Cardinal Lazarus You speculated as a possible contender for pope
Cardinal Lazarus You Heung-sik, the former bishop of Daejeon who was appointed the Vatican's prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy in 2021, is one of the 135 cardinals who can vote in the papal election, set to take place between 15 and 20 days after Francis' passing Monday.
The 74-year-old You, the only Korean with a ballot, has built a reputation as an insider since taking charge at the Vatican office responsible for the world's 400,000 Catholic priests.
You accompanied Francis on his five-day visit to South Korea in August 2014, the first of several visits to Asia, which elevated his standing within the Catholic Church. You also notably speaks fluent Italian.
That You hails from Asia is seen as a plus. The region is increasingly seen as the future of the Catholic Church, alongside Africa. The two regions lead the world in the number of priests and are showing sustained growth, compared to declines in Europe and the Americas.
In 2023, South Korea had some 6 million Catholics, representing 11.3 percent of the total population.
'The conclave is an open contest and more so this year, which means nothing is really fixed,' a Catholic official said of You's chances at the papacy, declining to be identified, citing protocol.
You also shares Francis' long-standing commitment to advancing causes of the marginalized, from time to time speaking out on issues some deem politically sensitive.
On March 21, You made a rare public statement asking the South Korean Constitutional Court for a speedy decision on the removal or reinstatement of then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, who was impeached by parliament for his martial law declaration on Dec. 3, 2024.
'Out of utmost urgency, I implore the court,' You said. 'There is no reason to prolong making a ruling if we heed our innermost voices of justice and conscience.'
'Pope Francis said there is no neutrality in pain. Likewise, there is no neutrality in justice. Let the Constitution speak for itself,' You added.
The statement was made in response to calls from many in and outside South Korea concerned about the turmoil the country was facing, according to You.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Kim's sister criticizes Lee for peace overture, says Seoul not diplomatic partner
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on Wednesday criticized President Lee Jae Myung for offering reconciliatory overtures, saying that Seoul is not a diplomatic partner to Pyongyang. Kim Yo-jong, vice department director of the North Korean ruling party's Central Committee, said Lee is unfit to change the course of history, while continuing to denounce ongoing military drills between South Korea and the United States. Kim made the remarks during a meeting with the foreign ministry's director generals the previous day, the North's Korean Central News Agency reported. "The Republic of Korea, which is not serious, weighty and honest, will not have even a subordinate work in the regional diplomatic arena centered on the DPRK," Kim Yo-jong said. "The ROK cannot be a diplomatic partner of the DPRK." DPRK refers to North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The remarks by Kim follow a series of Seoul's overtures to improve long-frayed inter-Korean relations. In his Liberation Day speech last week, Lee said he would respect North Korea's political system and would not seek unification by absorption. He also pledged to take steps to restore the now-suspended 2018 inter-Korean military pact designed to ease tensions. Kim said that since Lee took office, his administration has made sincere efforts to create the appearance of change aimed at improving inter-Korean ties. "But no matter how desperately the stinky confrontational nature is swathed in a wrapper of peace, the awl in the sack can never be hidden," she said. She referred to Lee's Cabinet meeting remarks Monday that "accumulating small steps could lead to the restoration of mutual (inter-Korean) trust," dismissing them as "a fancy and a pipe dream." "We have witnessed and experienced the dirty political system of the ROK for decades ... and now we are sick and tired of it," Kim said, claiming that Seoul's "ambition for confrontation" with North Korea has persisted both under the conservative and liberal governments. She also renewed criticism of the ongoing Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise between South Korea and the US, calling it "drills for aggression." "We should pay attention to the fact that through the current joint military drill ... the ROK is examining a new combined operation plan for removing the nuclear and missile capabilities of the DPRK at an early stage and expanding the attack into its territory," Kim noted. She also named Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back and Foreign Minister Cho Hyun, slamming their description of North Korea as "enemies" during their confirmation hearings, and criticized Unification Minister Chung Dong-young's key policy tasks submitted to the National Assembly. The KCNA also reported Kim instructed the country's foreign ministry to prepare countermeasures on relations with "the most hostile state" and its followers, based on state leader Kim Jong-un's view of South Korea. The previous day, the KCNA published the leader's inspection of a test of the naval destroyer, the Choe Hyon, quoting him as saying that the joint South Korea-US military exercise was aimed at igniting a war. The back-to-back criticism from North Korea came as South Korean experts said the regime might have expected a halt to this year's joint Ulchi exercise under the Lee administration. North Korea often reacts furiously to the large-scale summertime drills, describing them as a "war rehearsal." This year's Ulchi exercise began Monday for an 11-day run as planned, although half of its around 40 field training exercises have been postponed to next month, apparently in a bid to improve ties with Pyongyang. (Yonhap)
![[Kim Seong-kon] Agenda for the Korea-US summit meeting](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F19%2Fnews-p.v1.20250819.11b6189b7ae748a3a7ec61aeadaaa48d_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Kim Seong-kon] Agenda for the Korea-US summit meeting
Next week, there will be a summit meeting between President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump in Washington. Besides the tariff issue on which the two countries recently reached an agreement, experts say that there will be a lot to discuss at the meeting, such as cost-sharing for the US troops deployed in Korea, changing the role of US troops on the Korean Peninsula, and transferring wartime operational control of the ROK-US Combined Forces Command. The Korean people will be anxiously watching this important event with high expectations that President Lee may return home with fruitful results. However, the higher our hopes, the greater our disappointment will be. The current situation is not in our favor, as the Trump administration's outstanding policy is 'America First' — not 'other countries first' or 'our allies first.' Moreover, we hold no advantage at the negotiation table. Anyway, a summit meeting is not usually the place for tense negotiations. Rather, they are symbolic events that confirm mutual friendship between countries. Usually, policymakers conduct negotiations behind the scenes in advance. Thus, instead of having high hopes for the summit, we should brace ourselves for the outcome, whatever it may be. Under the circumstances, we can only hope that the two presidents become good friends during the summit, and that the friendship continues in the future. Then, the two leaders can discuss and negotiate a host of other matters later — there is no need to rush. At the summit, therefore, making a good impression is much more important than trying to negotiate or win an argument. We need to look further afield and far ahead. To build trust, perhaps President Lee should assure President Trump that he does not support authoritarian socialist countries, but is a leader in the Free World who values liberal democracy and the South Korea-US alliance. In Washington, some American politicians and policymakers are concerned about the radical atmosphere of the Democratic Party in Korea, which, in their eyes, favors socialist countries. President Lee will need to dispel such worries and suspicions in order to maintain the rock-solid alliance between South Korea and the United States. As President Lee must know already, the moment he assumed the presidency, he took on the solemn duty of representing and serving his country and people, not his political party or ideology. As for the transfer of wartime command, there is absolutely no rush to pursue it because the project reflects America's intention and policy of avoiding involvement in overseas conflicts. If and when a Korean general is given command in wartime, the US can easily pull out its troops from the Korean Peninsula. This is military strategy and tactics 101. Besides, US troops will never be under a foreign general's command. That too is American military studies 101. Not realizing it, many Koreans are naively elated, thinking that if wartime command is transferred, US troops would be under the command of a Korean general if war breaks out on the Korean Peninsula. Having a summit meeting with Japan before coming to the US was a wise choice for President Lee. The gesture could symbolize that Korea and Japan are close friends and important allies of the US. At the same time, President Lee might get some helpful tips from Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who has already had a summit meeting with President Trump. In Washington, President Lee should remind President Trump of the importance and strategic value of the Republic of Korea as a blood ally. President Lee should also discuss with President Trump the things South Korea and the US could do together in the future for global peace. Cooperating through Korea's cutting-edge shipbuilding technology might be an example. The possibility of Korea-US collaboration on semiconductors and electric car batteries could be another. President Lee should also remind President Trump that Korea has been contributing greatly to the American economy by building automobile and semiconductor factories on US soil, creating numerous jobs for American workers. Another thing President Lee may want to mention is that, together with Japan, Korea is also an indispensable military partner of the US, which America can rely on if international conflicts arise in East Asia. President Lee may also want to discuss Korea's vulnerability to possible nuclear attack by North Korea, especially amid the chaos of international conflicts. From President Trump, he should secure Washington's unconditional guarantee of protection under the US nuclear umbrella. The above-mentioned things are as important and urgent as the tariff issue and cost-sharing for US troops stationed in Korea. Both national security and the economy are equally crucial to us. We strongly hope that the two leaders can discuss those issues in depth during the summit meeting in Washington. We also hope that through the meaningful event, both Korea and America can understand each other better and strengthen their invaluable ties.
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
KHNP denied access to power plant projects in N. America, Europe under Westinghouse deal: sources
The state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) has been prohibited from bidding for new power plant projects in North America and the European Union (EU), excluding the Czech Republic, and other countries under its agreement with US energy firm Westinghouse over an intellectual property (IP) dispute, industry sources said Tuesday. Under the agreement signed in January, the KHNP is only allowed to sign fresh deals in the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and South Africa, according to the sources. But the Korean company is banned from bidding for new nuclear power plant deals in North America and Britain, Japan, Ukraine and EU nations, except for the Czech Republic. The KHNP and Westinghouse signed the settlement deal in January this year after the latter accused the Korean firm of infringing on its IP, claiming the KHNP's APR 1000 and APR1400 plant designs utilize its licensed technology. The deal removed a major hurdle for the KHNP-led Korean consortium to sign a final contract in June, with an estimated value of 26 trillion won, to build two nuclear power units in the Czech Republic. The Czech deal, which marked South Korea's first overseas nuclear power plant contract since 2009, was initially expected to open new doors for Korean firms seeking business opportunities in Europe. Earlier in the day, KHNP President Whang Joo-ho confirmed his company has closed operations in Poland amid speculations that its deal with Westinghouse influenced the decision. Poland is the fourth European country where the KHNP confirmed its business closure, following Sweden, Slovenia and the Netherlands. "After the new Polish administration took office ... the country decided to drop the state-owned enterprise projects (in the nuclear power sector) ... and that is why we withdrew our business there," Whang said during a meeting with the parliamentary industry committee. It also reportedly includes a condition requiring Korean companies to pass the latter's technology independence verification when independently developing and exporting next-generation nuclear reactors. The 50-year deal is also said to include provisions requiring the KHNP to sign a goods and services purchase contract worth about $650 million with Westinghouse per export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. Asked whether the KHNP believes the deal with Westinghouse was fair, Whang said, "As the party accepting the terms, I cannot say it was fair," but added, "I believe it is something we can endure and still make a profit from." Whang refused to confirm the details of the deal, citing a nondisclosure agreement. Earlier in the day, the presidential office said it has ordered the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to review whether the deal was signed under due process. (Yonhap)
