How To Close the Gender Gap in Workplace Competition
Team of happy female soccer players celebrating their achievement on a playing field at sunset.
A new Wharton study shows that women are less likely to enter competitions than their male colleagues at work.
In my interview with Katy Milkman, the James G. Dinan Professor at the Wharton School, and Sophia Pink, a PhD student at the Wharton School, they shared their new research on this gender competition gap.
Their research found that there is a persistent gender gap in competitive environments which has significant consequences, not just for women, but the organizations that want to maximize the use of their talent.
"We were wondering, what if we told women when they're deciding between what jobs to apply for, that women, on average, are less likely to apply for jobs than equally qualified men, would that help?' Milkman explained.
This is known as "stereotype reactance." Stereotype reactance is the process of informing women about the existing gender gap in competition proactively. This can paradoxically increase their likelihood of applying for jobs. This is attributed to women's potential desire to resist conforming to negative stereotypes and a motivation to take action against the observed inequality.
Pink notes, "What we found is that women who saw this reactance inducing message where they learned about this gender competition gap applied to about 20% more jobs on the day they saw the banner, so it led to this big and meaningful boost in job applications."
Milkman and Pink recommends organizations use more 'just in time' interventions. This could be providing a prompt at moment of decision reminding women about the gender competition gap or equipping managers to encourage women on their teams to apply for positions to overcome this gap. These "just-in-time" interventions can create a more equitable playing field by mitigating the impact of confidence barriers and internalized norms.
Milkman and Pink advocate for a shift in promotion practices, suggesting that organizations should make promotions the default rather than requiring individuals to opt-in. This seemingly simple change can act as a powerful form of encouragement, particularly for women who may be hesitant to self-promote or may underestimate their qualifications. By making promotion consideration a standard process, companies can proactively level the playing field and mitigate the impact of the gender competition gap.
They found research from the University of Toronto supports this recommendation. Their findings indicate that when promotion processes are structured so that all eligible individuals are automatically considered, the gender gap in who receives promotions significantly diminishes. This suggests that the act of requiring individuals to nominate themselves or actively seek promotion may inadvertently disadvantage women, potentially due to societal factors influencing their confidence in self-promotion or their perception of their readiness.
Implementing default promotions can foster a more equitable and inclusive workplace culture. It sends a clear message that the organization values all its talent and is actively working to ensure fair opportunities for advancement. This approach can also help to identify high-potential individuals who might otherwise be overlooked due to their reluctance to self-nominate. By removing the barrier of self-nomination, organizations can tap into a wider pool of talent and create a more diverse and representative leadership pipeline.
Research highlights the crucial role of proactive positive feedback in fostering confidence and narrowing the gender competition gap. Managers, mentors, and other allies can actively support women by specifically identifying and acknowledging their strengths and accomplishments. This validation helps women recognize their capabilities and encourages them to put themselves forward for opportunities.
Allies can play a vital role in explicitly pointing out the reality that if qualified women choose not to apply for a promotion or new challenge, others will undoubtedly step forward, emphasizing that their absence leaves a void that will be filled. This direct and encouraging approach can counteract any hesitancy stemming from a lack of confidence and empower women to embrace competitive opportunities.
Milkman suggests, "Rather than trying to solve long-term, systemic gender socialization problems around gender and competition, these interventions can help remedy the gender competition gap now. The answer is that we have to raise awareness about these issues and develop science-based tools that help combat them."
For organizations that want to close the gender competition gap, consider identifying points where the gap might exist, make promotions default and give feedback boosts on confidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Period Data ‘Gold Mine' Poses Serious Health and Safety Risks, Report Finds
A new report highlights the dangers of menstrual tracking apps, which collect data that could jeopardize the safety and wellbeing of people who menstruate. Apps that help people track their menstrual cycle are data 'gold mines' for advertisers, a new report warns. Advertisers use this highly valuable data for customer profiling, allowing them to tailor marketing campaigns to specific groups of consumers. The report, published by the University of Cambridge's Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy on Tuesday, June 10, explains that the risks to app users go far beyond just targeted ads. When this data falls into the wrong hands, it can affect users' job prospects and lead to workplace surveillance, health insurance discrimination, and cyberstalking. It has even been used to limit access to abortion in the U.S., the study warns. Hundreds of millions of people use period tracking apps. A 2024 study estimated that the number of global downloads for the three most popular apps exceeds 250 million. These platforms are run by companies that profit from the mountain of user data they collect—particularly pregnancy data. According to the University of Cambridge report, data on pregnancy is 200 times more valuable to advertisers than data on age, gender, or location. Investigations conducted in 2019 and 2020 by Privacy International, a U.K.-based nonprofit, found that multiple apps directly shared personal data with advertisers. A follow-up study published on May 28 found that while major menstrual app companies have improved their approach to data privacy, they still collect device data from users in the U.K. and U.S. with 'no meaningful consent.' Stefanie Felsberger, sociologist and lead author of the University of Cambridge report, interviewed period tracking app users in Austria to understand why they use them and what they track. She was surprised to find that many people she spoke with didn't think of their menstrual data as personal or intimate and were unaware of its incredible commercial value. 'Period tracking apps collect a vast number of different kinds of information,' Felsberger told Gizmodo. 'They don't just collect information about the menstrual cycle as such, they also collect information about people's reproductive choices, sexual activities, their wellbeing, health, [and] medication intake,' she said. These apps also gather background information about users, including their age, gender, IP addresses, app behavior, and device information, she added. 'We have limited and also changing knowledge about how and where this data has been shared and who has access to it,' Felsberger said. In the U.S., menstrual tracking apps are regulated as general wellness devices, so the data they collect don't get any special legal protections, she explained. Advertisers aren't the only ones who can exploit this lack of safeguarding to access menstrual data. Government officials can also get their hands on this information and use it to restrict abortion access. 'Menstrual tracking data is being used to control people's reproductive lives.' Felsberger's report highlights two such cases, though in these instances, menstrual data did not come specifically from period tracking apps. Still, they illustrate how governments can use this information to limit access to abortion at both state and federal levels. In 2019, Missouri's state health department used menstrual tracking data to investigate failed abortions. They also tracked patients' medical ID numbers, the gestational age of fetuses, and the dates of medical procedures. As a result of this investigation, the state attempted to withhold the license of St. Louis' Planned Parenthood clinic—the only abortion provider in the state at that time. This led to a year-long legal battle that ultimately restored the clinic's license. During President Donald Trump's first administration, the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement tracked the menstrual cycles of unaccompanied minors seeking asylum in the U.S. They aimed to prevent these minors from obtaining abortions even in cases of rape. A freedom of information request by MSNBC uncovered a spreadsheet containing dates of the minors' menstrual cycles, lengths of their pregnancies, whether the sex had been consensual, and whether they had requested an abortion. These cases underscore the dangers of failing to protect users' period tracking data, especially in a post-Dobbs world. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, abortion access has become deeply fragmented across the U.S. This procedure is currently banned in 13 states and access is significantly limited in an additional 11 states. In the European Union and the U.K., period tracking apps have more legal protections. 'But they are not often implemented very well,' Felsberger said. Their privacy policies tend to be 'very vague,' which makes it difficult for users to understand who can access their data. 'App developers and companies have a very large responsibility, because they do present themselves as providing people with this opportunity to learn about their menstrual cycles,' she said. 'I think they should also do their utmost to keep people's data safe and be transparent about the way that they use data.' There is also a need for stronger federal regulations, especially in the U.S., she added. Given that these apps offer valuable health insights, it's unrealistic to expect users to stop using them entirely. But Felsberger recommends switching to non-commercial period tracking apps that provide more data privacy. These platforms are run by non-profit organizations or research institutions that won't share your information with third parties. As the landscape of reproductive health becomes increasingly treacherous in the U.S., understanding how third parties may exploit your menstrual data has never been more important. 'Menstrual tracking data is being used to control people's reproductive lives,' Felsberger said in a University statement. 'It should not be left in the hands of private companies.'
Geek Wire
2 hours ago
- Geek Wire
AWS and national lab team up to deploy AI tools in pursuit of fusion energy
Sustainability: News about the rapidly growing climate tech sector and other areas of innovation to protect our planet. SEE MORE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's National Ignition Facility in Livermore, Calif. (LLNL Photo) Amazon Web Services is teaming up with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory — home to the world's only facility to achieve fusion ignition — to develop artificial intelligence tools to advance the lab's efforts, the two announced today. AWS and LLNL's National Ignition Facility are working together to build an AI-driven troubleshooting and reliability system, and have already deployed generative AI capabilities into the fusion lab's operations. The focus is on using AI to produce real-time solutions to anomalies that arise in the research and addressing increasing operational demands. More than two years ago, NIF reported that it had produced more energy from a fusion reaction than went into it, an accomplishment known as ignition. Since then, the facility has hit that mark seven additional times, most recently in April when it nearly tripled the amount of energy produced in December 2022. Researchers internationally are trying to recreate the fusion reactions that power the Sun — developing 'star in a jar' technologies that will allow humanity to produce nearly limitless clean energy on Earth. That power is increasingly in demand as data centers continue expanding and other sectors of the economy are electrifying their operations. In the new partnership with the federal lab, AWS's AI could help solve the very energy consumption problems it is helping to create. The National Ignition Facility has hit ignition eight times in fusion experiments conducted at LLNL. (LLNL Chart) 'I'm excited to unleash the superpower that is AI on NIF operations,' said Kim Budil, director of LLNL, in a statement. 'By leveraging our extensive historical data through advanced AI techniques, we're solving today's problems faster and paving the way for predictive maintenance and even more efficient operations in the future.' Last week, Washington state companies Helion Energy, Zap Energy and Avalanche Energy participated in a Seattle-area summit to share their progress in working towards commercialized fusion. In the past they celebrated NIF's experiments as a validation that their ambitions are possible. No other facility anywhere has demonstrated fusion ignition, and NIF's objective is strictly research, as opposed to building reactors to put power on the grid. One of the interesting applications being pursued at NIF is unleashing AI on more than 98,000 archived problem logs stretching back 22 years. The documents are a trove of lessons learned, including symptoms, causes and the steps taken to fix the problems. A release from the California-based national lab said the partnership could 'establish a new standard for AI application in high-stakes scientific facilities and may influence operational approaches at other national laboratories.' David Appel, vice president of U.S. Federal Sales at AWS, called LLNL 'an innovation and scientific powerhouse, and we're extraordinarily proud of our partnership together.'
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Rare cancer diagnoses surge dramatically among millennials and Gen X
A rare type of cancer is growing among millennials and members of Generation X, new research shows. Diagnoses of appendix cancer have tripled in the U.S. for people born between 1976 and 1984 — and it has quadrupled for those born between 1981 and 1989. The study was published on Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Researchers from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program to arrive at these findings. "When you take these alarming rates that we are seeing for appendiceal cancer across generations, together with the fact that one in every three patients diagnosed with appendiceal cancer is diagnosed under the age of 50, these point to a timely need for everyone to be aware of the signs and symptoms of appendix cancer," said lead author Andreana Holowatyj, PhD, assistant professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, in a press release from the university. Cancer of the appendix is rare, affecting only about one or two people per million each year in the U.S., according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Even so, doctors emphasize the importance of seeking medical attention if symptoms emerge. "Ruling out the possibility of an appendix cancer diagnosis, or diagnosing it early, is important for this cancer as we continue to learn what factors may be contributing to this worrisome trend," Holowatyj said. Appendiceal cancer forms in the appendix, which is a small organ located in the lower right abdomen. There are two main types: epithelial appendiceal cancer, which involves the cells of the lining of the appendix, and neuroendocrine appendiceal cancer, which results from the growth of neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors of the appendix, the NCI states. In early stages of the disease, most people do not notice symptoms. As the cancer progresses, common symptoms include pain, a bloated feeling, a mass in the abdomen, nausea and vomiting, and sudden feelings of fullness while eating, according to the above source. Five-year survival rates for appendix cancer range from 10% to 63%. Common treatments for this type of cancer include surgery to remove the appendix and any other affected organs, as well as chemotherapy to kill any metastasized cancer cells. Based on the study findings, the researchers are calling for increased awareness among both the public and the medical community. "As incidence rates in younger generations are often indicative of future disease burden, these results support the need for histology-specific investigations of appendiceal adenocarcinoma, as well as increased education and awareness of appendiceal adenocarcinomas among healthcare providers and the public," the study stated. There are no standard screening guidelines or risk factors for appendix cancer, which means up to half of diagnoses occur after the disease has already spread, according to the researchers. Five-year survival rates for appendix cancer range from 10% to 63%. For more Health articles, visit The new study received funding from the Appendix Cancer Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (ACPMP) Research Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.
