Ivy League colleges are not the priciest in the US: See which universities cost even more
While institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton continue to symbolise academic excellence, they have been outpriced by a number of prestigious—but non-Ivy—private universities when it comes to the total estimated cost of attendance.
At the top of the list is the University of Southern California (USC), where the total cost for a four-year undergraduate program is projected to reach a staggering $394,900.
That breaks down to nearly $100,000 per year, including tuition, room and board, fees, books, and other expenses.
The most expensive colleges in the US
According to the GOBankingRates analysis, the top five most expensive colleges in the U.S. all exceed a $385,000 four-year attendance estimate. These figures reflect the 'sticker price' before financial aid and scholarships are factored in, and they represent the full cost a family would pay without assistance.
Here's how the top five stack up:
University of Southern California (USC) – $394,900
Duke University
Vanderbilt University
Washington University in St. Louis
Brown University
Surprisingly, only one Ivy League school—Brown University—makes the top five. The rest are private, highly selective institutions located across the U.S., known for strong academics, high tuition, and rising living costs.
Ivy League institutions: Comparatively more affordable?
Despite their elite reputation, Ivy League universities are not the costliest options. Only four Ivies made the top 10:
Brown University – #5
Cornell University – #6
Dartmouth College – #8
Yale University – #10
The remaining Ivy League institutions, all ranked outside the top 10, include:
University of Pennsylvania – #11
Columbia University – #14
Princeton University – #19
Harvard University – #23
Perhaps most surprising: Harvard, often considered synonymous with exclusivity and wealth, ranks near the bottom of the top 25 most expensive universities.
This could be due to its enormous endowment, which enables the school to provide generous financial aid packages, often making it more affordable than its sticker price suggests.
Why are non-Ivies more expensive?
The reasons behind the rising costs at non-Ivy institutions are multifaceted:
Geographic Location: Schools in cities like Los Angeles (USC), Nashville (Vanderbilt), or St. Louis (WashU) face higher costs of living, which drive up on-campus housing and services.
Institutional Resources and Amenities: Many of these schools have invested heavily in campus upgrades, state-of-the-art facilities, student wellness programs, and global study opportunities—all of which add to operational costs.
Lack of Massive Endowments: Unlike Ivies such as Harvard and Princeton, which have multibillion-dollar endowments that help subsidize tuition, non-Ivies may rely more heavily on tuition revenue to maintain competitiveness.
Strong National Reputations: Institutions like Duke and USC have built powerful brands that attract top students globally—enabling them to charge premium prices.
What this means for students
The findings serve as a cautionary reminder for families evaluating college choices: prestige doesn't always equal unaffordability. Many Ivy League schools, despite their brand power, offer robust financial aid that makes them more affordable than they appear.
Meanwhile, families eyeing top private colleges outside the Ivy League should pay careful attention to:
Net price vs. sticker price
Merit-based scholarships
Work-study opportunities
Graduation rates and return on investment (ROI)
The bigger picture
With college affordability now central to the national conversation, this report underscores the urgent need for transparent pricing and wider access to aid information. The sticker shock of a nearly $400,000 education—at any institution—can be paralysing for middle-class families, many of whom fall through the cracks of traditional aid systems.
Students are encouraged to use net price calculators, compare aid offers, and consider long-term outcomes, such as earning potential, alumni networks, and debt burden.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Wheat, soy and corn bounce off lows as demand stirs
Strong export sales data boosts wheat, corn and soy futures Recovery also fuelled by short covering and technical trading (Updates for market open, changes dateline from PARIS/CANBERRA to CHICAGO) CHICAGO, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Chicago Board of Trade wheat rebounded on Thursday after hitting a five-year low on Wednesday, and corn recovered from previous contract lows as chart support and signs of new export demand countered the pressure of ample supplies, traders said. Soybeans also edged up from a four-month trough as low prices stirred demand for the oilseed. Abundant supply expected from Northern Hemisphere wheat harvests and autumn corn and soybean harvests in the United States drove a sell-off the previous day. The most active wheat contract on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) was up 10-1/2 cents to $5.19 as of 10:30 a.m. CT (1530 GMT). The benchmark had fallen to its lowest since August 2020 on Wednesday at $5.04 but held above the $5 floor. "We're getting a corrective bounce with a boost from strong export numbers, which are a function of cheaper prices," Terry Linn, a broker at Linn & Associates, said. CBOT December corn was up 5 cents to $4.06-1/4 per bushel, after most corn contracts hit lifetime lows the previous day. Weekly U.S. export sales, reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Thursday, showed wheat, corn and soybean volumes above market estimates. That bolstered expectations that the recent price drop, coupled with weakness in the dollar, has made U.S. crops attractive for export. The U.S. is expected to produce bumper corn and soy harvests later in the year. Analysts polled by Reuters think the U.S. Department of Agriculture will raise its estimates in a monthly report due on August 12. CBOT soybeans were last up 7-1/4 cents to $9.91-1/2 a bushel to recover from their lowest level since April struck a day earlier. Fund short covering and an uptick in demand helped fuel price recovery, traders and analysts said. "U.S. soybeans are the cheapest in the world clear out through the fall and non-Chinese buyers are scooping them up," Linn said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
India's state refiners pause Russian oil buys amid US tariff pressure
India's state-owned oil refiners are pulling back from purchases of Russian crude for now, according to people with direct knowledge of the companies' procurement plans, as Washington ratchets up the pressure on New Delhi over the flows with a wave of harsh tariffs. Companies including Indian Oil Corp., Bharat Petroleum Corp. and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. plan to skip spot purchases of the crude in the upcoming buying cycle, until there's clear government guidance, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they aren't authorized to speak publicly. On Thursday, IOC bought five million barrels of oil from the US, Brazil and Libya, the latest in a string of purchases for relatively quick delivery. The global oil market has zeroed in on India's crude purchasing after President Donald Trump doubled the levy on all Indian exports to the US as a direct punishment for the country's refiners taking Russian crude. The escalation — which hasn't yet been matched by similar action against China, another major buyer — is meant to put pressure on Moscow to end the war in Ukraine. The tension has swung futures this week as traders assess the odds of disruption to flows, as well as Moscow's ability to find alternative buyers should Indian refiners opt to take fewer barrels. Brent was little changed near $67 a barrel on Thursday, following a five-day drop. Officially, New Delhi hasn't given any direction to refiners to stop buying Moscow's crude, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government pushing back against Trump's tariffs. Bloomberg earlier reported that refiners had been asked to draw up plans for buying non-Russian crude. An oil ministry spokesman didn't immediately reply to an email seeking comment. Separately, IOC, BPCL and HPCL didn't reply to messages from Bloomberg seeking comment. Beyond term contracts, oil producers and refiners typically deal with purchases in short-run cycles, with cargoes booked about one-and-a-half to two months ahead of loading. That planned-ahead pattern allows users to ensure they have enough on hand to meet their requirements. The pause will affect buying of Russia's Urals cargoes for October-loading, they added. While overall purchases of October-loading Urals by India's refiners are unlikely to drop to zero, a dip could prompt a rush for other grades, with US, Middle Eastern and African cargoes as alternatives, said traders, who buy and sell across the region. Discussions for October cargoes have not yet started, though traders foresee deeper Russian discounts and more offers to China, which doesn't typically take much of the variety. In late-July, purchases of September-loading Urals concluded with India taking fewer barrels due to pricey offers. Since then, state-owned refiners have issued a slew of tenders, soaking up spot cargoes from other regions. Private processors Reliance Industries Ltd. and Nayara Energy Ltd., meanwhile, have been quiet, with the latter grappling with a steep drop in run rates following sanctions imposed by the European Union. Cargoes of Urals — Russia's benchmark crude grade from the west of the country — for August- and September-loading are likely to be delivered as planned, unless New Delhi advises otherwise, the people said. In recent days, tankers have offloaded some cargoes at Indian ports, albeit with some slight delays. At its peak, India imported more than 2 million barrels a day of Russian oil, up from almost zero purchases before the Ukraine war. 'There would be some operational disruptions for a period, but the crude supply-demand would balance out,' said R. Ramachandran, former director of refineries at Bharat Petroleum. If Russian supplies are more difficult, 'Middle East crudes — with the geographical advantages and a wide range of quality will be a prime substitute, especially from Saudi and Iraq,' he said. --With assistance from Sudhi Ranjan Sen, Lucia Kassai and Alex Longley.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Ivy League colleges are not the priciest in the US: See which universities cost even more
In a finding that challenges long-held assumptions about the cost of elite education in the United States, a new study by GOBankingRates has revealed that the most expensive universities in the country are not part of the Ivy League. While institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton continue to symbolise academic excellence, they have been outpriced by a number of prestigious—but non-Ivy—private universities when it comes to the total estimated cost of attendance. At the top of the list is the University of Southern California (USC), where the total cost for a four-year undergraduate program is projected to reach a staggering $394,900. That breaks down to nearly $100,000 per year, including tuition, room and board, fees, books, and other expenses. The most expensive colleges in the US According to the GOBankingRates analysis, the top five most expensive colleges in the U.S. all exceed a $385,000 four-year attendance estimate. These figures reflect the 'sticker price' before financial aid and scholarships are factored in, and they represent the full cost a family would pay without assistance. Here's how the top five stack up: University of Southern California (USC) – $394,900 Duke University Vanderbilt University Washington University in St. Louis Brown University Surprisingly, only one Ivy League school—Brown University—makes the top five. The rest are private, highly selective institutions located across the U.S., known for strong academics, high tuition, and rising living costs. Ivy League institutions: Comparatively more affordable? Despite their elite reputation, Ivy League universities are not the costliest options. Only four Ivies made the top 10: Brown University – #5 Cornell University – #6 Dartmouth College – #8 Yale University – #10 The remaining Ivy League institutions, all ranked outside the top 10, include: University of Pennsylvania – #11 Columbia University – #14 Princeton University – #19 Harvard University – #23 Perhaps most surprising: Harvard, often considered synonymous with exclusivity and wealth, ranks near the bottom of the top 25 most expensive universities. This could be due to its enormous endowment, which enables the school to provide generous financial aid packages, often making it more affordable than its sticker price suggests. Why are non-Ivies more expensive? The reasons behind the rising costs at non-Ivy institutions are multifaceted: Geographic Location: Schools in cities like Los Angeles (USC), Nashville (Vanderbilt), or St. Louis (WashU) face higher costs of living, which drive up on-campus housing and services. Institutional Resources and Amenities: Many of these schools have invested heavily in campus upgrades, state-of-the-art facilities, student wellness programs, and global study opportunities—all of which add to operational costs. Lack of Massive Endowments: Unlike Ivies such as Harvard and Princeton, which have multibillion-dollar endowments that help subsidize tuition, non-Ivies may rely more heavily on tuition revenue to maintain competitiveness. Strong National Reputations: Institutions like Duke and USC have built powerful brands that attract top students globally—enabling them to charge premium prices. What this means for students The findings serve as a cautionary reminder for families evaluating college choices: prestige doesn't always equal unaffordability. Many Ivy League schools, despite their brand power, offer robust financial aid that makes them more affordable than they appear. Meanwhile, families eyeing top private colleges outside the Ivy League should pay careful attention to: Net price vs. sticker price Merit-based scholarships Work-study opportunities Graduation rates and return on investment (ROI) The bigger picture With college affordability now central to the national conversation, this report underscores the urgent need for transparent pricing and wider access to aid information. The sticker shock of a nearly $400,000 education—at any institution—can be paralysing for middle-class families, many of whom fall through the cracks of traditional aid systems. Students are encouraged to use net price calculators, compare aid offers, and consider long-term outcomes, such as earning potential, alumni networks, and debt burden. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
