logo
The world nearly beat polio. But fake records, imperfect vaccine, missteps aided its comeback

The world nearly beat polio. But fake records, imperfect vaccine, missteps aided its comeback

Economic Times2 days ago
AP A health worker administers a polio vaccine to a child in Karachi, Pakistan, April 21, 2025.
For the past decade, Sughra Ayaz has travelled door to door in southeastern Pakistan, pleading with parents to allow children to be vaccinated against polio to wipe out the paralytic disease. She hears their demands and fears. Some are practical - families need basics like food and water more than vaccines. Amid rampant misinformation and immense pressure for the campaign to succeed, Ayaz said, some managers have instructed workers to falsely mark children as immunised. And the vaccines, which must be kept cold, aren't always stored correctly, she added. The World Health Organisation and partners embarked on their polio campaign in 1988 with the bold goal of eradication - a feat seen only once for human diseases, with smallpox in 1980. They came close several times, including in 2021, when just five cases of the natural virus were reported in Pakistan and Afghanistan. But since then, cases rebounded, hitting 99 last year, and officials missed at least six self-imposed eradication deadlines. Afghanistan and Pakistan remain the only countries where transmission of polio.
But in its quest to eliminate the disease, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative has been derailed by mismanagement and what insiders describe as blind allegiance to an outdated strategy, according to workers, polio experts and internal materials obtained by The Associated Press. Officials have falsified vaccination records, selected unqualified people to dole out drops, failed to send out teams during mass campaigns, and dismissed concerns about the oral vaccinesparking outbreaks according to documents shared with AP by staffers from GPEI - one of the largest public health campaigns, with over USD 20 billion spent and nearly every country in the world involved. Officials tout the successes - 3 billion children vaccinated, an estimated 20 million people who would have been paralysed spared - while acknowledging challenges in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Remote villages are hard to reach, some cultural and religious authorities instruct against vaccination, and hundreds of polio workers and security staff have been killed because of their alignment with a Western-led initiative. Dr. Jamal Ahmed, WHO's polio director, defended progress in those two countries, citing workers' tailored response in resistant pockets. Ahmed said he believes authorities will end the spread of polio in the next 12 to 18 months. Its latest goal for eradication is 2029. The campaign says about 45 million children in Pakistan and 11 million in Afghanistan must be vaccinated this year. Children typically need four doses of two drops each to be considered fully immunised.
Dr. Zulfiqar Bhutta, who has served on advisory groups for WHO, the Gates Foundation and others, said campaign officials should listen to the criticism of its tactics. Documents show years-long problems on polio vaccination teams. The documents flagged multiple cases of falsified vaccination records, health workers being replaced by untrained relatives and workers improperly administering vaccines. On numerous occasions, WHO officials noted, "vaccinators did not know about vaccine management," citing failure to keep doses properly cold. They also found sloppy or falsified reporting, with workers noting "more used vaccine vials than were actually supplied." According to an August 2017 report from Kandahar, Afghanistan, local government authorities and others interfered in choosing vaccinators, "resulting in the selection of underage and illiterate volunteers." Vaccination teams worked "in a hurried manner," reports said. A team in Nawzad, Afghanistan, covered just half of the intended area in 2017, with 250 households missed entirely. Village elders said no one visited for at least two years. Vaccine workers and health officials in Afghanistan and Pakistan confirmed the issues in the documents and told AP it's hard for campaign leadership to grasp the difficulties in the field. Door-to-door efforts are stymied by cultural barriers, unfounded stories about vaccines, and the region's poverty and transience. In an email response to AP's questions about officials' knowledge of the issues, WHO polio director Ahmed noted "operational challenges" in Afghanistan and Pakistan and said the program has "robust monitoring and evaluation processes." Ayaz described "fake finger marking" - placing the ink used to show a child is vaccinated on their pinky even when no vaccine has been given. Critics point to the continued use of the oral polio vaccine. Before the first polio vaccine was developed in 1955, the disease - spread mostly from person to person, through contaminated water and via faecal particles - was among the world's most feared, paralysing hundreds of thousands of children annually. Polio is mainly spread when people are exposed to water infected with the virus. In countries with poor sanitation, children often become infected when they come into contact with contaminated waste. WHO says that as long as a single child remains infected, kids everywhere are at risk. Eradication demands near-perfection - zero polio cases and immunising more than 95 per cent of children. The oral vaccine - proven to be safe and effective - has been given to more than 3 billion children. But there are some extremely rare side effects: Scientists estimate that for every 2.7 million first doses given, one child will be paralysed by the live polio virus in the vaccine. In even rarer instances, the live virus can mutate into a form capable of starting new outbreaks among unimmunized people where vaccination rates are low. Worldwide, several hundred vaccine-derived cases have been reported annually since at least 2021, with at least 98 this year. Most public health experts agree the oral vaccine should be pulled as soon as possible. But they acknowledge there simply isn't enough injectable vaccine - which uses no live virus and doesn't come with the risks of the oral vaccine - to wipe out polio alone. The injectable vaccine is also more expensive and requires more training to administer. Dr. Tom Frieden, a former director of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention who sits on an independent board reviewing polio eradication, said it would be impossible to eliminate polio without the oral vaccine. But he's urged authorities to find ways to adapt, such as adopting new methods to identify polio cases more quickly. Since 2011, he and colleagues have issued regular reports about overall program failures. Last year, former WHO scientist Dr. T. Jacob John twice emailed WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, calling for a course correction. John shared the emails with AP and said he's received no response. In his response to AP, WHO polio director Ahmed said the oral vaccine is a "core pillar" of the eradication strategy and that "almost every country that is polio-free today used (it) to achieve that milestone." Ahmed also pointed to the success the WHO and partners had in eliminating polio from India, once considered a nearly impossible task. In the four years before polio was wiped out there, health workers delivered about 1 billion doses of the oral vaccine to more than 170 million children. Today, nearly all of the world's polio cases -- mostly in Africa and the Middle East -- are mutated viruses from the oral vaccine, except for Afghanistan and Pakistan. Scott Barrett, a Columbia University professor, called for an inquiry into how things went so wrong, particularly with a failed effort in 2016, when authorities removed a strain from the oral vaccine. They miscalculated, leading to outbreaks in more than 40 countries that paralysed more than 3,000 children, according to an expert report commissioned by WHO. Last year, a mutated virus traced to that effort paralysed a baby in Gaza. Mistrust of the polio eradication effort persists.
With an annual budget of about USD 1 billion, the polio initiative is among the most expensive in all of public health. This year, the US withdrew from the WHO, and President Donald Trump has cut foreign aid. WHO officials have privately admitted that sustaining funding would be difficult without success. Some say the money would be better spent on other health needs. "We have spent more than USD 1 billion in the last five years in Pakistan alone, and it didn't buy us any progress," said Roland Sutter, who formerly led polio research at WHO. Villagers, too, have protested the cost, staging hundreds of boycotts of immunisation campaigns since 2023. Instead of polio vaccines, they ask for medicine, food and electricity. In Karachi, locals told AP they didn't understand the government's fixation on polio and complained of other issues - dirty water, heroin addiction. Workers are accompanied by armed guards; Pakistani authorities say more than 200 workers and police assigned to protect them have been killed since the 1990s, mostly by militants. The campaign is also up against a wave of misinformation, including that the vaccine is made from pig urine or will make children reach puberty early. Some blame an anti-vaccine sentiment growing in the US and other countries that have largely funded eradication efforts and say it's reaching even remote areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan. In suburban southwest Pakistan, Saleem Khan, 58, said two grandchildren under 5 were vaccinated over his family's objections. "It results in disability," said Khan, without citing evidence for his belief. Svea Closser, professor of international health at Johns Hopkins University, said Pakistan and Afghanistan were less resistant to immunisation decades ago. Now, people are angry about the focus on polio and lack of help for diseases like measles or tuberculosis, she said, spurring conspiracy theories.
In a mountainous region of southeastern Afghanistan where most people survive by growing wheat and raising cows and chickens, a mother of five said she'd prefer that her children be vaccinated against polio, but her husband and other male relatives have instructed their families to reject it. They believe the false rumours that it will compromise their children's fertility.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk
'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk

Economic Times

timea minute ago

  • Economic Times

'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk

Synopsis A recent CDC report reveals that over half of Americans' daily calories come from ultra-processed foods, high in sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats. While consumption has slightly decreased in the last decade, experts emphasize the link between these foods and health issues like obesity and diabetes. Efforts are underway to define ultra-processed foods more clearly and encourage healthier alternatives. AP Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, CDC report says Most Americans get more than half of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods, the kind that are very tasty but often full of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, according to a new federal is the first time the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially confirmed how high these levels are, based on diet data collected from August 2021 to August foods include burgers, sweet baked goods, salty snacks, pizza, and sugary drinks, all of which are popular across the United to the CDC report, about 55% of calories eaten by Americans aged 1 and older came from ultra-processed foods. For adults, it was about 53%, while for children and teenagers, it reached almost 62%.Young children ate slightly fewer ultra-processed foods compared to teenagers. Among adults, those aged 60 and older consumed less than younger adults. Low-income adults were found to eat more of these foods than those with higher incomes. 'This isn't surprising,' said Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert and co-author of the she added that it was surprising to see a small drop in ultra-processed food consumption over the last decade. For example, adult intake fell from 56% in 2013–2014, and for children, it dropped from 66% in 2017– said she couldn't say for sure what caused the Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was quoted by AP, said, 'There may be more awareness of how harmful these foods can be. People are trying, at least in some populations, to eat less of them.'U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also raised alarms. 'We are poisoning ourselves, and it's coming principally from these ultra-processed foods,' he told Fox News, as reported by CDC used the Nova classification system, which is widely used around the world. This system groups foods into four levels based on how much they are foods usually: Contain little or no whole foods Are high in salt, sugar, and bad fats Are low in fibre Are 'hyper-palatable' (very tasty and easy to overeat) Officials in the U.S. have said there is still confusion about how to define these foods. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Agriculture Department have asked for public input to help create a clearer definition for the U.S. food foods have long been linked to obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, though many studies could not prove that these foods directly cause these conditions.A small but important study showed that even when people ate the same number of calories, they gained more weight when eating ultra-processed foods compared to less processed new study in the journal Nature found that people lost twice as much weight eating minimally processed foods like chicken, pasta, fruit, and vegetables, compared to eating processed ready meals or protein bars, even if the meals had similar said people should try to eat less ultra-processed food where example, instead of instant oatmeal that contains added sugar and preservatives, people could use plain oats and sweeten them with natural honey or maple syrup.'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said, as quoted by AP. Inputs from AP

Bowel cancer on the rise: Experts reveal the hidden factor that increases the risk of colorectal cancer
Bowel cancer on the rise: Experts reveal the hidden factor that increases the risk of colorectal cancer

Time of India

time8 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bowel cancer on the rise: Experts reveal the hidden factor that increases the risk of colorectal cancer

A recent study by Flinders University reveals a significant link between having both adenomas and serrated polyps in the bowel and an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Individuals with these synchronous lesions are five times more likely to develop advanced pre-cancerous changes. Bowel cancer, also known as colorectal cancer, is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, according to the World Health Organization ( WHO ). What makes this cancer particularly dangerous is that the symptoms don't appear in early stages, which delays diagnosis and drastically reduces treatment outcomes. Experts now think that common growth can significantly increase the risk of bowel cancer. A new study conducted by the researchers at Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre has found a critical link between having two types of polyps, common growths found in the bowel, and an increased risk of developing cancer. The findings of the study are published in the Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) journal. Bowel cancer and common growths Most of the bowel cancers begin as benign polys, which are non-threatening growths that appear on the wall or the lining of the bowel. There are two types of polyps - adenomas and serrated polyps, which can progress into cancer. To understand if these common growths could increase cancer risk, the researchers analyzed over 8,400 colonoscopy records. They found that people with both adenomas and serrated polyps were up to five times more likely to develop advanced pre-cancerous changes than those with just one type. 'Polyps are common and usually harmless, but when both types appear together—what we call synchronous lesions—the risk of serious bowel disease or cancer rises sharply,' Dr Molla Wassie, lead author and researcher at the FHMRI Bowel Health Service, said in a statement. What's more concerning is that nearly half of all the patients with serrated polyps also had adenomas, which hints that the high-risk group is more common than previously thought. 'This is one of the largest studies of its kind. Our findings support growing international evidence that these two types of polyps may represent separate cancer pathways that can be active at the same time, making early detection and regular monitoring even more important,' Dr. Wassie said. The researchers also noticed that serrated polyps may progress to cancer faster than adenomas. 'Polyps become more common as we age, but the key is catching and removing them early. If you've had both types of polyps, it's especially important to stay on top of your colonoscopy schedule. If you're over 45 or have a family history of bowel issues, talk to your GP or visit the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program to learn more,' Dr Wassie added. No more guesswork: Doctor busts common myths about women's health What are the symptoms of bowel cancer ? Though bowel cancer does not have symptoms in the early stages, regular screening can help catch the disease early. Some of the common symptoms include: Changes in bowel habits (diarrhoea, constipation, or narrowing of the stool) Rectal bleeding Abdominal pain, cramps, or bloating that persists Unexplained weight loss Chronic fatigue Factors such as age, family history, personal history, and lifestyle factors (diet high in processed meats and low in fruits and vegetables, sedentary behaviour, obesity, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption) may increase the risk.

'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk
'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Americans are poisoning themselves': CDC reveals how over 50% of daily calories come from ultra-processed junk

Most Americans get more than half of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods , the kind that are very tasty but often full of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, according to a new federal report. This is the first time the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially confirmed how high these levels are, based on diet data collected from August 2021 to August 2023. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Ultra-processed foods include burgers, sweet baked goods, salty snacks, pizza, and sugary drinks, all of which are popular across the United States. According to the CDC report, about 55% of calories eaten by Americans aged 1 and older came from ultra-processed foods. For adults, it was about 53%, while for children and teenagers, it reached almost 62%. Young children ate slightly fewer ultra-processed foods compared to teenagers. Among adults, those aged 60 and older consumed less than younger adults. Low-income adults were found to eat more of these foods than those with higher incomes. Live Events 'This isn't surprising,' said Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert and co-author of the report. However, she added that it was surprising to see a small drop in ultra-processed food consumption over the last decade. For example, adult intake fell from 56% in 2013–2014, and for children, it dropped from 66% in 2017–2018. Williams said she couldn't say for sure what caused the drop. But Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was quoted by AP, said, 'There may be more awareness of how harmful these foods can be. People are trying, at least in some populations, to eat less of them.' U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also raised alarms. 'We are poisoning ourselves, and it's coming principally from these ultra-processed foods,' he told Fox News, as reported by AP. What Are Ultra-Processed Foods? The CDC used the Nova classification system, which is widely used around the world. This system groups foods into four levels based on how much they are processed. Ultra-processed foods usually: Contain little or no whole foods Are high in salt, sugar, and bad fats Are low in fibre Are 'hyper-palatable' (very tasty and easy to overeat) Officials in the U.S. have said there is still confusion about how to define these foods. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Agriculture Department have asked for public input to help create a clearer definition for the U.S. food supply. Why Is This Important? Ultra-processed foods have long been linked to obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, though many studies could not prove that these foods directly cause these conditions. A small but important study showed that even when people ate the same number of calories, they gained more weight when eating ultra-processed foods compared to less processed foods. Another new study in the journal Nature found that people lost twice as much weight eating minimally processed foods like chicken, pasta, fruit, and vegetables, compared to eating processed ready meals or protein bars, even if the meals had similar nutrients. What Can People Do? Deierlein said people should try to eat less ultra-processed food where possible. For example, instead of instant oatmeal that contains added sugar and preservatives, people could use plain oats and sweeten them with natural honey or maple syrup. 'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said, as quoted by AP. Inputs from AP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store