'Some mocked me when...', Brij Bhushan Singh reacts as Delhi court closes POCSO case
After Delhi court accepted the Delhi Police's cancellation report for closure of a sexual harassment case lodged by a minor wrestler against former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, the BJP leader said, "I never gave up in this fight and justice has now been served by the judiciary".
A court here on Monday accepted the Delhi Police's cancellation report for closure of a sexual harassment case lodged by a minor wrestler against ex-WFI president. Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Gomti Manocha of Patiala House Courts said, 'Cancellation accepted".
The FIR on the accusations levelled by the minor wrestler was filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, along with relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) concerning the act of outraging modesty.
The police's cancellation report was filed on June 15, 2023, which was not opposed by the complainant, who was a minor at the time of the alleged incident. On August 1, 2023, the victim and her father expressed their satisfaction with the police investigation, raising no objection to the police's report in the case. On July 4, 2023, the court sought the complainant's response to the police's cancellation report.
The 550-page report filed by the police before the Patiala House Courts had said that no corroborative evidence was found in the allegations levelled by the minor wrestler.
"On January 18, 2023, I clearly stated that it's a false case. I do not concern myself with others—I know who I am. If anyone truly wants to understand such events in their life, even one minute is enough. That is why I outright rejected all the allegations made against me. I stand by that statement even today. I had said that if a single allegation is proven, I am ready to hang myself.
"Some mocked me when a chargesheet had been filed; others questioned why I hadn't hanged myself yet. Today, I have been given justice by the judiciary. In every corner of the country, across all states and media platforms, this matter has been given due importance and recognition," Singh told IANS on Wednesday.
"I believe that in our country, there are three legal provisions that were originally created to protect women and Dalits. Unfortunately, these very provisions are being widely misused. I am not saying that these laws should be abolished, because they were established to safeguard. However, the reality is that they are now being used as weapons rather than safeguards. There must be a thorough review of this misuse," he added.
Singh was removed from his position as WFI president last year following months of protests by prominent wrestlers. He continues to face trial in the sexual harassment case brought by several women wrestlers.
The 68-year-old further said that he was falsely implicated in the sexual harassment case as part of a conspiracy, claiming that the Congress party was behind it to frame him in the sexual harassment case. He specifically named Bhupinder Hooda and some wrestlers from Haryana, stating that they were eyeing the post of WFI president.
"The Congress party was behind the conspiracy, with the main reason being Bhupinder Hooda and the wrestlers, all of whom were from Haryana, who were aiming for the post of WFI president. This is also evident from Sakshi's (Malik) statements and that many things have now become clear," he alleged.
"This ( WFI president) post is not a nominated one; proper elections are held for it. Each Union Territory and states have two representatives, and there are around 50 votes in total... It was completely political, with Congress involved, and even people from Canada were part of it... But I never gave up and by god's grace, justice has been served," he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HP agri varsity staff to CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu: Withdraw state govt's plea against HC stay on land transfer
Kullu: The teachers' association of Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, Palampur, has urged chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu to withdraw a special leave petition (SLP) which the state govt recently filed in the Supreme Court. The petition challenges a stay order by the Himachal Pradesh high court on the transfer of 112 hectares of university land to the tourism department. In a letter to the CM, the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Teachers' Association (HPAUTA), which has been opposing the land transfer for a proposed tourism village, said this state govt project would jeopardise agricultural education and research in a premium agricultural university. According to the association, govt should withdraw the SLP so that the university's academic, research, and extension work was not affected adversely. Prof Janardan Singh, the secretary of HPAUTA, told TOI that the university land was meant solely for academic and research purposes, not commercial. "The land transfer would not only halt major ongoing research projects, including those funded by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), but also hinder the university's future expansion as no land would be left for new colleges, departments, or student facilities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Address of Pride – Signature Global SPR Signature Global Book Now Undo The proposed village would weaken the academic mission of the university," said Prof Singh. He said state govt's move to approach the SC also raised several questions about its intent. "Why is the govt in such a hurry to establish a tourism village on the university campus when several hectares of land under various departments of the Himachal Pradesh govt lie unused? The state govt is unnecessarily putting the future of a premium institute of learning at risk," added Prof Singh. Despite protests and stiff opposition from teachers and students, the state govt last year transferred 112 hectares of university land to the tourism department for developing a tourism village. Challenging the state govt's land transfer, HPAUTA approached the Himachal Pradesh high court, which put a stay on the land transfer in August last year. Challenging the stay, state govt filed an SLP in the SC in March this year. Established in 1978, Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, Palampur, in Kangra district was renamed Chaudhary Sarvan Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University in 2001. The university was awarded 14th rank among the Indian agriculture universities by ICAR in 2019. So far, the university has released 179 improved varieties of different crops for different regions of the state and is the first in the country to establish an advanced centre on nature farming. There are four constituent colleges of the university which impart education to over 2000 students from eight countries and 15 Indian states. If the transfer of the 112 hectares goes through, the university will be left with 277 hectares of land in its Palampur campus. According to teachers, the university will require more land for expansion in near future. "The university land has been squeezed whereas it needs to be expanded and new programmes are required to be started as per the new education policy. There is an urgent need to establish new colleges including the college of agricultural engineering, fisheries, agricultural business management, environmental sciences and more. Instead of providing more land to the university, the state govt is taking away whatever little it has got," said a university teacher, who didn't want to be named. The state govt announced in Nov 2023 to set up a tourism village in Kangra district to promote "local art and culture and to create employment opportunities for the youth".
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Punjab govt struggles to translate central laws into Punjabi
1 2 3 Patiala: The Punjab govt's prolonged struggle to translate key central laws into Punjabi has come under fresh scrutiny, with activists and rural workers voicing frustration over years of delay. Despite repeated demands and official commitments, critical legislation such as the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) Act and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) remain untranslated, creating barriers to legal clarity and access for Punjabi-speaking citizens. The issue gained renewed attention after a group of rural labourers from Nabha encountered confusion over the interpretation of the English word "may" in the MGNREGA Act during a dispute with the local administration. Their request for a Punjabi version of the Act was denied, prompting them to file a Right to Information (RTI) application. With no response, the matter is now scheduled for hearing before the Punjab State Information Commission on June 25. This is not the first time the commission has intervened on such issues. Activist Vijay Walia, who was advocating for the Punjabi translation of the BOCW Act since 2022, revealed that multiple hearings were held over the years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Every time, the govt claims the Act is being translated by the Language Department and universities, but nothing concrete has emerged," Walia said. At one point, the language department even issued a written statement citing staff shortages as the reason for the delay. In 2023, the Estimates Committee of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha pressed for an expedited translation, prompting the labour department to seek assistance from Punjabi University. However, the translation is yet to be completed. In a response submitted in March 2024, the BOCW Welfare Board — chaired by the chief minister — told the Commission that once the translation is ready, it will be reviewed by the Vidhan Sabha's Legal Cell and then presented to the Cabinet for approval before being officially notified in Punjabi. Despite these assurances, there was no official notification to date. Meanwhile, the Democratic MGNREGA Front has also entered the fray and is set to begin its own hearings on the lack of a Punjabi translation of the MGNREGA Act starting June. For many, this delay underscores a broader systemic neglect toward Punjabi as an administrative and legal language in Punjab itself. With legal interpretations hanging in the balance, stakeholders are now hoping that pressure from civil society and the Information Commission will push the govt toward swift action. MSID: 121440669 413 |
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HC: Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes
1 2 Cuttack: In a significant ruling, the Orissa high court has held that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputes involving ownership or title to land, emphasising that such matters fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts. The vacation bench of Justice S K Panigrahi issued the order on May 30, setting aside an eviction order passed by the tehsildar of Dhamnagar under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (OPLE) Act, 1972. The case pertains to Dinabandhu Behera, who challenged the eviction proceedings initiated against him on the grounds that the state had erroneously recorded the disputed land in its name during the hal settlement. Behera claimed that his father had legally come into possession of the property after an 'ekpadia' (a written recognition) was issued by the ex-intermediary post-estate abolition. His father's name was subsequently recorded in the tenant ledger and rent was regularly paid to the govt. Upon his death, Behera came into possession of the land. But, despite these records, the tehsildar initiated eviction proceedings treating Behera as an encroacher. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walgreens Keeps Quiet About This '9 Pills for $7' Generic Cialis Deal Friday Plans Get Offer Undo The sub-collector and collector of Bhadrak later upheld the eviction order. The HC, while setting aside all these orders, stated that the existence of a bona fide dispute over ownership and title renders summary eviction proceedings under the OPLE Act is inappropriate. "The revenue authorities, who conduct summary procedures, are not competent to adjudicate such complex disputes of title," Justice Panigrahi observed. The court further noted that Behera had already approached the civil judge, junior division, Dhamnagar, seeking declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit land. He had also prayed for a declaration that the encroachment proceedings were unsustainable, given the pending civil suit. Reaffirming the supremacy of civil courts in deciding title-related matters, the court ruled that "summary proceedings by revenue authorities cannot constitute the proper forum for adjudication where a bona fide dispute exists over title".
