Romanian PM resigns and pulls out of coalition after nationalist vote win
BUCHAREST — Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu has resigned and his Social Democrat party is to leave the government after a right-wing nationalist candidate won the first round of the presidential election.
George Simion, a eurosceptic who has promised to put Romania first, won 40.9% of Sunday's vote and is expected to win a run-off vote on 18 May.
He will face liberal Bucharest Mayor Nicușor Dan, who narrowly defeated the Social Democrat (PSD) candidate.
Sunday's result plunged Romania — an EU state on Nato's eastern flank — into further political turmoil. Ciolacu told colleagues that as their coalition had failed to meet its objective and "has no legitimacy", they should pull out of the government.
Ciolacu, 57, had only come to power in a pro-EU coalition after elections in 2024, although George Simion's far-right party along with two other groupings had attracted a third of the vote.
The parties in that coalition had been holding emergency meetings on Monday to decide on their next steps.
Simion's victory on Sunday was largely driven by popular frustration at the annulment of presidential elections late last year. His likely success on 18 May is awaited nervously in European capitals, as well as in Kyiv.
He has said he wants an EU of strong, sovereign nations and his party has opposed supply weapons to Ukraine.
Ciolacu is now expected to submit his resignation to interim president Ilie Bolojan, who will then appoint a caretaker prime minister.
Bolojan himself took on the role of interim president last February because of the scandal surrounding the annulment of the presidential vote.
"Romania faces up to 45 days of political instability following Marcel Ciolacu's resignation," warned Elena Calistru of independent Romanian monitoring group Funky Citizens.
"This creates a dangerous power vacuum precisely when Romania needs steady leadership most."
Ciolacu's party was part of a three-party coalition and the prime minister told his colleagues they had come together with the aim of having a joint presidential candidate and a parliamentary majority.
"One of these two objectives has failed," he explained. "I've seen the vote from yesterday, and that tells us the current coalition no longer has legitimacy in this form."
"In any case, the new president would have replaced me – that's what I've seen and heard from the media. A new coalition will form to govern."
Catalin Predoiu, the leader of his liberal coalition partner PNL said they were now looking for a prime minister "capable of addressing the current challenges".
Meanwhile, the Social Democrat mayor of of Buzau, to the north-east of Bucharest, was highly critical of his party leaders: "We've embarrassed ourselves, and that's partly because of poor decisions taken over time by the leadership."
Georgescu had won last November's first round, which was annulled by the courts after allegations of Russian interference on social media and campaign fraud.
Simion cast his vote on Sunday alongside Georgescu, having told voters the election was "about every Romanian who has been lied to, ignored, humiliated, and still has the strength to believe and defend our identity and rights".
He has called for restoring Romania's old borders and has been banned from entering Moldova and Ukraine.
Political analyst Radu Albu-Comanescu told Romania public radio that Sunday's result was "a radical manifestation of hostility towards the current political establishment".
Simion did particularly well with Romania's diaspora voters, polling more than 73% in Spain and almost 65% in the UK among a broadly blue-collar electorate.
Public resentment at Romanian financial support for Ukrainian refugees has been a central plank in Simion's campaign, though he denies he is pro-Russian.
"Russia is the biggest danger towards Romania, Poland and the Baltic states, the problem is this war is not going anywhere," he told the BBC.
Elena Calistru said Romania was witnessing a remarkable political reset as both Simion and Nicușor Dan had positioned themselves as anti-establishment candidates with wildly different solutions.
"The outcome will reveal whether anti-establishment sentiment necessarily translates to anti-European positioning, or if Romania can channel its desire for change into constructive democratic renewal," she said. — BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
13 hours ago
- Leaders
Muslim Nations Should Build Palestinian State on Their Lands: US Envoy to Israel
The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has said that 'Muslim countries' should build a Palestinian state on their territory, according to BBC. 'Muslim countries have 644 times the amount of land that are controlled by Israel. So maybe, if there is such a desire for the Palestinian state, there would be someone who would say, we'd like to host it,' Huckabee said in a videotaped interview with the BBC. During the interview, he harshly criticized US allies, including the UK and Australia, for imposing sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers over 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities' in the occupied West Bank. On June 1, Huckabee attacked France's call for recognizing the Palestinian state, stating that if it adopted such an outcome, it could 'carve out a piece of the French Riviera' and create one, according to Al-Arabiya. The ambassador described the initiative at the UN as 'incredibly inappropriate when Israel is in the midst of a war.' The Israeli statement came after Macron's call for European countries to toughen up their stance on Israel if the humanitarian situation in Gaza did not improve. 'If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them — carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state. They are welcome to do that, but they are not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation,' Huckabee said. In May, Israel also accused French President Emmanuel Macron of undertaking a 'crusade against the Jewish state.' Related Topics: Western Allies Impose Sanctions on Israeli Ministers Over West Bank Violence Israel Plans to Build Jewish Israeli State in West Bank Macron Accuses Israel of Committing 'Shameful and Disgraceful' Actions in Gaza Short link : Post Views: 2
Arab News
14 hours ago
- Arab News
EU brings Turkiye into its security fold
Turkiye has long insisted on being a part of Europe's defense programs and having a say in how Europe shapes its security. Yet, for decades, European states viewed Turkiye mostly through the lens of its EU membership bid and political disagreements. But today, geopolitical matters — especially growing security threats — are shifting that perspective. Now, both Ankara and Brussels recognize that they face similar security concerns. This growing sense of mutual insecurity was highlighted this month, when Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler said that European allies must not only spend more on defense, but also do so wisely — by including Turkiye's fast-growing defense industry in their planning. Although many EU states have long been hesitant to increase their defense spending, US President Donald Trump pushed them to rethink and open their wallets. One major step was last month's creation of a €150 billion ($173 billion) EU defense fund, known as the Security Action for Europe scheme, which is aimed at strengthening its arms industry. A few years ago, the idea of integrating Turkish defense companies into Europe's security systems might have seemed unrealistic. But several factors have changed that. Turkiye's falling-out with the US over the F-35 program, increasing regional threats, Russia's aggression in Ukraine and Europe's doubts about long-term US security commitments have all helped bring Ankara and the EU closer together and make EU-Turkiye defense cooperation more appealing. The combination of these factors has created a major shift in their relationship, which is now reflected in more regular meetings between Turkish and European defense officials. Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time Dr. Sinem Cengiz Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time. The recent cooperation between Italy's Leonardo and Turkiye's Baykar — the company behind the well-known Bayraktar drones — is a significant example. Ankara is already joining several EU defense initiatives, such as the European Sky Shield Initiative. It is also involved in joint projects — like making ammunition with Poland, supplying military vehicles to Romania and working on naval programs with Portugal. This bilateral cooperation signals a new type of partnership between Turkiye and the EU states that goes beyond traditional parameters. Turkiye's success in building a strong defense industry — especially with its popular Bayraktar TB2 drone — has impressed many in Europe and boosted Ankara's leverage. Turkiye also has key strategic advantages. It has NATO's second-largest army and a central position near the Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East — areas where Europe needs security support. Its ability to help counterbalance Russian influence adds to its importance. With these advantages, Turkiye not only wants to sell its defense products to EU states, it wants a real seat at the table, shaping Europe's defense strategy and becoming part of the continent's industrial defense base. However, this potential partnership comes with some challenges. Not all EU countries are on the same page when it comes to Turkiye's integration into Europe's defense programs. The main challengers are Greece and Cyprus. Their concerns are not related to today's security realities, but rather to long-standing issues in Turkish-Greek relations. Despite these divisions, the insecurity caused by the broader global uncertainty is pushing many EU countries to move ahead with defense partnerships with Turkiye. They are trying to persuade Greece to accept closer cooperation with Turkiye in this field, emphasizing the bigger picture: a stronger and more self-reliant European security system. Thus, the pros of integrating Turkiye into EU defense programs are related to Turkiye's geographical position, its military strength, growing defense industry and mutual security concerns in a time of global instability. On the other hand, the cons and challenges are related to the fragmented EU approach. While some member states prioritize security and pragmatism, seeing Turkiye as essential for regional stability, some have long-standing issues with the country. Moreover, some remain wary of certain Turkish foreign policy moves that clash with EU interests, such as in Libya, the Eastern Mediterranean and Syria. Genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm Dr. Sinem Cengiz Given these challenges, genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm. What is meant by mutual benefit is that, while the EU keeps talking about the importance of Turkiye's role in European security, it is not offering any commitments relating to Ankara's membership of the bloc. The EU's often ambiguous approach raises questions about its sincerity and how it perceives Turkiye. European heavyweights such as Germany — which sees Turkiye's support to Europe's security as significant — often seem to turn a deaf ear and a blind eye when it comes to the issue of Turkish membership. Turkiye's experience with the 2016 migrant deal with the EU further deepens this skepticism. At the time, the agreement had raised hopes in Ankara that Turkiye's role within the EU framework would be strengthened. However, several factors have made both sides doubtful about the other's direction. According to Ankara, inclusion in EU defense planning not only strengthens its own economy and geopolitical standing, but it also increases its bargaining power in other policy areas with the EU. From Turkiye's perspective, defense ties could serve as a steppingstone to resetting broader relations with the EU after years of political friction. There are now even larger expectations that are likely to guide the Turkiye-EU defense partnership. Thus, if a new era is to begin, lessons from the past must guide the new EU approach so that this momentum will not end up as a missed opportunity. • Dr. Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkiye's relations with the Middle East. X: @SinemCngz
Saudi Gazette
18 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran
BRUSSELS — European leaders are voicing alarm over the military attacks launched overnight between Israel and Iran and calling for immediate de-escalation to avoid an all-out war that could spiral across the Middle East and beyond. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was one of the first heads of government to react, urging "all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently". "Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate," Starmer said on social media. "Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy." His Dutch counterpart, Dick Schoof, issued a similar message. "Alarming attacks in the Middle East," Schoof said. "The Netherlands calls on all parties to remain calm and to refrain from further attacks and retaliation. In the interest of stability in the region, immediate de-escalation is necessary." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz convened his security cabinet after speaking by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who informed him about the objectives behind the military operation. The Iranian nuclear program "violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel," Merz said in a statement as he warned against regional instability. Merz cited the recent conclusion by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that found Iran was not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years. Germany stands ready "to exert influence on the parties to the conflict using all diplomatic means at our disposal. The goal must remain to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons," the chancellor added. French President Emmanuel Macron also gathered his defense and security team to assess the escalation of hostilities and implement "all necessary steps" to protect French nationals, diplomats and military officials deployed across the region. In a post on X he condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and reaffirmed Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security, while echoing political calls for "maximum restraint" and immediate de-escalation. "Peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle," Macron said. As part of his diplomatic outreach, Macron spoke with US President Donald Trump, with whom he is believed to be in regular contact, as well as with Merz, Starmer and the leaders from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Jordan. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was highly critical of Israel, denouncing the military strikes as a "clear provocation that disregards international law". "The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions," Erdoğan wrote in Turkish, also posted on X. "The international community must put an end to Israeli banditry that targets global and regional stability," he went on. "The attacks of Netanyahu and his massacre network, which are setting our entire region on fire, must be prevented." In Brussels, the leaders of the European Union institutions weighed in on the "deeply alarming" chain of events. "Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in a statement that did not mention Israel or Iran by name. "A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security," von der Leyen added. High Representative Kaja Kallas described the situation as "dangerous" and said that "diplomacy remains the best path forward". Earlier on Friday, Kallas spoke with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Sa'ar, and her team was in touch with Tehran. "We're speaking to both sides and channels are open," her spokesperson said. Asked if the Commission was ready to evacuate its diplomatic presence on the ground, which is considered to be limited in scope, the spokesperson said: "Appropriate measures have been taken to reinforce the security of our staff and to mitigate risks." Other capitals offered their initial reactions through their foreign affairs ministries. "The situation in the Middle East is deeply concerning, and the cycle of military escalation must be brought to an end," said Finland's Elina Valtonen, noting the staff of the Finnish embassy in Tehran was "safe" and continued to operate "normally". Austria's Beate Meinl-Reisinger said her country and its partners should prepare "for all possible scenarios," as Ireland's Simon Harris cautioned that "further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover". "This would be disastrous for all the peoples in the region," Harris said. Meanwhile, the Kremlin's spokesperson said Vladimir Putin was receiving "real-time updates" on the "sharp escalation in tensions" adding that "Russia is concerned and condemns the sharp escalation in tensions between Israel and Iran." Russia is a close ally of Iran, which is under sanctions for providing military supplies to support the invasion of Ukraine. The renewed conflict between Israel and Iran comes two days before the leaders of the Group of Seven (G7) are set to meet for a two-day summit in Canada. The summit's agenda was intended to focus on Russia's war on Ukraine and the international trade system, but the latest developments are expected to alter that agenda. — Euronews
