logo
Americans Fear Retirement Shortfall

Americans Fear Retirement Shortfall

Newsweek10-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Older Americans fear that they will not have enough money to live out their ideal retirement, according to a new survey.
The survey for investment banking firm D.A. Davidson polled 1,008 U.S. adults 50 years and older between March 20 and 25 and found that 41 percent said they won't be able to support the retirement lifestyle they envisioned.
Recent decades have seen a significant shift in how many Americans retire. A 2023 Pew Research Center report found that around one in five Americans aged 65 and older were still employed, nearly twice as many as 35 years ago. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that 10 years ago, in February 2015, some 8.2 million people over 65 were employed in some capacity. This increased by 11.1 million, 35 percent, in February 2025.
Saving for retirement has become more challenging for many reasons. The cost of living, including health care and housing, continues to rise, and wages have not risen consistently at the same pace. Increased life expectancy also means people need more savings. Stable pensions have largely been replaced by less reliable 401(k) plans, putting the burden of saving on individuals. Student loan debt and caregiving duties often force people to delay saving money for later life.
"Once one gets to retirement age and hasn't accumulated enough retirement savings, one only has two options left—continue working or accept a lower standard of living in retirement—and neither of them are good," Robert Johnson, chairman and CEO at Economic Index Associates, told Newsweek.
Over half of pre-retirees are considering taking up a side gig during retirement to bridge the financial gap. Among Americans aged 50 and older—mostly Gen Xers—who have not yet given up work, 63 percent say they have considered taking on a side hustle to raise some extra cash once they exit the workforce.
Other survey results reflect the same anxiety held by Gen X, with many retired Americans grappling with the reality of post-working life and financing it, which falls short of their expectations.
However, only a small portion of the population is turning to supplemental income sources. While 92 percent of retired Americans report not having a side gig, 60 percent say they wish they did.
Composite image created by Newsweek.
Composite image created by Newsweek.
Photo Illustration by Newsweek
Working in Retirement: Good or Bad?
For those who have taken on part-time work in retirement, the experience appears to be positive. The study found that an impressive 93 percent of retirees with a side gig said they enjoy the work, and more than half, 55 percent, report that they pursued their side job to stay mentally or socially engaged.
Financial motivations, however, play a key role. Twenty percent took on side gigs to pay down existing debt, while 17 percent said they aimed to fund a more ideal retirement lifestyle.
"The definition of—and classic timeline for—retirement is changing," said Andrew Crowell, financial adviser and vice chairman of wealth management at D.A. Davidson. "While many retirees might picture never working again, a side gig in retirement can be a fun and meaningful way to stay engaged in the community while supporting a more ideal retirement overall."
Setting up a side hustle in your later years can be a boon, but it's not without its hurdles, explains Zack Swad, president and wealth manager at Swad Wealth Management.
"America is a land of opportunity. Unlike past generations, people today have the ability to learn virtually anything online, build side hustles, and create their own careers," he said. "But with that opportunity comes responsibility and often, a lack of structure. Without employer pensions or consistent guidance, more of the retirement burden falls squarely on individuals."
Aging can also get in the way of pursuing new income avenues.
"Health—their own or the health of a loved one," is a big factor in whether any sort of work is still tenable in later life, Johnson said. "People may want to continue working past retirement age but simply may not physically be able to do so."
Retirement Finances
Many older Americans are considering or have already taken on side hustles or other work during their later years, and it's not without good reason.
The Schroders 2024 U.S. Retirement Survey, published in December, found that Gen Xers anticipate having just shy of $603,000 in retirement savings when they stop working, but they believe they'll need just over $1,069,746 to fund an ideal retirement. Only 14 percent of Gen Xers felt that they had saved enough to live on in their later years.
Another study, by Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, found that more than half of current workers—52 percent—plan to work at least part-time in retirement. Almost seven in 10 workers—69 percent—said they could work until retirement age and still not save enough to meet their needs.
"The biggest challenge facing today's pre-retirees is financial uncertainty—rising health care costs, inflation and longer life expectancies have made it harder than ever to retire comfortably," Brian Harrison, financial planner and president of SAVVI Financial, told Newsweek. "Many individuals haven't saved enough, and even those who have are struggling to manage their retirement funds efficiently."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

The cheapest grocery stores in 2025 have been named — and the first-place winner is expanding in NYC
The cheapest grocery stores in 2025 have been named — and the first-place winner is expanding in NYC

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The cheapest grocery stores in 2025 have been named — and the first-place winner is expanding in NYC

Check out these checkouts. As food prices are expected to rise by up to 3.5% in 2025, according to the USDA, many Americans are looking for ways to keep their grocery bills in check. A recent study by MarketForce, which surveyed over 4,300 shoppers, highlights the grocery stores that best balance affordability with quality. Whether it's inflation, supply chain issues or simply the high cost of living, everyone could use a break at checkout. Here's your chance, according to the roundup, with seven grocers helping customers stretch their dollars without sacrificing taste or freshness. Lidl has been a rising star in the U.S. discount grocery scene, especially in NYC, where it has been expanding locations, including in Brooklyn. The store layout is inspired by European roots, which helps Lidl keep its overhead low by minimizing staffing and using a streamlined warehouse-style setup. This helps reduce costs for shoppers, making it one of the most budget-friendly options for families. According to the MarketForce study, an impressive 81.4% of customers return to Lidl because of its unbeatable value. The store's affordable pricing is made better with the quality of its products, the report notes. In addition to the usual grocery items, Lidl also surprises customers with seasonal and non-food items, from power tools to potted plants. If you've ever dreamed of paying Costco prices without the membership fee, WinCo Foods is where it's at. This employee-owned chain has become a household name in many parts of the U.S., with 139 locations spread across 10 states. WinCo operates a warehouse-style model focusing on low prices by cutting out the middleman. It buys directly from manufacturers and even has customers bag their own groceries. The strategy must be working: a whopping 73.1% of shoppers cited value for money as their main reason for frequenting WinCo. Its bulk sections are also noted as a treasure trove for those seeking to stock up on essentials like flour, rice and dried goods at steep discounts. Grocery Outlet's business model revolves around selling overstocked or discontinued items at discounted prices. Locations vary by region, but the appeal is universal: customers can score big on both name-brand and private-label products. Fresh produce, dairy and meat are always stocked, while their natural and organic sections offer a variety of specialty items like vegan and gluten-free foods — often for less than what you'd find at other places. Notably, 71.4% of shoppers reported returning to Grocery Outlet for the exceptional value it provides. Aldi's reputation for value is legendary — and the numbers don't lie. The MarketForce study found that 70.4% of shoppers favor Aldi for the exceptional value it offers. With a European-inspired model, Aldi keeps costs low by minimizing staff, using simple displays, and encouraging customers to bag their own groceries. Despite this no-frills approach, Aldi shoppers can find everything from pasta and canned goods to frozen items and fresh produce. If you're looking to make your budget stretch even further, Aldi is also home to great deals on dairy, baked goods and even alcohol. Known for its vast selection of high-quality store-brand products, Wegmans is a favorite among many shoppers, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region. The family-owned grocer boasts more than 110 stores and has become well-known for its excellent customer service and affordable prices. A solid 68.7% of MarketForce respondents cited value for money as their main reason for choosing Wegmans. Wegmans stands out for its wide range of organic and healthy food options, from fresh produce to gluten-free snacks. The grocer expanded to Long Island earlier this year and continues to extend its reach beyond the Northeast. Despite its smaller footprint compared to traditional grocery stores, about 67.2% of study participants mentioned that they return because of the store's value. While it's famous for its affordable and fun frozen-food options, much-beloved Trader Joe's also serves up fresh produce, unique snacks, seasonal items and high-quality private-label goods. While Costco may require a membership, the savings it offers can make it worth the investment. Known for its bulk-buying model, Costco allows customers to purchase everything from household essentials to luxury items at steeply discounted prices. Whether it's buying a year's supply of toilet paper, a bulk pack of fresh fruit, gourmet cheeses or pantry staples, according to the MarketForce study, 61.4% of customers return to Costco for its impressive deals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store