logo
Upgraded Very Large Array Telescope Will Spot Baby Solar Systems—If It's Funded

Upgraded Very Large Array Telescope Will Spot Baby Solar Systems—If It's Funded

Yahoo28-05-2025
New Mexico's Plains of San Agustin are otherworldly: Silence, sand and sharp plants reign on the valley floor. Knobbly volcanic rock rises above. Pronghorns' legs and jackrabbits' ears break up the landscape.
And so, too, does one of the world's largest telescopes.
The plains house the aptly named Very Large Array (VLA)—a radio telescope made of 27 different antennas, each of which looks like a home satellite dish on steroids. In the otherwise empty desert, they spread into a Y shape that can extend 22 miles end-to-end. When the antennas are pointed at the same thing in the sky at the same time, they function together as one large telescope, simulating an instrument as wide as the distance between the dishes. In this case, then, images from the VLA have as much resolution as they would if it were a single telescope 22 miles wide: high definition, in other words. The VLA became iconic, and inspirational to a generation of astronomers, thanks to the movie Contact, in which Jodie Foster's character uses the array to hear an alien communication.
[Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter]
The VLA's antennas, the true stars of the film, simultaneously look like they don't belong in the landscape and also like they've always been here. They haven't, of course, but their construction began in the 1970s, making the VLA the oldest instrument in the portfolio of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO). This federally-funded organization builds, maintains and operates radio telescopes that any astronomer—regardless of their institutional affiliation or citizenship—can apply to use.
But the VLA, now in its middle age, is due for a replacement. After all these decades, astronomers want something shiny, fully modern and more capable: a new build with all the bells and whistles rather than a charming old Colonial that's been remodeled piecemeal. NRAO is working on that, planning the VLA's proposed successor: the Next-Generation Very Large Array (ngVLA). (Astronomers may be scientifically creative, but they are linguistic straight shooters.)
On a Friday afternoon in late April, the organization gathered political leaders together, alongside scientists and engineers, to unveil a prototype antenna—one that will be cloned a couple of hundred times to make up the future ngVLA. It loomed on the plains just beyond the partygoers, standing alongside its predecessors, the old and the new in stereo with each other. 'The amount that technology has advanced since the VLA was created is amazing,' says Jill Malusky, NRAO's news and public information manager. 'A VLA antenna and an ngVLA antenna look very different because they are.'
Guests wandered near the antennas, checking out a spread of food that included a sculpture, made in the medium of watermelon, of a radio telescope antenna. A chamber quartet played in the background, a single fern fronting them, with an open bar lubricating the event. It was fancy—for science. But for astronomers, the ngVLA is a big deal, and the event was intended, in part, to bolster the political support needed to make it happen. At the moment, it's a proposed project—and still requires final funding. 'Having a physical antenna we can point to, and test, to prove the value of this project is such a milestone,' Malusky says. 'It makes it all more real.'
Representing an orders-of-magnitude improvement to the VLA that would complement other radio telescopes in the U.S. and abroad, the ambitious project has the enthusiastic yes of the astronomical community. But whether big-science telescopes, radio or otherwise, will survive the current funding environment remains a dark matter. That uncertainty is part of why NRAO's event elicited a spectrum of emotions for Malusky. 'It's a mix of excitement and trepidation,' she says. 'Can we get people invested in the potential of a major project that is still gathering resources and just over a decade to fruition?'
That Friday afternoon, Tony Beasley, director of NRAO, stood at the front of a hardy event tent and faced the prototype. Its dish was made up of shiny panels assembled into an octagon. From its bottom edge, supportive struts held up a secondary reflecting surface and a receiver (basically the radio version of an optical telescope's camera) that looked a bit like the spaceship Foster's character boarded in Contact.
The antenna, about as wide as a bowling lane is long, has been designed to collect radio waves from space—beamed from stars that are being born or dying, the stuff between stars, and more. As radio light comes in, it will hit the main dish and bounce up to the secondary reflector and then the receiver, which will catch the waves and turn them into digital signals that will then be sent to computers.
As a start, the prototype dish will hook up to VLA's aging ones and gather data alongside them—it will be an apprentice of sorts.
'You see one antenna out there,' said Beasley, directing the audience's attention beyond the tent, which was being shaken by the wind to such an extent that people also cast their eyes upward to assess its structural integrity. NRAO ultimately plans to build 262 more antennas and spread them across the U.S., with their numbers concentrated in the Southwest. Of those antennas, Beasley continued, '192 of them will be visible from where I'm standing right here.'
Together, the ngVLA's antennas could pick up a cell-phone signal from 500 billion kilometers (more than 310 billion miles) away (although that wouldn't be the most likely find). That means it could detect an Android embedded in the Oort Cloud, the collection of comets that makes up the outer part of the solar system. The future telescope's resolution should be high enough to pass a no-glasses eye exam in New York City if the chart of letters were placed in Los Angeles.
That precision gives it scientific latitude, allowing it to address some of astronomers' highest-priority questions, such as how planets come to be and how solar systems like ours form. 'You could, say, probe a cloud that is forming planets and find out where the planets are—like individual gaps in the cloud that the planets are carving out,' says David Kaplan, an astronomer and physics professor at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Of all the radio telescopes out there, the ngVLA would be the planetary 'flagship' for star and planet formation, Kaplan says. At high radio frequencies and big antenna separations, 'it would be the only game in town.'
The ngVLA will also look for the organic molecules and chemical conditions of new solar systems that might someday spur life. It will show how galaxies come together and evolve, use the Milky Way's center to test ideas about how gravity works and investigate how stars develop. And it will hunt black holes and their outbursts.
Given those varied abilities, the telescope was highly ranked in astronomers' 'decadal survey,' a yearslong process in which the astronomical community takes stock of its most valued scientific questions and assesses which future telescopes are best suited to find some answers. Funding from agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), which bankrolls NRAO, typically follows the survey's recommendations.
The survey recommended the ngVLA as a top priority. 'It can change the landscape,' says Matt Dobbs, a physicist at McGill University, who studies the origin and evolution of the universe and worked on the survey alongside Kaplan.
NRAO hopes to start construction on the ngVLA in 2029, with initial operations beginning in 2033. The possibility is a bright spot for American radio astronomy. The VLA is more than 40 years old; the Green Bank Telescope, completed in 2001, is more than 20. And NRAO's latest instrument, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, opened 12 years ago.
The latter two, though not new, aren't going anywhere, as far as anyone knows. But they do different kinds of scientific analyses than the VLA does and the ngVLA will.
The new telescope does, though, have a whippersnapper nipping at its heels. Another future radio observatory, called the Deep Synoptic Array 2000 (DSA-2000), is planning an order of magnitude more dishes than the ngVLA—2,000 of them. But each will be only around 16 feet across, whereas ngVLA's dishes will measure 60 feet. DSA-2000 will also work at a different radio frequency range than the ngVLA.
DSA-2000's development is also moving faster than that of the VLA's successor, though, in large part, that is because the former has relied on private funding more than federal resources, as the ngVLA's prototyping has.
In taking a step back from dependence on the NSF, the DSA-2000 crew might be on to something. Just days before the ngVLA ceremony, the NSF canceled more than 400 active grants; one day before, the agency's then director Sethuraman Panchanathan resigned. 'This is a pivotal moment for our nation in terms of global competitiveness,' he said in his goodbye letter. 'NSF is an extremely important investment to make U.S. scientific dominance a reality. We must not lose our competitive edge.'
No one knows what the future of NSF-funded astronomy, let alone NSF-funded radio astronomy, looks like. President Donald Trump hasn't said much about that particular domain yet. But not building the ngVLA could put that edge in jeopardy.
Dobbs, though, holds out hope for the U.S.'s role in radio astronomy's future, in part because of the propulsion of its past.
'The United States has everything it needs to make that project a reality,' he adds. Whether it will do so, though, requires gathering more data from the future. After all, it's bad luck to count your antennas before they hatch.
Dobbs has been putting his focus on smaller radio telescopes, such as one called the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) and its successor, acronymed CHORD. Both map how hydrogen was distributed in the early universe and detect fast radio bursts. Their antennas are cheap(ish), their overall footprint small, and their ambition is limited to specific science—in this case, gas maps.
At the prototype-antenna unveiling, then, it made sense that there was a liminal feeling to what was otherwise a celebratory gathering. And it was conspicuous that representatives from NSF, the agency that would fund the telescope's construction and operation, weren't there, which Beasley said was the case 'for various reasons.'
Chris Smith, interim director of the NSF's division of astronomical sciences, did send a letter to be read to the wined-and-dined crowd. 'NSF funded this development not just to ensure the technical feasibility of the advanced capabilities of ngVLA,' he wrote. It also supported the prototype as 'a way of creating new innovations in the field of radio astronomy.'
And that may be true. But those who gathered at NRAO's event also hope, specifically, that the ngVLA, a receptacle for optimism about the future of radio astronomy in the U.S., will sprout from this dry ground.
'It starts with a single step,' Beasley said at the event—in this case, a single antenna.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CX Is Changing—And If You Don't Like Change, You're Going To Hate Extinction
CX Is Changing—And If You Don't Like Change, You're Going To Hate Extinction

Forbes

time3 days ago

  • Forbes

CX Is Changing—And If You Don't Like Change, You're Going To Hate Extinction

Depending on which studies and articles you read, customer service and customer experience (CX) are getting better … or they're getting worse. Our customer service and CX research found that 60% of consumers had better customer service experiences than last year, and in general, 82% are happy with the customer service they receive from the companies and brands with which they do business. Yet, some studies claim customer service is worse than ever. Regardless, more companies than ever are investing in improving CX. Some nail it, but even with an investment, some still struggle. Another telling stat is the growing number of companies attending CX conferences. Last month, more than 5,000 people representing 1,382 companies attended and participated in Contact Center Week (CCW), the world's largest conference dedicated to customer service and customer experience. This was the largest attendance to date, representing a 25% growth over last year. Many recognized brands and CX leaders attended and shared their wisdom from the main stage and breakout rooms. The expo hall featured demonstrations of the latest and greatest solutions to create more effective customer support experiences. The primary reason I attend conferences like CCW is to stay current with the latest advancements and solutions in CX and to gain insight into how industry leaders think. AI took center stage for most of the presentations. No doubt, it continues to improve and gain acceptance. With that in mind, here are some of my favorite takeaways with my commentary from the sessions I attended: AI for Training Becky Ploeger, global head of reservations and customer care at Hilton, uses AI to create micro-lessons for employee training. Hilton is using Centrical's platform to take various topics and turn them into coaching modules. Employees participate in simulations that replicate customer issues. Can We Trust AI? As excited as Ploeger is about AI (and agentic AI), there is still trepidation. CX leaders must recognize that AI is not yet perfect and will occasionally provide inaccurate information. Ploeger said, 'We have years and years of experience with agents. We only have six months of experience with agentic AI.' Wrong Information from AI Costs a Company Money—or Does it? Gadi Shamia, CEO of Replicant, an AI voice technology company, commented about the mistakes AI makes. In general, CX leaders are complaining that going digital is costing the company money because of the bad information customers receive. Shamia asks, 'How much are you losing?' While bad information can cause a customer to defect to a competitor, so does a bad experience with a live customer service rep. So, how often does AI provide incorrect information? How many of those customers leave versus trying to connect with an agent? The metrics you choose to define success with a digital self-service experience need to include more than measuring bad experiences. Mark Killick, SVP of experiential operations at Shipt, weighed in on this topic, saying, 'If we don't fix the problems of providing bad information, we'll just deliver bad information faster.' Making the Case to Invest in AI Mariano Tan, president and CEO of Prosodica says, 'Nothing gets funded without a clear business case.' The person in charge of the budget for customer service and CX initiatives (typically the CFO in larger companies) won't 'open the wallet' without proof that the expenditure will yield a return on investment (ROI). People in charge of budgets like numbers, so when you create your 'clear business case,' be sure to include the numbers that make a compelling reason to invest in CX. Simply saying, 'We'll reduce churn,' isn't enough. How much churn—that's a number. How much does it mean to the bottom line—another number. Numbers sell! Final Words: Love Change, or Else Neil Gibson, SVP of CX at FedEx, was part of a panel and shared a quote that is the perfect way to end the article. AI is rapidly changing the way we do business. We must keep up, or else. Gibson quoted Fred Smith, the first CEO and founder of FedEx, who said, 'If you don't like change, you're going to hate extinction.' In other words, keep up or watch your competition blow past you.

Miniature Neutrino Detector Catches Elusive Particles at Nuclear Reactor
Miniature Neutrino Detector Catches Elusive Particles at Nuclear Reactor

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Miniature Neutrino Detector Catches Elusive Particles at Nuclear Reactor

A relatively small detector caught neutrinos from a nuclear reactor using a technique known as coherent scattering Physicists have caught neutrinos from a nuclear reactor using a device weighing just a few kilograms, orders of magnitude less massive than standard neutrino detectors. The technique opens new ways to stress-test the known laws of physics and to detect the copious neutrinos produced in the hearts of collapsing stars. 'They finally did it,' says Kate Scholberg, a physicist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. 'And they have very beautiful result.' The experiment, called CONUS+, is described on 30 July in Nature. Challenging quarry Neutrinos are elementary particles that have no electrical charge and generally don't interact with other matter, making them extraordinarily difficult to detect. Most neutrino experiments catch these elusive particles by observing flashes of light that are generated when a neutrino collides with an electron, proton or neutron. These collisions occur extremely infrequently, so such detectors typically have masses of tonnes or thousands of tonnes to provide enough target material to gather neutrinos in relevant numbers. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Scholberg and her collaborators first demonstrated the mini-detector technique in 2017, using it to catch neutrinos produced by an accelerator at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. The Oak Ridge particles have slightly higher energies than those made in reactors. As a result, detecting reactor neutrinos was even more challenging, she says. But lower-energy neutrinos also allow for a more precise test of the standard model of physics. Scholberg's COHERENT detector was the first to exploit a phenomenon called coherent scattering, in which a neutrino 'scatters' off an entire atomic nucleus rather than the atom's constituent particles. Coherent scattering uses the fact that particles of matter can act as waves — and the lower the particles' energy, the longer their wavelength, says Christian Buck, a leader of the CONUS collaboration. If the wavelength of a neutrino is similar to the nucleus's diameter, 'then the neutrino sees the nucleus as one thing. It doesn't see the internal structure', says Buck, who is a physicist at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany. The neutrino doesn't interact with any subatomic particles, but does cause the nucleus to recoil — depositing a tiny amount of energy into the detector. Catching sight of a nucleus Coherent scattering occurs more than 100 times as frequently as the interactions used in other detectors, where the neutrino 'sees' a nucleus as a collection of smaller particles with empty space in between. This higher efficiency means that detectors can be smaller and still spot a similar number of particles in the same time frame. 'Now you can afford to build detectors on the kilogram scale,' Buck says. The downside is that the neutrinos deposit much less energy at the nucleus. The recoil induced on a nucleus by a neutrino is comparable to that produced on a ship by a ping-pong ball, Buck says — and has until recent years has been extremely challenging to measure. The CONUS detector is made of four modules of pure germanium, each weighing 1 kilogram. It operated at a nuclear reactor in Germany from 2018 until that reactor was shut down in 2022. The team then moved the detector, upgraded to CONUS+, to the Leibstadt nuclear power plant in Switzerland. From the new location, the team now reports having seen around 395 collision events in 119 days of operation — consistent with the predictions of the standard model of particle physics. After COHERENT's landmark 2017 result, which was obtained with detectors made of caesium iodide, Scholberg's team repeated the feat with detectors made of argon and of germanium. Separately, last year, two experiments originally designed to hunt for dark matter reported seeing hints of low-energy coherent scattering of neutrinos produced by the Sun. Scholberg says that the standard model makes very clean predictions of the rate of coherent scattering and how it changes with different types of atomic nucleus, making it crucial to compare results from as many detecting materials as possible. And if the technique's sensitivity improves further, coherent scattering could help to push forward the state of the art of solar science. Researchers say that coherent scattering will probably not completely replace any existing technologies for detecting neutrinos. But it can spot all three known types of neutrino (and their corresponding antiparticles) down to low energies, whereas some other techniques can capture only one type. This ability means it could complement massive detectors that aim to pick up neutrinos at higher energies, such as the Hyper-Kamiokande observatory now under construction in Japan. This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 30 2025. Solve the daily Crossword

Why Earth Is Rotating Extra Fast This Summer, Shortening Days by Milliseconds
Why Earth Is Rotating Extra Fast This Summer, Shortening Days by Milliseconds

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Why Earth Is Rotating Extra Fast This Summer, Shortening Days by Milliseconds

As Earth spins through space, its rate of rotation changes. Here's why If you haven't accomplished as much this summer as you had hoped to, you can blame forces far beyond your control: a few of these dog days, by one measure, are among the shortest you've ever lived through. For most of humanity's history, we have measured time by the sun as it rises and sets—essentially, through Earth's orientation to the cosmos surrounding us. But compare that technique with modern, superprecise timekeeping, and soon you'll find that each day varies a bit in length at the scale of thousandths of a second. This summer a few factors are adding up to make a handful of Earth's spins—those occurring on July 10, July 22 and August 5—more than a millisecond faster than the average of the past several decades. Yes, there are scientists whose job is to track these things; no, they are not particularly concerned by these developments. 'It's a very small phenomenon,' says Christian Bizouard, an astronomer at the Paris Observatory and primary scientist at the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service's Earth Orientation Center. 'There is nothing extraordinary [happening].' [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Bizouard has a point, of course—no one is going to notice the sun rising a millisecond earlier or later than we might otherwise expect. But tracking Earth's rotation to this level of precision is vital because countless aspects of modern life rely on our ability to pinpoint locations to within a meter, and high-precision GPS navigation requires that satellites know exactly where they are compared with features on Earth's surface. So Bizouard and his colleagues track Earth's orientation in space. To do so, they have enlisted astronomers all over the planet to monitor a collection of about 300 objects, he says, primarily the bright, very distant, supermassive-black-hole-powered objects known as quasars. All day, every day, pairs of distant observatories tuned to radio wavelengths of light check in on their specific object. By measuring the timing mismatch between light received at each station, scientists can calculate the precise location of the observatories and, in turn, the planet. That's how scientists know that the amount of time it takes Earth to complete one rotation varies slightly. But why does the planet's speed vary? Even if you may never notice their loss, the missing milliseconds offer us a glimpse into the intricate oddities of the planet we live on—so let's track them down. Officially, time is defined by nine-billion-some vibrations of a cesium atom per second, 86,400 seconds per day. Inconveniently, Earth's behavior isn't governed by cesium atoms. Physics holds that, as a solid object moving in a vacuum, Earth ought to keep spinning at the same rate unless some outside force intervenes, says Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. But Earth isn't quite a simple solid object, and it has a rather large moon that can provide outside force. That means several different factors can affect Earth's rotation speed. Two of these factors—the core and the atmosphere—each affects Earth's spin under a similar principle. The overall rotational speed of the Earth system must stay steady, so if a component's movement changes, then the overall planet has to compensate. 'The sum of all the rotations has to add up to the same thing,' Agnew says. 'If part of the Earth is going slower, another part has to go faster.' Take Earth's core, for example, hiding below what we think of as the solid ground we walk on. Only the inner portion of the core is actually solid; the rest is fluid. 'There's this giant ball of molten iron about the size of the moon inside the Earth,' Agnew says. All that liquid metal (there's a little nickel mixed in with the iron) is moving, creating the magnetic field that shields us from some of the many hazards of space. The core's activity is quite a mystery. The region isn't actually all that far away—less than 2,000 miles from the surface, closer than New York City is from Los Angeles—but it cannot be directly accessed and is therefore very difficult to understand. In recent decades, for whatever reason, the core's spin has been slowing, forcing the rest of Earth to speed up to compensate. 'The core is what changes how fast the Earth rotates on periods of 10 years to hundreds of years,' Agnew says. 'The core has been slowing down for the last 50 years, and as a result, the Earth has been speeding up.' (This speed-up is part of why timekeepers have not implemented an artificial leap second—a tactic used annually during small stretches of the late 20th century—since 2016 and don't expect to anytime soon.) A similar phenomenon plays out in Earth's atmosphere. Like the core, the atmosphere is a fluid mass—and although it's a very complex one, scientists have much better insight into it than into the elusive core. The atmosphere changes with the seasons as the sun's radiation falls disproportionately on different parts of the planet. The Northern and Southern Hemispheres each have a primary polar jet stream, a river of strong wind flowing from west to east that wanders north and south as it carries weather around the planet. Because of Earth's topography and the influence of ocean currents, the Southern Hemisphere's jet stream is stronger overall than the Northern Hemisphere's. And each jet stream is fastest during its hemisphere's winter, slowing somewhat in local summer. Combine those factors and the Northern Hemisphere summer sees a small decrease in total speeds of westerly wind (those flowing west to east), Agnew says—forcing the solid Earth to spin a smidge more rapidly to compensate. This atmospheric effect is why the rotation rate changes in an annual cycle, with the days when Earth rotates fastest tending to cluster in the Northern Hemisphere's summer, particularly July and August. To the extent that the core explains decadal changes and the atmosphere explains annual ones, the moon explains millennial and daily differences in Earth's rotation rate. At geologic timescales, Earth's rotation is slowing down because of the moon's tidal influences on the water that fills our planet's oceans. The moon's gravity sloshes water around, causing an infinitesimal friction between ocean and seafloor. 'That's been slowing the Earth down since the Earth had oceans,' Agnew says. This trend doesn't register to humans, but over time, the effect is quite noticeable. About 70 million years ago, shortly before the extinction of nonavian dinosaurs, a day was about half an hour shorter than it is today, for example. Wind the clock even further back, to 245 million years ago, when dinosaurs first came on the scene, and a day lasted a bit more than 22 and a half hours, scientists have calculated. The moon causes a second phenomenon that affects Earth's rotation on a human timescale. Beachgoers know full well that the moon's gravity causes the seas' daily high and low tides, and the solid Earth rises and falls a little bit in response to the moon as well, albeit not nearly as noticeably. But the moon's orbit doesn't line up with Earth's equator: our constant companion's path is a bit tilted compared with Earth. Because of this, the tidal bulges wander north and south over the course of the moon's loops around Earth. When the moon is right over the equator, the tidal bulges are, too, and therefore their mass is farther away from the planet's spin axis; when the moon is the farthest north or south, the bulges move away from the equator, slightly closer to the planet's spin axis. This taps into the same physics as a spinning ice skater with outstretched arms does when they hug their chest to speed up—Earth's rotation rate speeds up just a hair when the moon is at the northernmost or southernmost point in its orbit, about every two weeks. All these factors combine for the remarkably complicated state of Earth's rotation rate: it is slowing over geologic time because of ocean friction but has been speeding up over recent decades because of the core, and its spin speed slightly increases every summer from the atmosphere and every two weeks from the moon's north-south wandering. The changes make such good sense in terms of physics that scientists like Bizouard are able to take variations in Earth's rotation rate for granted. And scientists have some grasp of the annual and weekly changes in Earth's spin rate, allowing them to expect the speedy summer days. But the mysteries of Earth's core prevent these experts from confidently charting how Earth's rotation will change into the future. 'We are not able to predict anything,' Bizouard says. Scientists put out predictions anyway, of course. As summer approached, they thought August 5 might be the shortest day of the year, a full 1.5 milliseconds shorter than usual. Current estimates still indicate that this day will be about that much shorter, and that August 18 may be another contender for the year's fastest rotation. For comparison, the shortest rotation day in recent years was on July 5, 2024, when we lost 1.66 milliseconds. Yes, you've probably now spent more time wrapping your mind around Earth's quickest days than you've ever lost to the vagaries of our planet's spin; I know I have. Let's just call it another reason why we live on the most remarkable planet out there. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store