logo
Are sector funds worth the hype? Not for most investors

Are sector funds worth the hype? Not for most investors

Mint26-05-2025

Rising geopolitical tensions—from Indo-Pak border strains to Trump-era tariff shocks—are prompting investors to rethink where to park their money. As global uncertainty deepens, the spotlight is shifting away from sectors like IT and pharma and turning toward manufacturing and capital-expenditure-led industries, especially in India.
Investing in popular sectors or themes with the hope of beating the market can sound like a smart strategy. But in reality, consistently outperforming a diversified portfolio through active sector or thematic bets is as difficult as timing the market—often with results no better than a coin toss.
The challenges of picking winners
Sectors can appear attractive due to a mix of factors: regulatory changes, new product launches, global trade shifts, interest rate movements, government policies, or temporary commodity and currency disruptions. But understanding how these macroeconomic forces interact—while also evaluating company-specific aspects like leadership and execution—is no easy task, especially for retail investors.
As a result, most retail investors tend to make sectoral or thematic investment decisions based on two things: recent market performance of the sector, or media hype fuelled by product launches or industry narratives.
Also read: How red tape is costing public sector bank employees crores in NPS savings
Boom, bust, repeat
The stock market is forward-looking—it often prices in expectations long before actual results show up. This creates a cycle of booms and busts across sectors:
IT stocks soared between 1997–1999 (NSE IT Index: +173%, +193%, +493%), only to crash in the following three years (-35%, -36%, -6% from 2000–2002).
Pharma had a strong run from 2012 to 2015 (+32%, +26%, +42%, +10%) and then posted four straight years of negative returns (-14%, -7%, -8%, -9%).
Infrastructure, real estate, power, and NBFCs saw massive gains before events like the Global Financial Crisis or IL&FS collapse triggered steep declines.
Chemical stocks surged in 2020 and 2021 (+46% and +69%) but have since delivered lukewarm single-digit returns.
Even if an investor correctly identifies a sector on the rise, they still need to exit before the tide turns. That means getting both the entry and the exit right—a double challenge. Statistically, if the odds of one correct decision are 50%, the chances of nailing both fall to just 25%.
The limits of sectoral funds
One of the key limitations of sectoral investing is the narrow mandate that many of these funds operate under. Since sectoral funds are bound to invest only within a specific sector—say, IT or pharma—fund managers have little flexibility.
They are often forced to include nearly all companies in that sector, regardless of quality. This reduces the manager's ability to generate alpha through stock selection. As a result, the fund's performance is almost entirely driven by how the overall sector performs, not by active fund management.
Also read: Are sector rotation funds the answer to risks of sector downturns?
A smarter approach for retail investors
A more robust strategy, particularly for retail investors, lies in diversified portfolios managed by professionals who can actively adjust sector weights as market conditions evolve.
For conservative or first-time investors, it is advisable to start with broad-based investment options such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), index funds, or diversified equity mutual funds that automatically spread risk across sectors and market caps.
Aggressive or more experienced investors can consider a core-satellite strategy—where 75% or more of the equity allocation is invested in diversified funds (like flexi-cap or multi-cap funds), and the remaining 25% is deployed tactically in sectoral or thematic funds based on strong, well-researched convictions.
Even here, thematic funds may be safer than pure sectoral funds, as they cut across industries. For instance, a 'capex" fund might include exposure to cement, utilities, auto, power, and real estate—providing broader diversification while still capturing a specific investment theme.
Be careful with sector-specific funds. It's hard for individual investors to consistently pick winning sectors better than professional fund managers. You might end up disappointed.
Instead, it's often smarter to let professional fund managers make these active choices within a diversified fund. This gives you much better chances of success.
Also read: Why balanced advantage funds are back in focus for moderate risk investors
Nishant Agarwal, senior managing partner, ASK Private Wealth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pak hikes defence spending by 20% in budget amid tense relations with India
Pak hikes defence spending by 20% in budget amid tense relations with India

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pak hikes defence spending by 20% in budget amid tense relations with India

Pakistan on Tuesday increased its defence budget by 20 per cent, allocating PRs. 2,550 billion (USD 9 billion) for the fiscal year 2025-26, amid tensions with India. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the PRs. (Pakistani Rupees) 17,573 billion worth federal budget for the fiscal year 2025–26 in the National Assembly. He also presented the budget document as a finance bill in the National Assembly. In his speech, the minister said that the government has 'decided to allocate PRs. 2,550 for the defence of the country'. He didn't provide any further details about the defence spending as traditionally the defence budget is not discussed by the parliament. Last year, the government allocated PRs. 2,122 billion for defence, reflecting a 14.98 per cent increase over PRs. 1,804 billion budgeted for the fiscal year 2023-24. 'This budget is being presented at a historic time when the nation showed unity [and] determination,' the minister said at the start while mentioning the recent Pak-India conflict. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. The on-ground hostilities from the Indian and Pakistan sides that lasted for four days ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. The defence sector expenses are the second-biggest component of the annual expenditure after the debt payments. The government allocated PRs. 8,207 billion for debt servicing, which constitutes the single biggest expense. The increase in the defence expenditure is expected to get the broad support of the lawmakers during the budget debate and voting on the finance bill. Aurangzeb also announced a 4.2 per cent GDP growth target for the economy which is higher than the 2.7 per cent achieved in the current year ending on June 30. He said that debt and interest servicing would cost PRs. 8,207 billion. Other key expenses include PRs. 971 billion for civil administration, PRs. 1,186 billion for subsidies, PRs. 1,055 billion for pensions and PRs. 1,000 billion for the Public Sector Development Programme. He said that the target for inflation was 7.5 per cent and the fiscal deficit target was 3.9 per cent as the government also announced to contain the deficit and achieve a primary surplus. The minister said that the government has set an ambitious tax collection target for the Federal Board of Revenue at PRs. 14,131 billion, an 8.95 per cent increase from last year's goal. Aurangzeb said that the main success of the government was that inflation was reduced to 4.7 per cent in the outgoing fiscal whereas it was 29.2 per cent two years ago, while the government achieved a current account surplus of USD 1.5 billion. He said the forex reserves will touch USD 14 billion by the end of the year and remittances were expected to reach USD 38 billion.

Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud
Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud

NDTV

time31 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud

It was the third week of Donald Trump's second term in the Oval Office. His most trusted lieutenant, Elon Musk, led a massive initiative, Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE), to slash federal spending. On February 7, the billionaire, who spent roughly $300 million on the Republican candidate's election campaign, posted on X, "I love@realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man." Much water has flown under the bridge since Musk proclaimed his love for Trump. Almost everything has changed. The Tesla CEO is no longer a part of the Trump administration, and the duo has had an ugly fallout, all in public. And now, Musk has blinked, admitting he went "too far" in his recent online attacks against Trump. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week," the Tesla CEO wrote on X. "They went too far." The feud started after Musk called Trump's tax bill a "disgusting abomination." It quickly spiralled, with the billionaire suggesting the President be impeached and accusing the government of hiding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex offender. Timeline: The Trump-Musk Feud May 29 Elon Musk announced he would be stepping down from his role in the Trump administration after finishing his term as a special government employee. He led DoGE. June 2 Donald Trump defended his landmark economic proposal, known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill," on Truth Social, "Many false statements are being made about our big, beautiful bill." June 3 Elon Musk posted a fiery critique of Trump's spending bill. "I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he wrote on X. He added in a follow-up post, "It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." June 4 Elon Musk suggested Congress needs to write a new bill. "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS," he said. June 5 Musk asked to " Kill the bill." "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." The same day, in response to Trump saying Musk was upset over EV subsidy cuts, Musk posted, "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." "In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that is both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" "Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way." Then came the bombshell. "Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!," Musk wrote in an X post, which he later deleted. Musk even appeared to support Trump's impeachment. At the White House, Trump replied, "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more. Very disappointed in Elon." He also revealed Musk was "aware" of the bill. Musk shot back, "False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress would even read it!" Then came more jabs. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude," he said. "The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion," he added. He even proposed a new party, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk also dug up Trump's old 2012-2013 tweets slamming government overspending, calling him out and asking, "Where is this guy today??" June 6 Trump fired back on Truth Social. He wrote, "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" He added, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts". He also said, "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago." Elon Musk said, "If this bill passes, we will decommission our Dragon capsules and halt cooperation with NASA's deep space initiatives." He later took back his words. Musk also posted, "Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year." Asked about Musk in an ABC interview, Donald Trump said, "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" He also warned of "serious consequences" if Musk supports Democrats in 2026, and said he had no plans to reconcile. Later that day, Musk appeared to soften. Replying to billionaire Bill Ackman's peace offer, he said, " You're not wrong." June 10 Trump told reporters, "I just wish [Musk] well." Musk responded to the video with a red heart emoji on X. June 11

Major Chinese maker of rare-earth magnets gets green light for US exports
Major Chinese maker of rare-earth magnets gets green light for US exports

Business Standard

time32 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Major Chinese maker of rare-earth magnets gets green light for US exports

JL Mag Rare-Earth Co. said that officials approved a certain number of export applications, and the company had permits for regions including the US, Europe and Southeast Asia Bloomberg A major Chinese manufacturer of rare-earth magnets received export permits to countries including the US, in a possible sign of easing tensions between Beijing and Washington. JL Mag Rare-Earth Co. said that officials approved a certain number of export applications, and the company had permits for regions including the US, Europe and Southeast Asia, according to a statement on Wednesday. Its Hong Kong-listed shares surged as much as 12 per cent, hitting the highest intraday level since 2022. Rare earths have been at the center of the debilitating trade war between the US and China, with Beijing leveraging its control of the sector to push back against the Trump administration given that local producers account for about 70 per cent of global supply. High-level talks between Beijing and Washington in London this week saw the sides agree a plan to revive the flow of sensitive goods. The commodities have an array of critical applications, making them vital for the auto industry, turbine makers, as well as some niche defence needs. After the negotiations, US officials said they 'absolutely expect' issues around shipments of rare-earth minerals and magnets to be resolved. The framework pact reached in the UK is subject to approvals from both countries' presidents. Some Chinese suppliers to US companies recently received six-month export licenses for rare earths, but uncertainty remained amid a large backlog of applications, the American Chamber of Commerce in China said last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store