logo
Utahns among those paying the most in housing costs, study says

Utahns among those paying the most in housing costs, study says

Yahoo23-04-2025
SALT LAKE CITY () — It likely comes as no surprise to Utah homeowners that they could be among those paying the highest amount of their income on housing in the nation. But it's a different story for renters.
According to a WalletHub study released on Wednesday, Utah ranks tenth in the nation for the highest cost of housing as a share of median monthly household income. On average, Utahns pay more than 30% of the median income on mortgage and utility payments.
Source: WalletHub
The report says homeowner's housing costs average $2,424 a month, with the mortgage payments ranking sixth highest in the nation and the home energy costs low at 39th.
'Homeowners and home buyers have faced whiplash over the past few years, with housing prices soaring and interest rates fluctuating from historic lows back up to the highest rates in more than a decade,' WalletHub Analyst Chip Lupo said.
However, there's a twist. When it comes to renting, Utah ranks 44th in the nation, only spending approximately 22.7% of the median household income on rent.
Andrew Burnstine, an associate professor at Lynn University, shared in the study that 'housing often eats up the biggest slice of our budgets,' with nearly half of renters in the U.S. spending more than 30% of their income on housing.
READ NEXT: Utah has nation's highest median household income when adjusted for cost of living, new report says
While Utah falls below that number, Burnstine provided a few recommendations for renters, including negotiating rent during the off-season, looking into less central locations, and sharing your space with a roommate. He also suggested reviewing lease agreements to 'avoid unexpected fees.'
'The current social and economic environment is significantly impacting monthly housing bill spending. High inflation has driven up the costs of everything from groceries to utilities, leaving less disposable income for housing,' he said. 'This means that a larger portion of household budgets is now dedicated to simply keeping a roof overhead.'
This study comes after a recent local publication by the University of Utah's that says Utah has the highest median household income in the country when adjusted for cost of living.
The study said that Utah's cost of living is actually lower than the national average regardless of the state's housing costs sitting above the average. Researchers said this is because the average homeowner in Utah bought their houses before today's high housing prices, and therefore face a different reality than new buyers and renters.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Property Tax Change To Affect 800,000 Americans
Property Tax Change To Affect 800,000 Americans

Newsweek

time17 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Property Tax Change To Affect 800,000 Americans

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Almost 800,000 homeowners in Utah are set to face higher property tax bills as a result of an 11.11 percent increase voted for by the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board on Monday. The tax increase, which the board said would help the company stay afloat in the coming years, is estimated to add more than $12 a year for the average homeowner in Salt Lake County and $21 a year for businesses. It is a relatively small sum, but it comes on top of years of property tax increases for homeowners across the U.S. Between 2019 and 2024, nationwide property taxes surged by almost 30 percent, according to Redfin, reaching a yearly median of $3,500. In Utah, where the effective tax rate is 0.46 percent and the average home value is $530,250, according to Bankrate, the average property tax on a typical home is $2,439 a year. But the increase is about more than higher housing costs. Local activists say the tax increase will make Utah's municipal water even cheaper than it is now, exacerbating the issue of water waste in the drought-prone state and accelerating the collapse of the Great Salt Lake. Newsweek contacted the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board and Utah Rivers Council for comment by email on Tuesday. Why Are Utah Homeowners Facing an Increase? The Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board—one of the largest water districts in the state—said that higher revenues would allow it to strengthen its footing in the next five years and implement much-needed changes. This has to do with the way Utah charges residents for their water use. While Utahns receive a monthly water bill, a significant part of their consumption is paid for through homeowners' and businesses' property taxes. Jordan Valley said the increase in property taxes would not only allow it to keep the cost of water low but also to maintain and build infrastructure vital to keeping taps running in the state. A "Welcome to Utah" sign near Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Page, Arizona, on July 10. A "Welcome to Utah" sign near Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Page, Arizona, on July 10."The benefit of it is having a strong financial ability for Jordan Valley because we're growing and building new facilities for future generations," Alan Packard, the general manager of the Water Conservancy District, said in a statement reported by ABC4. "It's important we have good credit rating and having some of our revenue come from a reliable source like property taxes helps that credit rating and lowers our interest cost we pay when we issue bonds," he added. According to Packard, higher revenues from property tax bills will allow the district to do things like "expanding out water treatment plants and building major new aqueducts." Higher property taxes would allow the company to "manage a loss of revenue of $3.1 million not only this year but each year into the future because that's how much revenue will be generated annually and going forward," Packard said. What Do Local Residents Think? Many Utahns have voiced strong opposition to the property tax increase in the lead-up to its approval on Monday, and not only because it adds to the financial burden carried by many homeowners already struggling with higher housing costs. According to Utah Rivers Council, a nonprofit protecting the state's watersheds, property taxes in Utah are used to subsidize municipal water—making it so cheap "that Utahns aren't incentivized to save it, which is why we constantly see sprinklers watering sidewalks and gutters," the group wrote on Facebook. Stats shared by the group show that the average Utah city consumes 245 gallons of municipal water per capita per day, compared to the U.S. average of 138—placing locals among the more wasteful water users in the country. For the Utah Rivers Council, the state's property tax should be written off entirely, and the system changed so that residents pay the price of the water they consume. Some tax experts and local homeowners are of the same opinion. Stephen Kenyon, a longtime Utah resident living on a fixed income with his wife, Julie, told KUTV: "We get nothing out of this. We don't get any part of any increase—just an increase in taxes. We would like to see those in charge look at where you can cut and do better." In July, The Salt Lake Tribune published an editorial calling for Utah to "stop using property taxes to hide the cost of water" and to change the taxing system to charge for every gallon of water consumed in the state. Criticism against Utah's property tax system is growing, and it has clearly reached the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board itself—even if the hike ultimately slipped through. Two board members of Jordan Valley were against Monday's increase. "Before we, as government, go and ask them for more taxes, we need to do everything possible to cut costs and tighten our belts," Riverton City Council Member Andy Pierucci, one of the two dissenting votes on the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board, told KUTV. He added, "I don't feel like we've done that enough yet."

New Jersey beat out New York in ‘best state to live in' ranking — here's who else made the list
New Jersey beat out New York in ‘best state to live in' ranking — here's who else made the list

New York Post

time18 hours ago

  • New York Post

New Jersey beat out New York in ‘best state to live in' ranking — here's who else made the list

From housing costs to hospital quality, this annual list did the math to rank the most and least desirable states to call home. WalletHub's 'Best States to Live In' ranking of 2025 set all 50 states against a lengthy list of 51 indicators — giving a numerical value to the livability of each proud state. Some things stayed the same in this annual ranking — Massachusetts reigned supreme for the second year in a row, and New York held on to its precarious slot in the top ten. While New Jersey earned itself a spot in the top 5, other states were knocked down a peg. Advertisement Massachusetts won thanks to its strong health care system and high-quality education, according to WalletHub. The Northeastern state put up strong numbers for 2025, boasting the lowest premature death rate in the country and a 90% high school graduation rate. 4 Massachusetts held on to its title. Wangkun Jia – This year's silver medal traded hands from Florida to Idaho — the Sunshine State dropped several slots from last year, down to sixth place, partially due to high housing costs. Advertisement New Jersey remained squarely in third place, thanks to factors like high median household income and low food insecurity. It's not called the Garden State for nothing. 4 Idaho kicked Florida out of second place. Steve – Big year-to-year shake-ups included Wisconsin earning a No.4 place, as well as Minnesota climbing from 13th to 5th place. Advertisement 4 New York state ranked ninth, retaining its spot from last year. Jacob – The Empire State remained in ninth place from last year. New York, as any New Yorker will tell you, has plenty to brag about. It ranked first in overall quality of life — a bucket of indicators that included commute times, museums per capita and average weekly hours — and seventh in safety. To round out the top 10 list — Pennsylvania came in tenth, scoring high on affordability and economy ranking. When it came to which states have the most restaurants per capita — New York tied with California, Florida and Texas. The high cost of calling New York home, however, remains a drag on the state's reputation. WalletHub ranked it 47th out of 50 states for affordability. Advertisement WalletHub's ranking, of course, is not the final word on where to call home. The high proportion of renters to owners in New York City, for example, weighs down the state's overall showing. New York ranked 50th for its low rate of homeownership — a heavily weighted WalletHub indicator. 4 New Mexico's high crime and poverty rates earned it last place in the 2025 rankings. Mona Mí¤kelí¤ – New Mexico found itself at the very bottom of the 2025 'Best and Worst' list. The Southwestern home state, known for snowy mountain peaks and inspiring desert landscapes, suffered from the country's highest crime rate — although Washington ranked 50th in the overall safety category — and one of its highest poverty rates. Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alaska took up the rest of the bottom five slots, all hindered by variously poor performances in key indicators like income growth, crime and poverty rates.

Study ranks New Mexico as the worst state to live in
Study ranks New Mexico as the worst state to live in

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Study ranks New Mexico as the worst state to live in

NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – When deciding where to live things like cost of living, job opportunity and safety all play a role in the decision. WalletHub considered these factors in their recent study on the best and worst states to live. WalletHub compared all 50 states across 51 metrics, including housing costs, education rate, safety, income growth and more. These 2000s movies and shows were filmed in Albuquerque. Have you seen them? New Mexico ranked last on WalletHub's list coming in 50th overall. In individual metrics New Mexico ranked 49th in safety, 48th in education and health, 33rd in economy and 25th in affordability. To view the complete study and list of rankings, click here. WalletHub's ten best states to live Massachusetts Idaho New Jersey Wisconsin Minnesota Florida New Hampshire Utah New York Pennsylvania WalletHub's ten worst states to live New Mexico Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Alaska Nevada South Carolina Oklahoma West Virginia Alabama Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store