BBC warns of ‘unprecedented' issues after £1bn drop in income
The BBC's income has fallen by £1 billion in real terms compared with 2010, the corporation's annual plan for 2025/26 has revealed.
The corporation said it is 'no longer sustainable' to cut more staff to plug financial issues after axing 2,000 roles over the last five years.
The BBC has been increasingly cash-strapped in recent years after two years when the licence fee was frozen and inflation rising.
The annual report said: 'Despite strong growth from BBC Commercial, the BBC faces an unprecedented content funding challenge, as co-production partnerships with global streamers and media companies have reduced across the sector.
'Without intervention, it will be difficult to maintain the current ambition and volume of UK content.'
It also said it will 'continue our ambitious programme of transformation to ensure the BBC is in the best shape to meet the challenges of a fast-changing media environment', after having 'a smaller, leaner workforce following an aggressive savings programme'.
It will continue to put out the investigative series Panorama on the morning of its evening broadcast, and 'build on success' of having live broadcasts of current affairs programme Question Time on iPlayer.
Episodes of children's news show Newsround, which is staying on CBBC and iPlayer, will be made available on YouTube for the first time.
The BBC is also exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI), while being wary of the technology's 'many risks'.
BBC chairman Samir Shah said: 'The BBC's role has never been more important, both here in the UK and around the world, to deliver trusted, impartial news in a world of disinformation; develop and promote the most compelling homegrown content; and be the place where people come together for unforgettable shared moments.
'The BBC board fully endorses this plan, as we plot the long-term future of this marvellous organisation and deliver for audiences for generations to come.'
The corporation promised to publish the findings of an independent review of its workplace culture after several controversies involving high-profile presenters and TV shows.
BBC director-general Tim Davie said: 'We are focused on our mission to deliver value for all, through our journalism, our storytelling and our unique ability to bring people together.
'The UK's creative industry continues to change rapidly, as does the world around us. This plan sets out how the BBC continues to evolve for audiences, both on and off air, but also how we will support and invest in the wider industry.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minister to soften disability benefits shake-up
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is making changes to her package of welfare reforms in an attempt to reassure Labour MPs who are considering rebelling against the plans. Kendall has tried to soften the impact of planned benefits cuts worth £5bn a year by 2030 before MPs vote on the government's welfare changes. The welfare reform bill will include proposals to make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payment (Pip). The BBC has been told anybody who loses Pip will receive the payment for a transitional period of 13 weeks, rather than the usual four weeks, before it is removed. Carer's allowance will continue to be paid during the 13-week transition, but will be ended when Pip is taken away. Benefits recipients with the most severe health conditions will not be reassessed and will receive extra income support through a universal credit payment. A scheme to give disabled people a right to try employment without the risk of losing their benefits will also be introduced at the same time as the welfare reform bill. Kendall has described these additions as "non-negotiable" protections, which will be added to the bill before it is published next week. The protections were proposed in the government's Pathways to Work green paper and consulted on before Kendall decided to add them to the bill. Kendall told the Guardian newspaper: "When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. "I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. "That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. "These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable." The BBC understands the protections had been raised in discussions between ministers, Labour MPs and disability rights groups. Dozens of Labour MPs have expressed concerns about the plans to cut Pip payments and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Many have said they are prepared to vote against the primary legislation the government needs to pass to make the changes to welfare payments. The welfare package as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty, according to the government's impact assessment. Neil Duncan-Jordan is one of 42 Labour MPs who wrote a letter that said the welfare reforms were "impossible to support" if changes were not made. When asked what he made of the protections Kendall had added to the bill, Duncan-Jordan said: "Poverty delayed is still poverty." Another discontented Labour MP, Ian Byrne, said: "After 14 weeks do the disabled and sick affected miraculously end the need for the vital assistance being taken away? An absolute nonsense." And Labour MP Rachael Maskell said Kendall had "just restated the proposals in Pathways to Work with a three-month transition before people lose their support". She added: "It will therefore not change the material facts nor my intention to vote against." Another Labour MP said the added protections will not stop dozens of his colleagues from opposing the bill. "The whips are pushing very hard with MPs but it's not working," the Labour MP said. But one supportive Labour MP said Kendall's protections sounded sensible. Some Labour MPs used the government's U-turn on winter fuel payments to renew their calls for the planned benefit cuts to be reversed. But on Thursday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government would not row back on the cuts. "We're not going to be changing that," she told the BBC. "It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works." The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says it expects 3.2 million families – a mixture of current and future recipients - to lose out financially, as a result of the total package of measures, with an average loss of £1,720 per year. This includes 370,000 current Pip recipients who will no longer qualify and 430,000 future claimants who will get less than they would previously have been entitled to. But ministers have stressed the figures do not factor in the government's plans to spend £1bn on helping the long-term sick and disabled back into work, or its efforts to reduce poverty. Ministers hope these efforts will boost employment among benefits recipients, at a time when 2.8 million people are economically inactive due to long-term sickness. If nothing changes, the health and disability benefits bill is forecast to reach £70bn a year by the end of the decade, a level of spending the government says is "unsustainable". The government is planning to put the welfare reforms in place by November 2026 and no one will lose out on benefits payments until that happens. Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn Starmer faces growing rebellion over welfare cuts Jittery Labour MPs divided over benefits cuts
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices surge after Israeli strike on Iran
Global oil prices soared on June 13 after Israel launched a strike on Iran, triggering fears of a broader conflict in the energy-rich Middle East that could disrupt global supplies, the BBC reported. The spike threatens to undermine Western efforts to choke off a vital revenue stream for Russia, which relies heavily on oil profits to sustain its war in Ukraine. According to the BBC, Brent and Nymex crude prices jumped by more than 10% following the Israeli attack, reaching their highest levels since January. Prices later stabilized but remained about 7.5% higher, with Brent at $74.50 a barrel and Nymex at $73.20. The price surge comes at a crucial time for Ukraine and its Western allies, who are intensifying efforts to minimize the Kremlin's oil revenues — the backbone of Russia's wartime economy. President Volodymyr Zelensky urged the European Union on June 11 to impose tougher sanctions on Russia, including a more aggressive price cap on oil exports. "A ceiling of $45 per barrel of oil is better than $60, that's clear," Zelensky said at the Ukraine-Southeast Europe Summit in Odesa. "But real peace will come with a ceiling of $30. That's the level that will really change the mindset in Moscow." The EU's current $60 per barrel cap, introduced in December 2022, prohibits Western companies from shipping, insuring, or servicing Russian oil sold above the threshold. While this measure has curtailed some of Russia's profits, the Kremlin continues to earn significant revenue, especially when market prices rise. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on June 10 that the EU is considering lowering the cap to $45, a move that will be discussed at the G7 summit in Canada between June 15 and 17. According to Reuters, most G7 countries, excluding the U.S. and Japan, are prepared to proceed with the reduction regardless of Washington's stance. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said early on June 13 that Israeli forces had launched "Operation Rising Lion," a preemptive strike targeting Iran's nuclear program. In a televised address, Netanyahu claimed Israeli forces struck Iran's main nuclear enrichment site in Natanz and targeted key nuclear scientists. Read also: Key to Russia's defeat lies in its economy We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
BBC Apologises After David Walliams' Nazi Salute During Would I Lie To You? Taping
The BBC has apologised for David Walliams' 'unacceptable' behaviour during a recent taping of a Would I Lie To You? special. Earlier this week, the former Little Britain star was a guest on the pre-recorded Christmas special of the popular BBC panel show. During the recording, fellow guest Helen George attempted to convince her opponents that she once injured herself while waving on the official Strictly Come Dancing tour. As she demonstrated the wave that supposedly caused the injury, BBC News reported that David joined with increasingly exaggerated hand gestures, eventually culminating in him performing a Nazi salute. They also claimed that at one point he performed a Nazi salute with one hand and a sexual gesture with the other. One audience member told BBC News: 'The atmosphere was uncomfortable and weird. I think Rob Brydon wanted to get past it as quickly as he could. 'David Walliams' teammates looked unsure what to do and were not laughing... It was like an elephant in the room after that as the incident was early on in the recording and so the remainder of the show felt weird.' A spokesperson for the broadcaster later said: 'The use of such an offensive gesture is completely unacceptable and we apologise to all at the recording for the offence caused.' Meanwhile, a representative for Banijay – the production company who makes Would I Lie To You? – also issued an apology, insisting: 'Any attempt at humour regarding this deeply offensive gesture, whether broadcast or not, is completely unacceptable in any context. 'It was immediately acknowledged during the recording that this segment would not be broadcast under any circumstances and we apologise to those who were at the recording for any offence caused.' HuffPost UK has also contacted David Walliams' team for comment. BBC News noted that David has made only a handful of terrestrial TV appearances in recent history, following his departure from Britain's Got Talent in 2022 after 10 years on the panel. David's exit came after recordings of him making disparaging and sexually explicit remarks about numerous BGT hopefuls on the set of the show in 2020, for which he later apologised, were leaked to the press. David Walliams Reaches Settlement With Production Company Behind Britain's Got Talent Simon Cowell Breaks Silence On David Walliams' 'Completely Unacceptable' Comments That Led To BGT Exit Matt Lucas Sets The Record Straight After Reports About 'New Series' Of Little Britain