logo
Are sector funds worth the hype? Not for most investors

Are sector funds worth the hype? Not for most investors

Mint26-05-2025

Rising geopolitical tensions—from Indo-Pak border strains to Trump-era tariff shocks—are prompting investors to rethink where to park their money. As global uncertainty deepens, the spotlight is shifting away from sectors like IT and pharma and turning toward manufacturing and capital-expenditure-led industries, especially in India.
Investing in popular sectors or themes with the hope of beating the market can sound like a smart strategy. But in reality, consistently outperforming a diversified portfolio through active sector or thematic bets is as difficult as timing the market—often with results no better than a coin toss.
The challenges of picking winners
Sectors can appear attractive due to a mix of factors: regulatory changes, new product launches, global trade shifts, interest rate movements, government policies, or temporary commodity and currency disruptions. But understanding how these macroeconomic forces interact—while also evaluating company-specific aspects like leadership and execution—is no easy task, especially for retail investors.
As a result, most retail investors tend to make sectoral or thematic investment decisions based on two things: recent market performance of the sector, or media hype fuelled by product launches or industry narratives.
Also read: How red tape is costing public sector bank employees crores in NPS savings
Boom, bust, repeat
The stock market is forward-looking—it often prices in expectations long before actual results show up. This creates a cycle of booms and busts across sectors:
IT stocks soared between 1997–1999 (NSE IT Index: +173%, +193%, +493%), only to crash in the following three years (-35%, -36%, -6% from 2000–2002).
Pharma had a strong run from 2012 to 2015 (+32%, +26%, +42%, +10%) and then posted four straight years of negative returns (-14%, -7%, -8%, -9%).
Infrastructure, real estate, power, and NBFCs saw massive gains before events like the Global Financial Crisis or IL&FS collapse triggered steep declines.
Chemical stocks surged in 2020 and 2021 (+46% and +69%) but have since delivered lukewarm single-digit returns.
Even if an investor correctly identifies a sector on the rise, they still need to exit before the tide turns. That means getting both the entry and the exit right—a double challenge. Statistically, if the odds of one correct decision are 50%, the chances of nailing both fall to just 25%.
The limits of sectoral funds
One of the key limitations of sectoral investing is the narrow mandate that many of these funds operate under. Since sectoral funds are bound to invest only within a specific sector—say, IT or pharma—fund managers have little flexibility.
They are often forced to include nearly all companies in that sector, regardless of quality. This reduces the manager's ability to generate alpha through stock selection. As a result, the fund's performance is almost entirely driven by how the overall sector performs, not by active fund management.
Also read: Are sector rotation funds the answer to risks of sector downturns?
A smarter approach for retail investors
A more robust strategy, particularly for retail investors, lies in diversified portfolios managed by professionals who can actively adjust sector weights as market conditions evolve.
For conservative or first-time investors, it is advisable to start with broad-based investment options such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), index funds, or diversified equity mutual funds that automatically spread risk across sectors and market caps.
Aggressive or more experienced investors can consider a core-satellite strategy—where 75% or more of the equity allocation is invested in diversified funds (like flexi-cap or multi-cap funds), and the remaining 25% is deployed tactically in sectoral or thematic funds based on strong, well-researched convictions.
Even here, thematic funds may be safer than pure sectoral funds, as they cut across industries. For instance, a 'capex" fund might include exposure to cement, utilities, auto, power, and real estate—providing broader diversification while still capturing a specific investment theme.
Be careful with sector-specific funds. It's hard for individual investors to consistently pick winning sectors better than professional fund managers. You might end up disappointed.
Instead, it's often smarter to let professional fund managers make these active choices within a diversified fund. This gives you much better chances of success.
Also read: Why balanced advantage funds are back in focus for moderate risk investors
Nishant Agarwal, senior managing partner, ASK Private Wealth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tariffs: Smartphones, PCs may become expensive for customers, says S&P
US tariffs: Smartphones, PCs may become expensive for customers, says S&P

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US tariffs: Smartphones, PCs may become expensive for customers, says S&P

NEW DELHI: Smartphones and personal computers (PCs) may become expensive as a result of manufacturers passing on the higher costs, arising from US tariffs , to end-consumers, S&P Global Ratings said. 'We expect PC and phone makers will pass on the higher cost to customers even if it leads to some demand destruction, especially for consumers who make up 45% of PC sales and most of smartphone sales,' the global credit ratings agency said in a research note, seen by ETTelecom . It noted that smartphone makers, such as Apple and its key suppliers, and personal computer (PC) manufacturers heavily reliant on China, are the most vulnerable to the US tariffs. 'S&P Global Ratings believes the most vulnerable companies are those with the largest reliance on China's integrated technology production infrastructure and the U.S. as a major end market,' it said in the research note. In particular, it said Apple and its key suppliers, including Hon Hai Precision Industry (Foxconn), may be the most disrupted due to reliance on China for production. Apple, with a shipment share of over 60% in the US market as of Q4 2024, faces a risk given its significant reliance on production in China. iPhones account for nearly 50% of Apple's revenue, with the US representing approximately a third of its global smartphone shipments, said S&P. The Cupertino-headquartered firm, however, has been shifting its production supply chain to India, which is expected to cover most of Apple's iPhone shipments to the US by 2026, the credit rating agency estimated. In turn, Korean Samsung 's bulk of production happens in Vietnam and India. 'Vietnam and India account for the bulk of Samsung's production base. Smartphone production is labor intensive, favoring production in countries with low labor costs such as India and Vietnam. Tariffs on these countries pose further risk for the issuers with significant U.S. smartphone exposure such as Apple and Samsung and their suppliers,' said S&P in its research note. Xiaomi is the only outlier that does not have direct exposure to the US consumer market. Its chips, too, are fabricated in Taiwan, and are unlikely to be a target of the US export restrictions, and neither will be subject to China's tariff on US goods. The Donald Trump administration has imposed a 10% baseline tariff on all countries, including India, with China also imposing reciprocal tariffs on the US. Notably, consumer electronics items, including smartphones and laptops, remain exempt from tariffs. However, Trump has threatened to impose a 25% tariff on all smartphone brands, particularly targeting Apple iPhones and Samsung handsets made outside the US, unless they are manufactured in America, the US media reported recently. Apple's vendors nearly doubled exports of iPhones from India in March–a majority to the US–to ₹20,000 crore, from ₹11,000 crore a year ago, ET reported in its April 7, 2025, edition. Recently, the International Data Corporation (IDC) projected that global smartphone shipments may grow by just 0.6% year-on-year to 1.24 billion units in 2025, down from the 2.3% year-on-year shipment growth it forecasted in February. 'Since April 2nd, the smartphone industry has faced a whirlwind of uncertainty. While current exemptions on smartphones have offered temporary relief, the looming possibility of broader tariffs presents a serious risk,' Nabila Popal, senior research director with IDC, said in a report separately. Popal added that despite complexities driven by geopolitical uncertainties and trade risks, India and Vietnam are expected to remain the key alternatives to China for smartphone production. 'However, additional tariffs of 20-30% on US-bound smartphones could post a serious downside risk to the current U.S. market outlook,' she had said. Laptop, PC makers also at risk Beyond smartphones, PC makers Dell, HP and Lenovo are also exposed to tariff risk. S&P said this is due to high input costs, from which tariffs are calculated, and high reliance on China for manufacturing laptops. Desktops, by contrast, are assembled across Asia and Mexico. The credit rating agency estimates the US PC sales contribute to about 15%-20% of the operating profit for each of Dell, HP and Lenovo. S&P noted that Dell's contract manufacturers have already shifted their production of US-bound PCs outside China, while HP is expected to do so by June-end. It, however, cautioned that shifting PC assembly to the US would not meaningfully offset tariff risks, unless components like processors, memory modules and display panels sourced from Taiwan, South Korea and China are tariff-exempted by the US.

Did Elon Musk use ketamine, ecstasy drugs? What Donald Trump said
Did Elon Musk use ketamine, ecstasy drugs? What Donald Trump said

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Did Elon Musk use ketamine, ecstasy drugs? What Donald Trump said

Elon Musk with Donald Trump (File photo) US President Donald Trump on Monday responded cautiously to recent reports alleging Elon Musk used recreational drugs while advising his administration, calling the claims troubling but unverified. "I really don't know. I don't think so," Trump told reporters on June 9 when asked whether Musk had brought drugs into the White House. "I hope not." The remark marks Trump's first major comment on the issue since The New York Times reported in late May that Musk had allegedly used ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms while campaigning with Trump in 2024. The report cited unnamed sources. Musk swiftly responded to the allegations in a post on X: "You can tell immediately that someone is a massive liar if they're claiming I'm on drugs, as I am one of the most photographed people on Earth and am in meetings 7 days a week!" He added that he underwent random drug testing for nearly three years following a widely-publicized 2018 podcast appearance with Joe Rogan . "Not the slightest trace of drugs or alcohol was found." USA Today reported it remains unclear whether Musk used any substances while serving in an official capacity. When asked about it on his final day as a special government employee, Musk avoided the question, saying, 'Let's move on.' The drug allegations come amid a broader fallout between Trump and Musk. Their once-close relationship soured after Musk denounced Trump's tax and spending package as a 'disgusting abomination.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sanitize & Smooth Clothes Fast with Philips Steamer Philips Garment Steamers Shop Now Undo Trump retaliated by suggesting he might scale back federal contracts held by Musk's companies, while Musk hinted that Trump appeared in classified files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Despite the tensions, signs of de-escalation have emerged. Trump took a softer stance when asked about Musk's satellite internet company, Starlink. 'It's a good service,' he said, indicating no plans to discontinue its use at the White House. He also struck a conciliatory note personally, saying: 'We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well.' The highly public spat has complicated Republican efforts to pass Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress, where the GOP holds narrow majorities. However, with Musk deleting earlier posts—some of which had supported impeachment—insiders suggest the billionaire may be ready to mend ties with the president.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store