Climate change could cut crop yields up to a quarter
And if carbon pollution worsens, the loss of calories across the same six staples -- corn, wheat, rice, soybeans, sorghum and cassava -- rises to nearly a quarter by century's end, the researchers reported in Nature.
More generally, every additional degree Celsius of warming reduces the world's ability to produce food from these crops by 120 calories per person per day, or nearly five percent of current daily consumption, they calculated.
"If the climate warms by three degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast," said co-author Solomon Hsiang, a professor at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability in California.
The steepest losses will occur at the extremes of the agricultural economy: in modern, Big Ag breadbaskets that currently enjoy some of the world's best growing conditions, and in subsistence farming communities that typically rely of small cassava harvests.
North America would be hit hardest, losing a fifth of yields by 2100 in the moderate carbon pollution scenario, and two-fifths if emissions from burning fossil fuels continue apace.
Working with more than a dozen scientists, Hsiang and co-leader Andrew Hultgren, an assistant professor at the University of Urbana-Champaign, sifted through data from more than 12,000 regions in 55 countries.
Erratic weather
Previous calculations of how a warming world will impact crop yields generally failed to consider the ways in which farmers would adapt, such as switching crop varieties, shifting planting and harvesting dates, and altering fertiliser use.
The scientists estimated such adjustments would offset about a third of climate related losses over the next 75 years in the scenario of rising emissions, but that residual impacts would still be devastating.
"Any level of warming, even when accounting for adaptation, results in global output losses for agriculture," said Hultgren.
With the planet about 1.5C hotter than preindustrial levels in the late 1900s, farmers in many regions are already experiencing longer dry spells, unseasonable heatwaves and erratic weather that undermines yields.
The nutritional value of most crops also declines with hotter temperatures, earlier research has shown.
The study revealed sharp variations in the impact of global warming on different crops and regions.
In the "worst-case" scenario of rising carbon emissions, corn yields would plummet 40 percent by 2100 across the grain belt of the United States, eastern China, central Asia, and the Middle East.
For soybeans, yields in the US would decline by half, and increase by a fifth in Brazil.
Wheat losses would drop by a fifth in eastern and western Europe, and by 30 to 40 percent in other wheat-growing regions: China, Russia and North America.
Cassava would be hit hard everywhere it's grown.
"Although cassava does not make up a large portion of global agricultural revenues, it is an important subsistence crop in low- and middle-income countries," the researchers pointed out.
Among the six crops examined, rice is the only one that stands to benefit in a warmer climate, mainly due to warmer nights.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
6 days ago
- Euronews
Space Race 2.0? US speeding plans to build nuclear reactor on the Moon
The United States is fast-tracking plans to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon in response to China and Russia's growing activity in space. US media reported last week that Sean Duffy, NASA's interim administrator and US transportation secretary, said the country could complete the project as early as 2030. It will also be much stronger than anticipated; while previous designs assumed the nuclear reactor would have around 40 kilowatt power, it's now expected to 100 kW. This dramatic increase in power is expected to provide stable power for future bases on the Moon. The facility will be built as part of the international Artemis programme, overseen by NASA, which aims to send people to the Moon and prepare for future expeditions to Mars. In addition to the nuclear reactor itself, a full supporting infrastructure – from transmission networks to energy storage – will be extremely important. The project's acceleration heralds a new era of global competition beyond Earth. Is the 2030 deadline possible? According to experts, the 2030 deadline is ambitious but technically possible. NASA and the US Department of Energy are now working to develop a fission surface power system to provide at least 40 kW of power, which NASA said would be enough to run 30 households for 10 years. Reactors have to operate reliably under extreme conditions: temperature fluctuations from daytime heat to nighttime frosts as low as -200° Celsius, no atmosphere, and limited cooling. Reactors must therefore be sealed, safe, and able to manage heat in low pressure and lower gravity conditions. In addition, rocket launches carry the risk of failure. The reactor would be sent in an "unactivated" state to minimise the risk of contamination in the event of a catastrophe. Competition to establish on the Moon Under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, no one can claim territory on the Moon. But for technical reasons, security zones around the reactor could effectively block other countries' access to strategic areas. "The first country to [place a reactor on the Moon] could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first," Duffy said. China is already testing its Lanyue lunar lander, which it expects to carry humans to the Moon by 2030. Working with Russia, China plans to build an International Lunar Research Station by 2035, possibly with its own nuclear plant on the Moon. Technological partnership with Europe European activity in lunar exploration is not limited to support for the Artemis programme. European countries are pursuing their own advanced projects that can not only inspire US ventures, but often feed directly into them. The Italian project SELENE (Lunar Energy Systems with Nuclear Energy) involves the construction of a "Moon Energy Hub," a stable energy source on the Moon based on small energy sources known as surface nuclear reactors. The Italian Space Agency (ASI) is also working with NASA to develop a module that could serve as a place of refuge for astronauts on the Moon. The European Space Agency (ESA) is implementing the Moonlight programme to create a constellation of five satellites orbiting the Moon, four for navigation and one for communication. The initiative, supported by Italy and the United Kingdom, expects to support more than 400 lunar missions over the next 20 years. Spanish technology company GMV developed the LUPIN system, which allows precise navigation on the Moon using satellite signals – similar to GPS but adapted to lunar conditions. Tests were carried out in Fuerteventura, an island off the coast of North Africa that has a landscape resembling the lunar surface. The company Airbus is working with the ESA on a transport vehicle capable of carrying cargo to the International Space Station. In parallel, scientists are developing the EL3 (European Large Logistic Lander), a modular lander to deliver payloads and samples to the lunar surface in support of European exploration autonomy. The LUNA centre, a joint initiative between the ESA and Germany's aerospace centre, is under construction in Cologne. It is a 700-metre hall that replicates the Moon's surface, with a layer of rock and lighting systems that mimic the day and night cycle. It is used to train astronauts and test robots, human-machine interaction, energy systems, and to simulate surface operations. Return to the Moon The space race is entering a new phase in which energy independence beyond Earth plays a key role. The lunar reactor is becoming not only an engineering project, but also a tool of strategic competition, determining technological and political superiority. By 2030, we may witness not only the return of humans to the Moon, but also the establishment of the first permanent energy installations, which will become the foundation for a long-term human presence in space. At the same time, questions of law, security and international cooperation arise. Although the Outer Space Treaty prohibits the "appropriation" of this natural satellite of the Earth, the practice of security zones may introduce a new form of space geopolitics. Europe, with its wide range of projects, can become not only a partner but also an independent player in this process, combining technological innovation with an active role in shaping the standards of lunar exploration. If these plans are realised, the future landscape of the Moon could look more like an industrial technology park than a quiet, untouched space desert. This is the beginning of an era in which the question is not whether bases will be established on the Moon, but under what rules and who will set them.
AFP
08-08-2025
- AFP
Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge
But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released August 6, 2025, challenges the conclusion of the climate paper (archived here and here). It found the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan (archived here). The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP August 6 it will have "further information to share soon" -- a move seized upon by climate-change skeptics following the publication of the re-analysis and pre-print correction of the paper. Both the original authors -- who have acknowledged errors in their methodology and data processing -- and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth (archived here). Influential paper It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others (archived here and here). AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 percent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. "That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 percent is a very big number," scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP August 5, 2025 (archived here). When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. "When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'" Hsiang said. "We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making." The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on August 6 uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. "We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next," Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while "there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community," the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Undeniable climate impact Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed (archived here). She told AFP on August 5 that the paper's correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are "extremely bad" regardless of the Kotz-led study, she explained, and "greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over." "Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption," she also noted. Image Riverbank dwellers carry banana produce over the dry Solimoes riverbed in the Pesqueiro community in Manacapuru, Amazonas state, northern Brazil, on September 30, 2024 (AFP / MICHAEL DANTAS, MICHAEL DANTAS) Hsiang said even smaller impacts on GDP should be considered "enough that it makes a lot of sense to invest in reducing climate change." "It's very cost effective," he told AFP. Heat stress on the economy manifests through various mechanisms, he said. For example, workforce productivity dips at high temperatures, risks of potential health complications rise, while machinery also deteriorates (archived here, here and here). "The very hottest countries in the world, near the tropics, we see this effect even more magnified," Hsiang said. "Every one degree of warming for them is a much larger impact on their economy." 'Final stages' Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 "as soon as we became aware of an issue" with the data and methodology (archived here). "We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon," he told AFP August 6. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. "One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science," he said. AFP has previously reported on other flawed reports and predatory studies on climate change.
LeMonde
08-08-2025
- LeMonde
On an Indonesian island, traces of human presence over one million years old have been discovered
After the discovery in 2003 of the so-called Flores Man on the Indonesian island of Flores, and the subsequent unearthing of human remains on the Philippine island of Luzon – which also lent its name to a distinct species – researchers turned their curiosity to another Indonesian island: Sulawesi (also known as Celebes). This vast landmass, spanning several hundred thousand square kilometers, had already yielded some prehistoric secrets, including tools at least 194,000 years old. However, these finds could not compete with the artifacts from Flores, dated at 1.02 million years old, or those from Luzon, around 700,000 years old. "We have searched for many years for evidence of the earliest humans of Sulawesi, so it is a great relief to finally find it," said Adam Brumm, an archaeologist and co-author of the study published on August 6 in the journal Nature. Together with colleagues from Australian and Indonesian universities, the team excavated the sediment layers at the Calio site, progressing 10 centimeters at a time. This meticulous approach paid off, allowing them to unearth seven flint tools.
