JINF Report: Is China's Senkaku Takeover Ever Closer?
The Japan Institute for National Fundamentals (JINF), chaired by Yoshiko Sakurai, analyzed and assessed the Chinese helicopter that violated Japanese airspace on May 3 near the Senkaku Islands (Ishigaki City, Okinawa Prefecture).
JINF, a private think tank, urged the Japanese government to take action, warning that China ultimately "aims to land on the Senkakus."
Japanese experts also raised concerns that Japan is being drawn into China's cognitive warfare, a strategy to shape public opinion through disinformation. This article summarizes the key points discussed during JINF's briefing session on May 30.
At approximately 12:21 PM on May 3, a Chinese helicopter violated Japanese airspace for about 15 minutes, prompting the Japan Air Self-Defense Force to conduct an emergency scramble in response. Just minutes earlier, at 12:18 PM, the Chinese Coast Guard vessel 2303, which was carrying the helicopter, had entered Japanese territorial waters.
Around the same time, a Japanese civilian aircraft that departed from New Ishigaki Airport approached the airspace near the Senkakus. Following guidance from the Japanese Coast Guard, the plane turned around at around 12:20 PM, approximately 20 kilometers south of Uotsuri Island.
Maki Nakagawa, a researcher at the JINF, outlined the sequence of events surrounding the airspace violation. She suggested that China "may have obtained advance knowledge of the Japanese civilian aircraft's flight plan and used that information to decide when to raise the ladder by deploying the helicopter for an air patrol over the Senkakus." Nakagawa added that it appears preparations were made in advance based on that information.
If the Chinese side had indeed accessed Japan's civilian flight patterns in advance, that would be a serious concern in itself. This indicates that the airspace violation was not accidental but rather a carefully coordinated operation. A Chinese helicopter violating Japanese airspace on May 3, 2025. (Photo provided by the 11th Regional Coast Guard Headquarters, Naha, Okinawa)
After the airspace violation, the China Coast Guard, along with the Chinese foreign ministry and defense ministry, released coordinated statements. They claimed that "a Japanese civilian aircraft had violated the airspace over Diaoyu Island (Chinese name for Senkakus)." The three agencies argued, "It is entirely lawful to take necessary enforcement actions, including issuing a warning to drive the aircraft away."
Nakagawa noted that China's statements seek to "assert sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands and legitimize [Chinese] actions under international law." In other words, "China is engaging in a cognitive warfare campaign against Japan by trying to frame the situation as if it were Japan that provoked a violation of Chinese airspace."
Kiyofumi Iwata, a member of the JINF and former chief of staff of the Ground Self-Defense Force, also warned that Chinese cognitive warfare is beginning to influence Japanese public perception.
Some observers have raised the possibility of a simultaneous Chinese invasion of Taiwan and a landing on the Senkakus. Iwata pointed out that Admiral John Aquilino, Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, has described China's military exercises around Taiwan since 2024 as a "rehearsal" for a future invasion.
Referring to former government officials and experts who spoke to the media about China's recent airspace violation, Iwata said, "Even at this stage, there are still those who claim Japan provoked China's breach of sovereignty." To this, he added, "They have completely fallen into China's cognitive warfare trap, and it's a truly regrettable situation."
"As far as I can recall, Chinese coast guard helicopters have been approaching for some time. But they had never [violated our airspace]," said Kazuhisa Shimada, former Vice Minister of Defense and ex-secretary to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
"The fact that they did so this time suggests they may now believe Japan's response will not be strong enough to deter them. And that is deeply concerning."
Shimada's comments reveal Japan had been caught off guard.
Ten days after the airspace violation, on May 13, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya held a press conference and stated that he had protested to China. He repeatedly called the recent incursion into Japan's territorial waters and the violation of its airspace "extremely regrettable."
However, he did not announce any new measures in response to China's unprecedented actions. As Shimada pointed out, such a lack of concrete action could very well embolden China to act even more aggressively.
There is a view that China is gradually increasing pressure through a "salami slicing tactic," steadily making incremental moves like slicing a salami. "If you ask which side the salami is on, it's Japan," warned Retired Vice Admiral Masanori Yoshida. "But the salami has already been sliced, and the next thing to be cut is our hand."
The implication is that the salami is gone, and China's next objective is to set foot on the Senkakus.
Iwata concurred, saying, "The salami slicing is over, and we must recognize that the only phase left is a landing." He emphasized the need for the government to secure effective control of the Senkakus and to strengthen the Air Self-Defense Force's response capabilities.
Iwata proposed conducting joint Japan-US training exercises on Kuba Island (private property) and Taisho Island (state property). These islands are located approximately 27 kilometers and 110 kilometers, respectively, from Uotsuri Island in the Senkakus. Iwata also recommended establishing an Air Self-Defense Force base at Shimoji Island Airport in Miyakojima City, Okinawa Prefecture.
The former chief of staff further stressed the importance of clearly demonstrating Japan's "will and ability" to defend its sovereignty over the Senkakus to China. He expressed serious concern about the response from the Ishiba administration, questioning, "Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, as head of state, has yet to make his intentions clear. Is this acceptable?"
Author: Takao Harakawa
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
7 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
China summons Nvidia over ‘backdoor safety risks' in H20 chips
WASHINGTON (AP) — China's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. 'Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. After the ban was lifted, Nvidia expected to sell hundreds of thousands more H20 chips in the Chinese market. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns'. While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation,' Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym.
Japan Forward
12 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Why the Famous Hiroshima Cenotaph's Wording Concerned Justice Pal
The inscription "Let all the souls here rest in peace; for we shall not repeat the evil" appears on the Cenotaph for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. Decades ago, Indian jurist Radhabinod Pal (1886–1967) raised concerns about the inscription. He argued that the wording was misleading, as it could be interpreted to suggest that the Japanese were responsible for the atomic bombing. His criticism contributed to the creation of a second cenotaph in Hiroshima. A few hundred meters east of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, across a main avenue, stands the gate of Honsho-ji Temple, founded more than 400 years ago. In front of the temple is a stone pillar inscribed in Japanese: "Memorial Monument by Dr Radhabinod Pal, Judge Representing India at the Tokyo Trials." Cenotaph for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. (Photo ©Sankei by Koki Yata) The International Military Tribunal for the Far East, also known as the Tokyo Trial (1946–1948), was established to prosecute leaders of the former Empire of Japan for war crimes. Justice Pal was the only judge who found all the defendants not guilty. He rejected what he saw as victors' justice motivated by revenge. In November 1952, just a few years later, Pal visited Hiroshima to attend the Asian Congress of the World Federalist Movement. While there, he offered flowers and a silent prayer at the cenotaph. When he read the inscription, Pal asked his interpreter, Nair, several times to clarify its meaning. His expression, marked by both doubt and anger, revealed his discomfort. According to Justice Pal: Declaration of Peace , a Japanese book compiling Pal's lectures, academic writings, and a travel account by his companion Masaaki Tanaka, Pal questioned who the phrase "we shall not repeat the evil" was referring to. He emphasized that the bomb had not been dropped by Japan and said he could accept the message only if it clearly identified the responsible party and included a personal vow not to repeat the act. Indian jurist, Dr Radhabinod Pal Pal also criticized the inscription's vague wording. He felt it failed to clearly distinguish between the perpetrators of the bombing and its victims, saying it neither offered comfort to those who suffered nor supported the nation's recovery. The inscription had been drafted by Professor Tadayoshi Saika of Hiroshima University. He was a scholar of English literature and an A-bomb survivor. In 1952, then-mayor Shinzo Hamai commissioned him to create a message of prayer and commitment. According to a book published by alumni of the former Hiroshima High School, Saika heard the mayor's request and drafted the inscription that same day. He completed it the next day. The English translation was finalized after discussions with American scholars. The Japanese phrase "過ちは繰返しませぬから" was translated as "For we shall not repeat the evil." The subject — "we" — was intended to refer to all of humanity, not only to the Japanese people. In response to Justice Pal's criticism, Professor Saika sent a rebuttal, arguing that a narrow-minded view could not prevent another tragedy like the atomic bombing. He also included the English translation to clarify his intent. The city of Hiroshima has explained that the term "evil" refers to war itself. However, Pal rejected that interpretation. According to Justice Pal: Declaration of Peace , he believed that Japan was not solely responsible for the war. He argued that its origins lay in Western colonial aggression in Asia. While in Hiroshima, Pal was approached by Yoshiaki Kakei, the 25th head priest of Honsho-ji Temple. Kakei, who had a long-standing friendship with Nair, asked Pal to write an alternative inscription. According to another book by Tanaka, Pal spent a night composing a new epitaph in Bengali. It was later translated into Japanese and engraved on the "Monument to the Tragic Aspiration of Greater East Asia," located on the temple grounds. The "Monument to the Tragic Aspiration of Greater East Asia" on the grounds of Honsho-ji Temple, with Chief Priest Yoshinari Kakei. July 7, Naka Ward, Hiroshima. (©Sankei by Koki Yata) The English version of the inscription reads: "For the peace of those departed souls who took upon themselves the solemn vow at the salvation ceremony of oppressed Asia, 'Oh! Lord thou being in my heart, I do as appointed by you.'" Yoshinobu Kakei, the grandson of the late priest and current head of Honsho-ji, believes the words, though abstract, express remembrance for those who died in war and in the bombing. He also sees it as a statement of pan-Asian solidarity. Pal wrote his inscription in April 1952, just six months after the end of the American occupation of Japan. Yoshinobu reflects that Dr Pal gave voice to thoughts that many Japanese at the time wanted to express but could not. A handwritten inscription draft by Professor Tadashi Saiga of Hiroshima University, held at the Hiroshima City Archives. This draft, created before the final English translation was finalized, renders the phrase in question as "for to repeat the fault we shall cease." (Courtesy of the Archives) The debate over the cenotaph's inscription, sparked by Pal's remarks more than 70 years ago, resurfaced in May 2025 — 80 years after the atomic bombing and the end of World War II. Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker Shoji Nishida reignited the issue, arguing that if the "we" in the inscription is understood to mean the Japanese, its meaning changes completely. The city of Hiroshima has stood by its original interpretation. It maintains that the inscription is a vow made by all people: to honor the victims of the atomic bomb and to never again repeat the tragedy of war. Unveiled on August 6, 1952, the cenotaph was built as part of Hiroshima's reconstruction as a city of peace. It commemorates those who died in the world's first atomic bombing. The central stone chamber contains the registry of victims' names. ( Read the article in Japanese . ) Author: Koki Yata, The Sankei Shimbun
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Pakistan and US reach a trade agreement to develop oil reserves and reduce tariffs
ISLAMABAD (AP) — The United States and Pakistan reached a trade agreement expected to allow Washington to help develop Pakistan's largely untapped oil reserves and lower tariffs for the South Asian country, officials from both nations said Thursday. Officials did not specify where the exploration would take place, but most of Pakistan's reserves are believed to be in the insurgency-hit southwestern province of Balochistan, where separatists say the province's natural resources are being exploited by the central government in Islamabad. 'We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves,' U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership,' Trump added. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India someday!' Total U.S. trade with Pakistan was an estimated $7.3 billion in 2024, according to the Office of the United States Representative, which said on its website that U.S. exports to Pakistan in 2024 were $2.1 billion, up 4.4% ($90.9 million) from 2023. U.S. imports from Pakistan totaled $5.1 billion in 2024, up 4.9% ($238.7 million) from 2023, it said. There was no immediate comment from the Baloch nationalists and separatist groups. Balochistan has long been the center of violence mostly blamed on groups including the outlawed Balochistan Liberation Army, or BLA, which the U.S. designated a terrorist organization in 2019. Separatists in Balochistan have opposed the extraction of resources by Pakistani and foreign firms and have targeted Pakistani security forces and Chinese nationals working on multibillion-dollar projects related to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Oil reserves are also thought to exist in the southern Sindh, eastern Punjab and northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed the 'long-awaited' deal and thanked Trump for playing a key role in finalizing it. Pakistan had been pursuing a trade agreement since May, when Trump mediated a ceasefire between Pakistan and India following an escalation triggered by Indian airstrikes on Pakistani territory in response to the killing of 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan's Finance Ministry said in a statement early Thursday the agreement aims to boost bilateral trade, expand market access, attract investment and foster cooperation in areas of mutual interest. The breakthrough came during a meeting in Washington between Pakistani Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and senior U.S. officials, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer. The deal includes a reduction in reciprocal tariffs, particularly on Pakistani exports to the U.S., the statement from the ministry said. 'The agreement enhances Pakistan's access to the U.S. market and vice versa,' it said. The agreement is also expected to spur increased U.S. investment in Pakistan's infrastructure and development projects, it added. The ministry said the deal reflects both nations' commitment to deepening bilateral ties and strengthening trade and investment cooperation.
