logo
The palace, the protests and the red carpet: How OPEC's seminar played out

The palace, the protests and the red carpet: How OPEC's seminar played out

CNBC11-07-2025
For centuries, Vienna's romantic Hofburg palace served as a winter residence of the imperial Habsburg dynasty — this week, though, it welcomed Saudi royalty, energy ministers, top CEOs and a slew of analysts traders and more.
Here are some highlights:
Since 1965, Vienna has housed the headquarters of the OPEC Secretariat — the administrative backbone of the 12-member OPEC alliance of oil producers.
The Secretariat is led by a secretary-general — currently, former Kuwaiti official Haitham al-Ghais, who took office for his first three-year term in 2022 and has since been reappointed for a second stint starting Aug. 1, 2025.
Before the Covid-19 pandemic, the OPEC Secretariat was the humble backdrop of (often) day-long, high-stakes and heated discussions over crude output levels between OPEC producers and their allies, at least twice a year.
The Secretariat's home is a cavernous building, where journalists are typically relegated to a basement media room. Sometimes, they're allowed to maraud down cordoned-off areas, hunting for comment as oil ministers of OPEC countries and their allies — collectively known as OPEC+ — arrive.
Despite that, even the most nostalgic OPEC journalists will admit that the group's seminar has had a major venue upgrade.
The Hofburg palace opened its gates to delegates and media over July 9-10 for a series of sessions focusing on the state of play in the oil market, hydrocarbon investment and the green energy transition. The conference is attended by invitation and accreditation.
For the OPEC seminar, the Hofburg palace laid out an interminable red carpet and armed one of its ballrooms-turned-conference halls with larger-than-life high-tech screens playing OPEC's cinematic account of the history of oil.
"I'm sure with this event, there are quite a few people who would say, 'Damn it, why I wasn't there?'" Saudi Prince and Energy Minister Abdulaziz bin Salman, the de facto leader of the OPEC alliance, said during special remarks as the conference opened on Wednesday.
Acknowledging the Austrian government's willingness to "do its utmost to enable this organization to survive and work and attend to its function, unhindered by … legal concerns and things like that," he stressed: "We are here because your country is beautiful, the city is historic, and more important, the people are welcoming."
It turned out, the idyllic charm of Hofburg's sprawling alleyways is no match for a megaphone.
By 4:45 p.m. local time on Wednesday, a group of around 30 people, by CNBC's count, had gathered at a respectful distance across the road from the palace to protest the OPEC seminar.
A protester briefly leading the chants, who did not want to be identified, said the demonstration was in support of the embattled Gaza enclave, which has been targeted by a retaliatory Israeli military campaign since the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 2023. She pointed CNBC to a series of posts on the stop_opec Instagram account.
"Sitting atop plentiful oil resources, Arab regimes yield the power enough to halt Israeli expansion and challenge the West. Yet they choose to fuel U.S. arm sales, and enrich them with real estate, simultaneously fortifying Europe's borders," said one social media post.
On the ground, chanting protesters called for an oil embargo and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz – echoing a threat made by Tehran during its 12-day war with Israel last month.
Many Arab states — including Hamas supporter Iran – have expressed solidarity with the Palestinian cause. CNBC has reached out to the OPEC Secretariat for comment over the protests.
The who's-who of OPEC Seminar speakers spanned ministers of OPEC countries, their allies, key consumers such as India and Turkey, as well as the CEOs of the biggest names in the industry, including the heads of BP, TotalEnergies, Shell and Saudi Aramco.
CNBC tried to intercept several of these delegations.
Ministers from heavyweight producers Russia and Iran — who would likely have been swarmed by journalists amid pressures from European and U.S. sanctions — were notably absent.
Iranian Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad nevertheless delivered opening remarks via videoconference on Wednesday, in a speech which included some rare political comments. He stressed the risks that armed escalations pose to crude markets, mere weeks after his country, OPEC's third-largest producer, was locked in a 12-day war with Israel.
"This vital and growing industry needs peace to serve its mission of promoting prosperity at national, regional and global levels; and to promote cooperation and development in a fast changing and ever-complicating world," he said, according to a speech readout.
Going into the conference, members of the press can't be begrudged their enthusiasm: OPEC+ — as well as its eight-nation subset who have been carrying out voluntary cuts in crude production — have been increasingly meeting over private videoconference, limiting opportunities for press briefings.
At the OPEC seminar, the action doesn't start at the red carpet. Often tipped off on where delegations are staying, journalists frequently stake out hotels, hoping for unguarded comments as ministers make their way to the conference. CNBC's Emma Graham also likened the event to a wedding — no one is getting married, but journalists can once again have a good catch up with their friends who report on the oil market.
Otherwise, most OPEC reporting is now done through sourced scoops and probing delegates for market views and indicators ahead of — and during — policy meetings. The next one is due on Aug. 3, between the eight members who have been progressively (and increasingly briskly) unwinding a voluntary 2.2 million-barrels-per-day production cut.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Politics won't help the planet — just ask Jay Inslee
Politics won't help the planet — just ask Jay Inslee

The Hill

time43 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Politics won't help the planet — just ask Jay Inslee

With passage of a federal budget that cuts subsidies for renewables like wind and solar and an executive order promising to 'end taxpayer support for unaffordable and unreliable 'green' energy sources,' climate activists are considering new approaches to reduce the impact of greenhouse gases. One such champion stepping forward is former Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee. Inslee made fighting climate change the rhetorical centerpiece of his time as governor and his short-lived presidential campaign. Inslee claims he made Washington state 'a leader' in the fight against climate change, and Time magazine gave him a 2025 Earth Award, saying the former governor 'believes in the power of local action.' Having worked on environmental policy for 25 years in Washington state, I can attest that following Inslee's lead would be a catastrophic mistake. In a recent editorial, he argued that Democrats should use climate change to 'win over young Trump voters.' His central, and repeated, error — the one he now encourages national climate activists to follow — is to treat climate change as a political tool, rather than focusing on effective solutions. In fact, Washington state's carbon dioxide emissions increased every year of Inslee's first decade in office, except 2020. The governor's policies were so ineffective that, in 2019, Florida's per capita CO2 emissions were actually lower than Washington state's, having been 10 percent higher just six years earlier. Florida, with no meaningful climate policy, outperformed Washington with Jay Inslee at the helm. Given a choice between candidly assessing the results of his policies and political expediency, the governor routinely chose politics. When he took office, Inslee promised to track the results of his policies, creating a web page that showed progress toward climate goals. He said the goal was to use that data to fix problems and improve outcomes. But in 2019, just prior to announcing his presidential campaign, Inslee's administration shut down the page. His administration was missing virtually all its targets, an embarrassing reality for the 'climate candidate.' Washington is now so far behind its 2030 emissions targets the state will have to cut CO2 emissions by the equivalent of three COVID-level pandemic shutdown reductions cumulatively. Washington's electric vehicle policy is another example of how the state has performed so poorly. Last year, Inslee announced a $45 million program of subsidies to help 'provide low-income Washingtonians access to electric vehicles.' The results were mixed at best, failing to 'ensure the rebates reached overburdened and vulnerable communities.' Governor Inslee deflects from those failures, instead focusing on the CO2 cap-and-trade system that took effect in 2023, promising that it will deliver results in the future. However, early results show projects funded by that system are failing to deliver emissions reductions. His own administration released a report showing that approximately two-thirds of the state's climate projects create no 'quantifiable emissions reductions.' The pattern has been to make bold statements and send out press releases claiming victory while repeatedly failing to deliver. With each failure, Inslee relied on partisanship to paper over policy failures. That approach earned Jay Inslee national attention and accolades. It did not, however, help the planet. This strategy is irresponsible and creates cynicism that undermines the ability to promote effective climate policy. Those who are sincere about climate and environmental policy are at a crossroads. They can take the route suggested by Inslee and put politics first, or they can honestly assess the record of the past two decades of climate policy and look for a better approach. Those who believe climate change is — as Jay Inslee has often said — an 'existential crisis' must live up to that rhetoric and ostracize self-serving politicians whose use of climate change as a political weapon has become a major barrier to addressing the problem. Politicians should look to companies like Microsoft and Amazon that invest in projects that are certified to reduce CO2 emissions — and if they don't, the funding is returned. Prioritizing efforts based on effectiveness and innovation, rather than political grandstanding, is the only way to responsibly reduce the risk from climate change. During the next three-and-a-half years of the Trump administration, those who care about reducing the risk from climate change can take the partisan (and failed) path that Inslee recommends. Or they can begin to find alternatives that aren't contingent on politics and, instead, focus on results. Todd Myers has worked on energy and environmental policy in Washington state for 25 years and is vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center in Seattle.

LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)
LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)

Business Upturn

time2 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) and certain of the Company's senior executives and directors for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Lineage, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 30, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of investors who purchased stock pursuant and/or traceable to Lineage's registration statement for its initial public offering held on or about July 25, 2024. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and is captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., et al. , No. 2:25-cv-12383. Why Was Lineage Sued Under the Federal Securities Laws? Lineage is a cold storage focused real estate investment trust ('REIT'). Through its Global Warehousing Segment, Lineage owns and operates hundreds of temperature-controlled storage facilities used by companies to store food and other perishable products. As alleged, Lineage's IPO documents touted its 'consistent cold chain demand,' which purportedly provided Lineage 'with strong cash flows even during periods of broader economic stress.' The IPO documents also represented that the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic had 'accelerated trends that . . . have the potential to be growth engines for the industry in coming years.' In truth, Lineage was allegedly in the midst of a sustained downturn, as its customers destocked excess inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and also shifted to leaner inventories on a go-forward basis and as more cold-storage supply came on line. Events Following the IPO On February 26, 2025, Lineage announced its fiscal Q4 2024 financial results, revealing that customers had been 'unwinding' previously 'overbuil[t]' levels of inventory, returning to a 'more normal seasonal pattern' that was expected to 'continue moving forward.' Lineage conducted its IPO at $78 per share. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen dramatically, to lows near $40 per share—approximately half the IPO price. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Lineage you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619

Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program
Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program

Chicago Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program

As Gwen Polk prepares the budget she will present to the Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 Board of Education in September, she has learned that she has approximately $6.2 million in additional revenue courtesy of the State of Illinois' evidence-based funding program. Though every school district receives some of the $9.25 billion appropriated by the Illinois General Assembly, Tier 1 districts like Waukegan and North Chicago School District 187 face a harder time adequately funding education, including a smaller property tax base, and receive the most. When the Illinois General Assembly approved the final $350 million in May — $43 million was held for distribution at a later time — Lake County's 13 Tier 1 districts and the Regional Office of Education were awarded 87.5% of the county's total, with District 60 getting 38% — $6.2 million. Polk, District 60's associate superintendent for business and financial services, said the proposed budget currently sits at slightly less than $327 million. With COVID-19 federal relief funds no longer available, the additional money from the state is a big help. 'We're all affected by the fiscal cliff,' Polk said, referring to the federal money schools received nationwide. 'The increase (from the state) is going to help.' Lake County's 47 school districts and the Regional Office of Education collectively received just under $16.3 million in additional evidence-based funding earlier this month from the state, bringing its total to more than $562 million to augment their budgets. For the Waukegan public schools, Polk said evidence-based funding provides for more than half of its total revenue, which also includes property tax income. The approximate district-wide enrollment for the 2025-2026 school year is 14,000. By contrast, Barrington Community Unit School District 220, a Tier 4 district — they receive the smallest amount of evidence-based funding — with approximately 8,100 students, received just over $6.5 million. State Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said evidence-based funding became law in Illinois in 2017 to help all schools get to a level of funding to adequately educate youngsters. 'Education is the great equalizer,' Johnson said, 'If students' schools are adequately funded they they get the support and resources they need. This helps students in low-income areas get those resources.' Originally proposing $550 million for the final round of evidence-based funding, Johnson said that with a tight state budget, $350 million was the most she and her colleagues could get passed. In Waukegan, like most school districts, the bulk of the budget goes toward salaries and benefits for teachers, staff, and administrators. The current evidence-based funding is 4.1% more than a year ago, but not close to full adequacy. With the largest share of evidence-based funding in Lake County, District 60's adequacy level is 72%, well below the ideal amount. Barrington's adequacy level is 119%. Some of the highest adequacy levels are found where the property values are also high. Leading Lake County in adequacy is Rondout School District 72 at 255% which includes parts of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, and Mettawa. Bannockburn School District 106 is at 202% while Lake Forest High School District 115 is at 193% and Township High School District 113 serving Deerfield and Highland Park High Schools is at 190%. District 187 Principal John Price said the adequacy level in North Chicago dropped from 78% to 71%. A year ago, there was a large influx of migrant children that is not the case this year. The district is receiving $1.67 million, the second-highest amount in Lake County. Price said District 187's budget is approximately $80 million, and its evidence-based funding totals just under $40.1 million.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store