logo
See where seniors face the longest travel times to get to their local Social Security offices

See where seniors face the longest travel times to get to their local Social Security offices

CNBC02-06-2025
A new Social Security Administration policy will require nearly 2 million additional beneficiaries to visit the agency's offices each year to change their direct deposit information, according to agency estimates.
That's often not a quick trip: Nearly one-quarter of seniors live more than an hour away from their local Social Security field office, according to a new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Meanwhile, half of seniors need to drive for at least 33 minutes without traffic to get to their Social Security office.
The policy change will lead to more than 1 million hours of travel per year, according to the nonpartisan policy and research institute.
The Social Security Administration said the new direct deposit requirements would curb fraud, which it said it's been working to root out in coordination with the Trump administration's so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Since 2023, the agency has experienced a "marked increase" in allegations of direct deposit fraud, a Social Security Administration official said via email.
In March, SSA implemented enhanced fraud protection for direct deposit changes. Between March 29 and April 26, the enhanced fraud protection flagged more than 20,000 Social Security numbers where phone direct deposit requests failed security measures that check for multiple fraud indicators.
Of the direct deposit transactions flagged, 61% to 72% of individuals never resubmitted their requests, a "strong indicator" that many of those attempts may not have been legitimate, according to the SSA official.
The agency estimates $19.9 million in losses were avoided as a result of the enhanced safety measures.
However, advocates say the change is an overreaction, given the scale of such fraud. The Social Security Administration has said about 40% of direct deposit fraud comes from phone calls attempting to change direct deposit information.
In early 2024, anti-fraud officials at the agency told The New York Times that about 2,000 beneficiaries had their direct deposits redirected over the prior year. By those estimates, that would mean just 800 of those people experienced direct deposit fraud by phone, according to Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and disability policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Yet the agency is now requiring about 2 million elderly and disabled individuals to visit its offices to prevent such fraud, she said.
More from Personal Finance:What the House GOP budget bill means for your moneyTrump tariffs create the 'perfect storm' for scamsSocial Security COLA for 2026 projected to be lowest in years
To help ensure benefit payments are not misdirected, the Social Security Administration has tightened beneficiaries' ability to change their bank information over the phone.
As of April 28, individuals who want to change their direct deposit information will need to log into or create a personal My Social Security online account and obtain a one-time code before they call the agency's 800 number.
Individuals who cannot use online or automatic enrollment services will need to visit a local field office to verify their identity in person. While the agency encourages those individuals to make an appointment, it is also possible to walk in for direct deposit changes.
Individuals who want to change their direct deposit information may also use automatic enrollment services through their bank. To do so, individuals need to contact their bank directly. Not all financial institutions participate in this process, according to SSA.
Because many seniors or disabled individuals do not have internet service, computers or smart phones — or if they do, may not know how to use those resources — many will likely have to make an in-person visit to their local Social Security office.
About 6 million seniors don't drive, while almost 8 million older Americans have a medical condition or disability that makes it difficult for them to travel, according to CBPP research.
In-person appointments may be burdensome for beneficiaries who face long travel times to get to their nearest Social Security office, according to the CBPP analysis.
In 31 states, more than 25% of seniors face travel times of more than an hour to get to their local field office.
In certain less-populated states, more than 40% of seniors would need to drive more than an hour. Those include Arkansas, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming.
In other states, around 25% to 39% of seniors would need to travel over an hour. That includes Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Virginia.
Residents of other states may also face a burden if they do not live near their closest Social Security field office.
The analysis is a conservative estimate to help assess how much time it may cost individuals who are affected by the policy, according to Devin O'Connor, senior fellow at the CBPP.
For example, it doesn't take into account the time spent getting an appointment to visit a Social Security office and the time spent waiting for the appointment, he said.
The CBPP's analysis was created with information from multiple sources including the 2022 National Household Travel Survey, SSA field office location data, the OpenTimes travel time database and the Census Bureau's 2023 American Community Survey.
The Social Security Administration has not independently validated the data, the agency said via email in response to a request for comment.
Notably, the new direct deposit requirements come as the Social Security Administration has moved to cut its work force by about 7,000 employees, reductions that have led some of the agency's field offices to be "understaffed," O'Connor said.
However, while it had been reported that DOGE planned to close Social Security field offices to help curb spending, thus far that has largely not happened, he said. The Social Security Administration has denied it plans to close local field offices.
Individuals who need to visit a Social Security field office will also be confronted by long wait times for appointments. Currently, just 43% of individuals are able to get a benefit appointment within 28 days, Social Security Administration data shows.
The agency's new policy to limit phone transactions has been scaled back. The agency had proposed limiting the ability to apply for benefits over the phone, but after it received pushback from organizations including the AARP, the agency changed that policy to limit only direct deposit transactions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's trade ‘deals' are economically self-defeating and a geopolitical failure
Trump's trade ‘deals' are economically self-defeating and a geopolitical failure

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's trade ‘deals' are economically self-defeating and a geopolitical failure

To President Trump's supporters, the one-sided trade 'deals' negotiated with the United Kingdom, Japan and most recently the European Union may seem like victories. They may seem like a vindication of the president's supposed street-savvy negotiating style. In reality, they are self-defeating in their economics and harmful to America's alliances. Under the trade arrangement concluded at the end of July, the EU will scrap tariffs on U.S. imports and commit to large-scale purchases on American energy and defense systems, as well further U.S. investment. In exchange, the EU gets a U.S. tariff of 15 percent, vastly exceeding average tariff rates across the industrialized world in the post-war era. At the risk of stating the obvious, the three 'deals' are not trade agreements in any meaningful sense. They lack the legal weight that foreign trade agreements carry. Nor do they entail a liberalization of trade — rather, they ratify America's imposition of new tariff barriers against some of its closest allies, while also extracting concessions from these nations under threat of even higher tariffs. Because tariffs are effectively taxes on Americans, the U.S. economy and consumers are the first and foremost losers of these new 'deals,' especially in sectors where imports from the three partner economies serve as inputs into U.S. economic activity. The BMW plant in Spartanburg, S.C., to cite just one example, uses a lot of EU-made components; barring special, yet-unannounced carve-outs, its production has just become less competitive. Jobs will be lost, just as they were lost in the aftermath of Trump's first-term steel and aluminum tariffs across industries that rely on those metals. The geopolitical ramifications are even more pernicious. 'It's about security, it's about Ukraine,' the EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said to justify the European concessions back in July, not anticipating that the deal would have little impact on the administration's planned rapprochement with Russia, on full display in Alaska on Friday. American alliances since 1945 have been sustained by a perception of the U.S. as a fundamentally different kind of global superpower, one that was neither predatory nor seeking domination for its own sake. While Russia and China may have had control over their clients or over nations that they subjugated by brute force, the U.S. had real friends — at least until now. Europeans, the Japanese, or the Koreans have generally hoped for our leadership, comfortable in the knowledge that our decisions will be informed, at the very least, by a basic sense of decency. That sense is being shaken to the core. Trump is transforming a rules-based, voluntary system of international cooperation, imperfect as it was, into a system of quasi-colonial extortion. The MAGA camp might derive a sense of satisfaction from humiliating 'free-riding' U.S. allies, but the resulting arrangements are not sustainable. Canada and Mexico have learned that even a proper free trade agreement negotiated with a Trump administration and ratified by Congress offers little protection against new arbitrary tariffs. It will soon dawn on voters in Japan, the U.K. and the EU — if it hasn't already — that their country's trade deals are both hopelessly unbalanced and subject to change by Washington at a moment's notice. Even if the deals hold in the short term, they are bound the produce a political backlash, which will make the prospect of working together with the U.S. on matters of mutual interest far less likely. There was a reason why the Japanese government postponed the announcement of its trade deal with the U.S. until after its recent upper house parliamentary election, from which it has emerged badly bruised. Similarly, the European Commission will have a hard time selling its deal with Trump to member states — whose cooperation is essential if the promises of hundreds of billions in U.S.-bound investment and purchases of American goods are ever going to materialize. For decades, there have been voices in European politics decrying America's real or imaginary domination of the old continent. Today, they have a real, tangible grievance they can hold on to: The EU is essentially promising a large transfers of wealth to the U.S., in the form of future military and energy purchases as well as outbound investment, while acquiescing to being subjected to a trade policy that would have been essentially unthinkable a few months ago. If the Trump administration were purposefully trying to peel the EU, the U.K. and Japan away from America's system of alliances, it would be hard-pressed to find a more surefire method than these deals. They put to rest a benevolent vision of America that has underpinned our soft power worldwide for 80 years.

Trump administration moves to 'prevent benefits' for some under popular student loan forgiveness program
Trump administration moves to 'prevent benefits' for some under popular student loan forgiveness program

CNBC

time4 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump administration moves to 'prevent benefits' for some under popular student loan forgiveness program

The Trump administration is moving to "prevent benefits" for some student loan borrowers under the popular Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, according to an announcement on Monday. The U.S. Department of Education said it issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on its regulations to halt loan forgiveness under PSLF for employees "of organizations that are undermining national security and American values through illegal means." PSLF, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, allows many not-for-profit and government employees to have their federal student loans canceled after 10 years of payments. More from Personal Finance:Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumersStudent loan forgiveness may soon be taxed againStudent loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us For now, the language used by the Trump administration on how it will determine an organization is ineligible is vague, which advocates say could help it nix any non-profit it doesn't approve of. Organizations that provide support to undocumented immigrants or transgender people, for example, could be at risk, they say. "Public Service Loan Forgiveness was enacted in a bipartisan way to help incentivize hardworking people to go into public service," said Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers. "The Trump administration is trying, through executive authority, to limit who can access this benefit based on a litmus test of who they like and who they don't like." People can comment on the proposed rules at on or before Sept. 17, the Education Dept. said. In its proposed rule, the department says the changes "may delay or prevent forgiveness for a subset of borrowers." Experts say borrowers' best option right now is to stay the course, assuming their current employer has previously been considered qualifying. That's because it remains unclear exactly which organizations will no longer be considered a qualifying employer for PSLF under the Trump's administration's regulations. And some experts say the changes to eligibility could be challenged in court. Whatever the outcome, the overhaul of the PSLF program can't be retroactive, said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit that helps borrowers navigate the repayment of their debt. That means that if you are currently working for or previously worked for an organization that the Trump administration later excludes from the program, you'll still get credit for that time — at least up until the rule changes go into effect. "If an organization is deemed illegal, the borrower can switch jobs to another that isn't considered illegal," said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. The proposed narrowing of PSLF comes at the same time that more than 72,000 borrowers are stuck in a backlog of applications waiting for relief under the program.

Switzerland's M&A Deal Surge Leaves the Rest of Europe Behind
Switzerland's M&A Deal Surge Leaves the Rest of Europe Behind

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Switzerland's M&A Deal Surge Leaves the Rest of Europe Behind

(Bloomberg) -- Switzerland is seeing a more than fivefold surge in mergers and acquisitions that's outpaced most of its European peers, giving bankers hopes for a lucrative payout this year. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The volume of takeovers targeting Swiss companies has jumped 465% to $16.7 billion so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Private equity firms are particularly active, with Advent announcing late Sunday it has agreed to acquire Zurich-listed chipmaker U-blox Holding AG in a deal valued at 1.05 billion Swiss francs ($1.3 billion). Switzerland's wave of dealmaking comes against a backdrop of macroeconomic challenges. Swiss companies are now facing a potential hit to revenues after the US unexpectedly imposed a 39% tariff on imports from the country. The levy is the highest in the developed world and prompted various Swiss companies from small to large to look at ways to lower the impact. The country's openness to foreign investment has helped drive inbound deal volume, as it doesn't have the restrictions that some other European nations have, according to Tino Gaberthüel, who heads the corporate and M&A practice at Zurich-based law firm Lenz & Staehelin. 'There is a high interest in Switzerland's mid-cap players that run cost efficiently, but may not have a globally critical size,' said Vincent Thiebaud, head of Swiss investment banking at Jefferies Financial Group Inc. Swiss firms themselves are also on the lookout for new technologies and for entering new markets or cementing their footprint in existing ones, said Reinout Boettcher, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s head of Switzerland investment banking. 'The Swiss M&A market has historically been strongly influenced by outbound activities, also because Switzerland has a large number of leading global companies that want to strengthen their positions,' Boettcher said. Domestic Champion Mergers of domestic companies, on the back of a strong Swiss franc and the needs to boost returns, are also driving Swiss dealmaking. In April, Helvetia Holding AG agreed to combine with Baloise Holding AG to form the country's second-largest insurance group, marking the biggest announced deal in Switzerland this year. OC Oerlikon Corp. in May signed a deal to sell its Barmag textile machinery business to domestic rival Rieter Holding AG. Some Swiss companies are under pressure to simplify their operations to revive growth and boost profit margins. ABB Ltd., which has a $122 billion market value, is looking to spin off or sell its robotics unit, while Nestle SA has announced plans to separate a water business that's home to brands like Perrier, and Acqua Panna. 'We see positive activity in Switzerland including in the large-cap segment,' said Jens Haas, head of investment bank Switzerland at UBS Group AG. 'It is largely focused on transactions with a perceived high certainty of success, like breaking up conglomerate structures via spinoffs or divestitures.' Deutsche Bank AG expects the industrial, health care and financial services sector to remain hotspots for further deal activity in the second half of the year. 'We have naturally become an increasingly important address for many European topics for our clients,' said Urs Raeber, head of investment banking coverage and advisory at Deutsche Bank in Switzerland. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store