5 timeless lessons from Parag Parikh's 'Stocks to Riches' on investor behaviour
First published in October 2005, Parag Parikh's ageless book, 'Stocks to Riches: Insights On Investor Behaviour', still remains a crucial read for both aspirational equity investors and investment professionals alike.
Parag Parikh was a well renowned visionary investor in India. He was also a behavioural finance professional, author, and the founder of the Parag Parikh Financial Advisory Services (PPFAS) mutual fund. He was admired in the market circles for his deep and intense insights on human psychology and investing.
Not only this he was an ardent follower of Warren Buffett and advocated long term value investing. His legacy lives on through his work and writings and the immense success of PPFAS mutual fund, which continues to uphold his investment philosophy.
His book focuses on blending behavioural finance with practical equity market wisdom. It details how human psychology and biases influence investment decisions in the financial world.
With decades of experience in well planned value investing, Parikh draws on real-life examples to spread awareness among investors against unproductive and flawed investment behaviour.
Here are five core insights from the book that continue to hold immense value even in today's volatile markets:
Parikh throws light on loss aversion as a key emotional trap. 'The pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining,' he elaborates. The objective of writing this is to explain why investors often sell winning stocks early and hold on to losing ones. This instinctive fear distorts prudent decision making and rational judgement.
Hence, on the part of investors one should consistently review their portfolio objectively. Focus should be on building long term wealth and not on short term market fluctuations and swings. Wealth can only be built by maintaining calmness, long term vision and composure throughout the investment journey.
Mental accounting simply refers to treating money differently based on its origin or purpose according to Parikh. He strongly warns against this bias stating that, "People invest bonus money more recklessly than salary savings because they see it as a windfall." Such practices can push investors to poorly thought-out and erratic financial decisions.
Therefore, as an investor you should consolidate your funds and base investment decisions on clear financial goals. You should also be careful while spending apparently 'free' looking money such as a lottery win in a responsible manner as per your long term financial goals.
Many investors are reluctant to sell underperforming stocks because they have already put money into it and are on the losing end, due to this they are unable to take fair calls in a short period of time. To deal with the same challenge, Parikh urges readers to 'ignore the past and evaluate the present potential.'
This difficult to overcome behavioural bias keeps people tied to bad investments. The focus here is to exit loss making positions in stocks and mutual funds after carefully analysing their fundamentals.
The book quite intensely discusses the perils of following and going with the crowd. 'Investors are often influenced by what others are doing rather than what they should be doing,' Parikh writes. This can result in the creation of asset bubbles and consequently result in panic selling.
The dot com bubble of 2000-01 and the housing bubble of 2007-08 in the US are some of the most recent examples of the creation of asset bubbles. If not side-stepped efficiently, such bubbles can even result in epic wipe out of wealth. Parikh hence wants investors to carry out thorough research and avoid participating in such market bubbles to conserve wealth.
Parikh firmly supports long-term value investing. He argues that short-term market movements often reflect emotion, not logic. 'Markets are driven by greed and fear, not by fundamentals.'
This simply means that one should ignore temporary noise, market declines or fluctuations and invest in only those businesses that have sustainable value. This is the simplest way to build wealth on a long term basis.
The focus at all times is on the power of compounding and investing in those businesses that have the potential to showcase solid results and strong earnings compounding. For more details on the same you can refer to the official link of the book: PPFAS Knowledge Centre – Book Section
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
General insurance industry premium income to grow 8.7% in FY2026, 10.9% in FY2027: ICRA
Growth in the general insurance industry is estimated to pick up in FY2026 after moderating in the previous financial year, with private insurers expected to perform better compared to their public peers. The gross domestic premium income of general insurance companies is estimated to rise to Rs 3.21–3.24 lakh crore in the current financial year, up from Rs 2.97 lakh crore a year ago, according to rating agency ICRA . This translates into a growth of 8.7% in FY2026. The growth for FY2027 is estimated at 10.9%. 'GDPI growth is expected to improve in FY2026, supported by pricing discipline in commercial lines and a low base, continued growth in health, and an increase in vehicle sales vis-à-vis FY2025, partly offset by the impact of 1/n, which is expected to continue in H1 FY2026,' said Neha Parikh, vice president and sector head – financial sector ratings. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When the Camera Clicked at the Worst Possible Time Read More Also Read: India's health insurance sector faces growth and profitability challenges: Report Parikh added that in the absence of the impact of 1/n, the growth in FY2027 is likely to further improve. Further, private insurers are expected to expand their share of GDPI to 70% by FY2027, up from 68% in FY2025. Live Events In the previous financial year, the industry's GDPI growth moderated to 6.5% YoY from 15.5% because of a slowdown in economic activity and vehicle sales, coupled with the implementation of the 1/n method of accounting, which came into effect on October 1, 2024. Public vs private According to ICRA, private insurers are projected to experience better expansion. However, the growth for public sector insurers is forecast to remain moderate due to their weak capital position. 'The underwriting performance for private insurers is likely to improve, supported by better pricing discipline. Although the combined ratio for PSU insurers is expected to improve, it will remain weak, negatively affecting their net profitability,' it said. In the case of private insurers, the combined ratio worsened in FY2025 due to the higher loss ratio for a few insurers in the motor segment and a higher expense ratio driven by 1/n regulations for long-term policies. Despite this, their profitability improved compared to the previous year due to high realised gains on equity investments. Also Read: Irdai urges insurers to cover India, not just quote stats ICRA estimates a capital requirement of Rs 152–170 billion for the three PSUs (excluding New India Assurance ) by March 2026 to maintain a 1.50x solvency ratio. This assumes 100% forbearance on the Fair Value Change Account (FVCA). 'Solvency for the three PSU insurers (excluding New India) remains weak at negative 0.85 (excluding the fair value change account or FVCA on investments) as of December 2024 in relation to the regulatory requirement of 1.50x, resulting in a sizable capital requirement. Private players, however, remain comfortably capitalised to meet the strong growth,' the rating agency said.
Mint
6 days ago
- Mint
India must streamline rules for the institutional trustee industry
India's wealth management ecosystem is undergoing rapid transformation, with institutional trustees playing a pivotal role in safeguarding assets, enabling succession, and ensuring fiduciary compliance. Yet, the regulatory framework governing institutional trustees remains fragmented and outdated, exposing the system to significant risks. As the volume of wealth under institutional trusteeship soars—estimated in the range of tens of thousands of crores—there is a pressing need to establish robust, uniform regulations to protect all stakeholders and foster sustainable industry growth. Also Read: How PPFAS is trying to change wealth management with simple advice Institutional trustee services in the country are primarily governed by two main statutes: (i) The Indian Trusts Act, 1882, which provides the foundation for the creation, administration, and duties of trustees in private trusts; and (ii) SEBI (Debenture Trustee) Regulations, 1993, administered by the markets regulator, specifically governing debenture trustees. Despite these frameworks, there is no comprehensive, unified regulation or certification regime for all institutional trustees, especially those operating outside the debenture and securities space. This regulatory gap exposes the industry to inconsistencies and serious risks. Why institutionalization is the need of the hour Enhanced professional standards and accountability: Institutionalising the industry would introduce mandatory certification, training, and ongoing education, similar to how chartered accountants (CAs) are regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). CAs must pass rigorous exams, adhere to a code of ethics, and undergo regular peer reviews, ensuring high professional standards and accountability. This structure has led to greater public trust and fewer instances of malpractice in the accounting profession. Improved transparency and investor protection: A regulated institutional trustee industry would require robust disclosure norms, regular audits, and transparent reporting, reducing the risk of fraud, mismanagement, or conflicts of interest. As seen in the CA profession, regulatory oversight deters unethical behaviour and builds investor confidence. Uniformity in practices and reduced legal ambiguity: Currently, the lack of standardization leads to varying practices and legal uncertainties, particularly in private trusts and family offices. Regulation would harmonize procedures, documentation, and dispute resolution mechanisms, reducing litigation and confusion. Better risk management and systemic stability: With thousands of crores of wealth under trusteeship, unregulated practices pose systemic risks to the wealth management and financial services sectors. Regulation would enforce risk management protocols, capital adequacy norms, and contingency planning, safeguarding both beneficiaries and the broader economy. Also Read: Can this mid-cap company take the lead in the exploding $1.2 trillion wealth management business? Facilitated market growth and global competitiveness: A regulated and institutionalized trustee industry would attract more domestic and international capital, as investors prefer jurisdictions with clear rules and protections. This would enable Indian trustees to compete globally and foster innovation in trust structures and estate planning. International precedents: Lessons from abroad UK: The UK's trust industry is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which mandates licensing, compliance, and anti-money laundering checks. This has resulted in a transparent, reliable, and globally respected trustee sector. Singapore: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) regulates trust companies, ensuring high standards of governance and investor protection. This has made Singapore a preferred hub for wealth management and family offices. US: Trust companies are state-licensed and subject to regular audits and capital requirements, ensuring safety and soundness for beneficiaries. In all these jurisdictions, regulation and oversight has benefited all stakeholders—trustees, beneficiaries, and the financial system—by reducing fraud, enhancing professionalism, and boosting investor confidence Risks of delayed action in India If India does not move swiftly to institutionalize and regulate its institutional trustee industry, the following risks loom large: Increased incidents of fraud and mismanagement: Without oversight, unscrupulous operators can exploit loopholes, leading to financial losses for beneficiaries and reputational damage to the industry. Legal and operational risks: Ambiguities in trustee duties and the lack of oversight can result in costly legal disputes, delays, and reputational damage. Loss of investor confidence: High-profile scandals or disputes could deter both domestic and foreign investors from using Indian trustee services. Regulatory arbitrage: Inconsistent rules could lead to regulatory arbitrage, where entities exploit gaps between different legal frameworks, undermining the integrity of the financial system. Systemic risk: The sheer quantum of wealth under trusteeship—estimated to be in the range of several lakh crores—means that failures could have ripple effects across the financial sector. Competitive disadvantage internationally: India may lose out on attracting global capital and trust business if it does not adopt internationally recognised governance standards. Also Read: Mastering wealth management: The role of psychology in decision making and financial success The institutional trustee industry in India stands at a crossroads. While there are a handful of institutional trustees currently operating per global best practices, several are not. To protect the vast wealth under their stewardship and to foster a robust, transparent, and globally competitive wealth management ecosystem, there is an urgent need to institutionalize and regulate trusteeship. Establishing a certification or regulatory body would professionalize the sector, protect stakeholders, and unlock long-term benefits for trustees, mirroring successful international models and established Indian professional bodies. Tanmay Patnaik is partner-private client practice at Trilegal.
Mint
7 days ago
- Mint
Parag Parikh Mutual Fund's Rajeev Thakkar turns to debt: What's driving the shift in his personal portfolio?
Rajeev Thakkar, chief investment officer of PPFAS Mutual Fund (Parag Parikh Financial Advisory Services), oversees assets exceeding ₹1 trillion. Thakkar, 52, has built a solid track record over the years, with the Parag Parikh Flexicap Fund becoming the largest fund in its category. Incidentally, this is also the fund that Thakkar uses for his own equity investments. In this interaction with Mint for the 'Guru Portfolio series', Thakkar shares how he manages his personal investment portfolio and why his equity allocation has reduced. How has your personal investing and portfolio evolved over the past five years? Over the past five years, my portfolio has seen a shift, especially in the last one to two years. We've been cautious as a fund house, largely due to elevated valuations in the market, and this cautious approach has reflected in my personal investments as well. Most of my investments over the past 18–24 months have been in hybrid and arbitrage funds. Given my historically high exposure to equities and the fact that now am in my 50s, I have started rebalancing by allocating more to hybrids and arbitrage products. Also Read: What makes Mirae Asset's Swarup Mohanty paranoid about his retirement corpus Why have you taken a more cautious investment approach recently? Given that valuations are elevated, while stocks may deliver slightly better returns than bonds, I have opted for a more balanced approach. Within hybrids, I have allocated to a dynamic asset allocation fund. It also offers a long-term capital gains tax benefit: if the holding period is more than 24 months, capital gains are taxed at a flat 12.5%. What does your asset allocation look like? On debt allocation, it has increased significantly. It was 4-5% around 2020, but has now grown to around 12-13%. If I include the contingency and retirement funds, the fixed income component moves closer to 20%. Overall, there's been a clear rise in allocations toward hybrids and debt instruments. Gold has largely been in the form of jewellery. I haven't had explicit exposure to gold, but on auspicious days, some buying and some gifting happen for ceremonial reasons. The balance 80% is still in equities. Also Read: How Capitalmind's Deepak Shenoy covered shortfall in his son's education goalWhat did your portfolio look like five years ago? Can you give some context? Five years ago, debt was very limited. That period— around March to May 2020—coincided with the covid lows. Valuations were extremely attractive then, and even some of my debt allocation was tactically moved into equities. At that time, the portfolio was heavily tilted towards equities. How heavy was the equity allocation back then? It was quite high—equity allocation could have been around 95%. How has your portfolio performed? It has delivered 14% returns over the past year and 29% annualized returns over a five-year period. What is the current split between large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks in your equity portfolio? As a fund manager, I have publicly stated that valuations in the small- and mid-cap segments have generally been more elevated compared to large-cap companies. Because of this, the exposure to mid- and small-cap stocks in my equity portfolio, which is through the flexicap fund, is currently in the single digits (4%). The bulk of the fund's portfolio—60%—is invested in large-cap stocks. About 10% is in international stocks, and the balance is in cash. Also Read: Inside Edelweiss MF CEO Radhika Gupta's plan to build over ₹10-crore—and how she's investing to get there How has your international exposure changed? This allocation has been coming down over the years due to the RBI-imposed limits on mutual fund investments abroad. Recently, Parag Parikh Financial Services (PPFAS) set up a subsidiary in the Gift City, which will offer both inbound funds, as well as outbound funds for Indian residents to invest in global stocks. So, hopefully, I will be able to use that and invest some additional money internationally. What has been your approach to insurance? Now that my savings have built up adequately, there's no longer a need to continue term insurance coverage. I am in the last three years of my term cover. Even my health insurance coverage is slightly lower than the typical amount. Given this scenario, I've been building an emergency corpus—particularly for health or unexpected needs in post-retirement period—again through hybrids and arbitrage funds. How much coverage do you want to build for this post-retirement emergency fund? I have reached the basic target to meet my post-retirement lifestlyle needs. But I also need to build a post-retirement contingency fund as my personal medical cover is small in size. I have employer cover, but that would not come in handy in post-retirement period. For this emergency fund, which I am planning for health and other contingencies post-retirement, my goal is to accumulate a corpus of around ₹10 crore. How much is your family involved in investment decisions? My wife is also a finance professional working in the mutual fund industry, but is on the risk-management side. My family is very well aware of what is happening in my investment portfolio, but any investment decisions are largely left to me. My daughter, who is now 20, has also become a keen investor and manages a small portfolio of her own. Since a young age, she has been a regular at our annual general meetings with unitholders. She is an avid reader and also watches investment-related content we put out on YouTube regularly. She has already been to Berkshire Hathaway meetings multiple times, where she has had the opportunity to listen to investing greats such as Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger.
