
Trump's EU Trade Deal Explained
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
After months of negotiations, and the two sides exchanging threats of further tariffs and potential countermeasures, the European Union and the United States have finalized terms of a deal that offers the bloc a reduced tariff rate in return for billions of dollars' worth of purchases and investments.
"I think it's the biggest deal ever made," President Donald Trump said following a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday afternoon.
Why It Matters
As well as averting a prolonged standoff and the risk of an all-out trans-Atlantic trade war, the deal substantially reduces the potential barriers that were emerging in the world's largest bilateral trading relationship—valued at just under $1 trillion last year per the U.S. Trade Representative.
The announcement, which follows weeks of back-and-forth and periodic reports of stalled negotiations, also marks a major victory for the administration, which has been racing to finalize as many deals as possible ahead of the latest, August 1 deadline.
Former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Newsweek recently that this could have proved one of the hardest deals to finalize, given that 27 members make up the EU, with the resulting difficulty of the bloc forming a unified front on complex issues such as trade.
What Are the Terms of the New Deal?
After pivotal in-person negotiations between Trump and von der Leyen, the president read out the terms of the new deal at the his luxury golf course in Turnberry, Scotland.
He said that the EU has agreed to purchase $750-billion-worth of U.S. energy products, including oil, gas, nuclear fuel and semiconductors. In a press release, von der Leyen said that this will "diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security."
In addition, the deal calls for a $600-billion investment in the U.S. by the EU, which comprises purchases of American military equipment.
In exchange, the U.S. will lower the import tax on the vast majority of European products to 15 percent, half the rate that was set to go into effect on August 1, and far below the 50-percent rate Trump briefly threatened in May.
President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as they meet in Turnberry, Scotland, on Sunday, July 27, 2025.
President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as they meet in Turnberry, Scotland, on Sunday, July 27, 2025.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo
The outcome is less favorable than the 10-percent rate negotiated by the United Kingdom, but matches that secured by Japan last week.
"This rate applies across most sectors, including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals," said von der Leyen. "This 15 percent is a clear ceiling. No stacking. All-inclusive."
Trump said that the lower tariff rate will come with the condition of the EU "opening up their countries" to more American exports.
The pair have also agreed on "zero-for-zero" tariffs on several goods, including aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals and agricultural products, and critical raw materials. The EU chief said that the bloc will "keep working to add more products to this list."
However, Trump said that the 50-percent tariffs on steel and aluminum will remain unchanged. "That's a worldwide thing that stays the way it is," he told reporters.
What Were the EU Tariffs Before Trump's Presidency?
Given the absence of a free trade agreement between the U.S. and EU, the pair have historically traded using the most-favored nation tariffs under World Trade Organization rules.
According to analysis by the economic think tank Bruegel, the average rate of tariffs on European imports was around 1.4 percent prior to Trump taking office, and his succession of tariff announcements threatened to push this average rate up to over 15 percent. However, sector-specific tariffs were higher on a range of agricultural products, as well as certain vehicles.
Meanwhile, the EU reported in February that most U.S. exports were duty-free or faced a roughly 1-percent tariff. However, higher charges are also placed on certain products, including a 10-percent tariff on vehicles and apparel taxes of 12 percent, according to CNBC.
What People Are Saying
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, in a statement following the meeting, said: "Today with this deal, we are creating more predictability for our businesses. In these turbulent times, this is necessary for our companies to be able to plan and invest. We are ensuring immediate tariff relief. This will have a clear impact on the bottom lines of our companies. And with this deal, we are securing access to our largest export market.
"At the same time, we will give better access for American products in our market. This will benefit European consumers and make our businesses more competitive. This deal provides a framework from which we will further reduce tariffs on more products, address non-tariff barriers, and cooperate on economic security. Because when the EU and U.S. work together as partners, the benefits are tangible on both sides."
Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at global trading and investing platform IG, told Newsweek: "For the second time in a week, President Trump has been able to proclaim a trade deal with one of the U.S.' key partners. Like the Japan deal, it seems to involve the U.S. slapping on tariffs while the other side pledges to open up its markets.
"Tariffs continue to be defanged as an issue, and the announcement of yet another 90-day pause for China merely underlines the view that Washington is now closing down the issue having gained a series of 'wins.' Now we wait to see whether the tariff price increases do start to show up in inflation data."
Robert Basedow, professor of international political economy at the London School of Economics, told Newsweek: "I do not expect the deal to put trans-Atlantic differences over trade to rest. We have seen it in the past that Trump reneges on trade deals and seeks to renegotiate them…Hence, I expect the Trump administration to come back with new demands or complaints as opportune to him (typically for domestic policy reasons).
"These Trump deals are not classic trade agreements that pass through parliament and are of hard law nature," he added. "They are more akin to political agreements, with often limited technical detail and thus scope for diverging interpretations."
What Happens Next?
Von der Leyen described the deal as "a framework." She added that there were certain details yet to be ironed out, France 24 reported, and that this would happen "over the next few weeks." The deal remains subject to EU member state approval. The bloc's ambassadors will meet on Monday for a debrief from the European Commission.
Basedow told Newsweek that von der Leyen "will get a lot of pushback from member states, businesses, and media over this deal," which will hold "EU-internal political ramifications."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Africa readying last-minute trade offer to avoid US tariff
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) -South Africa is preparing a last-minute "enhanced" trade proposal at the urging of U.S. officials in hopes of avoiding a 30% tariff which kicks in on Friday, its trade minister said on Thursday. South Africa initially submitted a proposed trade deal to President Donald Trump's administration in May and revised it in June, but received no response. "We're having to navigate a last-minute proposal that's enhanced from the proposal that we had initially given," Trade Minister Parks Tau said on South Africa's 702 radio, adding: "And to tell the truth, it's wait and see." The countdown to the August 1 deadline has stirred fear and uncertainty in South Africa, where the central bank governor has estimated a 30% U.S. tariff would put 100,000 jobs at risk, with the agriculture and automotive sectors hit hardest. The U.S. is South Africa's second-largest bilateral trading partner after China. South Africa exports cars, some manufactured goods, citrus fruits and wine to the U.S. Tau said South Africans spoke to U.S. officials on Wednesday night, both at the level of Washington's embassy in Pretoria and also the U.S. trade representative, but uncertainty lingered on what would happen as the tariff deadline approached. "They (said) they would encourage us to resubmit our proposal, possibly an enhanced proposal, to the United States government," Tau said. A top South African diplomat said on Tuesday that U.S. demands on domestic affirmative-action policies were complicating efforts to secure a trade deal. Bilateral relations have been strained by South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policies to address the legacy of centuries of racial inequality and its genocide case against Israel at the World Court, which Israel and the U.S. vehemently oppose.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NYSE-parent ICE's second-quarter profit rises on robust trading volume
(Reuters) -Intercontinental Exchange reported an increase in second-quarter profit on Thursday, as it benefited from strong trading volumes in its energy business. The New York Stock Exchange parent reported adjusted earnings of $1 billion, or $1.81 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, compared with $876 million, or $1.52 per share, a year earlier. Exchanges thrive during bouts of market volatility as investors frequently rebalance portfolios to seize opportunities and hedge against risks, driving up trading volumes. U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs triggered volatility in April, while tensions in the Middle East exacerbated in June. The volatility index, a barometer for market uncertainty and Wall Street's most-watched gauge of investor anxiety, spiked to record levels in April before easing as optimism over potential trade deals calmed markets. The company's revenue from trading in energy-related products jumped 27% to $595 million, while revenue from ICE's exchange business, the biggest driver of its revenue came at $1.42 billion in the quarter. Shares of the NYSE parent were up 0.7% in premarket trading. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


UPI
12 minutes ago
- UPI
Senate Democrats vote against arms sales to Israel in record number
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. in March. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 31 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate has approved weapons sales to Israel, despite the fact that a majority of Senate Democrats voted against the measure. Twenty-seven of the 47 Democrats voted Wednesday in favor of two resolutions to block U.S. military sales to Israel, a change from the historically typical bipartisan support such resolutions are expected to receive. The resolutions were sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who said in a press release Wednesday that "the members of the Senate Democratic caucus voted to stop sending arms shipments to a Netanyahu government which has waged a horrific, immoral, and illegal war against the Palestinian people." "The tide is turning," he added. "The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza." Sanders' resolutions may have failed, but the 27 senators in support is the most he has received in the three times he sponsored them. His first attempt in November of last year received 18 Democratic votes, and a second attempt in April scored 15. However, 70 senators voted against Sanders' first resolution that sought to block over $675 million in weapons sales to Israel. His second resolution, which would have prohibited the sale of thousands of assault rifles, lost more support as it was defeated by a 73-24 margin. Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., voted in support of Sanders' resolutions for the first time. "Tonight I voted YES to block the sale of certain weapons to Israel to send a message to Netanyahu's government," she posted to X Wednesday. "This legislative tool is not perfect, but frankly it is time to say ENOUGH to the suffering of innocent young children and families." "Tonight, I voted in favor of blocking the Trump Administration from sending more weapons to Israel," said Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., in an X post Wednesday, after voting yes for the first time. "My votes tonight reflect my deep frustration with the Netanyahu government's abject failure to address humanitarian needs in Gaza and send a message to the Trump administration that it must change course if it wants to help end this devastating war," she concluded. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future," Sanders further noted in his release.