
Police officer told a woman he met on Tinder he would kidnap, rape and murder her in chilling echo to the Sarah Everard case, a court heard
A police officer told a woman he met on Tinder that he would kidnap, rape and murder her in a chilling echo to the Sarah Everard case, a court has heard.
Andrew Holmes was a serving officer with Hampshire Police when he made the 'menacing and disgusting' comment to a woman he had started speaking to on the dating app.
During the conversation in August last year, the 32-year-old said that if they met up he would kidnap, rape and murder her and burn her body.
The shocked victim reported the incident to police, particularly given that he had told her he was a policeman.
Holmes, 32, was spared prison but a district judge said it was 'astonishing' he thought that his comments were appropriate against the background of the Sarah Everard case.
Ms Everard was abducted, raped and murdered by serving Met Police officer Wayne Couzens in March 2021, in a case that shocked the UK.
Poole Magistrates' Court heard that Holmes had engaged in a 'short conversation' with the woman on Tinder last year.
In a statement, the victim said that when they initially reported the incident to the police, they 'didn't feel like it had affected me that much'.
Holmes (pictured), 32, was arrested by fellow officers at his home in Southampton, two days later on August 18. He was spared prison but a district judge said it was 'astonishing' he thought that his comments were appropriate against the background of the Sarah Everard case
Describing the comments as 'vulgar and disgusting', the statement, read by Leah Dillon, prosecuting, added: 'Although he had told me he was a police officer I was really hoping he wasn't as I didn't want to believe a police officer would say such awful things.
'When the police told me he was an officer and had been arrested it really shook me up. I started to think what would have happened if we had met up.
'It made me feel so uneasy, especially the rape comment as this is something that happens to women on dating sites.'
The victim, who did not know Holmes prior to their 'short' interaction, also shared how the comments by Holmes had 'knocked' their confidence.
They added: 'I've not been on any dating sites since this incident and have no plans to.
'I don't know why he felt he could say this thing to me, as well as not knowing what his true intentions were.'
Holmes was arrested by fellow officers at his home in Southampton two days later, on August 18.
Officers also discovered an extendable police baton in his bedside drawer he was not meant to have.
Holmes maintained that it was a joke and denied sending an offensive, indecent, obscene or menacing message by public communication network. He did, however, admit to having an offensive weapon in a private place.
Found guilty of the charges following the trial, Holmes was sacked from his job following a misconduct hearing in March.
Rosa Bennathan, defending, described Mr Holmes as a 'man of good character'.
She said: 'That loss of good character will be significant. The loss of his career through his actions.
'When she said she was unhappy with the messages, he immediately apologised and sought to reassure her, he has expressed real significant remorse.'
Ms Bennathan also said that batons were kept in an area of the police station where individuals left unused equipment and that officers would often take things as spares.
She added: 'He intended to use it as a spare, took it home with him and forgot he had done so. He accepts he should not have been storing that kind of police equipment at home.'
The court also heard that Holmes is beginning to 're-establish' a 'relationship' with a woman, Ms Sarah Hocking.
Having met on a dating site, the pair have known each other for eight years, with Ms Hocking describing Holmes as 'consistently kind and supportive'.
Ms Bennathan added: 'He and Sarah Hocking are beginning to re-establish their relationship, move back in together and discuss a family.
'He is mortified, he will not commit similar offending in the future and he's not a risk to the public.'
Judge Mike Snow told Holmes that there was 'no possibility' that his comments 'could reasonably be taken as a joke'.
Directly addressing the former police officer, he said:' You were a serving police officer on August 16, 2024.
'Taking place against the background of the Sarah Everard case, I find it astonishing anyone would ever think it was appropriate to send two messages referencing kidnap, rape, murder and burning of the body.
'It had a very profound effect on your victim. She has left dating sites because of fear she will come across somebody who will behave in a similar way.'
The judge added that while this was the 'most serious category' which carries jail time, he would grant suspension due to Holmes' previous good character and real prospect of rehabilitation.
Holmes was given a six-week prison sentence, suspended for 12 months, and ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work and pay £500 compensation to the victim and prosecution costs of £650.
He was also ordered to pay a £200 fine for the police baton offence and £154 victim surcharge.
Hampshire Police Assistant Chief Constable Tony Rowlinson said: 'It is inconceivable to me that someone who has identified themselves as a police officer, while off duty, could ever feel it would be appropriate to make menacing comments like this to somebody they have just met.
'PC Holmes may have not intended to cause emotional or psychological harm to the woman, however he should have foreseen there was a risk of such harm.
'This sort of behaviour undermines trust and confidence, in particular in relation to the perception of women and girls, and the trust they can have in a male officer to treat them with respect and take their reports seriously.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Schoolboy, 12, dies in West Yorkshire after trying social media challenge as family warn of dangers
A family have warned of the dangers of a social media challenge after their 12-year-old son died trying it for himself. Sebastian, 12, was at home celebrating his younger brother's First Holy Communion at a residential address on Manor Grove in Castleford, West Yorkshire, before being found unresponsive. Emergency services, including Yorkshire Ambulance Service, West Yorkshire Police, and a Yorkshire Air Ambulance, were dispatched to the scene at 6:06pm. The teenager was rushed to hospital in a large police-escorted convoy, but despite efforts to save him, he was sadly pronounced dead. Local residents noted a significant emergency presence, with multiple vehicles responding to the incident. Sebastian's father Marcin suggested his son died whilst trying a viral challenge which involves a scarf. Authorities are continuing their enquiries to establish the full details of Sebastian's death. This heartbreaking incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks posed by dangerous online challenges, urging parents and guardians to remain vigilant about the content young people engage with on social media. West Yorkshire police said: 'Police were called by ambulance colleagues to an address in Manor Grove, Castleford, at 6:06pm yesterday (27/6) following reports of concern for the safety of a child. 'Officers attended the location and the boy was taken to hospital where it was later confirmed that he had died. 'Enquiries are ongoing on behalf of the West Yorkshire Coroner to establish exactly what happened. The incident is not being treated as suspicious.' It comes after the parents of four British teenagers filed a lawsuit against TikTok in February over the deaths of their children, which they claim were the result of the same challenge. The lawsuit claims Isaac Kenevan, 13, Archie Battersbee, 12, Julian 'Jools' Sweeney, 14, and Maia Walsh, 13, died in 2022 while attempting it. A GoFundMe page has been set up to support Sebastian's family and cover funeral costs. The statement on the fundraiser describes the teenager as 'a boy full of dreams, passion, and incredible talent'. It added: 'He taught himself to play the guitar and keyboard, and he loved to draw. Always smiling, kind, and full of joy - everyone who met him was touched by his gentle spirit. 'He had loving parents who did everything they could to give him a safe and happy childhood. They would have given him the stars. Sadly, one brief moment changed everything. A dangerous internet challenge took his life. 'What happened is a tragedy beyond words. No parent should ever have to bury their child. No one should ever endure such heartbreak. That's why we're reaching out today, asking for your help. 'We're organising this fundraiser to support Sebastian's family - to help cover funeral expenses, psychological support, and daily costs that suddenly became overwhelming. Every donation, no matter the amount, is not just financial support - it's a message of compassion: "We're with you." 'Sebastian lost his life because of an online challenge... His parents gave him all the love and care in the world - but that one moment online changed everything. 'So today, we ask you - as parents, guardians, friends: Talk to your children about what they do online. 'Ask what they watch, who they talk to, what inspires them. Be present. Don't assume: "My child would never do that." The online world can be as dangerous as the real one - sometimes even more so. 'Let Sebastian's passing not be in vain. Let it be a quiet call for awareness - a reminder to stay close, to talk more, to protect the ones we love. So that other children may live. So that no other parent has to experience this unimaginable pain. 'Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for any kind of support - donations, shares, or simply a few comforting words. Sebastian will remain in our hearts forever.'


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Girl, six, in ‘very serious' condition after tree collapse
A six-year-old girl is in a 'very serious' condition after being caught beneath a tree which collapsed in an Essex park. A seven-year-old girl was killed and three more children sustained minor injuries and received hospital treatment after the tree fell in Chalkwell Park, Southend-on-Sea, shortly before 3pm on Saturday. Advertisement Police are investigating what happened and an area has been set up for the laying of flowers and tributes. Assistant Chief Constable Lucy Morris of Essex Police said: 'Updates will be provided on the condition of the little girl who remains in hospital. 'I know many will be thinking of her today and she is in the right place, receiving urgent and around-the-clock care surrounded by her family. 'Sadly, her condition is still very serious at this time.' Advertisement Dozens saw the incident and rushed to try and lift the tree, a witness said. Accountant Ishan Madan, 39, from Westcliff-on-Sea, was playing in a cricket match nearby when he heard a 'horrendous, screeching scream'. He said: 'Everyone ran towards the clubhouse, where the tree is. 'The tree had snapped and I think there were four children, the fifth one was slightly further away, I think she'd been hit by a branch. Advertisement 'Two of them were under a smaller branch, they were rescued easily, and unfortunately, the other two girls, they were stuck under this massive tree. 'So we got bystanders to help, it must have been 40 to 50 people who then tried to lift the fallen tree up and to our horror, these two little girls, poor girls, were stuck underneath it. 'Their mother was on the corner. 'It was horrendous.' Advertisement Police praised the reaction of bystanders (Joe Giddens/PA) Mr Madan said that he had heard the children were walking on a path when the tree fell. He continued: 'You'd never think something like this could happen and there were a lot of people at our club that were shocked, including myself. 'It was horrendous. 'It was like a nightmare that you'd sort of wake up from and then someone would tell you it wasn't true. Advertisement 'You couldn't imagine kids walking in the park and something like this happening.' Chief Superintendent Leighton Hammett said that those who rushed to help 'showed the best of Southend'.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
DNA retrieved from suitcase pulled from wreckage may solve Lockerbie bombing riddle
Investigators have made a potential breakthrough in the Lockerbie bombing case after finding DNA evidence from the suitcase used to carry the explosive. Scientists are reported to have gathered genetic profiles from the suitcase lining and an umbrella packed into the luggage compartment of the doomed Pan Am Flight 103 after re-examining items salvaged from the wreckage in December 1988. Prosecutors now hope to be able to link the profile to alleged bomb-maker Abu Agila Masud Kheir Al-Marimi, known as Masud, who is waiting to go on trial in the US, with the DNA to be compared to swabs taken from the suspect. The Libyan, who is accused of playing a major role in what remains the UK's worst terror atrocity that killed 270 people, was due to face a jury last month but the trial was postponed as a result of his poor health and the complexity of the case. It is now not expected to begin until next spring. The Sunday Times has reported that US court papers identify a list of expert witnesses for the prosecution, including Dr Nighean Stevenson, a leading authority in DNA analysis at the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), who has re-examined exhibits from the crash site more than 30 years ago. The papers state: 'Dr Stevenson examined items relating to an umbrella and an item relating to the lining of a suitcase. 'These items were examined using specialised lighting, and DNA samples were taken from each. Part of the wreckage of a passenger jet that came down on Lockerbie in December 1988 Alleged bomb-maker Abu Agila Masud Kheir Al-Marimi, known as Masud, is waiting to go on trial in the US The scenes of devastation in the wake of the Lockerbie bombing in 1988 'The DNA profiles obtained from these items were of varying quality and were generally commensurate with the expectations of these items.' They add: 'Analysis of a DNA reference sample relating to the accused nominal [Masud] has yet to be carried out. 'When a DNA profile relating to this individual has been generated, it will thereafter be compared to any suitable DNA profiles which have already been obtained.' Masud, 74, is accused of making the bomb which brought down Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Dumfries and Galloway, on December 21, 1988. All 259 passengers and crew on board were killed along with 11 residents in the town when wreckage fell to the ground. Masud, a bomb-maker for the Libyan External Security Organisation, was extradited to the US at the end of 2022 after allegedly confessing to building the Lockerbie bomb and taking it in a suitcase from Tripoli to Malta. His defence team are set to argue that the confession was extracted in Libya under duress and is therefore inadmissible. But Dick Marquise, the FBI special agent who led the US end of the original investigation said: 'If you've got his DNA [in the suitcase]... it would knock down the building blocks of his potential defence.' Mr Marquise told the publication he was not aware of any DNA evidence collected in the immediate aftermath of the bombing in 1988, adding: 'It was much too new a science.' Masud, who was taken into US custody in 2022, will be the first person accused of playing a part in the bombing to be tried in a US court. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and co-accused Al Amin Khalifa Fahima stood trial in a Scottish court sitting in the Netherlands during 2000 and 2001. Megrahi was found guilty of mass murder and sent to Scotland to serve his life. Fahima was acquitted and returned to Libya. The Scottish Government released terminally ill Megrahi on compassionate grounds in 2009, three years before he died of cancer.