
Zohran Mamdani, cutlery shaming, and America's Finger-Lickin' hypocrisy
It was ornamental. Like that crockery set, in a middle class household, exhibited in a glass cabinet in the drawing room.Indians love to eat with their hands. The West can never digest this fact (and also our street food). The day they have an elaborate meal with their entire family on the same table with more than three items prepared, they celebrate it as Thanksgiving. For us, it's a usual Tuesday. The age-old debate gained currency when the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, armed with Bollywood songs and socialism, was found eating with his bare hands. And, was subsequently told to be civilised or go back to the 'Third World' by a Congressman.Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands pic.twitter.com/FDaQfcNSJv— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 29, 2025advertisementIt's slightly hypocritical for a country whose second-largest restaurant chain's slogan is 'Finger Lickin' Good'. Why aren't they licking their spoons? Tough question.Once, Dr S Radhakrishnan, our former President, was having lunch with Winston Churchill. Just before lunch, our man excused himself to wash his hands, and came back to dig into his plate with his bare fingers. Churchill was not amused. He actually asked Dr Radhakrishnan to use cutlery as it was more hygienic.The man, whose birthday we celebrate as Teachers' Day, shot back: "Since nobody can use my hand to eat, my hand is more hygienic than any spoon or fork you use."ChatGPT would summarise the above reply in just two words - 'Fork you'. There is no scientific reasoning that validates one theory over the other. It's just convenient racism - an inability to accept people can be different, especially when they are taking your jobs. Moreover, Western diet has a lot of meat, often medium rare, which requires a knife to be cut into edible bits. The only reason you need a knife to have Indian food is when you are NOT planning to pay the restaurant bill.Seriously speaking, a fact that various British governor generals didn't realise is that Indian food is not served like food. It's served like ingredients. The food is then mixed and prepared on your plate. Be it a Rajasthani thali or a South Indian meal, there are at least seven to eight items to mix the rice, dal or sambar, rasam, vegetables, appalam, pickle and many more. All of it is mixed together, with your fingers, like an expert chaatwala, using the various spices from different bowls in different proportions, to create that perfect morsel, which is then sent to your mouth for further flavour processing. Moreover, the curry or rasam sticks to your fingers due to forces of adhesion, thanks to class 10 science, and hence it's easier to transport the flavour to your mouth.advertisementThis is what an Indian thaali is. You can't do all that with a knife and a fork. My entire childhood was spent believing that the knife was only there to spread butter over my toast.For us Indians, taste buds are in our fingers. You will feel it the next time you are having a golgappa. 50% of the taste is the texture. When the hawker hands you the fragile, imli water-filled poori while you already have one in your mouth, the fingers send the sensory signal to the brain that the next one is coming, and it is even more spicy. It's 'Finger Lickin' Good', to use their own words.advertisementMamdani, meanwhile, who wasn't finding many fans among the Indian diaspora in New York, suddenly is an eating-with-his-hands-racism martyr, and people like the author of this article, who aren't a big fan of his policies, are writing columns to defend him. The only hope is that his socialist ideas stay unused, like that spoon fitted on my friend's lunchbox. But who cares about the views of a Gurgaon resident, when the New Yorkers seem to be eating out of his hands.(Abhishek Asthana is the founder of a creative agency – GingerMonkey. He tweets as @GabbbarSingh)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
UNSC report links TRF to attack in Pahalgam
The United Nations Security Council has for the first time, named The Resistance Front, a front for Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba in a document, linking the group to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, a development that is being seen as a diplomatic win for India. Indian soldiers trek back after a search operation around Baisaran meadow, a day after an attack on tourists in Pahalgam, on April 23, 2025. (AFP) The biannual report from the Security Council's monitoring team for sanctions on al-Qaeda and Islamic State clearly linked TRF to the Pahalgam attack and warned that terrorist groups could exploit tensions between India and Pakistan. 'On 22 April, five terrorists attacked a tourist spot in Pahalgam, in Jammu and Kashmir. Twenty-six civilians were killed. The attack was claimed that same day by The Resistance Front (TRF), who in parallel published a photograph of the attack site,' the report said. 'The claim of responsibility was repeated the following day. On 26 April, however, TRF retracted its claim. There was no further communication from TRF, and no other group claimed responsibility. Regional relations remain fragile. There is a risk that terrorist groups may exploit these regional tensions,' it said. The report comes in the wake of a July 17 move by the US to designate TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist, citing the Pahalgam terror attack. When the UN Security Council issued a press statement three days after the Pahalgam attack on April 22 that killed 26 civilians, Pakistan – currently a non-permanent member of the body – blocked any reference to TRF or even to Pahalgam. Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar subsequently said in Parliament that the country had removed any reference to TRF in the statement. Dar, however, changed his position after the US designation of TRF as a terrorist organization, and said Pakistan has no objections to this. The UNSC report stated, without naming specific countries, that one UN member state said the attack 'could not have happened without Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) support, and that there was a relationship between LeT and TRF', while another member state said the 'attack was carried out by TRF, which was synonymous with LeT'. People familiar with the matter said on condition of anonymity that these two countries were India and the US. In an obvious reference to Pakistan, the UN Security Council report said: 'Yet one member state rejected these views and said that LeT was defunct.' Pakistan has for long taken the official position that LeT is 'defunct' since authorities imposed a ban on it. However, the group continues to be active in many cities and regions of Pakistan, raising funds and recruiting cadres while maintaining a low profile. The people cited above said the latest UN report is notable as all decisions of the 1267 Sanctions Committee, including monitoring team reports, are adopted by consensus by members of the Security Council. 'In other words, Pakistan was unable to prevent a reference to TRF in the report, as they had done in the case of the press statement in April,' a person said. The 1267 Sanctions Committee monitors sanctions on al-Qaeda, Islamic State and their affiliates. LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) are included under the purview of the 1267 Sanctions Committee because of their links to al-Qaeda dating back to the 1990s. The people said it was also notable that Pakistan's close ally China, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, had not stepped in to block any reference to TRF or LeT in the UN report. In the past, China intervened on behalf of Pakistan to block the listing of Pakistani terrorists at the UN Security Council using what is known as a 'technical hold' or request for more information. In the case of JeM chief Masood Azhar, China blocked his listing by the Security Council for almost a decade before lifting its hold in 2019. 'The inclusion of TRF in the UN report has punctured Pakistan's strategy of plausible deniability by using secular and modern names such as The Resistance Front and People Against Fascist Front for its jihadi proxies. This was done to divert attention from LeT and JeM and give an indigenous guise to its terrorist activities in Jammu and Kashmir,' a second person said. The LeT and Pakistan-based terror groups have found mention in the monitoring team's report after several years. Following the Pahalgam attack, a team of Indian officials travelled to the US in mid-May and briefed the monitoring team of the 1267 Sanctions Committee and other partner countries on the activities of TRF and presented a dossier on the group. The team also met representatives of the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT) and Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) as part of efforts to get TRF designated as a global terror group by the Security Council. India had also provided information about TRF's role and its links to LeT in half-yearly reports to the monitoring team in May and November 2024. Before this, the monitoring team was informed by the Indian side in December 2023 about the LeT and JeM operating in Jammu and Kashmir through groups such as TRF. On May 7, India carried out military strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir under Operation Sindoor in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. This triggered four days of intense strikes and counter-strikes by the two countries using drones, missiles and long-range weapons before they reached an understanding on halting military actions on May 10.


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump hits India with 25% tariff plus a Russia penalty
Even as India and the US negotiate a trade agreement, President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods from August 1, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia. In a post on social media platform Truth Social, Trump said India has 'the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country'. India's Commerce and Industry Ministry said the government had taken note of Trump's statement and is 'studying its implications'. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs,' the ministry said in a statement. The government will take 'all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the ministry said. Hours later, Trump hardened the rhetoric. Speaking to reporters in the White House after his announcement, Trump also took note of India's BRICS membership, terming the bloc as 'an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar'. 'Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business with us. They sell a lot to us but we don't buy from them…because the tariffs are so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now, we will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or whether we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week,' Trump said. The announcement of the 25 per cent tariff plus a 'penalty' comes ahead of the visit of US officials to India later next month on August 25 for the next round of negotiations over the proposed bilateral trade agreement. The fifth round of talks between India and US were concluded last week in Washington. Trump's decision to announce the tariff and penalty on Indian goods comes two days before his August 1 deadline, when the reciprocal tariffs announced on several countries will come into effect. The decision to announce the 25 per cent tariff is being seen as a way to pressure India into agreeing to the demands made by the US. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was reported to have said on Wednesday that Trump has been frustrated with how the trade deal negotiations with India have gone and 'believes his 25 per cent tariff announcement will help the situation,' news agency Reuters reported. At 25 per cent, the tariff on India is just below the 26 per cent reciprocal rate Trump had announced in early April. However, it is higher than the levels agreed between the US and Asian countries such as Vietnam (20 per cent) and Indonesia (19 per cent). In his post on Truth Social, the US President also said that India would face a 'penalty' in addition to the 25 per cent tariff because of its imports of Russian energy items and defence equipment. The proposed 'penalty' for the import of Russian goods marks the first use of secondary tariffs by the US. 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST,' Trump said in his post. India's import of crude oil from Russia has surged in recent years, rising to 35-40 per cent of its total purchases from less than 1 per cent prior to the invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, which sent global crude oil prices sharply higher. After China, India is the second-largest buyer of Russian crude oil. Historically, India's oil purchases have primarily been from Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The size of the 'penalty' announced by Trump was not immediately known. According to Reuters, Kevin Hassett told reporters on Wednesday that Trump and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer 'will have more information 'shortly' on the additional penalty'. 'Massive trade deficit' In a second post on Truth Social minutes after he announced the 25 per cent tariff, Trump said the US has a 'MASSIVE TRADE DEFICIT WITH INDIA!!!' In 2024, the total goods trade between India and the US stood at $129.2 billion. While the US' exports to India in calendar year 2024 rose 3.4 per cent to $41.8 billion from 2023, its imports from India increased by 4.5 per cent to $87.4 billion, resulting in a goods trade deficit of $45.7 billion. The deficit was 5.4 per cent higher than in 2023. India's main exports to the US included drug formulations and biologicals, telecom instruments, precious and semi-precious stones, petroleum products, vehicle and auto components, gold and other precious metal jewellery, readymade cotton garments, and iron and steel products. Meanwhile, its main imports include crude oil, petroleum products, coal, cut and polished diamonds, electric machinery, and aircraft, among others. The US President has cited a deficit with its trade partners as a negative for the world's largest economy, calling for fairer trade relations. The Trump administration has hence aggressively pursued trade agreements with various countries, signing one with the European Union (EU) earlier this week. As part of the trade deal, imports from the EU into the US will face a tariff of 15 per cent and will see American goods get 'unprecedented levels of market access', according to the White House. Further, the EU will purchase $750 billion of US energy goods and invest $600 billion in the US by 2028. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Don't elect Muslim immigrants': Islamophobic attacks follow NFL headquarters mass shooting after Muslim NYPD officer gets killed
The tragic shooting on Park Avenue has ignited a wave of political disinformation (Getty Images) A tragic mass shooting on Park Avenue in Manhattan has become the latest flashpoint for political disinformation, with far-right voices attempting to link the attack to Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani—despite no evidence connecting him to the crime. The incident, which claimed four lives including an NYPD officer, quickly turned into a digital battlefield fueled by Islamophobic rhetoric and political fearmongering. Right-wing figures falsely blame Mamdani despite lack of evidence In the chaotic aftermath of the shooting, conspiracy theorists and conservative commentators pounced. Far-right personality Laura Loomer accused Mamdani of inspiring 'a generation of pro-Islamic cop killers,' writing on X, 'This is why you don't elect Muslim immigrants to office.' Other voices resurfaced old statements from Mamdani about defunding the police—remarks he has since walked back—to question his legitimacy as a public servant. This narrative gained traction online before facts could surface, despite the real story being far different. One of the victims was Officer Didarul Islam, a Muslim Bangladeshi immigrant and father of two, who was working security when he was fatally shot. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch called him 'a hero,' saying, 'He made the ultimate sacrifice, shot in cold blood… He died as he lived: a hero.' Muslim communities mourn while fighting rising hate In the Bronx, where Officer Islam lived, the Bangladeshi community gathered in solidarity. Nurul Islam, a community leader and friend of the fallen officer, dismissed the online hate: 'The killer is the killer. He doesn't care who is Muslim, who is non-Muslim.' Zohran Mamdani , currently visiting Uganda, responded with empathy, tweeting: 'I'm heartbroken to learn of the horrific shooting in midtown… Grateful for all of our first responders.' Supporters, including Councilwoman Shahana Hanif, blasted the bigoted narratives: 'This bigoted rhetoric dishonors the lives we lost and endangers our Muslim communities.' The Council on American-Islamic Relations condemned the online hate, calling it 'blind hatred' and demanding accountability for spreading false narratives in times of tragedy. Also Read: 'Study my brain please': Shooter in NYC accused NFL of CTE, demanded brain study in suicide note after Manhattan massacre FAQs 1. Was Zohran Mamdani involved in the Park Avenue shooting ? No, there is no evidence linking him to the attack. 2. Who was Officer Didarul Islam? A Muslim NYPD officer and father, killed while working security during the shooting. 3. Why are people blaming Zohran Mamdani for the Park Avenue shooting? Right-wing commentators used his religion and past statements to push anti-Muslim narratives. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!