logo
Austen's Jane is the friend you need

Austen's Jane is the friend you need

Indian Express4 days ago
It is a truth often ignored that the Pride and Prejudice screen adaptations are unfair to her secondary characters. As the 2005 movie returns to Indian cinemas and a new series hits Netflix, amid all the sizzle and dazzle of the lead pair, another generation of viewers will probably dismiss Jane Bennet as the sweet, boring sister of Elizabeth.
However, the eldest Miss Bennet was written with more substance than is universally acknowledged, and she would probably be a better friend than the clever Lizzy in today's world.
One of the many reasons the charms of Pride and Prejudice refuse to fade is how easily the main story adapts to the screen. Jane Austen's sparkling dialogue can directly be lifted into the screenplay, and the lead characters, Elizabeth and Mr Darcy, confirm to modern sensibilities. Written 200 years ago, Elizabeth has more spirit and verve than many 21st century heroines. The rich, brooding Mr Darcy is an atypical romance hero in that he actually understands consent.
In contrast, Jane Bennet's rather unfashionable and non-camera-friendly virtues seem to be patience, forgiveness, and suffering in silence. In fact, most movies don't even do her the justice of adhering to the one fact the novel hammers on, that Jane is much more beautiful than Elizabeth.
But the thing about the book Jane is this — she is not just beautiful and sweet, she is kind and strong, and has good judgement without the need to judge. Austen repeatedly alludes to Jane's good sense, steady disposition, and moral courage. When the Bingleys are pressing her to stay on at Netherfield, Austen writes, 'Jane was firm where she felt herself to be in the right.' When Lizzy says Jane can never see a fault in anybody, she replies, 'I would not wish to be hasty in censuring anyone; but I always speak what I think', which Elizabeth agrees is the case.
Elizabeth is the favourite of her dad, the intelligent, witty parent, while throughout the book, Jane is taking care of their mother, the petulant, embarrassing parent. While Elizabeth goes vacationing with her aunt and uncle, it is Jane who is best suited to 'play with, teach, and love' their four small children.
And of course, it is Jane's assessment of Mr Darcy that turns out to be the right one, after all.
One of the most telling commentaries on Jane's character comes from Austen much later in the book, when Elizabeth tells her about Wickham's true character. Jane would 'willingly have gone through the world without believing that so much wickedness existed in the whole of mankind, as was here collected in one individual'.
And this is why I think she would make for a better friend than Lizzy in today's world — choosing to believe in the goodness of the world and its inhabitants, in the face of staggering counter-evidence.
While their circumstances turn Elizabeth cynical, Jane continues to believe that romance and love and hope and goodness are around and even aplenty.
Also, Jane refuses to perform. Throughout the book, there is no scene of her being singled out to play or sing, or of some sparkling repartee she delivers. Her good sense and brains are all displayed in acts of care or confidence. Liz and Charlotte even discuss how she does not display her affection for Bingley.
In the hyper-performative age we live in, Jane's willingness to forever pass the mic would be truly radical. At a time when we seem to live for likes and views, a stunningly beautiful woman who refused to play for attention is refreshing.
The sparkle of Lizzie Bennet will never fade. But it is the steady light of Jane we need when our hearts feel heavy and dark.
The writer is Senior Assistant Editor, The Indian Express
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dhadak 2 Box Office Collection Day 6: Triptii Dimri's movie slows midweek, collects only THIS much
Dhadak 2 Box Office Collection Day 6: Triptii Dimri's movie slows midweek, collects only THIS much

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Dhadak 2 Box Office Collection Day 6: Triptii Dimri's movie slows midweek, collects only THIS much

Dhadak 2 Box Office Collection Day 6: Siddhant Chaturvedi and Triptii Dimri starrer Dhadak 2 saw a midweek slowdown in its earnings at the Indian box office. However, the movie has finally crossed the ₹ 15 crore mark. Dhadak 2's earnings have been significantly hit by blockbuster Saiyaara and Hombale Films' mythological animated film Mahavatar Narsimha. It also had some competition from Ajay Devgn's Son of Sardaar 2, which was also released on Friday, August 1. According to industry tracker Sacnilk, Dhadak 2 earned ₹ 1.04 crore on Wednesday, Day 6. The movie, which had maintained its average weekday earnings, slipped by 36.97% on August 6. Its Day 6 earnings are Dhadak 2's lowest earnings for a single day so far. In its six-day run, Dhadak 2 earned only ₹ 15.44 crore, while Son of Sardaar 2 earned more than double— ₹ 31.49 crore. Dhadak 2 had an overall 13.05% Hindi occupancy on Wednesday Dhadak 2 had the highest number of screenings in Delhi NCR, Mumbai, and Ahmedabad, with 334, 231, and 177 shows, respectively. However, other regions across India are only running shows in double digits, highlighting the film's declining demand within the first 7 days of its release. Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, and Jaipur are currently leading in terms of occupancy. Meanwhile, regions like Lucknow, Kolkata, and Bhopal have witnessed a noticeable decline in theatre occupancy. Dhadak 2 has also earned ₹ 2.75 crore overseas, taking its global total to ₹ 20 crore. Its India gross was reported to be ₹ 17.25 crore. IMDb describes Dhadak 2, directed by Shazia Iqbal, as 'A searing romantic drama about identity, power, and the cost of love in the world we live in.' The movie stars Saad Bilgrami, Manjiri Pupala, Richa, Vipin Sharma, Deeksha Joshi, Mayank Khanna, Aditya Thakare, Shantanu Pandey, Bala, Priyank Tiwari, Ashwant Lodhi and Amit Jaat in key roles.

Salman Khan rejected these 4 blockbuster films, one has been running in theatres for 30 years, its name is..., lead actors are...
Salman Khan rejected these 4 blockbuster films, one has been running in theatres for 30 years, its name is..., lead actors are...

India.com

time29 minutes ago

  • India.com

Salman Khan rejected these 4 blockbuster films, one has been running in theatres for 30 years, its name is..., lead actors are...

Salman Khan rejected these 4 blockbuster films, one has been running in theatres for 30 years, its name is..., lead actors are... Salman Khan is considered one of Bollywood's biggest superstars, celebrated for his action-packed roles and charismatic screen presence. Ever since entering the industry, the actor has given us countless blockbusters, but there are some films he turned down that went on to became massive hits. Let's take a look at these blockbuster projects! Baazigar Salman Khan was first approached for the lead role in Abbas-Mustan's directorial. However, the actor turned it down as his father advised the makers to add an emotional intensity in protagonist's mother. However, the makers didn't agree, and the role eventually went on to Shah Rukh Khan, who delivered an impeccable performance. Chak De! India Not Shah Rukh Khan, but Salman Khan was first offered lead role in Chak De! India. However, he chose to turn the project down as he was worried that the film's serious tone might won't appeal his fans, as he was doing more comedy films at the time. The role eventually went on to SRK, and won audiences hearts with his nuanced performance. Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (DDLJ) DDLJ, one of Bollywood's most admired love stories, was initially offered to Salman Khan. However, the actor declined the portrayal of Raj Malhotra, and it went on to Shah Rukh Khan, which solidified his legacy as India's ultimate romantic hero. DDLJ has become the longest-running film in Indian cinema's history. It continues to run in theatres for 30 years, specifically at Mumbai's Maratha Mandir cinema since its release on October 20, 1995. Ghajini Salman Khan was first approached for the lead role in blockbuster film Ghajini. According to reports, he wasn't happy with the script and turned down the offer. The role then went to Aamir Khan, who gave a tremendous performance and shattered all box office records.

Fact Check: Rs 3 Lakh Fine Or Jail For Posting 'Hakla Shah Rukh Khan' Meme? Here's The Truth
Fact Check: Rs 3 Lakh Fine Or Jail For Posting 'Hakla Shah Rukh Khan' Meme? Here's The Truth

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Fact Check: Rs 3 Lakh Fine Or Jail For Posting 'Hakla Shah Rukh Khan' Meme? Here's The Truth

Last Updated: Some reports allege that posting the meme could lead to a fine of up to Rs 3 lakh and a jail term of up to two years. Social media users are constantly introducing new memes and trends. While many of them are funny and entertaining, some cross the line and spark controversy. One such trend is the 'Hakla Shah Rukh Khan' meme. Let's take a closer look at what this meme is about and why it has stirred debate online. The meme trend started from a parody of Shah Rukh Khan's iconic stammering in his 'K‑K‑K‑Kiran" dialogue delivery, using 'hakla"—a Hindi term meaning 'stammerer". It features a funny picture or GIF of Superstar Shah Rukh Khan with an exaggerated hairstyle, like a mohawk or pigtails—illustrating awkward hesitation or speech. While the meme dates back almost a decade, it has recently caught netizens' eyes when reels and GIFs resurged across platforms like Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube Shorts. The 'Hakla Meme' Controversy Fact Check- The 'Hakla Shah Rukh Khan Meme' Fine While there have been reports of the fine being charged, reports and the law say that these claims are not true. There is no specific Indian cyber law that imposes an Rs 3 lakh fine or a 2-year jail term for posting the 'Hakla" GIF. While social media platforms may remove such content under their anti-bullying policies, no official government regulation currently enforces such penalties. However, general hate speech provisions exist—such as Karnataka's draft bill, which proposes up to 3 years in jail and a Rs 5,000 fine—they do not specifically address this meme. Additionally, there has been no official statement from the Cyber Cell regarding this issue. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store