Sharif. "Anyone who asks questions and casts doubts finds himself under attack and outside the national consensus. He is labelled a traitor," she told MEE. "The Israeli crimes in Gaza are justified in the mainstream media, just as they are in the extreme right media outlets," Majadli said. "There is no justification for the assassination of Anas al-Sharif. According to Israeli logic, Israeli journalists are also legitimate targets - while an Israeli journalist called for the killing of 100,000 Gazans and another blew up houses in Lebanon, they are considered professional journalists." 'Hunt down Arabs' Journalists in Israel that condemned the attack faced criticism of their own. Majadli and Saeed said they received abuse while expressing their views on the assassination of Sharif. Saeed said that a post on her Instagram account lamenting the killing of Sharif was translated into Hebrew and led to incitement. According to Saeed, the purpose of translating the post was to "hunt down Arabs", adding that this is what happens "when a Palestinian journalist in Israel wants to express her opinion". Exclusive: MPs urge UK to disclose if it holds spy plane footage of Israel's journalist killings Read More » "All of our journalistic work has been reduced to whether you are for or against terrorism. Asking questions beyond the borders of the IDF spokesperson is considered a crime," Saeed said, adding that "it is dangerous to be a journalist in Israel as well, not only in Gaza". "In Israel, the equation is very simple - the Palestinians are terrorists," Majadli said. "A Palestinian journalist who speaks out against the killing of Anas al-Sharif is considered an encourager of terrorism, a sympathiser of terrorism, or an inciter to terrorism. "There is no journalistic space in Israel. The vast majority of Palestinians in Israel can't even say about Anas al-Sharif 'may Allah have mercy on him'." "The incitement against Palestinian journalists is open, it is the norm, it is urgent," Majadli said. "The incitement is here to stay for a long time. In Israel, the Palestinians need to know that they have to keep their mouths shut."
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Legal groups file complaint against UK Lawyers for Israel director over alleged ethics breaches
Two legal advocacy organisations have filed a formal complaint with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) against the director of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI). Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) and the European Legal Support Centre (ELSC) accused Caroline Turner, a solicitor and UKLFI's director, in a 114-page report of breaching professional standards and engaging in unregulated legal work to suppress solidarity with Palestine. The complaint, which was filed on 5 August and made public on 13 August, alleges Turner has violated the SRA's Principles and Code of Conduct, including through the use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which are legal threats designed to deter free expression on matters of public interest. PILC and ELSC want the SRA to investigate whether UKLFI, which is not regulated under any UK legal regulatory body, is in effect operating as a law firm, and to bring it under formal regulatory oversight. According to the groups, between January 2022 and May 2025, UKLFI sent at least eight threatening letters to individuals and organisations engaged in Palestine solidarity work. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The letters, shared with the complainants by the recipients, allegedly show a pattern of "vexatious and legally baseless" correspondence aimed at silencing campaigners, academics and civil society groups. "UKLFI is actively suppressing solidarity with Palestine," a representative for the ELSC told Middle East Eye. Charity watchdog investigating UK Lawyers for Israel's charitable trust Read More » "Our research documents how their threatening letters have triggered concrete reprisals - workers disciplined or fired, reputations smeared, and events cancelled under pressure. "This is a systematic strategy to criminalise solidarity with Palestine and shield genocide complicity," they said. "This complaint is a demand for accountability," they added PILC solicitor Paul Heron said: "No solicitor is above the SRA's regulatory framework. We are calling for a full investigation into their conduct and into UKLFI as an organisation that effectively acts as a law firm. "The SRA has a duty to uphold professional standards and protect civil society from intimidation dressed up as law." A history of legal threats Founded in 2011, UKLFI describes its mission as "countering the delegitimisation of Israel" and opposing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. It is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee and operates alongside a registered charitable arm, UKLFI Charitable Trust. Neither entity is regulated by the SRA, meaning their activities are not subject to the same oversight as a law firm. UKLFI's work frequently involves sending legal complaints or warning letters to institutions and individuals involved in pro-Palestine activity. The Hind Rajab Foundation: Pursuing Israeli soldiers worldwide for Gaza war crimes Read More » Since October 2023, the group has led campaigns against expressions of support for Palestine: filing legal letters to Tower Hamlets council over Palestine flags on lampposts, pressuring music festivals to ban Irish rap group Kneecap, threatening ICC prosecutor Karim Khan KC for pursuing legal action against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and even threatening a judicial review against the UK government for suspending some arms licences to Israel. The last threat prompted the resignation of UKLFI patron Lord Carlile. Critics say UKLFI's tactics amount to "lawfare" - the use of legal mechanisms to achieve political objectives by silencing or intimidating opponents. In May 2025, human rights group Cage International accused UKLFI of contributing to a "wave of repression" against Palestine advocates by targeting academics, charities and campaign groups. In June, campaigners Led By Donkeys released a short film alleging UKLFI was systematically pressuring venues, employers and regulators to act against those supporting Palestinian rights. The scrutiny has intensified. In July, MEE revealed that the UK Charity Commission had opened an investigation into UKLFI's charitable wing after receiving complaints from Cage and Led By Donkeys. The SLAPPs debate SLAPPs have become a growing concern in the UK, with press freedom organisations warning they are used to deter journalists, campaigners and NGOs from speaking on matters of public interest. In 2024, the government introduced anti-SLAPP provisions in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act, but campaigners argue the protections remain weak and do not adequately cover cases outside financial crime. The ELSC and PILC claim that UKLFI's correspondence fits the SLAPP pattern, using the prospect of costly legal battles to chill debate and discourage public participation. Exclusive: MPs urge UK to disclose if it holds spy plane footage of Israel's journalist killings Read More » UKLFI's letters often cite its "patrons and members", describing them as "some of the most distinguished members of the UK legal profession" and naming regulated solicitors and barristers. The complainants argue that this creates a misleading impression of official regulatory oversight, potentially breaching SRA Principle 2 (upholding public trust) and Code of Conduct 8.8 (accuracy in publicity). "The SRA must step in," Heron said. "Without regulatory intervention, groups like UKLFI will continue to use these tactics to suppress conversation about war crimes and crimes against humanity and to silence those who speak out against Israel." The SRA has not yet commented on the complaint, but a spokesperson told MEE they would investigate any complaint made. MEE reached out to UKLFI for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication. UKLFI has previously rejected claims that it seeks to stifle legitimate debate, insisting that its work is focused on countering antisemitism and the misrepresentation of Israel.
