Judges in Epstein, Maxwell grand jury records cases want more details from DOJ
The big picture: "The court intends to resolve this motion expeditiously," the two Manhattan judges wrote in similar court orders. "However, the Court cannot rule on the motion without additional submissions from the government."
The orders came the same day as Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday that he's seeking a meeting with Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida after being found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges in 2021.
The Trump administration has faced pressure from even typically loyal MAGA circles to act after the DOJ and FBI concluded there's no evidence that Epstein kept a "client list" and that the convicted sex offender and disgraced financier was not murdered.
Driving the news: U.S. District Judge Richard Berman, who was overseeing Epstein's case before he was found dead in his cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex-trafficking minors, requested that the DOJ provide a more detailed memorandum by July 29 on making the case for unsealing grand jury transcripts related to the case.
Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, who's overseeing Maxwell's case, requested the same and on the same date.
Victims and representatives for Epstein and Maxwell in the cases have until Aug. 5 to file submissions, according to the orders.
What they're saying: "According to the government, Epstein harmed over one thousand victims," noted the Clinton-appointed Berman.
"Each suffered unique trauma. Sensitive information relating to these victims is intertwined throughout the materials."
Context: Grand jury transcripts are typically kept secret under federal criminal procedure rules, but federal judges can release them under special circumstances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lindsey Graham Hit With Embarrassing Epstein Fact-Check on Live TV
Republicans are losing their grip on Donald Trump's latest Epstein cover-up. Speaking with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Senator Lindsey Graham tripped up a supposedly 'new' development in the Russian collusion investigation, suggesting that more evidence had emerged tying former President Barack Obama to the nearly 10-year-old national security scandal. Amid rising intraparty tensions over Trump's apparent ties to pedophilic sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, the president wildly suggested last week that Obama had interfered with the results of the Trump-Russia investigation, claiming that it was actually Hillary Clinton who received aid from the foreign power. But Graham carried the torch over the weekend, reiterating the president's theory on air while claiming that National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard recently found that Obama had forced investigators to 'keep looking' after initial findings had pointed to no collusion. 'I think somebody needs to look at what we found,' Graham said. 'So what we're looking at is what role did Obama play in 2016 that changed the narrative that resulted in 2017? I'm not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying that it bothers me, it's disturbing.' But then host Kristen Welker played back a montage of Graham's previous comments, proving that Graham originally agreed with the findings of the intelligence community—long before Trump tried to opportunistically rewrite history. 'Senator, are you now saying that you don't believe Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 election?' Welker pressed. Apparently getting frustrated, Graham again stressed that new evidence had emerged that changed his opinion. 'Hold on, Senator, as you know, former President Obama has weighed in through a spokesperson,' Welker interrupted. 'He says that's just patently false. I actually spoke to Susan Miller, who's a former senior CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russian interference. She says it's completely false that Obama or anyone else asked them to change or sway their investigation. She says, and she's a Republican, that they all would have quit if that happened.' And then Welker asked the million-dollar question: 'Senator, are you trying to rewrite history to distract from the Epstein matter, Senator?' 'I'm trying to let you know, and the media know, that we found something we didn't know before,' Graham insisted, continuing to defend Trump. 'At the end of the day, I'm not calling for a prosecution against President Obama for treason, but I am calling for an investigation. 'The only people colluding with the Russians were the Hillary Clinton campaign,' Graham continued. But Welker wasn't having it. 'Senator, you're saying there's something new,' Welker replied. 'This report goes back to 2020. It's five years old. There's actually nothing new in this report and nothing that changes any conclusion.' 'Whatever,' Graham responded. The Mueller report was published in 2019. The 22-month investigation found that Russia did interfere with the 2016 election, but did not find sufficient evidence to prove that the 2016 Trump campaign had coordinated with Russia to undermine the election results. The report did not take a clear stance on whether Trump had obstructed justice.
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
What to know about First Amendment issues in Trump's lawsuit against Wall Street Journal
Trump filed the lawsuit on July 18, accusing WSJ of defamation. President Donald Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, filed in South Florida, raises potential First Amendment concerns regarding freedom of the press, speech and accountability. The Wall Street Journal reported July 17 about a leather-bound birthday book given to the late multi-millionaire investor and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 for his 50th birthday, with letters from friends and family — and one of them bearing Trump's signature. The president's attorney in Miami promptly filed a federal lawsuit against the Journal, its publisher, its parent company, two executives and the two reporters who wrote the story. The suit is significant because it presents challenges to multiple First Amendment issues: defamation, freedom of press, freedom of speech and state laws that are meant to protect speech from costly lawsuits. The federal filing comes at a time of nationwide clamor to pressure the Trump administration to release documents related to Epstein's case, where online conspiracy theorists and even Democratic and Republican members of Congress alike have encouraged releasing more information. Here's what to know about the suit at a time when Trump has been scrutinized nationally for deflecting focus away from the Epstein matter: WSJ may SLAPP Trump's $10 billion lawsuit away Florida is one of 38 states with anti-SLAPP laws in place, which are meant to protect free speech. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, a type of lawsuit intended to intimidate, silence, or punish critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense, even if the case lacks merit. SLAPPs are often used against individuals or organizations who speak out on matters of public interest, such as journalists, activists, or whistleblowers. Traditionally, whether anti-SLAPP state laws apply in federal court is a topic of controversy, but attorneys for the Journal could argue for Trump to pay its attorney fees using Florida's anti-SLAPP provision. But the complaint against the Journal, in which Trump is requesting strikingly high damages of $10 billion, would fall under Florida's anti-SLAPP law, said David Keating, the president of the Institute for Free Speech. A representative of the Wall Street Journal declined comment on the case, including questions of whether the newspaper would use the state anti-SLAPP law. A request for comment to Trump's attorney who filed the lawsuit, Alejandro Brito, is pending. The nitty-gritty in this Florida case This case was filed in the U.S. Southern District of Florida court by Trump's attorney in Miami, Alejandro Brito. He also filed a 2023 lawsuit against Trump's then-attorney Michael Cohen for $500 million, saying Cohen violated attorney-client relationship. Trump dropped the lawsuit months later. Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles will be presiding over Trump's lawsuit against the Journal. Gayles, who was the first openly gay Black man appointed as a federal judge, also oversaw Trump's case against Cohen. A potentially short-lived lawsuit? The Journal's case could have a similar fate to Cohen's – and end promptly in Trump's team potentially filing for dismissal. Cases involving the First Amendment have more complexity in proving whether defamation or libel are at play, said Lyrissa Lidsky, a First Amendment law professor at the University of Florida. Lidsky said Trump's litigious background demonstrates a history of using suits strategically against his critics. She said the Journal's main battle is demonstrating the steps reporters took in verifying the reliability of the sources they used in the story. "He knows that the filing of a defamation lawsuit could be a symbolic way to contest the truth that has been written about you, even if you never end up making it to trial," Lidsky said. The First Amendment protects the press to write and publish without fear of government retaliation, but defamation is not protected by the First Amendment. Defamation is the act of making a false statement about someone that harms their reputation. A person who claims defamation usually asks for financial damages from the person who defamed them. Public officials have a higher bar in libel cases under the U.S. Supreme Court's New York Times v. Sullivan case. They have to prove "actual malice," meaning a news organization knew the information was false and acted with reckless disregard for the truth. In many cases, journalists and media outlets are accused of defamation when it comes to news on high-profile court cases. Trump previously sued outlets like CNN, New York Times and the Washington Post for defamation over the past five years – and most of these resulted in dismissal. This reporting content is supported by a partnership with Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. USA Today Network-Florida First Amendment reporter Stephany Matat is based in Tallahassee, Fla. She can be reached at SMatat@ On X: @stephanymatat.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump talks Gaza, Epstein island invite
It's Monday. How is everyone in the House enjoying the first real day of recess? Hopefully you're right behind them, Senate staffers! In today's issue: Trump says he refused Epstein invite Trade deadline week is here Timeline for Putin shortened US to set up food centers in Gaza Booker coaches Dems on social media Trump loves an AMA*: * AMA = Ask Me Anything President Trump met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer this morning in Scotland. Trump took questions from reporters, making news on a wide range of topics. Here are the highlights: What was top of mind for Trump?: ♦️ The humanitarian crisis in Gaza 🔷 The Jeffrey Epstein scandal 🔶 The war between Russia and Ukraine ♦ ️ First, I'll start with the Gaza situation: Trump announced the U.S. will work to set up 'food centers' in Gaza to help alleviate the starvation, describing the humanitarian crisis amid the Israel-Hamas war as 'real starvation.' Starmer chimed in, arguing Israel needs to be pressured to end the 'humanitarian catastrophe.' The U.K. prime minister called the starvation 'intolerable' and the images of malnourished Gazan children 'revolting.' 🔷 OK, now the Jeffrey Epstein scandal: Trump told reporters he turned down an offer to visit convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 's private island. In Trump's words: 'I never went to the island and [former president] Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times. I never went to the island but [former Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers, I hear, went there, he was the head of Harvard. And many other people that are very big people, nobody ever talks about them. I never had the privilege of going to his island and I did turn him down. But a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Trump also launched into a fiery tirade about reports detailing his alleged past relationship with Epstein. He pushed back on The Wall Street Journal's reporting detailing a message and drawing he allegedly contributed for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. 'I don't do drawings. I'm not a drawing person,' Trump said. 'I don't do drawings of women, that I can tell you.' 📹 Watch the clip And when asked whether he would consider a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, Trump said it would be 'inappropriate' to discuss a pardon for Epstein's accomplice 'right now.' 🔶 Trump shortened Putin's ceasefire deadline: Trump said he's no longer interested in simply talking with Russian President Vladimir Putin — he wants Moscow to quickly agree to a ceasefire in the Ukraine war. 'He talks — we have such nice conversations, such respectful and nice conversations, and then people die the following night,' Trump said. For reference, Trump announced earlier today he would shorten Russia's deadline to end its war with Ukraine to 'about 10 or 12 days from today.' 📹 Watch the Starmers welcome Trump Forget Infrastructure Week, it's a trade deadline week: After months of delays, President Trump 's long-awaited tariffs are scheduled to take effect at the end of this week. Quick primer: Trump announced tariffs on dozens of other countries on April 2. A week later, he lowered the tariff rates for 90 days. But as the 90-day deadline neared, he pushed the deadline to Aug. 1. In that time: Trump has cut several trade deals, including with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and the United Kingdom. What about China?: 'The U.S. and China announced in late May the contours of a deal to stave off a trade war between the two countries temporarily. The U.S. reduced its tariff rate from 145 percent to 30 percent, and China reduced its rate from 125 percent to 10 percent.' The Hill's Sarah Fortinsky pulled together a list of the trade deals Trump has made ahead of Friday's deadline and their specifics. ⏱️ ON CAPITOL HILL The boss doesn't want a shutdown, folks: 'Senate Republicans say President Trump has made it clear he doesn't want a government shutdown, and they're urging House GOP lawmakers to tone down their approach to the Sept. 30 funding deadline,' The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports. Remember how House Republicans jammed a partisan funding bill through Congress in March? Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) reluctantly voted for it to avoid a shutdown. He faced a lot of blowback after. But as Bolton points out, the political dynamics are *much* different now: 'Schumer is under heavy pressure to fight harder against Trump and his MAGA allies, heightening the chance of a shutdown if Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) tries to use the same playbook.' ➤ INTERESTING READ — CORY BOOKER, THE SOCIAL MEDIA Semafor's Burgess Everett writes today, 'How Cory Booker convinced his party to get extremely online.' Excerpt: 'He used to 'live on Twitter,' now X, but has soured on it. Lately Instagram is his 'happy place.' He believes children should not be on social media. On a political level, however, Booker looks at it as a professional obligation. He's invited platform executives to talk to Senate Democrats about how their algorithms work.' Lol: 'I wouldn't say he works me over; it's not like I'm under duress,' Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said. 'He'll call me up or text me and say, 'Hey, you did this on social. But if you do that, you know you'll get more engagement.'' ➤ NEW BILL ON THE HILL: A House GOP bill would rename the Kennedy Center for Trump, stripping former President John F. Kennedy 's name from the D.C. landmark. What would the new name be?: 'Trump Center for the Performing Arts.' Keep in mind: House Republicans on the Appropriations Committee approved an amendment earlier this month to rename the Kennedy Center's famed opera house the 'First Lady Melania Trump Opera House.' Vance is on a PR trip: Vice President Vance is on the road in his home state of Ohio today to promote President Trump 's 'big, beautiful' law. He's in Canton today to talk about the benefits of the bill. Keep in mind: Some of the controversial provisions in the bill, such as the cuts to Medicaid and food stamps, are a harder sell for some constituents. So, Vance is making the rounds to sell its benefits to the American people. FWIW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he thinks Vance would make a 'great nominee' for the Republican Party in 2028 if he decides to run. But keep in mind, Rubio was asked whether *he* would run. He sidestepped the question and pivoted to Vance. *Mentions 2028 and braces for hate mail*: I know we're only halfway through 2025, but there's already speculation building about the 2028 presidential race. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) is traveling to New Hampshire next month, speaking at a 'Politics & Eggs' event hosted by the New England Council and the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College, which is known as a rite of passage for any presidential hopeful. 12:25 p.m.: Trump arrives in Aberdeen, Scotland. 🐝 INTERNET BUZZ 🍫 Celebrate: Today is National Milk Chocolate Day. 👋 AND FINALLY… To leave you with an incredible realization, did you know bugs can actually help your golf game? …Well, depending on how you define 'help.' 😉
