
Plans to make mutual fund rules more investor and industry friendly: SEBI official
Existing regulations governing the sector are among the lengthiest and require simplification to keep pace with evolving investor needs and industry innovations, stakeholders said.
'We are reviewing the entire mutual fund regulatory framework to enhance ease of doing business for all stakeholders, including the regulator,' SEBI executive director Manoj Kumar said at the 17th Mutual Fund Summit organised by the Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) here.
Kolkata, Jun 21 (PTI) The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is undertaking a comprehensive review of mutual fund regulations to make them more investor-centric and industry-friendly, a senior official said on Saturday.
'The process has started and soon we will come out with draft regulations for feedback and consultation process before it is finalised,' Kumar said without giving any timeline for the rollout of the new rules.
Kumar outlined the regulator's strategic roadmap to strengthen India's securities market, with mutual funds positioned as a critical pillar in fostering inclusive financial growth and investor protection.
A consultation paper on regulations which governs advisory functions in mutual funds is also in the pipeline.
Addressing the event, Kumar said India has undergone major market transformations under SEBI's stewardship.
These include the shift to an electronic trading ecosystem in 1998, followed by achieving 100 per cent dematerialisation of shares, making India the only jurisdiction globally to do so.
'The third transformation is unfolding now through the mutual fund revolution,' he said, calling it a cornerstone of SEBI's 'optimum regulation' approach, one that seeks balance among the interests of the regulator, the industry, and investors.
While India's mutual fund industry has crossed Rs 72 lakh-crore in AUM and monthly SIP contributions have touched Rs 28,000 crore, the investor base remains limited to just five crore in a population of 140 crore, Kumar pointed out.
SEBI is also actively reviewing scheme categorisation norms to make them more intuitive for investors, while ensuring all offerings remain 'true to label' to prevent mis-selling.
To offer wider choice to investors, SEBI has approved a new product category, referred to as SIF, aimed at investors with ticket sizes between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 50 lakh.
Mutual funds were selected to manage these products given their established governance and handling of retail flows.
Parallelly, SEBI has opened faster registration windows for Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) with similar offerings.
Addressing industry concerns over stress test disclosures for mid- and small-cap funds, Kumar reaffirmed SEBI's disclosure-based regulatory model, stressing that informed investors are central to market resilience.
While he acknowledged that some disclosure requirements may seem burdensome, he assured stakeholders that SEBI remains open to feedback and streamlining processes.
He urged the industry to avoid situations that warrant regulatory intervention, saying, 'Our goal is not to disrupt but to allow business to thrive.' Highlighting the untapped potential in eastern India, Kumar said SEBI views West Bengal and the Northeast as strategic regions for mutual fund expansion, underscoring the need for targeted penetration efforts.
Echoing this vision, AMFI chief executive V N Chalasani said India is transitioning from financial inclusion to financial well-being, where saving smartly and investing wisely will enable sustainable wealth creation.
He cited the exponential growth of mutual funds post-2017, following SEBI's investor education mandate, which helped expand the investor base and improve financial awareness.
However, Chalasani pointed out that India's mutual fund AUM still forms only about 20 per cent of GDP, compared to a global average of 65 per cent.
He stressed the need for deeper financial literacy, especially in Tier 3 and 4 cities, where AMFI is focusing through school and university programmes, distributor expansion via India Post, and new product innovations aimed at mid-income investors.
'Every Indian can evolve from a saver to an investor and ultimately a wealth creator,' he said, calling for sustained collaboration between regulators, industry, educators and investors to build an empowered, financially resilient India. PTI BSM MNB
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Interest on refund is like compensation in consumer disputes'
New Delhi: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), while holding builders liable for deficiency in service, observed that in consumer cases, awarding interest along with a refund serves as a form of compensation. The commission's bench of Justice Sudip Ahluwalia and Sadhna Shanker was hearing an appeal filed by a builder against the orders of a state commission. The state commission had found the builder's service deficient and directed a refund of Rs 34,27,747 with 12% interest, Rs 1 lakh as compensation, and Rs 11,000 as litigation costs to the complainant. On June 16, NCDRC modified the state commission's order based on legal precedents. It set aside the Rs 1 lakh compensation but increased the litigation costs from Rs 11,000 to Rs 40,000. In 2011, the complainants booked a flat in a project by Barnala Builders on the Chandigarh-Ambala Highway after seeing advertisements that claimed it was fully developed and clear of legal issues. They paid a large portion of the price, but the builder did not provide the buyer's agreement at first. Later, the builder gave them an agreement with many unexpected and unfair terms. The complainants also received several arbitrary service tax demands without a proper explanation. Despite paying over Rs 34 lakh, they were only given a paper possession letter, while actual development, utility connections, and statutory certificates were still missing. They asked for a refund, but the builder only threatened forfeiture. They filed a complaint before the state commission of Punjab in 2014. The commission in 2016 held that the builder had been deficient in service and ordered a refund of Rs 34,27,747 with 12% interest, Rs 1 lakh compensation, and Rs 11,000 as litigation costs. Aggrieved, the builder filed an appeal before the National Commission. The national commission reaffirmed that in consumer cases, giving interest and a refund is a kind of compensation.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Corpn can't tax railway property: HC
Madurai: Article 285(1) of the Constitution indicates that the property of the Union shall be exempt from all taxes imposed by a state, even if it is put to commercial use, observed Madras high court . The court set aside a single bench order dismissing a plea moved by Madurai Multi Functional Complex Private Limited challenging the demand notice issued by Madurai corporation seeking payment of property tax. The land in Madurai belongs to railways. To develop vacant land parcels owned by railways, The Railways Act, 1989, was amended and Railway Land Development Authority (RLDA) was constituted. In 2013, RLDA and Ircon Infrastructure and Services Limited entered into an agreement for development of railway land throughout India. Subsequently, Ircon entered into a sub-lease agreement for 30 years with Madurai Multi Functional Complex Private Limited concerning the property in Madurai. The Multi Functional Complex was constructed by Ircon on a 2,700 sq metre plot within Madurai railway station premises. Madurai corporation assessed the building for property tax and issued a demand notice in 2018, calling upon Madurai Multi Functional Complex Private Limited to pay half-yearly tax of Rs 10,07,623. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo Though a petition was filed challenging the demand notice, it was dismissed by the single judge. Therefore, Madurai Multi Functional Complex Private Limited (appellant) preferred the present appeal in 2020. A division bench of Justice G R Swaminathan and Justice M Jothiraman observed that the plain language of Article 285(1) of the Constitution indicates that the property of the Union shall be exempt from all taxes imposed by a state or by any authority within a state. "Article 285(1) stands as an iron dome which cannot be breached. Property of the Union of all kinds and hues can take shelter within it," the judges observed. The judges noted that RLDA is an alter-ego of the railways which cannot hold properties in its name. "Therefore, we hold that the petition mentioned building belongs to railways. The title over the building vests with the railways," they said. Hence, the judges held that the levy of property tax over the appellant-building would fall foul of Article 285(1) of the Constitution and set aside the order of the single bench. However, the judges made it clear that since the appellant is enjoying certain facilities offered by the Madurai corporation, it is open to the corporation to enter into a special agreement with the appellant to enable the petitioner to continue to enjoy those facilities. Since the appellant-building forms a class by itself, it is open to the corporation to charge a higher drainage tax. The corporation will issue notice to the appellant and other occupiers of the building to come for negotiation and enter into an appropriate agreement in this regard, the judges observed.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sreekaryam flyover initial construction phase to be completed in three months
Thiruvananthapuram: The major construction phase of Sreekaryam flyover, including stormwater drains, utility ducts, service roads and utility shifting, is expected to be completed within the next three months. The work is progressing at a fast pace despite the monsoon rains. Kochi Metro Rail Limited, the implementing agency, is planning to complete the initial phase in three months to ensure smooth conveyance for commuters and motorists through service roads. Once the initial phase wraps up, the central portion of the road will be cordoned off to facilitate piling and construction of main flyover pillars. Unlike other flyover projects, Sreekaryam's piling work is being executed with enhanced strength and depth, specifically engineered to support the future Metro rail pillars that may run along the divider, an alignment coordinated with the proposed Metro rail corridor in the state capital. Currently, work is going on to complete the infrastructure beneath the elevated carriageway. "Prioritising the service roads and utilities at this stage is essential," said an official close to the project. "It is about laying a strong foundation to ensure safety and minimal disruption when the main overbridge construction begins," the official said. Approved in Sept 2024, the flyover is a flagship element of the city's infrastructure upgrade, aligned with the proposed Metro system. The design features common piers meant to support both the flyover and the Metro pillars, optimising land use and reducing duplication. Project cost stands around Rs 170–177 crore, encompassing civil works, land acquisition, utility shifting and service road construction. Funding has been arranged through Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB). An earlier tender awarded to the construction firm serving as the main contractor quoted Rs 71.38 crore for the flyover structure, including negotiations to bring the estimate just above the technical sanction of Rs 61 crore, allowing swift commencement to avoid delays. The land acquisition covering approximately 1.34 hectares from 168 affected parties across Cheruvakkal, Ulloor and Pangappara was completed late 2024 and demolition of existing structures concluded prior to full mobilisation in early 2025. In Jan 2025, the contractor started mobilising equipment and labour, with the four-lane flyover extending 535m and its carriageway measuring 7.5m wide. In addition, 5.5m service roads flank both sides, with 1.5m footpaths incorporated for pedestrian use. "Shifting utilities and completing stormwater drains along the length there are the priorities now," said the official. "We are making sure commuters can use the parallel service roads without hindrance," he added. With the underdrainage, ducts and relocations nearing completion, the next major activity will be piling the central columns. These foundations, laid to Metro-compatible specifications, will uphold a flyover capable of carrying both surface traffic and Metro infrastructure, said a site engineer. A total of Rs 98 crore has been disbursed to the landowners who conceded land for the project. A total of 168 buildings were razed as part of the project. In 2016, the govt green-lit the construction of flyovers at Sreekaryam, Pattom and Ulloor for a total cost of Rs 272 crore as part of the proposed Metro rail project. However, the flyover projects at Pattom and Ulloor will be implemented only after finalising the alignment of the Metro project.