logo
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle accused of hypocrisy after appointing their own ‘royal' court of staffers

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle accused of hypocrisy after appointing their own ‘royal' court of staffers

Yahoo6 days ago

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been accused of fueling hypocrisy after they introduced their own new 'royal' court of staffers to take charge of their fractured public image.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who quit royal life in 2020 and moved across the pond, have restructured their staff roster that now bears a striking resemblance to the royal family's own royal court, the Daily Mail reports.
The new revamp will see communications strategist Meredith Kendall Maines front a team of 11 — with the small-but-mighty organization being based in Montecito, Calif., and the UK.
The operation is said to run totally independently of Archewell, which Harry, 40, and the 'Suits' alum, 43, founded in October 2020.
But the move has since been slammed by top royal commentators and historians, with expert Richard Fitzwilliams arguing that the pair appear to be inching back to their royal days, despite repeatedly criticizing life in the palace.
'The hypocrisy lies in the act that Harry has, especially in his most recent interview, attacked courtiers and the Royal Household, considering them enemies. So it is extremely surprising that he should want a similar structure in Montecito,' Fitswilliams told the Daily Mail.
'In 'Spare,' he excoriated senior courtiers. He, as his mother did, regards them as the enemy.'
He went on, 'The difference is, tragically, that she would not accept police protection as she distrusted it so. Ironically, it's what he wants for himself and his family. He also claimed courtiers or their equivalent used security as a lever to prevent them stepping down as senior working royals.
'So the 'Montecito model' better be different and they would be wise to pay attention to its advice.'
Fitzwilliams' sentiment was echoed by royal expert Tom Bower, who said the new reshuffle is nothing but the couple's last-ditch 'desperate bid to save their brand.'
'Undoubtedly, the Sussexes would like to rule over a 'royal court' from their Montecito mansion,' Bower told the outlet. 'Nothing would give them greater pleasure than courtiers pulling their forelocks as they bow and scrape to please the Duke and Duchess.'
'Competing with Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace would delight Meghan. But what the Sussexes have assembled is not a 'royal court,'' he said, adding that it's 'a hugely expensive group of bureaucrats signaling the Sussexes' final, desperate bid to save their brand.'
Bower noted that should the Invictus Games founder follow the As Ever founder's move to commercialize his title, 'his currently minimal chance of reconciliation and return to Britain will be totally extinguished.'
Elsewhere, Fitzwilliams cast doubt on just how successful the operation will be, given the couple's extensive history of a 'revolving door' of staffers.
'We are promised new projects and initiatives in the months to come and obviously can then judge the success of this revamp,' he told the outlet.
'However there are question marks which have haunted the Sussexes entire operation. The first issue is whether the high staff turnover which has characterized their ventures continues, with some 20 having left.'
The new restructure means that now the 'Spare' author and former actress each have their own chief of staff.
'Chief Communications Officer, Meredith Maines, has retained the global firm, Method Communications, to bolster her team overseeing the growing business portfolio and philanthropic efforts of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex,' a spokesperson for the Sussexes told The Post.
'The team in the US will be led by Executive Vice Presidents Clay Blackham, Erin Grant and Senior Vice President Casey Adams and in the UK by Senior Media Counsel Liam Maguire.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MobLand: Who Should Run the Show in a Potential Season 2?
MobLand: Who Should Run the Show in a Potential Season 2?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

MobLand: Who Should Run the Show in a Potential Season 2?

Paramount+ hasn't yet renewed MobLand for a second season. But as Tom Hardy's Harry proved time and again in the show's inaugural run, it helps to stay a few steps ahead of the game. More from TVLine MobLand Finale Recap: The Harrigan Rat, Revealed! Plus: Grade the Episode Criminal Minds: The Surprising Story Behind That Shocking Will Scene Criminal Minds: A.J. Cook Opens Up About JJ's Loss, Her Real-Life Sons Playing 'Big Emotions,' and Negotiating That Brief Cameo So with that in mind, we've pulled together a little power ranking ahead of a potential Season 2. Season 1 wrapped Sunday with an episode that revealed the identity of the family's mole (R.I.P., lawyer O'Hara!), put a permanent end to the family's biggest competitor (R.I.P., Richie Stevenson!) and outed Conrad as Eddie's biological father (R.I.P., Kevin's sense of loyalty!). By the end, both Maeve and Conrad were behind bars — though eyeing a speedy release — and Kevin had declared himself the new head of the family. In case you missed the finale, you can read a full recap here. Below, scroll through the Harrigan (and Harrigan-adjacent) characters who were not offed during the show's first season; our choice for Season 2 boss is at the very bottom. Scroll through, then hit the comments with the character you'd pick and why! We feel for Jan and Harry's teen daughter, whose schooling and social life was uprooted thanks to her father's choice of profession. But snogging Eddie Harrigan shows an exceptional lack of common sense. And after all, she's just a kid! Her inclusion on this list is merely academic: She's not in the running to take anything over (except maybe her GCSE Psychology exam). Much like his daughter, Harry's wife never signed up for a life steeped in danger and crime, and likely has zero designs on getting in deeper than she currently is. She's not exactly cut out for the secrecy and isolation (see also: Alice), though — as the final moments of the season finale and Harry's bloody pec showed us — she's not above a little violence, unintentional though it was. Tattersall is a highly intelligent, if incredibly dirty, cop who rode the Stevenson gravy train to its final stop. Now that Richie's dead, who's to say that Tattersall won't ingratiate himself into the Harrigan organization in Season 2? And once inside, whose to say he couldn't mastermind a takeover of his own? A lot of characters, his wife included, spent Season 1 talking about how Conrad Harrigan is no longer the man he once was. And maybe that's true: His behavior was erratic at best all season, and his temper tantrums tended to end in body counts. Plus, does the guy have a blind spot for Maeve or what? Still, we wouldn't count Pierce Brosnan's character out in Season 2: The man that had his entire cell block cheering for him at the end of the finale has still got a lot of juice left in his lemon. He's so rich that very little has meaning, and he's so violent that committing murder at his grandmother's behest didn't faze him a bit. Now that he knows he's been lied to about his parentage for his entire life? We easily could see Conrad's grandson — er, son — funneling all of his aggression into a play to head the family… backed, of course, by his twisted, doting Nan. Let's call a spade a spade: Maeve pretty much ran the Harrigan family for the entirety of Season 1. Who had Eddie kill Tommy? Who encouraged Conrad to kill Archie? Who was behind Vron's explosive death? Who wasn't afraid to put her own son in danger in order to exterminate Seraphina? The answer to all of these questions is the brassy broad who belted 'Twenty Men From Dublin' even as police were taking her into custody. Maeve has the smarts and the cunning to assume control of the family business — but more importantly, she's got the do-anything swagger/borderline psychotic nature necessary for the job. Before the Season 1 finale, we probably would've cast a vote for Kevin to take the top spot: He seemed the most even-keeled of the Harrigan children, and his conscience also seemed the most intact. We… wouldn't cast that vote now. Kevin is clearly having a delayed (though highly warranted) reaction to the rape and trauma he experienced as a much younger man, and that stew of emotion seems to be guiding every choice he's making — including out-and-out threatening his father's seat of power in the family. Did we love seeing Kev stand up to his lecherous old man? We did. Do we think it bodes well for him once Conrad is no longer behind bars? No, no we do not. Harry's hired henchwoman is street-smart, efficient and effective. She knows her role and does it well. While it would be a huge jump to Harrigan CEO, we could easily see her slipping into Harry's position if/when he ever ascends within the organization. As Pierce Brosnan told us earlier in the season, Harry 'is my son, in some regards,' and the Harrigan family fixer would be Conrad's pick if the old man was pressed to choose a successor. Can you blame him? Harry is smart, discreet, tough, strategic and incredibly loyal — even when it puts the lives of his family in danger, as it did during that season-ending conversation with Kat. Perhaps Harry's best attribute? He's not a shoot-first-think-later hothead, as so many of the Harrigans are, which instantly puts him well ahead of the competition. Conrad's love child got herself into a spot of bother with that whole Antwerp debacle, which was borne of the probably-not-wise choice to go into business with her feckless brother, Brendan. But aside from that, we love that she seems to have her father's killer instinct but very little of the family loyalty that so often proves a weakness. Take that conversation with Kat in the season finale, for instance: Boss move! While we agree with Brosnan that Harry likely will wind up running the Harrigan empire, we wouldn't mind watching Seraphina take it for a spin in Season 2. Best of TVLine Young Sheldon Easter Eggs: Every Nod to The Big Bang Theory (and Every Future Reveal) Across 7 Seasons Weirdest TV Crossovers: Always Sunny Meets Abbott, Family Guy vs. Simpsons, Nine-Nine Recruits New Girl and More ER Turns 30: See the Original County General Crew, Then and Now

Prince Harry Spoke to Princess Diana's Brother About Changing His Last Name to Spencer & I'm Floored By the Prospect
Prince Harry Spoke to Princess Diana's Brother About Changing His Last Name to Spencer & I'm Floored By the Prospect

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Prince Harry Spoke to Princess Diana's Brother About Changing His Last Name to Spencer & I'm Floored By the Prospect

When I first saw the headlines, I took it with a grain of salt: Over the weekend, The Mail on Sunday reported that Prince Harry spoke with his uncle, Charles Spencer, about the idea of dropping his royal last name of Mountbatten-Windsor in favor of using his late mother Princess Diana's surname, Spencer, instead. But could it really be true? As with many royal things, the sources felt spotty, but as more and more publications picked up the news, the gravity of the Duke of Sussex even considering a move like that hit me: The state of royal relations between father and son (and William) must be bleaker than we ever all, the move—which Diana's brother, Charles Spencer, is said to have talked Harry out of, according to the reports—would have also affected his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, who are currently sixth and seventh in line to the British throne. (For example, it would have changed Lilibet's name from Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor to Lilibet Diana Spencer.) It also would have read like a royal mic drop and a permanent and symbolic severing of any remaining familial get me wrong: We already know that the state of Harry's relationship, specifically with his father King Charles, is practically non-existent in the wake of the Duke of Sussex's battle for U.K.-based security, per his recent interview with the BBC. But the idea that he would adopt his mother's last name feels like a blow that would remove all associations with the House of Windsor, not to mention chart a path that he couldn't take back. (That said, to formally align his identity with Diana's would not only carry a great deal of meaning for Harry, it would make sense given how similarly their life trajectories inside—but especially outside of—the royal sphere seem to align.)As for Charles Spencer's role, reports state that the 9th Earl Spencer—who recently saw Harry during a rare visit to the U.K. to attend the funeral of his uncle, Robert Fellowes, last year—talked him out of it and told Harry that the legal challenges to a decision like that would be 'insurmountable.' (Both William and Harry are notably close with Diana's brother.) Of course, this isn't the only name change drama that's cropped up for the Sussexes as of late. When Meghan Markle's recent Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, first debuted, much was made about her revelation to actress Mindy Kaling about changing her last name to Sussex—a move that solidified her family's collective identity, even if it wasn't formalized. 'I love that that is something that Archie, Lili, H and I all have together. It means a lot to me,' she shared. To be clear, based on reports, it sounds like Harry was just putting feelers out. (It's also good to know he has someone like Charles Spencer to lean on in times like this.) But a move like that would be major—and, sadly, speaks volumes about where things currently stand. Prince Harry Just Gave a Rare (& Emotional) Interview About the Royal Family

Princess Diana's Letter Two Days After Her Wedding Reveals Early Issues in Marriage To King Charles
Princess Diana's Letter Two Days After Her Wedding Reveals Early Issues in Marriage To King Charles

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Princess Diana's Letter Two Days After Her Wedding Reveals Early Issues in Marriage To King Charles

A letter Princess Diana sent two days after marrying King Charles III in 1981 speaks volumes about the early stages of their marriage. The letter is one of 300 pieces available for auction by Julien's Auctions. The extraordinary collection, Princess Diana's Style & A Royal Collection, is one of the largest auctions of items that once belonged to the late Princess of Wales in history. More from SheKnows Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Reportedly Considered Another Last Name Before Embracing Sussex Dated July 31, 1981, the letter is from Diana to Mark Simpson, a footman at Buckingham Palace, whom she appears to be thanking for helping her early transition into life in the Royal Family. The letter reads, 'Dear Mark, I just wanted to thank you for all your kindness + patience you've showed towards me since I moved into B.P. My stay was made so much easier by your company as it was so terribly lonely + we had so many laughs for that I can't thank you enough. Do hope you were able to enjoy Wednesday + that you liked my dress? I'm off to Britainia tomorrow, what with all those men around. I will have to keep a watchful eye on Evelyn! The bad news is that I haven't eaten any cereal — sob. How am I going to cope without my bowls of cereal….[smiley face]. A large thank you for being you — Much love, Diana.' Just days after marrying the then-prince in a lavish London ceremony that was watched by upwards of 700 million people around the world, Diana makes no mention of her new husband and instead discusses feeling 'terribly lonely' in her new home. 'It's like a couple of days after she got married. She'd been living in Buckingham Palace as she was transitioning from being a normal person to being a royal and the future queen,' Martin Nolan, co-founder and executive director of Julien's Auction, told People about the letter. 'So she had to learn from the Queen Mother and the Queen about curtsying and all that. But she had fun with Mark Simpson, the footman. And he was about the same age, a little bit older than her,' Nolan adds. 'And she talks here, it speaks of how she was lonely when she was in the palace.' The letter shows early signs of distance between Diana, who turned 20 weeks before her wedding, and her 32-year-old husband Charles. The couple would go on to welcome sons William and Harry in 1982 and 1984, respectively, before separating in of SheKnows All the Men Marilyn Monroe Reportedly Had Relationships With Throughout Her Short Life 30 Photos of Marilyn Monroe's Too-Short Life, From 1947-1962 Every Time Heidi Klum's Gorgeous, Colorful Fashion Choices Stopped Us in Our Tracks

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store